McCollough, Cynthia H.

Abstract Objective. To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) noise reduction technique for ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography (UHR-PCD-CT) that can be efficiently implemented using only clinically available reconstructed images. The developed technique was demonstrated for skeletal survey, lung screening, and head angiography (CTA). Approach . There were 39 participants enrolled in this study, each received a UHR-PCD and an energy integrating detector (EID) CT scan. The developed CNN noise reduction technique uses image-based noise insertion and UHR-PCD-CT images to train a U-Net via supervised learning. For each application, 13 patient scans were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) and allocated into training, validation, and testing datasets (9:1:3). The subtraction of FBP and IR images resulted in approximately noise-only images. The 5-slice average of IR produced a thick reference image. The CNN training input consisted of thick reference images with reinsertion of spatially decoupled noise-only images. The training target consisted of the corresponding thick reference images without noise insertion. Performance was evaluated based on difference images, line profiles, noise measurements, nonlinear perturbation assessment, and radiologist visual assessment. UHR-PCD-CT images were compared with EID images (clinical standard). Main results. Up to 89% noise reduction was achieved using the proposed CNN. Nonlinear perturbation assessment indicated reasonable retention of 1 mm radius and 1000 HU contrast signals (>80% for skeletal survey and head CTA, >50% for lung screening). A contour plot indicated reduced retention for small-radius and low contrast perturbations. Radiologists preferred CNN over IR for UHR-PCD-CT noise reduction. Additionally, UHR-PCD-CT with CNN was preferred over standard resolution EID-CT images. Significance. CT images reconstructed with very sharp kernels and/or thin sections suffer from increased image noise. Deep learning noise reduction can be used to offset noise level and increase utility of UHR-PCD-CT images.

Abstract Background A common rule of thumb for object detection is the Rose criterion, which states that a signal must be five standard deviations above background to be detectable to a human observer. The validity of the Rose criterion in CT imaging is limited due to the presence of correlated noise. Recent reconstruction and denoising methodologies are also able to restore apparent image quality in very noisy conditions, and the ultimate limits of these methodologies are not yet known. Purpose To establish a lower bound on the minimum achievable signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) for object detection, below which detection performance is poor regardless of reconstruction or denoising methodology. Methods We consider a numerical observer that operates on projection data and has perfect knowledge of the background and the objects to be detected, and determine the minimum projection SNR that is necessary to achieve predetermined lesion‐level sensitivity and case‐level specificity targets. We define a set of discrete signal objects that encompasses any lesion of interest and could include lesions of different sizes, shapes, and locations. The task is to determine which object of is present, or to state the null hypothesis that no object is present. We constrain each object in to have equivalent projection SNR and use Monte Carlo methods to calculate the required projection SNR necessary. Because our calculations are performed in projection space, they impose an upper limit on the performance possible from reconstructed images. We chose to be a collection of elliptical or circular low contrast metastases and simulated detection of these objects in a parallel beam system with Gaussian statistics. Unless otherwise stated, we assume a target of 80% lesion‐level sensitivity and 80% case‐level specificity and a search field of view that is 6 cm by 6 cm by 10 slices. Results When contains only a single object, our problem is equivalent to two‐alternative forced choice (2AFC) and the required projection SNR is 1.7. When consists of circular 6‐mm lesions at different locations in space, the required projection SNR is 5.1. When is extended to include ellipses and circles of different sizes, the required projection SNR increases to 5.3. The required SNR increases if the sensitivity target, specificity target, or search field of view increases. Conclusions Even with perfect knowledge of the background and target objects, the ideal observer still requires an SNR of approximately 5. This is a lower bound on the SNR that would be required in real conditions, where the background and target objects are not known perfectly. Algorithms that denoise lesions with less than 5 projection SNR, regardless of the denoising methodology, are expected to show vanishing effects or false positive lesions.

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of a higher spatial resolution, full field-of-view investigational photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) on radiologist confidence in imaging findings and diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) compared with conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Materials and Methods Patients suspected of interstitial lung disease were scanned on a PCD-CT system after informed consent and a clinically indicated EID-CT. In 2 sessions, 3 thoracic radiologists blinded to clinical history and scanner type evaluated CT images of the right and left lungs separately on EID- or PCD-CT, reviewing each lung once/session, rating confidence in imaging findings of reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, ground-glass opacities (GGOs), mosaic pattern, and lower lobe predominance (100-point scale: 0–33, likely absent; 34–66, indeterminate; 67–100, likely present). Radiologists also rated confidence for the probability of UIP (0–20, normal; 21–40, inconsistent with UIP; 41–60, indeterminate UIP; 61–81; probable UIP; 81–100, definite UIP) and graded image quality. Because a confidence scale of 50 represented completely equivocal findings, magnitude score (the absolute value of confidence scores from 50) was used for analysis (higher scores were more confident). Image noise was measured for each modality. The magnitude score was compared using linear mixed effects regression. The consistency of findings and diagnosis between 2 scanners were evaluated using McNemar test and weighted κ statistics, respectively. Results A total of 30 patients (mean age, 68.8 ± 11.0 years; M:F = 18:12) underwent conventional EID-CT (median CTDIvol, 7.88 mGy) and research PCD-CT (median CTDIvol, 6.49 mGy). The magnitude scores in PCD-CT were significantly higher than EID-CT for imaging findings of reticulation (40.7 vs 38.3; P = 0.023), GGO (34.4 vs 31.7; P = 0.019), and mosaic pattern (38.6 vs 35.9; P = 0.013), but not for other imaging findings (P ≥ 0.130) or confidence in UIP (34.1 vs 22.2; P < 0.059). Magnitude score of probability of UIP in PCD-CT was significantly higher than EID-CT in one reader (26.0 vs 21.5; P = 0.009). Photon-counting detector CT demonstrated a decreased number of indeterminate GGO (17 vs 26), an increased number of unlikely GGO (74 vs 50), and an increased number of likely reticulations (140 vs 130) relative to EID-CT. Interobserver agreements among 3 readers for imaging findings and probability of UIP were similar between PCD-CT and EID-CT (intraclass coefficient: 0.507–0.818 vs 0.601–0.848). Photon-counting detector CT had higher scores in overall image quality (4.84 ± 0.38) than those in EID-CT (4.02 ± 0.40; P < 0.001) despite increased image noise (mean 85.5 vs 36.1 HU). Conclusions Photon-counting detector CT provided better image quality and improved the reader confidence for presence or absence of imaging findings of reticulation, GGO, and mosaic pattern with idiosyncratic improvement in confidence in UIP presence.

AbstractPurposeTo demonstrate the feasibility of simultaneous dual‐contrast imaging in a large animal using a newly developed dual‐source energy‐integrating detector (EID)‐based multi‐energy computed tomography (MECT) system.MethodsTwo imaging tasks that may have potential clinical applications were investigated: head/neck (HN) CT angiography (CTA)/CT venography (CTV) with iodine and gadolinium, and small bowel imaging with iodine and bismuth in domestic swine. Dual‐source X‐ray beam configurations of 70 kV + Au120/Sn120 kV and 70 kV + Au140/Sn140 kV were used for the HN‐CTA/CTV and small bowel imaging studies, respectively. A test bolus scan was performed for each study. The regions of interest (ROIs) in the carotid artery and jugular vein for HN‐CTA/CTV imaging and abdominal aorta for small bowel imaging were used to determine the time‐attenuation curves, based on which the timing for contrast injection and the CT scan was determined. In the HN‐CTA/CTV study, an MECT scan was performed at the time point corresponding to the optimal arterial enhancement by iodine and the optimal venous enhancement by gadolinium. In the small bowel imaging study, an MECT scan was performed at the optimal time point to simultaneously capture the mesenteric arterial enhancement of iodine and the enteric enhancement of bismuth. Image‐based material decomposition was performed to decompose different materials for each study. To quantitatively characterize contrast material separation and misclassification, two ROIs on left common carotid artery and left internal jugular vein in HN‐CTA/CTV imaging and three ROIs on superior mesenteric artery, ileal lumen, and collapsed ileum (ileal wall) in small bowel imaging were placed to measure the mean concentration values and the standard deviations.ResultsIn the HN‐CTA/CTV study, common carotid arteries containing iodine and internal/external jugular veins containing gadolinium were clearly delineated from each other. Fine vessels such as cephalic veins and branches of external jugular veins were noticeable but clear visualization was hindered by image noise in gadolinium‐specific (CTV) images, as reviewed by a neuroradiologist. In the small bowel imaging study, the mesenteric arteries and collapsed bowel wall containing iodine and the small bowel loops containing bismuth were clearly distinctive from each other in the iodine‐ and bismuth‐specific images after material decomposition, as reviewed by an abdominal radiologist. Quantitative analyses showed that the misclassifications between the two contrast materials were less than 1.7 and 0.1 mg/ml for CTA/CTV and small bowel imaging studies, respectively.ConclusionsFeasibility of simultaneous CTA/CTV imaging in head and neck with iodine and gadolinium and simultaneous imaging of arterial and enteric phases of small bowel with iodine and bismuth, using a dual‐source EID‐MECT system, was demonstrated in a swine study. Compared to iodine and gadolinium in CTA/CTV, better delineation and classification of iodine and bismuth in small bowel imaging were achieved mainly due to wider separation between the corresponding two K‐edge energies.

AbstractPurposeConventional model observers (MO) in CT are often limited to a uniform background or varying background that is random and can be modeled in an analytical form. It is unclear if these conventional MOs can be readily generalized to predict human observer performance in clinical CT tasks that involve realistic anatomical background. Deep‐learning‐based model observers (DL‐MO) have recently been developed, but have not been validated for challenging low contrast diagnostic tasks in abdominal CT. We consequently sought to validate a DL‐MO for a low‐contrast hepatic metastases localization task.MethodsWe adapted our recently developed DL‐MO framework for the liver metastases localization task. Our previously‐validated projection‐domain lesion‐/noise‐insertion techniques were used to synthesize realistic positive and low‐dose abdominal CT exams, using the archived patient projection data. Ten experimental conditions were generated, which involved different lesion sizes/contrasts, radiation dose levels, and image reconstruction types. Each condition included 100 trials generated from a patient cohort of 7 cases. Each trial was presented as liver image patches (160×160×5 voxels). The DL‐MO performance was calculated for each condition and was compared with human observer performance, which was obtained by three sub‐specialized radiologists in an observer study. The performance of DL‐MO and radiologists was gauged by the area under localization receiver‐operating‐characteristic curves. The generalization performance of the DL‐MO was estimated with the repeated twofold cross‐validation method over the same set of trials used in the human observer study. A multi‐slice Channelized Hoteling Observers (CHO) was compared with the DL‐MO across the same experimental conditions.ResultsThe performance of DL‐MO was highly correlated to that of radiologists (Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.987; 95% CI: [0.942, 0.997]). The performance level of DL‐MO was comparable to that of the grouped radiologists, that is, the mean performance difference was ‐3.3%. The CHO performance was poorer than the grouped radiologist performance, before internal noise could be added. The correlation between CHO and radiologists was weaker (Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.812, and 95% CI: [0.378, 0.955]), and the corresponding performance bias (‐29.5%) was statistically significant.ConclusionThe presented study demonstrated the potential of using the DL‐MO for image quality assessment in patient abdominal CT tasks.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to estimate the impact of high matrix image reconstruction on chest computed tomography (CT) compared to standard image reconstruction. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with interstitial or parenchymal lung disease, airway disease, and pulmonary nodules who underwent chest CT. Chest CT images were reconstructed using high matrix (1024 × 1024) or standard matrix (512 × 512), with all other parameters matched. Two radiologists, blinded to reconstruction technique, independently examined each lung, viewing image sets side by side and rating the conspicuity of imaging findings using a 5-point relative conspicuity scale. The presence of pulmonary nodules and confidence in classification of internal attenuation was also graded. Overall image quality and subjective noise/artifacts were assessed. Results: Thirty-four patients with 68 lungs were evaluated. Relative conspicuity scores were significantly higher using high matrix image reconstruction for all imaging findings indicative of idiopathic lung fibrosis (peripheral airway visualization, interlobular septal thickening, intralobular reticular opacity, and end-stage fibrotic change; P ≤ 0.001) along with emphysema, mosaic attenuation, and fourth order bronchi for both readers (P ≤ 0.001). High matrix reconstruction did not improve confidence in the presence or classification of internal nodule attenuation for either reader. Overall image quality was increased but not subjective noise/artifacts with high matrix image reconstruction for both readers (P < 0.001). Conclusion: High matrix image reconstruction significantly improves the conspicuity of imaging findings reflecting interstitial lung disease and may be useful for diagnosis or treatment response assessment.