KC, Anil

Background: In the landscape of organ transplantation, heart transplantation stands as a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage heart failure. Comprehensive analyses of transplant programs are imperative to optimize outcomes and understand the complexities. Hypothesis: This study hypothesizes that an increasing trend of heart transplant service and short-term mechanical circulatory support (STMCS) is the bridge to transplant; the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) guideline positively impacts STMCS utilization. Even with the standard of care, there might be a disparity in receiving care in terms of gender and race. Goal/ Aims: By examining this center's collective experience, this research provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of heart transplantation, ultimately contributing to advancements in patient care and transplant policy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes heart transplant patients in a single large transplant center. For statistical analysis, Cox regression, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal Wallis, and Chi-Square test were used in IBM SPSS 25. Result: Trends: This retrospective study covering 2010 to 2022 comprehensively analyzed 1513 heart transplant patients. The cohort consisted of 1071 (70.78%) males and 442 (29.21%) females, 31.9% were bridged through STMCS. 76.7% of Caucasian and 16.1% were African American.The mean utilization of STMCS was 20.08% before the UNOS policy change, increasing to 53.81% after that (p < 0.001). Disparity Analysis: There was a statistically significant difference in STMCS utilization between white and black patients (p= 0.008) but no difference in between obese and non-obese cohorts (P=0.362).Wait time was similar among the genders (p=0.161) and different races (p=0.302). Survival Analysis: There is a significant survival discrepancy between patients bridged through MCS and those without STMCS(p< 0.001). However, yearly trend analysis showed an evolving survival trajectory favoring STMCS users. There are statistically significant survival differences among whites and blacks (P =0.008) but similar among the genders (p=0.589). Summary: The study reveals significant changes in the trend of transplants regarding STMCS utilization since the UNOS guideline. There are substantial differences in survival between STMCS vs. non-STMCS groups and among the races.There was a significant difference in STMCS utilization among the races.

Background: According to the American Cancer Society, there are currently over 18 million adult cancer survivors in the US, and by 2030, that figure is estimated to rise to over 22 million. While this is positive, more and more survivors are now at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Hypothesis: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association between cancer survivors and cardiovascular event. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases from inception until March 2024 using appropriate Mesh terms for ‘Cancer’, and ‘cardiovascular risk’. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random effects models. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of nine studies with 1,209,168 people (Cancer survivor: 140697 and non-cancer: 1068471) were included in our study. The mean follow-up duration was 12.4 years. The risk of cardiovascular events was seen in all cancer survivors (RR: 1.69, 95%CI: 1.31-2.08, P <0.05). The cardiovascular risk was statistically significant in patients with leukemia (RR: 1.71, 95%CI: 1.54-1.88), lung cancer (RR: 1.99, 95%CI: 1.38-2.6) and lymphoma (RR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.29-2.01), and comparable in breast cancer (RR: 1.22, 95%CI: 0.98-1.46), colorectal cancer (RR: 1.13, 95%CI: 0.89-1.37), prostate cancer (RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.99-1.17) and thyroid cancer (RR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.57-1.35). Conclusion: Our study showed that overall cancer survivors had significant risk for cardiovascular events; mainly leukemia, lung cancer, and lymphoma patients had a significant result. Early identification, continuous monitoring, and proactive management strategies are essential to mitigate the long-term cardiovascular effects of cancer treatments.

Despite the frequent use of prophylactic antibiotics in hospitals for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Infectious Disease Task Force does not recommend routine antibiotic prophylaxis due to a lack of compelling evidence. We assessed the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in ECMO patients. We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases from their inception up to September 6, 2023, on various databases using keywords like “antibiotics,” “prophylaxis,” “extracorporeal membrane oxygenation,” and “ECMO.” Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included research. We collected data using Microsoft Excel version 2016, mean and standard deviations were calculated for continuous data, while frequencies and percentages were calculated for binomial data. A total of three studies was included in the review with a total of 8,954 participants, of which 4,483 (50.06%) received antibiotic prophylaxis, and 1,131 (25.22%) were female. The administration of antibiotics prophylactically was associated with reduction in rate of mortality, the risk of infections, and complications like acute kidney injury and diarrhea. Although there have been some benefits on antibiotic prophylaxis, prospective research, and possibly the creation of tailored, ECMO-specific bundles will be needed to identify efficient ways to prevent ECMO infection.