Sherris, David A.

Background The nasal muscles and their function are not clearly defined. The nasal muscles generally are thought to act synergistically to produce mimetic motion and affect the nasal airway. We proposed direct examination of the effects of the nasal muscles on the nasal airway. Methods Rhinomanometry was performed on volunteers. After paralysis of the nasal muscles with lidocaine, rhinomanometry was performed again to measure nasal airway function with the patient at rest and attempting to flare his/her nostrils. Each patient's rhinomanometric results (at rest and attempting to flare the nostrils) taken before injection of lidocaine served as the control for comparison of his/her results postinjection. The structural tension of the ala at rest and with active flaring of the nostril was measured also, and the results pre- and postparalysis with lidocaine were compared. Results The data from both the stiffness (structural tension) and the airflow portions, taken together, support the following conclusions. First, the paralysis was significant, although not complete. Clinical and stiffness data supported complete paralysis. Airflow data, which we think most sensitive, support a statistically significant affect of the injection, although incomplete paralysis. Conclusion All of the evidence supports an important role for the nasal muscles when actively used to increase nasal airflow. Second, the majority of the evidence supports an important resting nasal muscle tension that opens the nasal airway.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate symptoms described by patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polypoid changes/nasal polyps and their correlation with computed tomography (CT), nasal endoscopy, and intranasal biomarkers. Study Design: Prospective multicenter study symptom data from postsurgical adult chronic rhinosinusitis study participants with recurrent disease refractory to medical therapy were analyzed in comparison with objective data. Methods: Using logistic regression analysis, participant-rated 16-question surveys from 258 participants were assessed for correlation with nasal endoscopy scores, CT percentage of sinus occlusion, and intranasal biomarkers of fungal antigens (Alternaria and Aspergillus), eosinophilic inflammation (eosinophil-derived neurotoxin [EDN] and major basic protein [MBP]), and inflammatory cytokines (interleukins 5 and 13). Results: Study participant assessments revealed increased CT occlusion in participants presenting with greater inability to smell ( P < .019). Mucosal inflammation identified on nasal endoscopy was positively correlated with congestion ( P < .028), runny nose ( P < .002), and ear pain ( P < .007). Elevated EDN was positively correlated in patients with bothersome congestion ( P < .031) and runny nose ( P < .011). Sneezing was positively correlated with multiple markers: Alternaria ( P < .024), interleukin-13 ( P < .027), MBP ( P < .034), and interleukin-5 ( P < .019). Conclusion: Nasal endoscopy, not CT imaging, has the strongest correlation with the 2 cardinal symptoms of congestion and runny nose in CRS patients; these correlate with biomarkers of eosinophilic inflammation.

BackgroundA histologic hallmark of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an eosinophilic inflammation, present with and without nasal polyposis and independent of atopy. Eosinophils migrate through nasal tissue including the epithelium into the nasal airway mucus, where they form clusters and degranulate, releasing granule proteins including the toxic major basic protein (MBP). Specific biomarkers for CRS, which could be used as a diagnostic test for CRS with a high sensitivity and specificity, are presently lacking. Recently, an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)‐based test for MBP in nasal airway mucus received regulatory approval.MethodsA new assay was specifically developed to detect released MBP in airway mucus. MBP levels in nasal mucus of 85 randomly selected CRS patients diagnosed by endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scans and symptoms were compared to 13 healthy controls and 5 disease controls (allergic rhinitis).ResultsOverall, 92% (78/85) of CRS patients’ mucus were positive for MBP (mean 7722 ng/mL) vs none of 13 healthy controls and none of 5 allergic rhinitis patients (<7.8 ng/mL; p < 0.000000000002). In this study, the MBP ELISA had a 92% sensitivity and 100% specificity for CRS.ConclusionFree MBP in nasal mucus can be used as a biomarker to diagnose CRS. The MBP ELISA represents the first immunologically‐based test to potentially distinguish CRS from the eosinophilic inflammation in allergic rhinitis.

ObjectivesA truly objective method of measuring disease severity in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has only recently existed. We evaluated computed tomography (CT) scans of CRS patients using this novel objective 3D computerized system and compared results with a novel 2D computerized analysis of a single coronal slice through the osteomeatal complex (OMC) and subjective methods including Lund‐Mackay and Zinreich's modified Lund‐Mackay.Study DesignProspective multicenter study.SettingTwo academic tertiary referral centers.Subjects and MethodsForty‐six adults with a diagnosis of CRS underwent CT examination and received an intramuscular triamcinolone injection, dosage weight dependent, followed by CT scan 4 to 5 weeks later. Recruitment lasted 21 months. Scans were evaluated with all 4 scoring methods over 5 months.ResultsThe Lin's concordance class correlation (CCC) of the OMC method revealed the best correlation to the 3D volumetric computerized values (0.915), followed by the Zinreich (0.904) and Lund‐Mackay methods (0.824). Posttreatment results demonstrated that both the OMC (0.824) and Zinreich's (0.778) methods had strong agreement with the 3D volumetric methods and were very sensitive to change, whereas the Lund‐Mackay (0.545) had only moderate agreement.ConclusionComputerized CT analysis provides the most comprehensive, objective, and reproducible method of measuring disease severity and is very sensitive to change induced by treatment intervention. A 2D coronal image through the OMC provides a valid, user‐friendly method of assessing CRS and is representative of CRS severity in all sinuses. Zinreich's subjective method correlated well overall, but the Lund‐Mackay method lagged behind in disease representation and sensitivity to change.

Objective To investigate the improvement in histologic detection of fungi with Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) stain by trypsin predigestion in the mucus of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design Prospective, single group, descriptive analysis. Setting Multi‐institutional. Subjects and Methods Thirty‐four sinus specimens from 12 surgical patients with CRS were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, GMS stain, GMS with trypsin digestion, immunofluorescence stains for chitinase, and anti‐ Alternaria . All patients received skin testing, total IgE serology, and radioallergosorbent tests (RAST) for 23 fungal‐specific IgE antibodies. Results The conventional GMS stain detected fungi in only 9 of 34 (27%) specimens. Predigesting the specimen with trypsin dramatically improved the visualization of fungi (31/34, 91%). The chitinase immunofluorescence visualized fungi in 32 of 34 (94%), and anti‐ Alternaria visualized 33 of 34 specimens (97%). Only 8 of 12 (75%) patients had detectable allergies. Conclusions This report describes a simple modification of the conventional GMS stain that can significantly improve the visualization of fungi on histology and explains the lack of detection in previous studies. These novel, more sensitive histologic methods reveal the presence of fungi within the eosinophilic mucin in allergic and also nonallergic CRS patients, further questioning a crucial role of an IgE‐mediated pathophysiology.

In the graft depleted revision rhinoplasty patient and the patient with major tissue needs, alternatives to septal and conchal cartilage grafts are needed. The costal cartilage graft and rib bone/costal cartilage combination graft are excellent alternatives. In this study 14 patients received 40 grafts from 20 autogenous ribs harvested during septorhinoplasty. Materials were harvested for use as septal replacement grafts, cantilevered grafts, dorsal onlay grafts, columellar struts, and tip grafts. Patient followup was 6 to 31 months, and no evidence of graft resorption or warpage was evident during that period. Complications of harvest were minimal, and harvest techniques are detailed.

A persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is potentially lethal, and surgical treatment is often required. CSF leak repair is an infrequently performed procedure, and only limited information is available on the long term success of the surgical techniques that are used. This retrospective chart review includes 95 patients who underwent various types of repair surgery for CSF rhinorrhea at the Mayo Clinic. The purpose of this study was to extract factors such as the choice of sealing material, etiology, location of defect(s), surgical approach, and previous procedures, and to analyze their association with the long term success and failure of surgical repair. The mean time interval in this study between unsuccessful surgery and recurrence was 50.8 months, and the mean follow-up 109 months. Among the various approaches, defects repaired endonasally had the lowest recurrence rate. Local nasal mucosa advancement flaps failed more frequently (83.3% failure) than other types of graft material (p = 0.023). These failures took place in a delayed fashion (mean interval until failure: 80 months). Local osteo-mucoperiosteal or chondro-mucoperichondrial flaps (22.2% recurrence rate) and free graft material (15.6% recurrence rate) had the best outcome. The use of fibrin glue to fixate free grafts did not improve the result in this series. Transcranial procedures were associated with a higher complication rate than extracranial procedures (12.9% versus 3.2%). Overall, successful repair was achieved in 91.6% of the patients. We discourage the use of mucosa advancement flaps and advocate free grafts or pedicled osteomucoperiosteal or chondro-mucoperichondrial flaps as sealing material of choice in the majority of cases. The occurrence of delayed failure has to be considered when evaluating reports of CSF rhinorrhea after surgical repair.

The objective of this study is to present an algorithm for choosing graft materials for the reconstruction of severe caudal and/or dorsal septal cartilage abnormalities and to examine the long-term results obtained with these techniques. Retrospective review of 21 consecutive cases of caudal and/or dorsal septal reconstruction via the external approach using the algorithms is presented. The techniques used are carefully described. Patient survey at least 1 year after the initial procedure, rhinologic examination before and after the procedure, and photographic analysis of preoperative and postoperative views are presented. The graft choice algorithm presented helps the surgeon to consider appropriate graft choice alternatives before surgery.

Surgery of the nasal valves is a challenging aspect of rhinoplasty surgery. The middle nasal vault assumes an important role in certain aspects of nasal valve collapse. Techniques that address pathologies of the middle vault include the placement of spreader grafts and the butterfly graft. We present an alternative technique of middle vault reconstruction that allows simultaneous repair of nasal valve collapse and creation of a smooth dorsal profile. The surgical technique is described in detail and representative cases are discussed.

OBJECTIVETo compare perioperative and early postoperative complication rates of performing open septorhinoplasty (OSR) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) concomitantly or individually.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGRetrospective chart review of 55 patients treated at an academic referral center who had undergone combined OSR and FESS. Complication rates for the combined procedures were compared with published complication rates for the individual procedures.RESULTSPatients’ ages ranged from 14 to 77 years (average, 43 years). Among the 55 cases, there were no major complications and 6 (11%) minor complications: 4 cases of cellulitis (7%; previously published risk, 1%‐3%) and 2 cases of postoperative epistaxis (4%).CONCLUSIONOSR and FESS may be performed safely in combination without a clinically significant increased risk of complications.SIGNIFICANCEThe slightly increased risk of cellulitis may warrant the use of intraoperative sinus irrigation and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after combined OSR and FESS.