Petersen, Gloria M.

AbstractPurpose: Most familial cancer susceptibility genes are tumor suppressor genes that are biallelically inactivated in familial neoplasms through somatic deletion of the wild-type allele. Identifying the genomic losses that occur in pancreatic neoplasms, particularly those that occur in familial and precursor neoplasms, may help localize the genes responsible for pancreatic cancer susceptibility.Experimental Design: Normal and neoplastic tissue DNA was isolated from fresh-frozen surgically resected tissues from 20 patients with primary familial pancreatic adenocarcinoma (defined as having at least one first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer), 31 with sporadic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), and 7 with familial IPMNs using laser capture microdissection. Microdissected DNA was whole genome amplified using multiple strand displacement. Genome-wide allelotypes were determined using 391 microsatellite markers. The accuracy of microdissection and fidelity of the whole genome amplification were determined by comparing the genotypes of microdissected primary pancreatic cancers to the genotypes of xenografts derived from these cancers and by comparing the results of amplified to nonamplified specimens.Results: The concordance of genotypes between LCM whole genome amplified primary pancreatic cancers and their corresponding pancreatic cancer xenograft DNAs was 98%. Among the 20 primary familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas, we found a high prevalence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) with an average fractional allelic loss (FAL) of 49.9% of an aggregate of 2,378 informative markers. The level of FAL in the IPMNs (10%) was significantly lower than in the pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The most common locus of LOH in the IPMNs was at 19p (LOH at 24% of markers). The regions of frequent allelic loss observed in the familial pancreatic cancers were similar to those found in sporadic pancreatic cancers.Conclusions: The allelic loss patterns of familial and sporadic pancreatic cancers and IPMNs provide clues as to the genomic locations of tumor suppressor genes inactivated in these neoplasms.

Abstract The role of genes that influence the risk of developing pancreatic cancer (PC) has not been well studied. The mitochondrion, conventionally thought to be an organelle specific to energy metabolism, is in fact multifunctional and has been implicated in many diseases, including cancer. To evaluate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA (mtSNP) are associated with increased risk of PC, we screened Caucasian cases diagnosed or seen at the Mayo Clinic with primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 955), and healthy clinic-based Caucasian controls (n = 1,102). A total of 24 mtSNPs, including 10 of the most common tagSNPs, 7 non-tagSNPs in the coding region, and 7 common SNPs in the regulatory region were genotyped. For analysis, these samples were grouped into two phases, the “testing” set (474 cases and 615 controls), and the “validation” set (481 cases and 487 controls). In the testing set, one mtSNP (SNP11719) suggested an association in single SNP analysis, with an odds ratio of 1.34 (95% confidence intervals, 1.05-1.72; P = 0.020), but did not remain statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. In the validation set, none of the 24 variants indicated any association with PC. For haplogroup analysis, 10 core SNPs that form common haplogroups in Caucasians (1719, 4580, 7028, 8251, 9055, 10398, 12308, 13368, 13708, and 16391) were evaluated. No significant associations with PC were identified either by analyzing the two sets separately or combined (combined global P = 0.17). Overall, these results do not support a significant involvement of mitochondrial DNA variation in the risk of developing PC. Investigation of other mitochondrial genetic variations (i.e., nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins) would be necessary to elucidate any role of mitochondrial DNA variation in PC. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(7):1455–9)

Abstract The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has yielded great success in treatment of lung adenocarcinomas. However, patients who develop resistance to TKI treatment often acquire a somatic resistance mutation (T790M) located in the catalytic cleft of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) enzyme. Recently, a report describing EGFR-T790M as a germ-line mutation suggested that this mutation may be associated with inherited susceptibility to lung cancer. Contrary to previous reports, our analysis indicates that the T790M mutation confers increased Y992 and Y1068 phosphorylation levels. In a human bronchial epithelial cell line, overexpression of EGFR-T790M displayed a growth advantage over wild-type (WT) EGFR. We also screened 237 lung cancer family probands, in addition to 45 bronchoalveolar tumors, and found that none of them contained the EGFR-T790M mutation. Our observations show that EGFR-T790M provides a proliferative advantage with respect to WT EGFR and suggest that the enhanced kinase activity of this mutant is the basis for rare cases of inherited susceptibility to lung cancer. [Cancer Res 2007;67(10):4665–70]

AbstractPurpose: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) can be divided into two nonoverlapping groups: those that are chromosomally unstable but microsatellite stable (MSS CIN+) and those that are chromosomally stable but microsatellite unstable (MSI CIN−). However, a third group with neither chromosome nor microsatellite instability (MSS CIN−) makes a substantial contribution to the total CRC burden. The clinicopathologic features of MSS CIN− CRC are not well delineated. We assessed the relationship between age and chromosomal instability (CIN) status as measured by ploidy and allelic imbalance in a series of MSS tumors.Experimental Design: We studied a prospectively collected series of CRC patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester. A total of 84 samples of MSS CRC in patients ≤50 years old were identified between 1994 and 1997. A consecutive series of 90 MSS CRC in patients ≥65 years old served as a comparison group. CIN status was assessed using two techniques: ploidy analysis by flow cytometry and small chromosome changes as measured by genomewide fractional allelic imbalance.Results: CRC in the young-onset group was more likely to involve the rectum and to be high stage. MSS tumors in the young-onset group were more often diploid (46%) than those in older patients (26%; P = 0.006). This difference was maintained in the subset of MSS CRC that were high stage (42% versus 18%; P = 0.02) and in rectal cancers (50% versus 23%; P = 0.04).Conclusion: A greater proportion of young patients with MSS CRC has diploid tumors than patients who develop MSS CRC over age 65.

AbstractMutations in the BRCA2 gene have been implicated in pancreatic cancer susceptibility through studies of high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families. To determine the contribution of mutations in BRCA2 to familial pancreatic cancer, we screened affected probands from 151 high-risk families identified through pancreatic cancer clinics for germ-line BRCA2 mutations. Of these families, 118 had two or more first- and second-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer, and an additional 33 had two or more affected second-degree relatives. The average age of onset for pancreatic cancer was 62.8 years. Five BRCA2 truncating mutations were identified, three in families with two or more first- and second-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer. Three of the families with mutations had a history of breast cancer but not ovarian cancer. Four of five families with mutations were identified through probands with early-onset (<55 years) pancreatic cancer. The results of this study were combined with those from a BRCA2 mutation study of 29 other families from the same Johns Hopkins University National Familial Pancreatic Tumor Registry to estimate the frequency of BRCA2 mutations. A total of 10 carriers from 180 families were identified, suggesting that BRCA2 mutations account for 6% of moderate and high-risk pancreatic cancer families. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(2):342–6)

Abstract In this study, we observed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in human chromosomal fragment 6q25.1 in sporadic lung cancer patients. LOH was observed in 65% of the 26 lung tumors examined and was narrowed down to a 2.2-Mb region. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of genes located within this region identified a candidate gene, termed p34. This gene, also designated as ZC3H12D, C6orf95, FLJ46041, or dJ281H8.1, carries an A/G nonsynonymous SNP at codon 106, which alters the amino acid from lysine to arginine. Nearly 73% of heterozygous lung cancer tissues with LOH and the A/G SNP also exhibited loss of the A allele. In vitro clonogenic and in vivo nude mouse studies showed that overexpression of the A allele exerts tumor suppressor function compared with the G allele. p34 is located within a recently mapped human lung cancer susceptibility locus, and association of the p34 A/G SNP was tested among these families. No significant association between the less frequent G allele and lung cancer susceptibility was found. Our results suggest that p34 may be a novel tumor suppressor gene involved in sporadic lung cancer but it seems not to be the candidate familial lung cancer susceptibility gene linked to chromosomal region 6q23-25. [Cancer Res 2007;67(1):93–9]

AbstractWe have organized the Pancreatic Cancer Genetic Epidemiology (PACGENE) Consortium to identify susceptibility genes in familial pancreatic cancer (FPC). The Consortium comprises seven data collection centers, a statistical genetics core, and a pathology/archival genotyping core. We recruit kindreds containing two or more affected blood relatives ascertained through incident pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases, physician referrals, and/or through Internet recruitment. Accrual to a database containing core clinical, demographic, lifestyle, and family history information from questionnaires is ongoing, along with biospecimen collection. To date, 13,147 patients have been screened for family history, of whom 476 (50% male) probands and 1,912 of their adult (99% unaffected) relatives have been enrolled. Of these, 379 kindreds meet criteria for FPC, having at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer. Cumulative incidence curves using available age of diagnosis (onset) among and affected relatives were compared with those for incident pancreatic cancer cases reported to 13 U.S. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) sites from 1973 to 2000 (N = 72,700). The mean age ± SD at diagnosis among 466 PACGENE probands and 670 affected relatives was 64.1 ± 11.8 and was 65.4 ± 11.6 for the subset of 369 FPC probands and 429 relatives. Both samples were significantly younger than the mean age at diagnosis in the SEER population (70.0 ± 12.1 years; differences in curves versus SEER, P < 0.001). Age at diagnosis (excluding probands) in FPC kindreds does not decrease with increasing number of affected individuals. In our sample, younger age at diagnosis was observed whether we grouped probands by recruitment sites that predominantly recruited through high-risk referrals, or through screening all pancreatic cancer patients for family history. Linkage studies are ongoing. The PACGENE Consortium will be a valuable family-based resource that will greatly enhance genetic epidemiology research in pancreatic cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(4):704–10)

Abstract Individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Quantification of this risk provides a rational basis for cancer risk counseling and for screening for early pancreatic cancer. In a prospective registry-based study, we estimated the risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated by comparing the number of incident pancreatic cancers observed with those expected using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) rates. Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) kindreds were defined as kindreds having at least one pair of first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer, and sporadic pancreatic cancer (SPC) kindreds as families without such an affected pair. Nineteen incident pancreatic cancers developed among 5,179 individuals from 838 kindreds (at baseline, 370 FPC kindreds and 468 SPC kindreds). Of these 5,179 individuals, 3,957 had at least one first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer and contributed 10,538 person-years of follow-up. In this group, the observed-to-expected rate of pancreatic cancer was significantly elevated in members of FPC kindreds [9.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.5–16.1], but not in the SPC kindreds (1.8; 95% CI., 0.22–6.4). This risk in FPC kindreds was elevated in individuals with three (32.0; 95% CI, 10.2–74.7), two (6.4; CI, 1.8–16.4), or one (4.6; CI, 0.5–16.4) first-degree relative(s) with pancreatic cancer. Risk was not increased among 369 spouses and other genetically unrelated relatives. Risk was higher in smokers than in nonsmokers. Individuals with a strong family history of pancreatic cancer have a significantly increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

AbstractGenetic counseling may turn risk information into cancer prevention behavior by modifying health beliefs and cancer‐related distress. We assessed the effect of genetic counseling on these factors in 101 adult first‐degree‐relatives of colorectal cancer patients from families with known or suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Before counseling and once afterward, subjects completed self‐report measures of perceived lifetime risk and cancer‐distress. Most persons overestimated their cancer risk, and higher perceived risk was associated with believing that colorectal cancer cannot be prevented. Individual perceived risk changed after counseling, although mean perceived risk was unchanged. After adjusting for baseline risk, older persons and those with higher estimated objective cancer risk had larger postcounseling decreases. Distress after counseling was positively correlated with baseline distress and anxiety symptoms, and inversely correlated with tolerance for ambiguity. The findings suggest counseling interventions that should increase the likelihood of screening and offer hypotheses for future research.