Citations 266

568: HUMANIZING THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: PERSPECTIVES OF PATIENTS AND FAMILIES ON GET-TO-KNOW-ME BOARD

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 272-272

10.1097/01.ccm.0000908000.34467.1a

996: MAXIMIZING THE GOLDEN HOUR IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS: ASSESSMENT GAPS AT THE TIME OF ADMISSION

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 491-491

10.1097/01.ccm.0000909712.84143.a5

301: STOP-VIRUS COLLABORATIVE: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS TO FORMING A VIRTUAL LANDSCAPE OF PRACTICE

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 136-136

10.1097/01.ccm.0000906940.46587.2a

291: DEVELOPING DELPHI EXPERT CONSENSUS RULES FOR A DIGITAL TWIN MODEL OF THE NEURO CRITICAL CARE UNIT

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 131-131

10.1097/01.ccm.0000906900.72957.55

236: OBSERVATIONAL COHORT STUDY OF MAYO CLINIC VIRUS REGISTRY COVID-19 INPATIENTS

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 103-103

10.1097/01.ccm.0000906680.39709.fd

859: STOP-TRAUMA: STRUCTURED TEAM-BASED OPTIMAL CRITICAL CARE FOR TRAUMA VICTIMS

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 422-422

10.1097/01.ccm.0000909164.81551.aa

855: EVALUATION OF CERTAIN UKRAINE ASYNCHRONOUS BEST PRACTICES IN SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 419-419

10.1097/01.ccm.0000909148.81690.dd

852: IMPROVING KNOWLEDGE AND CONFIDENCE WITH BETA-LACTAM THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING IN THE ICU

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 418-418

10.1097/01.ccm.0000909136.01139.7d

59: PREDICTION MODEL TO IDENTIFY SEPSIS PATIENTS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE MANAGEMENT OUTSIDE THE ICU

Critical Care Medicine | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 30-30

10.1097/01.ccm.0000906112.33131.1d

743. Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Programs in the Critically Ill: A Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 9 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofac492.034

Abstract Background Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (BL TDM; drug level testing) can facilitate improved outcomes in critically ill patients. Yet less than 20% of hospitals have implemented BL TDM. The purpose of this study was to characterize provider perceptions and key considerations for successful implementation of BL TDM. Methods This was a sequential mixed methods study from 2020 to 2021 of stakeholders at three academic medical centers with varying degrees of BL TDM implementation - Mayo Clinic (BL TDM not implemented), University of Florida Health Shands (partially implemented), and Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (fully implemented). Stakeholders completed a survey to characterize their knowledge, perceptions, and experience with BL TDM. A diverse group of 30 respondents were then purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Results from the two strands were integrated, themes were identified, and findings were situated within implementation science frameworks. Results Among the 138 survey respondents (22% response rate), the majority were physicians (38%) and pharmacists (33%). 71% practiced in critical care and 21% in infectious diseases. The majority of respondents felt BL TDM was relevant to their practice and improved medication effectiveness and safety (Figure 1). Two implementation themes were identified: individual internalization and organizational features. Individuals needed to internalize, make sense of, and agree to BL TDM implementation which was positively influenced by repeated exposure to evidence and expertise. The process of internalization seemed more complex with BL TDM than with other antibiotics (i.e., vancomycin). Organizational considerations relevant to BL TDM implementation included adequate physical and informational infrastructure, access to trained personnel, supportive governance/leadership, and robust process and workflow development. Conclusion We found broad enthusiasm about the relevance and potential benefits of BL TDM among stakeholders. Prior literature suggested the primary barrier to implementation was assay availability, but we identified many more individual and organizational attributes which impacted the scale and spread of BL TDM. Disclosures Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Christina G. Rivera, PharmD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Honoraria|Insmed: Honoraria Jason Roberts, BPharm(Hons), PhD, FSHP, FISAC, British Society of Chemotherapy: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Honoraria|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Honoraria|Pfizer: Board Member|Pfizer: Honoraria|Qpex: Grant/Research Support|Sandoz: Board Member|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Wolters Kluwer: Advisor/Consultant Marc H. Scheetz, PharmD, MSc, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Allecra: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Grant/Research Support|Premier Healthcare Solutions: Honoraria|Spero: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Third Pole Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant.