Kumar, Shaji

8020 Background: Circulating plasma cells (CPCs) at diagnosis, prior to transplant and at relapse have a negative prognostic impact on survival in multiple myeloma (MM). However, the impact of changes in CPCs along the course of illness has not been defined. Methods: We evaluated 247 patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) undergoing early autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the era of novel agents (2007 to 2015), who had serial evaluation of CPCs at diagnosis and pre-ASCT by 6-color flow cytometry. Results: The median age at transplant was 62 years.A total of 117 (47%) patients had no detectable CPCs at both time points (CPC-/-), 82 (33%) had CPCs at diagnosis followed by complete eradication after induction therapy (CPC+/-) and 48 (19%) had detectable clonal CPCs at transplant, with persistence of cells (CPC+/+; n=45) or emergence of new CPCs (CPC-/+; n=3) after induction. The incidence of t(11;14) by iFISH was lower in the CPC-/- group (19%) compared to CPC+/- (29%) and CPC +/+ or -/+ (39%) groups ( p=0.033). Conversely, the incidence of hyperdiploidy was significantly higher in patients with CPC-/-, compared to those with CPC+/- and CPC+/+ or -/+ (64%, 44% and 39% respectively; p=0.005). The rate of post-ASCT stringent complete response was 32% in the CPC-/- group, 30% in CPC+/- group and 12% in CPC+/+ or -/+ group ( p=0.018). At a median follow-up of 58 months from ASCT, the median progression-free survival (PFS) from transplant in the 3 respective groups was 30, 24 and 14 months and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83%, 70% and 43% ( p<0.001 for both comparisons). On a multivariate analysis, using CPC-/- group as the comparator, PFS and OS was significantly inferior in CPC+/- (RR 1.6; p=0.020 and RR 2.7; p=0.008 for PFS and OS respectively) and CPC +/+ or -/+ groups (RR 2.9; p<0.001 and RR 5.8; p<0.001 for PFS and OS respectively). Conclusions: Clonal CPCs are detectable in more than 50% of newly diagnosed MM patients undergoing upfront ASCT. Monitoring for CPCs before initiation of induction therapy and before ASCT by 6-color flow cytometry is highly predictive of outcome in NDMM and should be incorporated into prospective clinical trials.

8014 Background: t(11;14) is a standard risk cytogenetic marker in MM. Methods: We reviewed 366 patients with MM who had t(11;14) by FISH and 732 age and period-matched controls without t(11;14), seen at our institution from 2004 to 2014 and outcomes were analyzed using time to first progression or death (PFS1) and overall survival (OS). Results: For the t(11;14) group at diagnosis, the median age was 63.7 yr (range, 22.1-95.4) with 64.5% of patients being male. Eighty nine (24.3%) patients were above 70 yr of age at diagnosis. 33.8%, 40.3% and 25.9% patients belonged to ISS 1, II and III stages respectively. 13% patients had elevated LDH. Monosomy 17 or del 17p were identified in 10.6% patients. The median follow up period was 56.9 months (m) (95% CI: 54.6-62.2) and 209 (57.1%) patients were alive at last follow-up. Among patients receiving proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based, immunomodulator (IMiD)-based, PI+IMiD based or other agent based induction therapy, 71.2%, 70.3%, 90.4% and 37.5% patients respectively attained ≥PR as best response to induction (p < 0.01). During their course, 223 (60.9%) patients underwent stem cell transplant. Median PFS1 and OS were 23.1 (CI: 20.8-27.9) and 78.6 (CI: 66.7-105.9) m respectively. Among the controls, high risk cytogenetics (HRC) was present in 142 (19.4%), and the median OS was 83.8 m (CI: 70.8-97.0) being comparable to t(11;14) group (p = 0.8). For all 1098 patients, using a Cox-proportional hazards model with age > 70 years, induction therapy (novel agent-based vs others), cytogenetics [HRC vs t(11;14) without HRC vs no HRC or t(11;14)], and ISS stage III vs II/I as predictors, age > 70 years [HR-2.2 (CI: 1.8-2.8) and p < 0.01], ISS III vs ISS II/I [HR-1.4 (CI: 1.1-1.8) and p < 0.01] and HRC [HR of 2.1 (CI: 1.6-2.8) vs no HRC or t(11;14) (p < 0.01) and 1.9 (CI = 1.4-2.6) for t(11;14) without HRC (p < 0.01)were associated with reduced OS. The risk for reduced OS did not differ between t(11;14) without HRC, and those without t(11;14) or HRC [HR-1.1 (CI: 0.9-1.4), p = 0.4]. Conclusions: Our study characterizes the outcomes of a large cohort of MM patients with t(11;14) at diagnosis. Advanced age, HRC and advanced stage at diagnosis were associated with worse OS in our cohort. t(11;14) MM without HRC does not differ in outcome compared to non-t(11;14) MM without HRC.

8006 Background: In 2 randomized phase 3 trials of RRMM patients (pts), DRd (POLLUX) or DVd (CASTOR) significantly improved PFS and deepened responses compared with Rd or Vd alone, respectively. The novel mechanism of action of daratumumab (D) may improve the poor prognosis associated with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in RRMM. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of DRd and DVd among RRMM pts with standard (std) or high cytogenetic risk status. Methods: Bone marrow aspirates were collected at screening and assessed centrally via next generation sequencing (NGS). Pts with high-risk cytogenetics included those who had ≥1 of the following abnormalities: t(4;14), t(14;16), or del17p; std-risk pts were defined as those confirmed negative for these abnormalities. Efficacy analyses included PFS and ORR. Results: Samples from 311/569 pts in POLLUX and 353/498 pts in CASTOR were assessed via NGS. In POLLUX, the median duration of follow-up was 17.3 months. Significantly longer median PFS and numerically higher ORR were observed with DRd vs Rd among high-risk patients, and significant improvements in these outcomes were observed in std-risk patients (Table). In CASTOR, the median duration of follow-up was 13.0 months. Significantly longer median PFS and higher ORR were observed with DVd vs Vd among both high- and std-risk pts (Table). Concordance rates for t(4;14), t(14;16), and del17p were high (88%-98%) between NGS and FISH. Updated data, including subgroup analyses, will be presented. Conclusions: In RRMM pts, the addition of D to standard-of-care regimens improved outcomes regardless of cytogenetic risk status. Targeting CD38 by combining D with Rd or Vd appears to improve the poor outcomes associated with high-risk cytogenetic status. See table. Clinical trial information: NCT02136134 and NCT02076009. [Table: see text]

TPS3102 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is largely incurable despite available therapies, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). As most MM patients (pts) eventually have relapsed/refractory (RR) disease, there is an unmet need. Myeloma cells upregulate PD-L1 [Liu et al, 2007]. Nivolumab (nivo), an immuno-oncology mAb, binds PD-1 on T cells and natural killer cells and inhibits signaling by PD-L1–expressing tumor cells, thus augmenting antitumor immunity. Nivo monotherapy has shown acceptable safety and modest clinical activity in RRMM [Lesokhin et al 2016]. Daratumumab (dara) is a cytolytic mAb that targets CD38+ myeloma cells, inducing antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, and apoptosis, and may have an immunomodulatory role via depletion of CD38+ immune-suppressor cells [Dimopoulos et al 2016]. Dara is approved as monotherapy (US: after ≥3 prior lines of therapy; EU: after a prior PI and IMiD and progression on last therapy), and with lenalidomide/dexamethasone (dex) or bortezomib/dex (US: after ≥1 prior line of therapy for both combinations). Combining PD-1 and CD38 mAbs, immunotherapies with different mechanisms of action, may overcome resistance and improve outcomes. This phase 1 safety study (NCT01592370) includes multiple cohorts of nivo as monotherapy or in combination regimens across RR hematologic malignancies; 2 MM cohorts will evaluate nivo plus dara, with or without pomalidomide and dex. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 y, with RRMM after ≥2 prior therapies. Pts are RR to their last regimen, RR to prior IMiD and PI therapy, and agreed to bone marrow aspiration. Primary outcome of safety/tolerability will be measured by incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and laboratory test abnormalities. Secondary endpoints include minimal residual disease, overall response rates and duration of response, and progression-free survival. Study funding: BMS. Writing support: C Tomas, Caudex, funded by BMS. Clinical trial information: NCT01592370.

2023 Background: TRC105 is a humanized antibody targeting CD105 (endoglin), a member of the TGFβ receptor superfamily. CD105 is expressed in glioma stem cells and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in GBM patients (pts), increasing following VEGF inhibition. N1174 was conducted in recurrent bevacizumab (bev) naïve GBM pts to investigate the hypothesis that CD105 blockade+bev can delay development of bev resistance. Methods: After a ph I cohort (15 pts) established the ph II dose of TRC105 as 10 mg/kg IV over 4 hours every 7 days in combination with standard dose bev, the ph II trial used 1:1 randomization with 90% power and 0.10 type I error to detect a 3 month (mo) difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two arms. CECs including CD105 positive subsets were measured by flow cytometry at baseline and multiple time points. Results: Based on 101 evaluable ph II pts, there was no significant difference in PFS between TRC105+bev and bev only (2.9 vs 3.2 mo, respectively; HR=1.14, 95% CI 0.73-1.77, p=0.57), or overall survival (10.0 vs 7.4 mo; HR 1.02 95% CI 0.63-1.65, p=0.93). Response rate (complete or partial) was 12.2% (6/49) for TRC105+bev and 11.6% (5/43) for bev only. Overall incidence of grade (gr) 3+ toxicity was higher for TRC105+bev (67.3% vs 32.7%, p<0.001) mainly due to 14 pts with gr 3 anemia in the TRC105+bev arm vs 0 in the bev only pts. Gr 3+ non-heme toxicities were higher in pts receiving TRC105+bev vs bev only (50% vs 30.6%, p=0.07), mainly due to headache (6 vs 1 pts) and hyperglycemia (3 vs 0 pts). CECs remained stable in combination treated pts, suggesting a possible impact of the anti-CD105 blockade, but increased at progression in the bev only arm. There was no association between PFS and initial changes in CEC values, independent of treatment received. Conclusions: TRC105 plus bev did not prolong median PFS vs single agent bev in recurrent GBM pts, although it was associated with a non-significant prolongation of OS. These data and associated correlative analysis of CECs from study pts point against endoglin being a clinically significant factor for the development of bev resistance. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. Clinical trial information: NCT01648348.