Kumar, Shaji

Abstract Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), has shown efficacy in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and is often used in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Ixazomib is the first oral PI to be approved in routine practice but has not yet been evaluated in the upfront treatment setting. Newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function were enrolled. The primary objective was to determine the hematologic response rate of ixazomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Treatment was given for 12 cycles, followed by ixazomib maintenance until progression. Thirty-five patients were included; their median age was 67 years, and 69% were male. Major organ involvement included heart (66%) and kidneys (54%). A median of 4 induction cycles (range, 1-12) were administered. The overall hematologic response to induction was 63% and included complete response in 11.4% and very good partial response in 37.1% of patients. One patient was upstaged to complete response during maintenance. The most common reason for going off study was the institution of alternate therapy (61%). With a median follow-up of 29.7 months for the living patients, the 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 74% and 78%, respectively. The median time to alternate therapy was 7.5 months. Grade ≥3 hematologic and nonhematologic adverse events occurred in 23% and 49% of patients. Given ixazomib’s favorable toxicity profile, which is an important advantage for the typically frail AL population, further evaluation of ixazomib in other combinations in the upfront setting is warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01864018.

Abstract Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy marked by uncontrolled clonal expansion of plasma cells. Previous research has examined single-cell transcriptome profiles of Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and MM tumor microenvironment (TME) and found that natural killer (NK) cell abundance is elevated in the early stages and correlated with altered chemokine receptor expression. This study suggested the critical role of immune cells on myeloma progression from asymptomatic MGUS to symptomatic MM. Up to date, however, there are no published studies comprehensively comparing tumor and immune populations differences between MM NON-progressors (NPs) and FAST-progressors (FPs) and investigating how clonal plasma cells affect disease progression in a large cohort. Therefore, understanding how tumor and immune cells influence disease progression within symptomatic MM is of great interest.Here, we subjected CD138-negative Bone Marrow Mononuclear cells (BMMC) samples from 418 MM patients to scRNA-seq. From MMRF CoMMpass study (NCT01454297), we also have whole exome sequencing (WES) and bulk RNA-seq from CD138-positive fraction of BMMC samples. Based on time to progressive disease (TTPD), we classified patients into 2 categories. Patients with TTPD less than 18 months were classified as FAST-progressors (FPs), whereas patients with TTPD more than 5 years were classified as NON-progressors (NPs). By analyzing patient genomic alterations and its association with progression, we found that there was a significant association of slow MM progression with t(11;14) (p = 0.048), consistent with previous study. In our preliminary analysis, we profiled 83 CD138-sorted MM bone marrow samples using scRNA-seq. Interestingly, we found plasma cells from samples with the same genetic alterations tend to cluster together, highlighting the important role of genetic drivers in transcriptome profiles of plasma cells. Moreover, integrated analysis of bone marrow samples from 83 MM patients and 4 healthy donors revealed an atypical naïve-B cell subset with enrichment of cells from fast-progressors and partial expression of MS4A1. Differentially expressed genes for this naïve-B cell subset includes KLF9, BCL2L11, JOSD1, and IRS2, etc. Overall, as part of MMRF immune profiling research, this study will help to interrogate how genetic alterations and disease progression interplay MM tumor and TME and provide a sufficiently broad and valuable dataset for systematically characterizing MM at single-cell resolution. Hopefully, this study could identify novel targets for MM immunotherapies, and ultimately identify patients with high risk of fast progression for early intervention in the clinic. Citation Format: Lijun Yao, Tianjiao Wang, Kazuhiro Sato, Reyka Jayasinghe, I-Ling Chiang, Darwin D'souza, William Pilcher, Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova, Yered Pita-Juarez, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Deon Bryant Doxie, Beena Thomas, Brian Lee, Swati Sharma Bhasin, Upadhyaya Bhaskar, Mark Fiala, Julie Fortier, Travis Dawson, John Leech, Shaji Kumar, Hearn Cho, Seunghee Kim-Schulze, Bee Raj, Stephen Oh, the MMRF Immune Profiling Research Team, John Dipersio, Ravi Vij, Adeeb Rahman, Ionnis Vlachos, Shaadi Mehr, Mark Hamilton, Daniel Auclair, Surendra Dasari, David Avigan, Madhav Dhodapkar, Sacha Gnjatic, Manoj Bhasin, Li Ding. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of multiple myeloma bone marrow samples suggests that disease progression interplays with tumor and tumor microenvironment in The MMRF CoMMpass Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1729.

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of multiple myeloma in populations of European ancestry (EA) identified and confirmed 24 susceptibility loci. For other cancers (e.g., colorectum and melanoma), risk loci have also been associated with patient survival. Methods: We explored the possible association of all the known risk variants and their polygenic risk score (PRS) with multiple myeloma overall survival (OS) in multiple populations of EA [the International Multiple Myeloma rESEarch (IMMEnSE) consortium, the International Lymphoma Epidemiology consortium, CoMMpass, and the German GWAS] for a total of 3,748 multiple myeloma cases. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between each risk SNP with OS under the allelic and codominant models of inheritance. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, country of origin (for IMMEnSE) or principal components (for the others) and disease stage (ISS). SNP associations were meta-analyzed. Results: SNP associations were meta-analyzed. From the meta-analysis, two multiple myeloma risk SNPs were associated with OS (P < 0.05), specifically POT1-AS1-rs2170352 [HR = 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09–1.73; P = 0.007] and TNFRSF13B-rs4273077 (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.01–1.41; P = 0.04). The association between the combined 24 SNP MM-PRS and OS, however, was not significant. Conclusions: Overall, our results did not support an association between the majority of multiple myeloma risk SNPs and OS. Impact: This is the first study to investigate the association between multiple myeloma PRS and OS in multiple myeloma.

SummaryBelantamab mafodotin (BLMF) is a B‐cell maturation antigen‐directed antibody‐drug conjugate, recently approved for advanced multiple myeloma (MM). The impact of BLMF‐induced ocular toxicity on patient outcomes is unknown. We studied a cohort of 38 consecutively seen patients treated with BLMF outside of trials. Of those, 75% experienced ocular toxicity, with 69% developing keratopathy. Among patients requiring ocular toxicity‐related permanent BLMF discontinuation (14%) or dose reduction (11%), 70% had progression of MM within a median of 3 months (95% confidence interval: 0.2–not reached) following BLMF interruption or dose reduction. Ocular toxicity is a major deterrent to the continuous use of BLMF in routine clinical practice. Measures to successfully prevent and mitigate ocular toxicity should be developed to achieve the full potential of this agent.

8057 Background: Following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto HCT), maintenance therapies improve survival, reduce relapse risk in multiple myeloma (MM), and are the de facto standard-of-care. However, clinical trials have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM) with maintenance therapy, including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We examined data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry to evaluate the impact of SPM on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and the utilization of allogeneic HCT in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN). Methods: Adult patients (pts) with MM who underwent first auto HCT in the United States with a melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011-2018 and subsequently received maintenance therapy were included (N=3948). The primary endpoint of interest was the impact of SPM and SHM on OS. Multivariate analytic (MVA) modelling was applied, accounting for competing risks while integrating significant covariates to determine the impact of SPM on PFS and OS. Finally, we studied the utilization and survival following allogeneic HCT for SHM. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Maintenance regimens used were lenalidomide (2836, 72%), bortezomib (370,9 %) or lenalidomide + bortezomib (372, 9%) based combinations. At a median follow up of 37 months, 175 (5%) pts developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid 36 (21%) myeloid, and 27 (15%) lymphoid cancers. In MVA, the development of SPM and SHM was associated with an inferior PFS (HR 2.62, P<0.001 and HR 5.01, P<0.001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P<0.001 and 8.13, P<0.001, respectively). The two commonest causes of death were MM (42%) and SPM (30%) for those developing SPM. Similarly, MM (53%) and SHM (18%) were the two commonest causes of death for those developing SHM. Nine (14%,5 t-MDS and 4 t-AML) of 63 patients with SHM underwent an allogeneic HCT. Patients undergoing allogeneic HCT were more likely to have Karnofsky score ≥90 (100% vs. 50%, P=0.02) compared to those who did not. One year survival from allo SCT was 66.7% (CI 34.6-92%). Conclusions: The three-year cumulative incidence of SPM was 3.3 (2.6-4)% in this large contemporaneous CIBMTR cohort. Disease relapse remains the primary cause of death in MM patients who develop SPM or SHM. Given the median OS for MM is now > 10 years, longer follow-up is needed to assess the SPM and SHM risks with maintenance therapy post-auto HCT.

8055 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by somatic mutations involving cancer-associated genes. The most commonly mutated genes are N- and K-Ras, which increase in prevalence as the disease progresses. Case reports and retrospective data suggest efficacy of targeting the MAPK pathway in N/K-Ras mutated MM. The MyDRUG trial was initiated to explore the efficacy of specific molecularly-targeted therapies in combination with standard therapies in MM. Methods: MyDRUG (NCT03732703) is a genomically-guided umbrella trial for patients with functional high-risk MM, defined as early relapse following primary therapy (3 years for transplant with maintenance, 18 months without), with specific genetic abnormalities. Subjects undergo molecular profiling of their MM cells and are assigned to a targeted arm if a variant allele frequency (VAF) over 25% is identified. The targeted mutated genes and respective agents (approved for non-MM indications and with a known phase 2 dose) are: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF (cobimetinib), FGFR3 (enasidenib), IDH (erdafitinib), CDKN2C (abemaciclib), t(11;14) (venetoclax). Patients receive the investigational drug for 2 cycles as a single agent followed by addition of an active MM combination (ixazomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone, IPd). Limited dose escalation was performed with the single agent followed by dose assessment in combination with IPd. Here we present the results of the dose escalation portion of C1 arm exploring cobimetinib in patients with N/K-RAS or BRAF mutations. Cobimetinib was administered at 40 mg daily in combination with standard doses of IPd. Results: Eleven subjects with BRAF/RAS mutations were screened between August 2019 and October 2020, with 4 screen failures. Seven were enrolled, 5 males, median age 65 years, and median time from diagnosis of 30 months. N-RAS, K-RAS or BRAF mutations were seen in 4, 2, and 1 subject(s), respectively, with VAF ranging from 33-93%. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (1-3), 3 patients had extramedullary disease, and 1 patient had high risk cytogenetics. Median duration of therapy was 12 months. One patient was not evaluable for dose limiting toxicity. All but 1 patient had at least one cycle delayed due to adverse events (AEs), but no dose reductions were required. No dose limiting toxicities were observed across the cycles, either during single agent therapy (Cycles 1-2) or in combination with IPd (Cycles 3 and 4). Six patients responded to therapy (4 PR, 2 VGPR). One patient was not response evaluable. Fatigue was the most common non-hematological AE followed by diarrhea. Conclusions: Here we report on the feasibility of genomically-guided, precision medicine therapy in K/N-RAS/BRAF-mutated MM. The MEK inhibitor cobimetinib in combination with IPd appears safe in functionally high-risk patients. Ongoing study will provide more information regarding the efficacy of this approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03732703.

8044 Background: In the phase 3 MAIA study, adding DARA to Rd improved progression-free survival (primary endpoint), overall survival, duration of response, and PROs in transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM. We report a MAIA subgroup analysis of time to response, duration of response, and PROs. Methods: Transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM received 28-day cycles of Rd (R 25 mg PO on Days 1-21; d 40 mg PO QW) ± DARA (16 mg/kg IV QW in Cycles 1-2, Q2W in Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Secondary endpoints included time to response and duration of response. PROs were measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30, with treatment effects assessed via mixed-effects model with repeated measures. Results: In total, 368 pts were assigned to the D-Rd group and 369 pts to the Rd group; 162 (44%) D-Rd pts and 142 (38%) Rd pts had renal impairment (defined as baseline CrCl ≤60 mL/min). At a 56.2-mo median follow-up, median times to very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and complete response or better (≥CR) were shorter with D-Rd vs Rd in the overall study population and in the subgroups of pts with and without renal impairment (Table). Among pts who achieved ≥CR or partial response or better (≥PR), higher proportions of D-Rd vs Rd pts had not experienced disease progression at 48 mo (Table). Among pts with renal impairment, greater improvements from baseline in pt-reported pain, fatigue, and nausea and vomiting symptom scores were observed with D-Rd vs Rd across most timepoints; a notably greater meaningful reduction in pain symptom score was seen with D-Rd vs Rd as early as Cycle 6 Day 1 (least squares mean change from baseline, −14.9 vs −7.0; P=0.0241). Analyses for additional pt subgroups will be presented. Conclusions: In transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM, D-Rd showed more rapid deep responses as well as more durable responses vs Rd, regardless of renal function. Improvements in pt-reported symptoms were generally greater with D-Rd vs Rd in pts with renal impairment. Our results support the use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible pts with NDMM. Clinical trial information: NCT02252172. [Table: see text]