Hu, Leland

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is a diffusely invasive primary brain tumor with significant spread of tumor cells to the periphery of visible image abnormality. Enhancement of Gadolinium (Gd) contrast agent on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has historically been considered a confirmation of local breakdown of the blood brain barrier (BBB) and sufficient drug delivery to the bulk of tumors. In this work, we used GBM-derived xenograft (PDX) models to compare drug delivery in GBM brain for high and low BBB-permeable drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five patient-derived orthotopic xenograft models from two GBM cell lines (GBM39 and GBM12) were co-dosed with erlotinib and osimertinib, two drugs with low and high BBB-permeability, respectively. T1Gd and T2-weighted MRIs were acquired from all animals prior to model sacrifice. Tumors were manually segmented on denoised and standardized MRIs and intensity patterns were captured using first and second order statistical features in the moving 3x3 kernel. We compared drug levels found in Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) in T1Gd enhancement, T2 enhancement, and normal brain. We also performed linear regression modeling to predict drug levels using MRI features. Model performance was measured using root mean squared error (RMSE). RESULTS Our analysis showed correlations between imaging features and MALDI drug levels. Osimertinib had a uniform distribution across the brain for all animals and all cell lines, consistent with our expectation for a high BBB-penetrant drug. Erlotinib showed the highest drug levels in T2 for GBM39 and in T1Gd for GBM12. Regression models showed promising results for predicting Erlotinib with a low RMSE of 0.037. CONCLUSION Our preliminary results suggest MRI can be predictive of drug levels for low-BBB penetrant drugs. Understanding the relationship between MRIs and drug distribution in diffuse tumors can be beneficial to developing effective treatment.

Abstract Choosing effective chemotherapies for intravenous delivery to brain tumors is challenging, especially given the protective nature of the blood brain barrier (BBB). Connecting drug distribution to non-invasive, pre-surgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could allow for predictive insight into drug distribution. In a previous study, we found that T2Gd images were predictive of a low BBB penetrant drug (Cefazolin), and FLAIR images were predictive of a high BBB penetrant drug (Levetiracetam). While these results are promising, we further seek to explore how advanced MRI sequences might inform image-based models of drug distribution. Prior to surgery, we acquired advanced dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) MRI sequences for eight brain tumor patients (7 gliomas and 1 metastatic adenocarcinoma) in addition to the anatomic MRIs. All resulting quantitative maps and acquired images were co-registered. Prior to incision, patients received injections of cefazolin and levetiracetam. Next, multiple blood samples and biopsies were collected during surgery. Biopsies and plasma samples were analyzed for drug concentration using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS), and biopsy drug levels were reported as Brain-Plasma Ratio (BPR). Mean image intensity was extracted from a 15x15 voxel window surrounding the biopsy location. We performed linear regression analyses to determine which combination of images were predictive of BPR. We found that considering quantitative imaging improved our initial ability to predict BPR for both drugs. For cefazolin, the third diffusion tensor eigenvalue (L3) map was significantly correlated with BPR (p< 0.001, R2= 0.36). For levetiracetam, the best model consisted of a combination of images and maps with the L3 map and the isotropic diffusion map (P) being the most influential (p= 0.001, R2= 0.63). Advanced MRI-based modeling is a promising tool for forecasting drug distribution in brain tumors and could be of great importance for understanding efficacy and selecting therapeutic strategies.

AbstractBackgroundMargins in transoral surgery for tonsil cancer can be limited by oropharyngeal wall thickness (OWT), but the normal range is not well established.MethodsIn 240 noncancer subjects, OWT was measured bilaterally in the vicinity of the tonsils with MRI. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for interaction of age, sex, location, and obesity.ResultsMean(SD) OWT measured 3.4(0.6) mm posteriorly, 3.7(2.0) mm between the styloglossus and stylopharyngeus, and 5.3(0.8) mm laterally. OWT was greater in men, correlated with obesity, decreased posteriorly and laterally in the 60–80 versus 40–59 year age groups, and increased when styloglossus/stylopharyngeus were closer. OWT was <5 mm in 36.7%–97.9% of locations, with the largest percentage below this threshold located posteriorly.ConclusionsOWT is frequently <5 mm, particularly in the posterior and intermuscular areas, suggesting that a smaller surgical margin may need to be accepted in transoral tonsil cancer surgery for anatomic reasons.

Abstract Advanced molecular and pathophysiologic characterization of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has revealed insights into promising targeted therapeutic approaches. Medical imaging plays a fundamental role in PCNSL diagnosis, staging, and response assessment. Institutional imaging variation and inconsistent clinical trial reporting diminishes the reliability and reproducibility of clinical response assessment. In this context, we aimed to: (1) critically review the use of advanced positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of PCNSL; (2) provide results from an international survey of clinical sites describing the current practices for routine and advanced imaging, and (3) provide biologically based recommendations from the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) on adaptation of standardized imaging practices. The IPCG provides PET and MRI consensus recommendations built upon previous recommendations for standardized brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIP) in primary and metastatic disease. A biologically integrated approach is provided to addresses the unique challenges associated with the imaging assessment of PCNSL. Detailed imaging parameters facilitate the adoption of these recommendations by researchers and clinicians. To enhance clinical feasibility, we have developed both “ideal” and “minimum standard” protocols at 3T and 1.5T MR systems that will facilitate widespread adoption.

Abstract OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults, with males more commonly affected than females(1.6:1). Despite advancements in treatments, prognosis is dismal with a median overall survival of 15 months. Our aim was to investigate sex as a variable in GBM patient survival after receiving incremental levels of standard-of-care treatment regimens – different extents of surgical resection and different numbers of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. METHODS Drawing from our extensive multi-institutional brain tumor repository, we investigated GBM subjects with overall survival (OS), extent of resection (EOR), number of temozolomide (TMZ) cycles, and sex data (n=620, males: n=387, females: n=233). Cox proportional hazard ratios were computed to investigate the multivariable predictive value of the patient variables with OS. Patients were then divided into groups based on their sex, EOR (either biopsy, subtotal resection (STR) or gross total resection (GTR)), and TMZ cycles (I: &lt; 6 cycles, II: 7-11 cycles and III: &gt;12 cycles). RESULTS We observed that STR was beneficial for females (HR=0.52; CI=0.33-0.83; p-value=0.013), while for males the benefit was not detected (HR=0.73; CI=0.46-1.15; p-value=0.173) for STR but was detectable for GTR (HR=0.58, CI=0.37-0.90; p-value=0.014). Females receiving 7-11 cycles of TMZ showed a survival benefit (HR=0.52; CI=0.12-0.53; p-value=0.048) while males in the same group did not (HR=0.74; CI=0.46-1.19; p-value=0.21), in comparison to those in group I of TMZ cycles. No sex differences were identified in patients receiving &lt; =6 cycles or &gt;=12 cycles. CONCLUSION Together, our results contribute to the growing literature that sex differences exist in GBM patients, even in response to standard-of-care therapies. This should be accounted for when designing clinical trials for GBM so that we may advance our pursuit to deliver personalized medicine.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the one of the most aggressive and common primary brain malignancies, with a poor median overall survival of less than 15 months. While the immune system is activated and brain-resident microglia and blood-derived macrophages combat the tumor, the tumor can convert some microglia and macrophages to instead exhibit an immune-suppressive phenotype. These co-opted immune cells are thereby termed ‘glioma-associated microglia and macrophages’ (GAMMs), as they allow for continued tumor growth. However, limited clinical data has been collected to understand this phenomenon. As a result, we have collected spatially-distributed image-localized biopsies from a cohort of patients and performed RNA sequencing on each sample. Correlations between normalized RNA counts of genetic markers for macrophages (i.e., CD68, CD163), tumor populations (i.e., SOX2, OLIG2), and key cell functions (i.e., KI67, CASP3) were analyzed. To further investigate the temporal effects that GAMMs have on GBM growth, we proposed the Proliferation-Invasion-Macrophage (PIM) model. This system of partial differential equations incorporates the proliferative and invasive behavior of GBM, as well as populations for both ‘healthy’ and ‘glioma-associated’ macrophages. By exploring the parameter space, we classified the various dynamics of tumor progression and how they relate to the immune response. With further insights of the interactions between GBM and macrophage populations, we can begin to parameterize the model on a patient-specific basis and provide insights to personalized immunotherapies and other novel immune-targeted treatments.

Abstract Background Accurate assessments of patient response to therapy are a critical component of personalized medicine. In glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, tumor growth dynamics are heterogenous across patients, complicating assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to analyze days gained (DG), a burgeoning model-based dynamic metric, for response assessment in patients with recurrent GBM who received bevacizumab-based therapies. Methods DG response scores were calculated using volumetric tumor segmentations for patients receiving bevacizumab with and without concurrent cytotoxic therapy (N = 62). Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were implemented to examine DG prognostic relationship to overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the onset of treatment for recurrent GBM. Results In patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab and cytotoxic therapy, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS and PFS at DG cutoffs consistent with previously identified values from newly diagnosed GBM using T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1Gd). DG scores for bevacizumab monotherapy patients only approached significance for PFS. Cox regression showed that increases of 25 DG on T1Gd imaging were significantly associated with a 12.5% reduction in OS hazard for concurrent therapy patients and a 4.4% reduction in PFS hazard for bevacizumab monotherapy patients. Conclusion DG has significant meaning in recurrent therapy as a metric of treatment response, even in the context of anti-angiogenic therapies. This provides further evidence supporting the use of DG as an adjunct response metric that quantitatively connects treatment response and clinical outcomes.

Abstract Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40–50 ms at 1.5 T, 20–35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.