Okuno, Scott H.

TPS10591 Background: Osteosarcoma is a rare cancer and 33% of patients who have completed primary treatment will recur. The Src pathway has been implicated in the metastatic behavior of several tumors including osteosarcoma where 95% of samples express Src or have evidence of downstream activation of this pathway. Saracatinib (AZD0530) is a potent and selective Src kinase inhibitor. The recommended phase II dose in adults was found to be 175mg daily. The primary goal of this study is to determine if treatment with Saracatinib can increase progression free survival (PFS) for patients who have undergone complete resection of metastatic osteosarcoma nodules in the lung. Secondary goals are evaluation of overall survival, time to treatment failure, and evaluation of several biological correlatives. Methods: This is a multi-institutional, phase II.5, placebo-controlled study with an accrual goals of 88 randomized patients. Patients between 15 and 75 years, with histological confirmation of recurrent osteosarcoma, localized to the lung, who have potential for complete surgical resection, are eligible for enrollment. After complete resection, patients are randomized to treatment with saracatinib or placebo, of a daily oral dose of 175 mg, continuously for up to 1 year or until progression. Patients who recur in the lung while on-study and who are amenable to complete surgical resection will be un-blinded. Those patients who received placebo may have the option to undergo surgical resection. If fully resected, they will be offered therapy with saracatinib under the same treatment guidelines as above. As of January 2013, 38 patients have enrolled and 32 patients met the criteria to be randomized and began oral therapy with either saracatinib or placebo. An interim analysis is planned after 40 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT00752206.

10531 Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) is a clinically challenging primary malignant bone tumor that has a high rateof local recurrence and metastasis. Disease free survival has been reported to be as low as 19% despite contemporary chemotherapy regimens and surgery. Wnt signaling is known to play a role in osteogenesis and cancer pathogenesis, therefore is a promising target for therapeutic intervention in OS. Secreted Frizzled Related Proteins (sFRPs), Dickkopf-1 (DKK1), and Sclerostin (SOST) are secreted Wnt inhibitor proteins that regulate Wnt signaling in bone. This study investigates the activity of sFRP3, DKK1, and SOST in serum from OS patients with the goal of developing therapeutic Wnt inhibitors and clinically useful biomarkers. Methods: Enzyme linked immunosorbent assayswere used to quantify sFRP3, DKK1 and SOST levels in human serum (n=40 pairs; 20 OS patients, 20 aged matched non-diseased controls). Patients were stratified into 2 age groups: >35 (n=26 pairs) and <30 (n=14 pairs) years of age. Clinical data from the medical records was correlated with experimental results. Using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, a p–value <0.05 was significant. Results: sFRP3 levels were significantly decreased in 55% (22/40) of diseased samples compared to 20% (8/40) of the non-diseased controls (p= 0.007). DKK1 levels were elevated in 40% (16/40) of OS samples compared to 30% (12/40) of the non-diseased controls (p= 0.08). SOST levels were increased in 42.5% (17/40) of diseased samples compared to 32.5% (13/40) of the non-diseased controls (p= 0.38). When stratified by age, the younger patients showed a statistically significant decrease in sFRP3 expression (p<0.001). Serum levels of sFRP3, DKK1, and SOST were not statistically significant between metastatic and non-metastatic OS. Conclusions: Serum sFRP3 levels were significantly decreased in OS patients, a difference that was even more pronounced in the pediatric strata. Since sFRP3 is differentially expressed in patient serum it has potential as a clinical biomarker for initial tumor diagnosis and early detection of recurrence. Decreased sFRP3 expression may be responsible for the up regulation of Wnt signaling in OS. Wnt inhibitors such as sFRP3 have potential as therapeutic agents in OS warranting further investigation.

10521 Background: Sarcomas are rare cancers, with > 50 subtypes, and require multi-disciplinary care. Their management benefits from multi-institutional input due to the paucity of concentrated experience with each subtype. However, sarcoma tumor boards, wherein a patient-specific, consensus treatment approach is determined, are predominantly conducted in isolation at individual centers. Methods: Since March 2010, we have conducted a weekly multi-institutional, multi-disciplinary sarcoma tumor board to combine knowledge and experience in the management of our most challenging patients. The Mayo Clinic bridge links sites by interactive videofeed. Each site may contribute cases. De-identified history, radiology and pathology are reviewed. A didactic series reviews a rotation of seminal papers, newly published research, or our own data. An “Expert Guest" series allows outside experts to connect to one conference. A yearly participant survey assesses quality. Conference is free to sites and is CME accredited. Results: Currently, 8 sarcoma programs connect Mondays from 8-9am ET. Median attendance is 20 (range: 8-27). In 2012, 342 cases were reviewed over 43 conferences (median: 8 cases/conference; range: 4-12 cases/conference). The 2012 survey revealed 96% (25/26) agreed HIPAA rules are followed; 93% (25/27) agreed conference is educational; 93% (25/27) agreed recommendations are evidenced-based or reasonable; 100% (27/27) agreed participants are respectful; and 86% (18/21) agreed input from other sites has changed their management. Staff attendance (quantity) rated as meets/exceeds needs was 100% (25/25) for medical oncology; 96% (26/27) for pathology; 93% (25/27) for orthopedic oncology; 92% (23/25) for radiation oncology, surgical oncology and radiology; and 61% (17/23) for thoracic oncology. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the only weekly multi-institutional sarcoma tumor board in existence. It permits consistent oncology care across a wide geographic area, and is a model for providing consensus recommendations regardless of the remoteness of the patient and care team. Future plans for this group include prospective collection of outcomes data.

6095 Background: Prognosis for patients (pts) with locally-advanced, HPV-positive oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) is significantly better than for pts with HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Historic survival of pts with metastatic HNSCC is 6-9 months with palliative therapy. However, the prognosis and survival of pts with HPV+OPSCC with distant metastases is not known. Methods: Pts with HPV+OPSCC with distant metastatic disease were identified from databases from the departments of surgery, radiation, and medical oncology. Demographic and clinical data was abstracted from the medical record. All pts had confirmed HPV/p16+ disease. Results: Fifteen pts with metastatic HPV+ OPSCC were identified. The median age was 57 years (range 42-78, 15 male). The median pack-year smoking was 0 (range 0-120). Primary site included 10 tonsil and 5 tongue base. At diagnosis, one pt had stage III and 14 had stage IV disease (IVA: 9, IVB: 2, IVC: 3). T- and N-stage included T1 (1), T2 (10), T3 (3), T4 (1) and N1 (1), N2a (1), N2b (9), N2c (3), N3 (1). Extracapsular extension was seen in 8 pts, absent in 2, and unknown in 5. Seven pts had lymph node (LN) involvement at level IV/V. Initial therapy for locally-advanced disease included surgery followed by adjuvant radiation (RT) in 1 pt and chemoRT in 8, and definitive chemoRT in 3 pts. Three pts were metastatic at initial diagnosis. Of 6 pts with an isolated metastatic site, 3 pts are alive > 2 years from diagnosis of metastasis (median 1.97 years, range 0.49-2.29). Palliative therapy included surgery (3), RT (9), platinum chemo +/- cetuximab (8), cetuximab alone (2) or with a taxane (2). The most common sites of metastasis included bone (6), lung (5), and LNs (5). The 1-year survival rate after diagnosis of metastatic disease was 92%. The median time to diagnosis of metastatic disease after definitive therapy was 0.47 years (95% CI 0.19-1.29); 75% of pts who developed metastatic disease did so within 1 year of definitive therapy. Of note, 2 of the 15 pts developed a secondary immune-mediated malignancy (melanoma and non-HIV associated Kaposi’s sarcoma). Conclusions: The survival of pts with metastatic HPV+OPSCC is significantly better than that of historic controls.

TPS10099 Background: PDGFRα is a receptor commonly overexpressed in STS. Olaratumab is a fully human IgG1 MAb which specifically binds to human PDGFRα and blocks PDGFR-mediated signaling pathways. Olaratumab demonstrated significant tumor inhibition as a monotherapy and in combination with standard chemotherapy in preclinical human sarcoma xenograft models. A Phase 1b/2 clinical trial for patients with advanced or metastatic STS is currently enrolling patients in 9 sites across the United States; approximately 45 patients have been randomized. Methods: In Phase 1b, patients received olaratumab (15 mg/kg) via intravenous infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle and D (75 mg/m²) 1 hour after olaratumab on Day 1. Phase 1b was completed without encountering dose-limiting toxicities; enrollment into Phase 2 has begun. The primary endpoint of the Phase 2 portion is to compare progression-free survival in patients with advanced STS when treated with D plus olaratumab versus D alone. Planned enrollment goal for Phase 2 is 130 patients. Patients are required to be ≥ 18 years old with ECOG 0-2, have appropriate organ function and histologically confirmed, measurable, and advanced STS. There is no restriction on the number of prior therapies. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either D plus olaratumab (Arm A) at same dose/schedule as in Phase 1b or D alone (Arm B). All patients can receive dexrazoxane. Upon completion of 8 cycles, patients in Arm A continue with olaratumab monotherapy. Patients in Arm B who develop disease progression during or after treatment can subsequently receive olaratumab monotherapy. Patients are stratified to treatment arms according to PDGFRα expression (positive vs. negative), number of previous lines of treatment, sarcoma subtype, and ECOG performance status. Response assessment occurs every 6 weeks. Exploratory analyses include biomarkers of olaratumab pharmacodynamic activity including PDGF ligands, PDGFR downstream molecules, VEGF, and changes in vascularity of tumor specimens.

10003 Background: Preclinical studies demonstrate synergistic anti-tumor activity by inhibiting mTOR and IGF-1R. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of A12 and TEM in 3 chemo-refractory cohorts: IGF-1R (+) STS (Arm A), IGF-1R (+) bone (Arm B), and IGF-1R (-) bone and STS (Arm C). Methods: An optimal Simon 2 stage design was used for each arm. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks. Based on historical data, a 40% PFS rate was considered promising and a 20% PFS non-promising (type I/ II error, 0.05/0.10). ≥5 PFSs at 12 weeks were required in the first 19 and ≥16 PFSs were required in a total of 54 pts to consider each arm positive. Key eligibility: measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), age ≥18, 1- 4 priors, ECOG status 0-1. A12 (6 mg/kg) and TEM (25 mg) were administered IV weekly. Pre and post treatment tumor biopsies and plasma for IGF-1 and IGFBP3 were obtained. 20 Sarcoma Centers participated. Results: Starting in 02/2010, 383 pts were tested for IGF-1R by immunohistochemistry (IHC; 54% +) and 171 were treated: mean age 47 (range: 18-80), mean # priors 2.2 (range: 1-4). Grade 3/4 toxicities ≥10%: lymphopenia (12%), mucositis (10%). By intent to treat (ITT) analysis, each arm of the study achieved its primary 12 week PFS end-point (≥16 PFSs): Arm A: 18/56 (32%), Arm B: 19/50 (38%) (4 too early), Arm C: 27/63 (43%). The one-sided 95% CI for 12-week PFS is (0.22, 1), (0.27, 1), and (0.32, 1), respectively. By ITT the median PFS (95% CI) in weeks for each arm is 6.3 (5.9, 12.0), 11.0 (8.0, 18.0) and 11.6 (9.0, 17.9), respectively, and for chondro (n=18), Ewing’s (n=24), and osteo (n=23) only it is 22.6 (5.7, 40.9), 10.4 (5.7, 17.9) and 6.0 (6.0, 18.0), respectively. Westerns on 32 matched pair tumor biopsies indicate inhibition of IGF-1R, pAKT and pS6. Of biopsies on 7 IGF-1R (-) IHC pts (Arm C), 5 were IGF-1R (+) by western. Plasma biomarkers did not correlate with PFS. Conclusions: A12 and TEM met its primary end-point of improved PFS in pts with metastatic sarcoma. This effect was independent of IGF-1R status by IHC. These results support further clinical development of this combination in bone and STS.

9504 Background: CCI-779 inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a Ser/Thr kinase involved with the initiation of mRNA translation, showing growth inhibition in many tumor cell types. The primary goal was to evaluate the confirmed response rate (RR) of CCI-779 in advanced STS. Methods: Eligibility included pts ≥ 18 yrs, measurable advanced STS, PS 0–2, adequate laboratory function (including Chol ≤ 350 mg/dL and TG ≤ 400 mg/dL), no prior chemo for advanced disease (adjuvant chemo allowed), and no brain metastases. Following premedication with an antihistamine, CCI-779 was given intravenously at 25 mg over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, repeated q 4 wks. A total 50 pts were to be enrolled, if there were 2 responses at the time of an interim analysis conducted on the initial 20 patients. Pre- and post-treatment blood was collected to evaluate p70S6 kinase, S6 phosphorylation, inhibition of mTOR, and sirolimus levels. Pre-treatment paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was used to evaluate immunohistochemistry markers (including, EFGR, c-Myc, Her2, 4EBP1). Results: 41 eligible pts (18 male, median age 62 yrs with range 28–79) were enrolled from 11/04 to 9/05. 71% presented with high grade tumors. Histologic subtypes include: malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) (7), sarcoma NOS (9), fibrosarcoma NOS (3), liposarcoma NOS (5), leiomyosarcoma (8), endometrial stromal (1), synovial (1), hemangio/angiosarcoma (2), hemangiopericytoma NOS (1), and neurofibrosarcoma (1). 42% (16/38) evaluable pts had Gr 3+ events at least possibly related to CCI-779, 1 of which was Gr 4 hyperglycemia (see table). One pt having extremity fibrosarcoma, achieved a PR after 2 cycles lasting at least 36 weeks. Twenty-eight pts have progressed and 10 have died. Estimated median time to progression is 2 months (95% CI 1.8–3.5). Conclusions: Despite an acceptable toxicity profile, CCI-779 failed to demonstrate promising activity in pts with advanced STS. Results of the correlative studies are pending. Supported by N01 CM17104. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9514 Background: We sought to compare the response of metastatic STS to G vs. G+D in a phase III study using a novel Bayesian adaptive randomization strategy. Methods: Entry criteria included non-GIST STS diagnosis, age > 10, measurable disease, ≤ 3 prior regimens, normal organ function, and Grade (Gr) ≤ 1 neuropathy. Pts were stratified by histology (leiomyosarcoma [LMS] vs. other), and history of prior pelvic radiation (PPR) or not, yielding 4 diagnostic subgroups. Therapy was G 1200 mg/m2 (over 120 min, d1+d8) or G 900 mg/m2 (over 90 min, d1+d8) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2 d8) q21d; all pts received (peg)-filgrastim starting d9. 25% dose reductions were employed for PPR or toxicity. The primary endpoint was tumor response (CR, PR, or 24+ weeks stable), using a double-blind Bayesian adaptive randomization procedure to incrementally assign more pts to the superior treatment arm, while accounting for possible treatment-subgroup interactions. Although this study is not based on a 1:1 randomized phase III design, enrolling ∼120 pts would show a difference between a response rate (RR) of 10% for G and 30% with G+D with a power of 0.8 and two-sided alpha of 0.05. Results: 122 pts were randomized; 119 pts had evaluable outcomes. Median number of prior regimens was 1; median number of cycles was 4 (range 1–26). 49 pts were adaptively randomized to G and 73 to G+D, indicating superiority of G+D. Of 119 evaluable pts, 27% (G) and 32% (G+D) showed response as defined. The odds of pts with LMS receiving G+D instead of G increased from 1:1 at the start of the study to ∼6:1 at its completion. RR was 10% (G) vs. 16% (G+D) (p=0.15, Fisher exact test). Consistent with the RR outcomes, progression free survival (PFS) was 6.2 m (G+D, K-M 95%CI 3.6–8.8) vs. 2.6 m (G, 95%CI 2.0–3.2). Overall survival (OS) was 18.0 m (G+D, K-M 95%CI 11.7–24.1) vs. 11.2 m (G, 95%CI 6.8–15.5). Pts receiving G+D had a higher rate of discontinuation due to toxicity than those receiving G (p<0.01, log rank). Conclusions: We observed substantial clinical activity in this pre-treated STS population. G+D yields superior PFS and OS to G, but at the price of increased toxicity. Adaptive randomization is an effective method that substantively reduces the number of pts receiving inferior therapy. [Table: see text]

10058 Background: P-METs remain illusive with standard treatments for STS. AGM-CSF demonstrated tolerability with promising efficacy in reducing P-METS. We evaluated the 2-yr P-MET free rate in chemonaiive pts with extremity STS. Methods: ECOG PS 0/1 and Gr 3/4 primary STS of the limb girdle/extremities, were required. Treatment sequence: 2 cycles of IMAP (Ifosfamide, Mitomycin, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin) plus s.q. GM-CSF (preload d -6 to -3, d1–14); MAP (d0, 28) during irradiation (d1–35) plus AGM-CSF 250 mcg bid (d1–7, 15- 22, 28–35); surgery; post-op irradiation plus AGM-CSF 250 mcg bid (d1–7, 15–22, 28–35, 42–49). 6 of 35 pts with P-METS in ≤ 2 yrs implied lack of efficacy w.r.t. reducing P-METS. Results: 38 eligible pts were enrolled (20 male, median age 51 yrs, 24 PS 0). Median size of tumor 9 cm (2.3–26.7 cm).Location of tumors included: proximal extremity-16, distal extremity-11, and limb girdle-12. 79% received debulking surgery; 29 rendered disease-free. 38 pts are evaluable for toxicity (see table ). More common Gr 3+ events related to treatment appear below. 79% had Gr 4 neutropenia, despite s.q. GM-CSF. 6 pts have died, with 2.5 yrs median follow-up on survivors (range .4- 4.6). No treatment related fatalities occurred. 10 pts had P-METS ≤ 2 yrs. The estimated 2 yr P-MET free rate is 75% (95% CI 62–91). Conclusions: Although high, neutropenia was as expected. AGM-CSF failed to improve the 2 yr P-MET free rate in this group of STS pts. Other strategies need to be explored. Supported by NIH Grant CA15083–32 and Berlex Corporation. Max Severity (Gr 3+) [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

11015 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated activity in multiple tumor types but their activity in soft tissue sarcomas remains limited. In the multicenter phase II study, SARC028, the anti-PD-1 antibody, P demonstrated objective responses that were largely restricted to UPS and LPS subtypes. We now report outcomes from 2 expansion cohorts of SARC 028 in advanced UPS and LPS. Methods: To further confirm the clinical activity of P in UPS and LPS, we enrolled an additional 30 pts in each of 2 expansion cohorts for a total of 40 UPS and 40 LPS pts. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed response by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), 12-week PFS rate, and overall survival (OS). An ORR of 25% was considered clinically meaningful and < 10% was considered to show lack of efficacy. P was to be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients had a PR or better (1-sided α = 0.042, 82% power). Pts age ≥18 with advanced, refractory UPS or LPS received 200 mg of P IV every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Preliminary results from the first 10 pts in each of the UPS and LPS cohorts have been reported. We now present summary data after enrolling an additional 30 pts in each cohort. The ORR in the UPS cohort was 23% (9/40), with an additional 5/30 PRs observed in the expansion cohort (total 2 CRs, 7 PRs). In the LPS cohort, the ORR was 10% (4/39 evaluable pts), with an additional 2/30 PRs observed (total 4 PRs). Median PFS for the UPS group was 3 months [95% CI: 2, 5] and 2 months [95% CI: 2, 4] for the LPS group. 12-week PFS rate was 50% in UPS [95% CI: 35, 65] and 44% in LPS [95% CI: 28, 60]. The UPS group had a median OS of 12 months [95% CI: 7, 34] and 13 months [95% CI: 8, NR] for the LPS group. P was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: The UPS cohort achieved its primary endpoint, however the activity of P in UPS deserves further evaluation in a randomized study. The activity of P was not confirmed in the LPS cohort. Ongoing biomarker analyses may direct better patient selection and guide future combination strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT02301039.