Piura, Yoav

Abstract Background Tau‐PET neuroimaging is increasingly applied to diagnose and stage, track progression, and assess response to putative disease‐modifying treatments in individuals with Alzheimer disease. However, it remains to be seen whether findings established in predominantly non‐Hispanic White (nHW) cohorts will generalize to Black and Latino participants who are underrepresented in dementia research. Method Community‐dwelling Black ( n = 83) and Latino participants ( n = 27) completed MRI (with quantification of white matter hyperintensity volumes), and amyloid‐ (PiB or florbetapir) and tau‐ (flortaucipir) PET brain imaging as part of a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Global and regional tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratios (normalized to the cerebellar crus) were determined in Black and Latino participants and compared with findings from an independent cohort of nHW participants ( n = 110), 1:1‐matched for age, sex, education, and global Clinical Dementia Rating®. Conditional logistic modeling compared 47 regions of interest, adjusted for false discovery rate. Relevant associations between flortaucipir retention and clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman rank correlations. Result Eighty‐three Black (mean 72±10.8‐years‐old, 63% female, 33% cognitively impaired) and 27 Latino participants (mean 65.8‐years‐old, 56% female, 11% cognitively impaired) completed neuroimaging. Data were compared with findings in 110 matched nHW individuals. Global tau‐PET burden was similar between matched cohorts (Black and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.34±0.39 vs 1.36±0.37, p = 0.71; Latino and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.17±0.09 vs 1.20±0.11, p = 0.66). Lower flortaucipir uptake was noted in the caudate ( p = 0.005) and putamen ( p = 0.022) of Black/Latino participants (vs nHW), although differences attenuated following adjustment for white matter hyperintensity volume. Global flortaucipir retention increased with age (Black: Rho=0.31; Latino: Rho=0.46; nHW: Rho=0.27; p <0.05), amyloid Centiloids (Black: Rho=0.65; Latino: Rho=0.41; nHW: Rho=0.58; p <0.05), and cognitive impairment (i.e., Clinical Dementia Rating® Sum‐of‐Box scores, Black/Latino: Rho=0.31, p = 0.07; nHW: 0.76, p <0.001). Conclusion Tau‐PET patterns were similar across ethnoracial groups after adjusting for white matter hyperintensity volumes—a biomarker of small vessel disease. Flortaucipir retention increased with age, amyloid accumulation, and cognitive impairment across all cohorts. These findings affirm the clinical and research applications of tau PET in diverse cohorts. Acknowledgements : Flortaucipir precursor and technology was supported by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals.

Abstract Background Plasma p ‐tau217 represents a promising alternative to PET‐ and CSF‐based biomarkers of AD in well‐characterized research cohorts. However, the performance of this accessible biomarker in outpatient clinics comprised of patients with multiple causes of cognitive impairment has yet to be established. Method Plasma Aβ42/40 and p ‐tau217 concentrations were measured using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays in patients evaluated within a subspecialty memory clinic at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Syndromic and etiologic diagnoses were established by consensus, integrating clinical data and findings from MRI ( n = 484), FDG‐PET ( n = 117), and CSF AD biomarkers ( n = 440). Plasma biomarker performance was evaluated using established diagnostic cutpoints to identify patients with “positive/elevated”, “intermediate”, or “negligible” levels of cerebral amyloid pathology on amyloid‐PET. Result Plasma AD biomarkers were measured in 509 patients (mean 68.6±9.3 years; 47% female; 91.3% non‐Hispanic White), including patients with typical amnestic AD ( n = 237, 46.6%), non‐amnestic presentations of AD ( n = 48, 9.4%), and non‐AD causes of cognitive concerns ( n = 224, 44.0%). “Intermediate” plasma p ‐tau217 and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 concentrations were reported in <15% of patients (43% of patients with Aβ42/40), implying the need for further testing to inform the likelihood of AD neuropathologic change in these patients. After excluding these patients, plasma p ‐tau217 reliably distinguished patients with symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Integration of Aβ42 measures (ptau217/Aβ42) incrementally improved specificity (86%). Diagnostic performance was unaffected by age (> vs < 65‐years). Plasma p ‐tau217 (AUC: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.91‐0.96) and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 performance (AUC: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.94‐0.98) were closely aligned with results of established CSF AD biomarkers ( p ‐tau181/Aβ42), outperforming Aβ42/40 (AUC: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.74‐0.83). Reduced kidney function was associated with elevated plasma p ‐tau217 and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 concentrations in patients without AD (referencing CSF AD biomarkers). Conclusion Concentrations of plasma p ‐tau217, but not Aβ42/40, strongly associated with clinical diagnoses of symptomatic AD and CSF AD biomarker results. Integration of Aβ42 measures yielded marginal improvements in performance, with increased complexity and cost. These findings support the use of plasma p ‐tau217 in heterogeneous clinical cohorts, including patients with multiple causes of cognitive impairment. Caution is advised when interpreting p ‐tau217 concentrations in patients with decreased kidney function, due to potential elevations in plasma biomarker concentrations.

Abstract Background Black and Latino Americans experience a disparate dementia burden yet remain underrepresented in dementia research, including clinical trials designed to slow or prevent symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Accessible and non‐invasive AD blood biomarkers may improve identification and recruitment of underrepresented participants into AD clinical trials. There is a clear need to assess the performance of emergent plasma AD biomarkers for the detection of AD neuropathology in cognitively normal Black and Latino Americans. Method Cognitively normal Black and Latino participants underwent cognitive evaluations and PET (amyloid‐PiB, tau‐flortaucipir) imaging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Plasma p ‐tau217 was measured using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a p ‐tau217 threshold (≥0.186 pg/mL) known to identify non‐Hispanic White participants with cognitive impairment and “positive” amyloid PET scans (>25 Centiloids). Next, we derived an optimized threshold to identify participants with “positive” amyloid PET using Youden's method. Result The cohort included 58 Black (55%) and 47 Latino‐White (45%) well‐educated (mean 16.1±2.3 years) individuals, with mean age 64.7±8.8 years, and slight female bias (63%). Plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations increased with age (rho=0.269, p = 0.004) and declined with MoCA scores (rho=‐0.225, p = 0.027). Sixty‐nine participants completed amyloid‐ and tau‐PET imaging. Plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations increased with amyloid‐ (rho=0.254, p = 0.044) but not with tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratio (rho=0.127; p = 0.334). p ‐tau217 concentrations were ≥0.186 pg/mL in 10/69 participants (14%), including 3/3 amyloid‐ and tau‐PET positive (A+T+) participants, 3/8 A+T‐ participants (sensitivity: 55%), and 4/58 A‐T‐ participants (specificity 93%). An optimized p ‐tau217 threshold of ≥0.118 pg/mL identified 10/11 A+T± participants (sensitivity 91%), and 16/58 A‐T‐ participants (specificity 73%). In A‐T‐ participants, estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in participants with ‘false positive’ elevations in plasma p ‐tau217 (mean difference: 67 vs 81 ml/min/1.73m 2 , p = 0.004), emphasizing the need for caution when interpreting plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations in patients with decreased kidney function. Conclusion Plasma p ‐tau217 thresholds validated in participants with symptomatic AD (≥0.186 pg/mL) failed to identify early AD neuropathology in 5/8 cognitively normal Black and Latino participants. Optimized thresholds are required to improve detection of preclinical AD in Black/Latino individuals.

Abstract Background Prion diseases are universally fatal causes of rapid progressive dementia owing to the formation and spread of prions throughout the brain. Palliative care focuses on improving quality of life for patients with serious or advanced medical conditions. Timely access to palliative care is central to the care of patients with prion disease and other progressive neurodegenerative diseases. We sought to evaluate palliative care utilization and mode of delivery in patients with prion disease. Method Clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients with definite or probable prion disease diagnosed and managed across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise from January 2012 to August 2023. We systematically evaluated the frequency of symptoms and signs likely to benefit from palliative care and considered the relationship between these features and palliative care resource utilization, method of delivery, and outcomes. Result 172 patients with symptomatic prion disease were identified. 165 (94.8%) patients experienced ≥1 symptom/sign likely to benefit from palliative care, yet only 113 (65.7%) patients accessed palliative care resources during the illness course (hospice care: 39.7%; palliative care consultation: 14.9% inpatient, 6.9% outpatient; both: 3.4%). Lack of referral by the diagnosing clinician was the most common reason (55.9%) patients did not receive palliative care services. Early and predominant language dysfunction, behavioral changes, constipation, and emergency department visits or hospital admissions were independently associated with greater odds of referral for palliative care services. Goals of care (i.e., living environment, nutritional and hospitalization plans) and advanced care plans (i.e., healthcare surrogates, living will, code status, hospice) were more likely to be documented in patients receiving palliative care consultations (88.6% and 93.2%, respectively) versus hospice care alone (7.8% and 14.5%, respectively; p <0.001). Conclusion More than a third of patients with prion disease did not receive palliative care resources despite a high prevalence of symptoms/signs likely to benefit from palliative care. These findings highlight an opportunity to enhance the care of patients with prion disease by promoting early access to palliative care resources that may support symptom management, enhance caregiver support, and reinforce patient autonomy by clarifying goals of care and advance care planning.

Abstract Background Bedside cognitive screening tools intend to reliably and efficiently detect cognitive impairment in research, clinical, and community settings. Black American (BA) and Hispanic/Latino (H/L) adults obtain lower performance on widely used screeners, largely driven by demographics and structural and social determinants of health (SSDoH). This study characterized the performance of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance in a cohort of cognitively normal ethnoracially diverse adults while considering cohort‐specific factors that contributed to misclassification of impairment. Method Cognitively normal BA and H/L participants completed a comprehensive neurological assessment, neuropsychological testing, and MRI and amyloid‐ and tau‐PET imaging as part of a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Demographically adjusted MoCA cutoffs were applied to BA (MoCA ≤ 22) and WH/L (MoCA ≤ 24) subgroups. Hierarchical binary logistic regression assessed whether amyloid burden (Centiloid value) improved prediction of scoring below demographically adjusted MoCA cutoffs beyond demographic/SSDoH factors, including age, education, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Result Participants included 105 (47 WH/L, 58 BA/AA) cognitively normal adults (mean age = 64.71 years, SD = 8.91; 62.9% female) with average of 16.07 years of education (SD=2.35) and mild‐to‐moderate neighborhood disadvantage (mean ADI=47.60, SD=23.77). 40% of H/L participants (MoCA (≤ 24) and 17% of BA participants (MoCa ≤22) scored below demographically adjusted MoCA cut‐offs. For the H/L subgroup, the best fitting model included age, education, ADI, and amyloid burden ( R 2 = 0 .43, χ 2 = 10.98, p = 0.03). Age (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.986 – 1.487) and amyloid burden (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.67 – 1.03) approached statistical significance as individual predictors ( p = 0.06, p = 0.09). In the BA/AA subgroup, the best fitting model included age, education and ADI only ( R 2 = 0.47, χ 2 = 9.06, p = 0.02), with education approaching significance as an individual predictor (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.21 – 1.01, p = 0.05). Conclusion Sociodemographic factors continued to drive low MoCA performance in cognitively normal individuals despite applying demographically adjusted cut‐off scores by subgroup. These factors differentially impacted performance among BA/AA and WH/L participants. Careful consideration of these factors is warranted to mitigate risk of overdiagnosing impairment based on cognitive screening across clinical and research settings.

Abstract Background Monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid‐β (Aβ), including aducanumab, have been tested to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, limited data exist on neuropathology following treatment and the effects of amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). We report on such data from five aducanumab‐treated study participants with AD of whom two experienced ARIA. Methods Aducanumab‐treated study participants who came to autopsy ( n = 5) were matched to AD controls ( n = 12) based on the presence/type of autosomal dominant AD mutation, APOE genotype, age at cognitive symptom onset, and sex. We assessed cognitive measures, 18 F‐florbetapir PET centiloid, ARIA risk factors, and AD neuropathologic change. Using multiplex immunofluorescence, brain regions affected along Thal Aβ phases were stained for Aβ isoforms and phosphorylated tau, as well as for ARIA‐associated markers, including Perls’ Prussian blue to detect ferric iron, fibrinogen‐α for blood brain barrier integrity, membrane attack complex (C5b‐C9) for complement activation, and activated microglia (IBA1, CD68). Results Study participants included four males and one female, all carrying at least one APOE ε4 allele. Two participants carried a PSEN1 NM_000021.4:c.817G>A , p.Glu273Lys mutation. Cumulative aducanumab dosage ranged between 5–241 mg/kg, with death occurring 5–41 months after the last infusion. Amyloid burden on PET declined in all participants (range 15‐100 centiloids). Two participants experienced ARIA. Compared to AD controls, Aβ aa1‐8 and Aβ 42 were selectively reduced in cortical layer I of aducanumab‐treated study participants ( p <0.05) but not in the total cortex, as shown for the middle frontal cortex in Figure 1. No differences were observed in phosphorylated tau burden. Prussian blue‐stained hemosiderin was present in both treated and untreated AD cases. However, in participants with ARIA, hemosiderin accumulated in superficial cortical layers near CAA‐laden meningeal and penetrating vessels, which also exhibited extensive complement and microglial activation (Figure 2). Conclusions Aβ clearance and ARIA‐related findings were localized predominantly in superficial cortical layers, suggesting that aducanumab biodistribution is more pronounced in these regions rather than deeper cortical layers.

Abstract Background Disparities in structural and social determinants of health in Latino and Black communities may increase the burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Identifying dementia risk factors, which may account for up to 45% of ADRD risk, is crucial to implement effective risk‐reduction strategies. This study aimed to assess ADRD risk factors in community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black Americans by measuring the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors through subjective and objective measures. Method Community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black adults (≥45‐years‐old) were enrolled in a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Baseline assessments conducted between Mach 2022 and November 2024 included demographics, self‐reported race/ethnicity, and history of dementia risk factors. Socioeconomic deprivation [Area Deprivation Index (ADI) State scores] and modifiable dementia risk factors were reported by participants and directly measured, including hypertension (BP >130/80 mmHg), obesity (BMI≥30), hyperlipidemia (LDL>100 mg/dL), hyperglycemia (HbA1C >5.6%), low vitamin B12 (B12<350 pg/mL), hearing loss (bedside assessment), vision loss (bedside assessment), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale ≥5). Result 105 participants (47 Latino, 55 Black), 64.7 (±8.8) years‐old, female 66 (63%), with 16 (±2.3) years of education were assessed. Black participants experienced higher socioeconomic deprivation than Latino participants (median ADI 7 vs 3; p <0.001). Dementia risk factors were common in Latino and Black participants. These included, hypertension (55.3%, 70.3%; p = 0.291), hyperlipidemia (58.7%, 55.8%; p = 0.908), obesity (29.8%, 45.5%; p = 0.263), hyperglycemia (51.1%, 49.1%; p = 0.834), low vitamin B12 (23.9%, 28.0%; p = 0.270), hearing loss (19.1%, 7.3%; p = 0.111), vision loss (85.1%, 85.2%; p = 0.771), and depression (6.4%, 5.5%; p = 0.168). Objective measures revealed a higher frequency of risk factors compared with participant‐provided history, highlighting a substantial proportion of unrecognized or inadequately treated risk factors: hypertension (62.3%, 45.1%; p = 0.067), hyperlipidemia (57.6%, 47.5%; p = 0.004), hyperglycemia (49%, 20%; p = <0.001), vitamin B12 deficiency (27.8%, 9.3%; p = 0.170), and depression (6.9%, 11.9%; p = 0.009). Conclusion Modifiable dementia risk factors were detected in most cognitively normal Latino and Black adults engaged in a longitudinal study of memory and aging. Objective measures highlighted unrecognized and undertreated risk factors. Active surveillance programs are needed to detect and treat modifiable ADRD risk factors in underrepresented populations.

Objective To determine the clinical features that identify patients with suspected rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) who will develop RPD. Methods Patients with suspected RPD were enrolled and followed at Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville, FL; January 2020 to October 2023) and Washington University (Saint Louis, MO; June 2016 to December 2019). Two dementia specialists independently reviewed clinical data and assigned diagnoses. Patients were diagnosed with RPD if they developed dementia within 1 year or incapacitation within 2 years of symptom onset. The associations between clinical features and causes and outcomes were explored via univariate and multivariate comparisons. Results Of 248 patients with suspected RPD, 185 (74.6%) met criteria for RPD. Patients with RPD were older (62.6 ± 14.5 vs 55.2 ± 18.1 years; p < 0.001), and more frequently diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.40, 7.31) or Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.38, 15.75). Visual agnosia (15/183; 8.2%), substantial brain atrophy (27/182; 14.8%), and periodic epileptiform discharges (11/151; 7.3%) were exclusively detected in patients with RPD. After controlling for age, intensive care unit admission (OR 4.77, 95% CI 1.61, 14.12), lack of seizures (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.15, 5.31), abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.997, 4.05), and cerebrospinal fluid white blood cell count ≤5 cells/mm 3 (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.60, 6.82) were also independently associated with RPD. Patients with RPD were more likely to die or develop severe dementia (mean time to outcome, 36.1 months; 95% CI 31.2–41.0). Interpretation Selected clinical features may identify patients with suspected RPD who are likely to continue to decline. Early recognition of these features may improve diagnostic accuracy and inform prognosis. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:764–776