Yang, David Yi

INTRODUCTION: Indomethacin is often used experimentally to induce intestinal hyperpermeability, enabling evaluation of interventions targeting barrier function. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT05538247) in healthy volunteers to assess whether a supplement could mitigate indomethacin-induced hyperpermeability. Participants received 150 mg/d of indomethacin for 6 days, either before or during placebo/supplement administration. Permeability was measured using 13 C-mannitol and lactulose urinary excretion. RESULTS: Contrary to expectations, indomethacin failed to increase 13 C-mannitol excretion in either group. No meaningful elevations in serum (zonulin, claudins) or fecal (calprotectin) biomarkers were observed. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the expected increase in intestinal permeability after indomethacin administration may not be consistently observed in healthy volunteers. These results highlight the need to carefully consider the reproducibility and sensitivity of this model in future clinical studies aiming to investigate gut barrier function.

ABSTRACT Background In healthy controls, higher gastric accommodation (GA) was associated with slower gastric emptying (GE) of solids. Aims In patients with gastroparesis: (1) To investigate the association between GA and GE of solids. (2) To assess the prevalence of abnormally high GA. Methods An electronic medical records (EMR) review (2010–2024) was conducted on 745 adult patients with measured GA following 300 kcal Ensure using SPECT, and scintigraphy‐based GE of solids (320 kcal, 30% fat, egg meal). Among these patients, 284 had gastroparesis (GE < 25% emptied at 2 h or < 75% emptied at 4 h). Spearman correlation analysis examined associations between GA volume or ratio and GE at 1, 2, and 4 h, and GE T 1/2 . Results Weak positive correlations were observed between GA volume and GE of solids % at 1 and 2 h (respectively R s = 0.148, p = 0.0234, and R s = 0.121, p = 0.042). In addition, there was a correlation between GA ratio and GE of solids % at 2 h ( R s = 0.143, p = 0.0160). However, there were no significant correlations of GA with GE % at 4 h or GE T 1/2 . Among the 284 patients with gastroparesis, we had documented increased GA, assessed by postprandial minus preprandial gastric volume (> 640 mL), in 7.75%, and increased GA by GA ratio > 3.85 in 22.9%. Conclusions Among patients with gastroparesis, higher GA is associated with accelerated GE of solids in the first 2 h, though the effect size is small. There is no significant effect on delayed GE at 4 h or GE T 1/2 .

INTRODUCTION: Altered intestinal permeability (IP) is implicated in multiple gastrointestinal and systemic disease conditions; an experimental model of perturbed IP in healthy subjects is needed. Traditional approaches to perturbing IP include use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of dose-related effects of castor oil (CO) (and its ingredient ricinoleic acid) at 750, 1,500, or 3,000 mg daily doses on IP. Permeability was assessed using validated 13 C-mannitol and lactulose urine excretion at 0–2, 8–24, and 0–24 hours after oral administration. RESULTS: Permeability analysis across all groups demonstrated significant difference among the groups for 0–2 hours 13 C-mannitol, 0–24 hours 13 C-mannitol, and borderline significant difference for 2–8 hours 13 C-mannitol ( P = 0.060) and 0–24 hours lactulose ( P = 0.056). Direct comparison of 3,000 mg CO vs placebo ( t test) demonstrated higher excretion of 13 C-mannitol and lactulose at 0–2, and 0–24 hours, and lactulose at 2–8 hours. DISCUSSION: CO may perturb small intestinal and colonic permeability in healthy adults.

AbstractBackgroundSeveral organizations have proposed guidelines or clinical decision tools for the management of patients with disorders of gut‐brain interactions (DGBI) affecting the lower digestive tract including irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation. Such algorithms are based on sequential therapeutic trials and modifying the treatment strategy based on efficacy and adverse events.PurposeThe aims of this review are to evaluate the evidence for efficacy of second‐ and third‐line pharmacotherapies and to assess the evidence for the alternative option to manage subgroups of patients with symptoms suggestive of lower DGBI based on diagnostic tests or documented dysfunctions. The preeminent tests to identify such subgroups that present with symptoms that overlap with lower DGBI are detailed: digital rectal examination as well as anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion for evacuation disorders, detailed measurements of colonic transit, and diagnosis of bile acid diarrhea or carbohydrate malabsorption based on biochemical measurements. The review also addresses the cost implications of screening to exclude alternative diagnoses and the costs of therapy associated with the therapeutic options following an algorithmic approach to treatment from the perspective of society, insurer, or patient. Finally, the costs of the diagnostic tests to identify actionable biomarkers and the evidence of efficacy of individualized therapy based on formal diagnosis or documentation of abnormal functions are detailed in the review.

AbstractBackgroundGastroparesis is a motility disorder of the stomach characterized by cardinal symptoms and delayed gastric emptying of solid food in the absence of mechanical obstruction. There is significant unmet need in its management, and essentially there are no medications approved for its treatment over four decades.PurposeThe objectives of this review are to develop an understanding of the goals of treatment, the evidence‐based criteria for treatment success based on the current scientific understanding of gastroparesis as well as patient response outcomes, and to propose evidence‐based principles for the successful development of treatments for gastroparesis. Specifically, we discuss the pathophysiologic targets in gastroparesis, eligibility criteria for clinical trial participation based on validated gastric emptying studies, and the patient response outcome measures that have been validated to appraise effects of treatment on clinically relevant outcomes. These considerations lead to recommendations regarding eligibility, design, and duration of proof‐of‐efficacy studies, and to endorsing the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary as a validated patient response outcome and to justification of the shortening of proof‐of‐efficacy, placebo‐controlled clinical trials to 4 weeks treatment duration after a baseline period. We believe that such approaches will increase the likelihood of successful assessment of efficacy of novel approaches to treating patients with gastroparesis.