Goetz, MP

Abstract Background: Based upon the association between pathologic response and disease free survival, the neoadjuvant setting is increasingly being used for drug development. NGS has identified unique and recurrent genetic alterations in breast cancer (BC) that are potentially targetable; however, the clinical implications are mostly unknown. We developed a prospective neoadjuvant study (BEAUTY) in high risk BC patients (pts) using weekly T followed by anthracycline-based chemo wherein percutaneous tumor biopsies (PTB) are obtained before/during/after chemo for NGS and PDX. Our goal is to identify novel biomarkers/pathways and develop PDX to test new therapeutic approaches. Methods: Pts underwent PTB at baseline and after 12 wks of T. Response to T was defined based upon 12 week Ki-67: responder (<15%) vs non-responder (≥15%). Pts with histologic response and absence of invasive BC at 12 wks were classified as responders. NGS was performed using PTB/blood DNA (exome) and PTB (RNA seq). MRI response was classified using RECIST criteria. NGS data were used to identify somatic copy number variants (cnvs) and expressed single nucleotide variants (eSNVs). Non-SCID mice (estrogen supplemented) were implanted ≤ 30 minutes with PTB samples. Results: Of the first 78 pts, 44 have completed T. Here we focus on 18 pts with either triple negative or luminal B BC. Clinical characteristics according to Ki-67 response are shown in Table 1. Comparison of genomic alterations in BEAUTY pts with TCGA identified a greater overlap with copy number gains (73%) compared to deletions (40%), along with similar observations of mutations in TP53, PTEN, RYR2, and AKT1 genes. Association analysis of CNVs and eSNVs between responders/non-responders identified 33 genes (predominantly located in chromosomes 1, 8, 13) and 580 eSNVs (corresponding to 497 genes) with a p < 0.05. Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis of responders/non-responders identified 198 genes with a p-value < 0.05. Integrated analysis of 539 genes (CNVs, eSNVs and DGE) identified pathways such as TGF-beta, Jak-Stat, WNT and NOTCH signalling. PDX take rate was 44% [triple negative (6/10); Luminal B (2/8)]. PDX growth rate was significantly associated with clinical baseline Ki-67 (p = 0.00014). Conclusion: This is the first prospective study to demonstrate the feasibility of using PTB to obtain both NGS data and PDX in the neoadjuvant setting. PDX take rate is associated with BC subtype and baseline Ki-67. Studies are ongoing to 1) validate genes/pathways associated with treatment response in subsequent BEAUTY pts; 2) genomically characterize and assess PDX in vivo response to T and 3) Use NGS data to prioritize new drugs/drug combinations in PDX. Funded by Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine and MC Cancer Center. Clinical CharacteristicsOverallResponders: 12 week Ki-67 < 15% (n = 9)Non-Responders: 12 week Ki-67 ≥ 15% (n = 9)Median Age495345T stage T2/T314 (78%)7 (78%)7 (78%)Node Positive8 (44%)4 (44%)4 (44%)Triple negative10 (56%)6 (67%)4 (44%)Luminal B8 (44%)3 (33%)5 (56%)Ki-67 after 12 Weeks of T Median 5% (0-11%)Median 35% (17-60%)Complete/Partial MRI Response after T 6 (67%)2 (22%) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-08-10.

Abstract Background: First in human studies of Z-endoxifen hydrochloride (E), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (T), are underway in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Previous data have demonstrated the superiority of aromatase inhibitors (AI's) over T in estrogen receptor (ER) + BC. Using an in vivo aromatase expressing model (MCF7/AC1), we compared the antitumor activity of E with T and Letrozole (L), as well as the antitumor activity and global gene expression changes of E with T in an L-resistant model. Methods: MCF7/AC1 tumors were stimulated with androstenedione. Once tumor size reached 300 mm3, mice (30/group) were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: control (daily, po), T (500 μg/day, sc), endoxifen 25 mg/kg/day p.o.(LDE) endoxifen 75 mg/kg/day p.o. (HDE) or letrozole, 10 μg/day s.c for 4 weeks. Tumors were harvested from control, T, and E groups while the L group continued treatment until the development of resistance defined as an increase in tumor volume of at least 300% from day 1. Mice with L-resistant tumors were randomly assigned to T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks and then sacrificed. Gene expression in L-resistant tumors was quantified using Affymetrix U133+2 and changes in gene expression profiles [comparing T and E with L-resistant (n=3)] were analyzed. Genes identified as significantly different were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR assays. Results: At the 4 week time point, both doses of E and L resulted in greater anti-tumor activity than control (Wilcoxon rank sum test: all p < 0.0001); however, tumor burden did not differ between T and control (p=0.095). HDE resulted in significantly less tumor burden than T (p=0.002) but was similar to L. In mice that continued on L, resistance developed at 24 weeks in 9/25 mice. These mice were randomly assigned to either T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks. Tumor volume (expressed as a% of its size prior to randomization) was significantly different comparing E (73.3%; range: 69.3 to 80.75%) versus T (148.39%; range: 114.07 to 165.99%) (Wilcoxon rank sum test p=0.016). Compared to control, microarray studies identified 1518 unique probe sets regulated by E (p<0.001) compared to 441 for T including estrogen-regulated genes such as progesterone receptor (PGR) and amphiregulin (AREG) that were significantly down-regulated in the E group [PGR (−6.2 fold, p=0.000008) and AREG (−3.2 fold, p=.0006) but unchanged or up-regulated in the T group (PGR unchanged and AREG +9.2 fold p=0.00002). These findings were confirmed by RT-PCR. Conclusions: Using the MCF7/AC1 model previously used to show the superiority of AI's over T, HDE demonstrated similar antitumor activity to L and was superior to T. In cells resistant to L, E was superior to T and gene expression changes demonstrate that E down-regulates while T activates estrogen regulated genes. These findings support the ongoing development of E for the treatment of ER+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-06.

Abstract Background The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively; yet, much less is known about full-length ERβ (ERβ1) and even less about its 4 variant forms (ERβ2-5). We have recently implicated a role for ERβ1 in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to anti-estrogens. However, the ability of ERβ2-5 to modulate ERα and ERβ1 activity, and their association with cancer development, progression, and response to estradiol (E2) and anti-estrogens are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that the presence of ERβ variants may be of diagnostic and clinical relevance for breast cancer patients and describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody (MC10) that is able to detect their expression in tumor biopsies. Methods: Transient transfection and luciferase assays were used to determine the transcriptional activity of ERβ2-5 in response to E2 and anti-estrogens alone or in combination with ERα and ERβ1. A novel monoclonal antibody targeting all ERβ variants (MC10) was developed and characterized. The sub-cellular localization of ERβ2-5 was determined via confocal microscopy. Finally, the MC10 antibody was used to assess ERβ positivity in breast tumors and was compared to that of another monoclonal antibody which only detects ERβ1. Results: Unlike ERβ1, ERβ2-5 do not activate an estrogen response element (ERE) in response to E2 and instead, slightly repress the activity of this reporter construct. Expression of ERβ2-5 does not significantly alter the transcriptional activity of ERβ1 following E2 treatment. However, ERβ2, 3 and 5, but not ERβ4, significantly enhance the E2-induced transcriptional activity of ERα. Interestingly, expression of ERβ3, 4 and 5, but not ERβ2, enhance the ability of anti-estrogens to block ERα mediated transcriptional activity. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERβ1 and 2 are almost exclusively localized to the cell nucleus. However, ERβ3-5 exhibit significant cytoplasmic and peri-nuclear localization. Immunohistochemistry of breast cancer biopsies using the MC10 antibody revealed multiple staining patterns including tumors which exhibit primarily nuclear staining and others primarily cytoplasmic, both in the presence and absence of ERα. These results are in contrast to the almost exclusive nuclear staining obtained on the same tumors with an ERβ1-specific antibody. Conclusions: ERβ variants exhibit variable sub-cellular localization patterns and can influence the function of ERα, both in response to E2 and anti-estrogens. Therefore, the differential expression of ERβ variants and their cellular localization may influence breast cancer progression and/or therapeutic responses. The use of ERβ antibodies which do not detect all ERβ variants, or the use of a single ERβ antibody which does not discriminate between ERβ1 and its variants, is unlikely to reveal the complete biological significance of total ERβ expression in breast cancer and may in part explain the conflicting studies which have been reported for ERβ in the field. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.

Abstract Background Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We have recently demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite with regard to inhibiting the growth of ERα+ breast cancer cells and these studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which first-in-human studies are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone. Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast (OB) and osteoclast (OC) maturation and gene expression were monitored by cell differentiation assays and real-time PCR. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) and micro-Computed Tomography (μCT) were used to determine changes in bone density, mass and architecture following 45 days of oral endoxifen administration (50mg/kg/day) to 3-month-old ovariectomized (OVX) C57BL/6 mice relative to vehicle control treated animals. Alterations in the numbers and activity of OBs and OCs were determined by histomorphometry and serum levels of P1NP and CTX-1 respectively. Results: Endoxifen treatment of mouse derived bone marrow stromal cells and human OBs led to significant increases in the expression of critical bone marker genes such as Runx2, osterix, osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin and alkaline phosphatase in a dose dependent manner. Daily administration of endoxifen to OVX mice led to significant increases in total body bone mineral density (BMD) (6%) and content (BMC) (9%), which was accompanied by a 50% decrease in fat tissue mass as determined by DXA. pQCT analysis of the tibial metaphysis revealed dramatic increases in BMD (35%) and BMC (20%), as well as trabecular density (52%), cortical content (62%), cortical area (60%) and cortical thickness (78%). μCT analysis of the femoral metaphysis revealed increases in bone volume/total volume (200%), trabecular number (38%) and trabecular thickness (18%), as well as decreased trabecular spacing (29%). Interestingly, there was nearly a 50% increase in the numbers of OCs derived from endoxifen treated mice which was associated with elevated expression of OC marker genes such as NFATcl, RANK, c-fms and cathepsin-K compared to control treated animals. Approximately 4 times as many OBs and OCs were observed on the bone surfaces of endoxifen treated mice which correlated with nearly 2-fold increases in serum levels of the bone formation (P1NP) and resorption (CTX-1) markers. Conclusions: These data are the first to demonstrate that endoxifen has anabolic effects on the mouse skeleton which are similar to that of estrogen. Additionally, these data reveal that endoxifen's mechanism of action in bone is different than that reported for tamoxifen and other selective estrogen receptor modulators in mice as it increases, rather than decreases, bone formation and remodeling. Therefore, the use of endoxifen for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer may avoid the detrimental skeletal effects of many conventional endocrine therapies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-16-09.

Abstract Background: A major issue surrounding the use of therapeutic drugs for the treatment of breast cancer is the eventual development of resistance. Endoxifen, the most potent tamoxifen metabolite, is being developed as a novel endocrine therapy for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer patients. While numerous studies have investigated the process of tamoxifen resistance, no such data exist regarding the mechanism by which cells develop resistance to endoxifen. Here, we describe the development and characterization of a novel endoxifen resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line and the identification of a specific treatment to effectively target these resistant cells. Methods: MCF7 cells were chronically exposed to concentrations of endoxifen previously demonstrated to be associated with the greatest reductions in estrogen stimulated proliferation and transcription (1000 nM). Changes in the physiological and molecular properties of these cells were monitored during the course of resistance using a wide range of techniques. Results: Following 15 months of endoxifen exposure, an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was induced in MCF7 cells, characterized by loss of E-cadherin expression, up-regulation of fibronectin and vimentin expression and increased responsiveness to TGFβ. Resistant cells exhibit a 7-fold increase in their proliferation rates relative to parental cells and display basal like properties (triple negative) due to silencing of ERα , progesterone receptor and CD24 expression. Resistant cells were confirmed to be estrogen insensitive through the use of cell proliferation and gene expression studies. Wound healing and cell migration assays revealed that resistant cells are highly aggressive with a significant level of metastatic potential. Microarray analysis revealed over 7500 genes to be differentially expressed in the resistant cell line relative to parental cells using a 2-fold cutoff, of which only 52 genes (0.7%) were determined to be up-regulated. Interestingly, a number of the most highly altered genes have previously been implicated in the development of EMT and/or resistance including Twist2, IGF binding protein 5, GATA and β-tubulin. Based on the identification of P-tubulin as the most up-regulated gene in resistant cells, 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) was recognized as a candidate drug to specifically target this resistant cell line due to it known roles in blocking tubulin polymerization. Indeed, 2ME2 exposure resulted in the induction of apoptosis and significant cell death in vitro. Conclusions: Chronic exposure of MCF7 cells to high concentrations of endoxifen led to induction of EMT with cells that are basal like, estrogen and SERM insensitive, highly TGFP responsive with significantly increased proliferation rates and metastatic potential relative to parental cells. These findings suggest that the mechanisms of resistance to endoxifen may differ from those observed with long term exposure to tamoxifen and have identified 2ME2 as a potentially successful alternative therapy for endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-11.

Abstract Background: NSABP P1 and P2 are the largest prevention trials of tamoxifen and raloxifene in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Both agents have been shown to decrease, but not eliminate breast cancer risk in these women. The goal of our study was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with development of breast cancer in high-risk women treated with tamoxifen or raloxifene. Methods: We performed a nested matched case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS) in subjects entered on the P2, which included only postmenopausal women, and subjects at least 50 years old entered on the P1 phase III prevention trials who were treated with tamoxifen or raloxifene. Cases were defined as subjects who developed invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and each was matched to two controls based on trial (P1, P2), age at trial entry, Gail risk score, history of lobular carcinoma in situ, and time on study. The study was restricted to the 94% of subjects self-identified as Caucasian. Genotyping was performed with the Illumina Human610-Quad chip. Eigenstrat analyses were performed to control for population stratification. SNPs were imputed within 200 Kb on either side of regions containing SNPs with p ≤ 3E-05. CYP2D6 genotyping was performed on all subjects. Results: The GWAS included 592 cases and 1171 controls. 547,356 SNPs were used in the analyses after removing 14,019 for call rates less than 98%, 30,560 for minor allele frequencies <1%, and 301 with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-value <1E-06. Eigenvectors did not alter the results when used as covariates. Eleven genotyped SNPs with p-values ranging from 2.12E-06 to 9.98E-06 (conditional logistic regression with eigenvector adjustment) were identified; and 22 SNPs with p < 4E-05 were identified by imputation around these SNPs on chromosomes (Chr) 4, 8, 9, 13, 16 and 22, which were then genotyped with the Invader platform. Following imputation and genotyping, initial functional genomic studies have focused on 8 SNPs on Chr 16 (p-values 1.81E-06 to 9.55E-06, with the lowest p-value for an imputed and fine mapped SNP), all of which were in ZNF423, a gene known to encode a protein that associates with SMAD family members. In lymphoblastoid cell lines genotyped for the 2 top SNPs in ZNF423 (rs8060157 and rs11076499) and stably transfected with estrogen receptor-α, the variant and wild type SNPs displayed striking differences in estradiol-induced expression of ZNF423, SMAD3, BRCA1, and BRCA2. Conclusions: This GWAS revealed SNPs associated with the development of breast cancer in high-risk women treated with tamoxifen or raloxifene. Genome-wide significance was not achieved, but SNPs in ZNF423 identified on Chr 16 were associated with differential expression of ZNF423, SMAD3, BRCA1, and BRCA2 in response to estradiol in vitro, providing direction for future research. (Supported in part by NIH grants U01GM61388, U01GM63173, P50CA116201, U10CA77202, U10CA37377, U10CA69974, U24CA114732, and the Biobank Japan Project funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-02.

Abstract Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a heterogenous group of proliferative cellular lesions that have the potential to become invasive. Very little is known about the molecular alterations involved in the progression from DCIS to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Heparan endosulfatases HSulf-1 and -2 catalyze or edit sulfate moieties on heparan sulfate proteoglycans and have been implicated in modulating heparin binding growth factor signaling. Several studies have suggested that while expression of HSulf-1 is down-regulated and is considered a tumor suppressor gene, expression of HSulf-2 is over-expressed in primary breast tumors and cell lines. However, the role of HSulf-2 in breast tumorigenesis is poorly understood. Here we have evaluated the effect of HSulf-2 in an in vivo model of breast cancer progression (MCF10DCIS.com). These cells form comedo type DCIS and progress to IDC when transplanted in immune-deficient mice and therefore are an ideal model to study breast cancer progression. Methods: Stable clones depleted of HSulf-2 in MCF10DCIS.com cells were generated and injected into mouse mammary fat pads with non-targeted control shRNA clones (NTC) as controls. HSulf-1, HSulf-2, smooth muscle actin immunostaining and H&E staining was perfromed at weeks 3, 5 and 7. Matrixmetallo Protease (MMP) expression by real time PCR was evaluated at Weeks 3 and 5 in both groups. Results: A significant reduction in tumor growth was observed in HSulf-2 depleted clones compared to NTC clones (p=<0.01). HSulf-2 immunohistochemical staining showed distinct pattern of staining localized to ductal lesions as well as stromal (myoepithelial and myofibroblasts cells). In contrast, the closely related family member, HSulf-1 expression was restricted largely to stromal and myoepithelial layer in ductal lesions. While HSulf-2 staining remained intense from weeks 3 to 7, HSulf-1 expression was diminished during the same time period. In NTC clones, ductal like lesions were observed by week 3 with disruption of the basement membrane and appearance of invasive phenotype by weeks 5 and 7. In contrast, HSulf2 knockdown xenografts showed retention of ductal like structures even at week 5 and retention of basement membrane (p=<0.05). Additionally marked necrotic areas were also observed in HSulf-2 silenced clones. Previous studies have shown that the malignant epithelium induces the development of the stroma necessary for the development of invasive phenotype. Consistent with this observation, we demonstrated decreased MMP expression in xenografts derived from HSulf-2 depleted clones compared with NTC xenografts (p=<0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that HSulf-2 may play an important role in the transition from DCIS to an invasive phenotype (IDC) potentially by up regulating MMP expression and activity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-12.

Abstract Background: The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively, and its protein expression is prognostic and a primary determinant of endocrine sensitivity; however, much less is known about the role of ERß. In vitro studies demonstrate a tumor suppressive function for ERß, and we have recently implicated a role for ERα in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen. However, the in vivo relevance of ERα remains unclear due to conflicting reports. Here, we provide evidence that some of this controversy may be explained by variability in antibody specificity. In addition, we describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody and provide data regarding ERα expression in human breast cancers. Methods: Five commercially available ERα antibodies were screened for their sensitivity and specificity using western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in known ERα negative and positive cell lines as well as in normal human tissue samples. A novel monoclonal ERα antibody (C10) was developed and characterized in the same manner. Following identification of two specific antibodies, ERα expression was assessed in 66 breast tumors collected prior to adjuvant therapy. Samples were scored separately for nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Results: In depth analysis of commercially available ERα antibodies reveled that the majority were non-specific with substantial cross-reactivity to ERα . Only one commercial antibody (PPG5/10), which solely recognizes full-length ERß, and our newly developed monoclonal antibody, which recognizes full-length and all 4 ERα variants, were determined to be sensitive and specific for ERα expression. These same two antibodies resulted in strong staining for endogenous levels of ERα protein in normal prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry. We further assessed these two antibodies in a set of breast tumors. Preliminary analysis revealed significant differences for ERα positivity between these two antibodies. Based on nuclear staining, 92% of tumors were ERα positive using the PPG5/10 antibody while only 34% were positive with C10. Approximately 50% of all tumors exhibited cytoplasmic staining with both antibodies. Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that the majority of commercially available ERα antibodies are either non-specific or insensitive for the detection of ERα via immunohistochemistry. The present data call into question the relevance of prior studies which tested the association between clinical outcome and ERα expression and demonstrate the need to further analyze the role of ERα in breast cancer using highly specific and validated antibodies. While both the PPG5/10 and C10 antibodies are highly specific for ERß, the significant discrepancy in nuclear staining between them in breast tumors may be due to changes in epitope availability as a result of post-translational processing. Our newly developed C10 antibody could provide additional discriminatory features which may be useful in predicting response to therapy and/or associations with other clinicopathological factors and such studies are currently underway. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-25.

Abstract Abstract #6037 Background: Tamoxifen (Tam) is biotransformed to the potent antiestrogen, endoxifen, by the CYP2D6 enzyme. We previously demonstrated that patients (pts) receiving adjuvant TAM with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism due to CYP2D6 (*4) and/or concurrent administration of a CYP2D6 inhibitor had a higher risk of recurrence. Other studies suggest CYP2C19*17 (Schroth JCO 2007) and SULT1A1*2 (Nowell JNCI 2002) may be associated with treatment outcome. With extended follow-up, we sought to evaluate the importance of comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping as well as the potential association between CYP2C19*17 and SULT1A1 copy number with clinical outcome in pts randomized to TAM in NCCTG 89-30-52.
 Methods: Using DNA derived from paraffin embedded sections, CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotype were determined using quantitative multiplex PCR and CYP2C19 by sequencing. Pts administered the following CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, cimetidine, amiodarone, doxepin, ticlopidine and haloperidol) were considered as intermediate (IM) or poor metabolizers (PM) based on the potency of CYP2D6 inhibition. CYP2D6 phenotype was defined as follows: extensive metabolizers (EM) were pts not administered an inhibitor who did not carry a null allele (*3, *4, *6) and who were not homozygous for an IM allele (*10, *17, *41). CYP2D6 IM were either heterozygous for a null allele or homozygous for an IM allele but not administered an inhibitor or CYP2D6 EM administered a weak inhibitor. PM were pts homozygous for a null allele, or any patient administered a potent inhibitor. The association between genotype or CYP2D6 phenotype and clinical outcome was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox modeling was performed using traditional prognostic factors.
 Results: The median follow-up of living pts is now 14.5 years. Of 256 pts. randomized to TAM, genotype was determined for CYP2D6 (n=210), CYP2C19*17 (n=170), and SULT1A1 (n=169) with the following allele frequencies: CYP2D6 *3 (.02), *4(.20), *6 (.01), *10 (.03), *17 (.00), *41(.08), and CYP2C19*17 (.22). The frequency of SULT1A1 copy number alleles (CNA) was 1 (4%), 2 (67%), 3 (20%), and 4+ (9%). 14/227 patients (6%) were administered an inhibitor. A multivariate analysis accounting for nodal status and tumor size demonstrated that compared to CYP2D6 EM, CYP2D6 PM had significantly shorter time to recurrence (TTR) (HR 4.0, p=0.001) and DFS (HR 2.0, p=0.02) and CYP2D6 IM tended to have shorter TTR (HR 1.8, p=0.08) and DFS (HR 1.4, p=0.10). DFS did not differ by SULT1A1 copy number (p=0.62) or CYP2C19 *17 (p=0.47)
 Conclusion: Long term follow-up of pts in NCCTG 89-30-52 confirms the importance of CYP2D6 metabolism and further demonstrates the importance of comprehensive genotyping and phenotyping with CYP2D6 inhibitors. We could not identify an association between CYP2C19*17 or SULT1A1 copy number with recurrence but further evaluation is needed in larger cohorts. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6037.

Abstract Abstract #19 Background: Tamoxifen (TAM) is a standard endocrine therapy for the treatment of women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. TAM is activated by the cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme system into two potent and active metabolites, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4HT) and 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (endoxifen). While human concentrations of 4HT are negligible and vary little in plasma (5-10 nM), endoxifen concentrations vary widely (10-180 nm), and women with genetically impaired CYP2D6 metabolism have significantly reduced endoxifen levels and a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence. Despite these observations, endoxifen's contribution to tamoxifen's overall drug effectiveness is uncertain.
 Methods: Using cells endogenously expressing ERa (MCF7, T47D) and cells stably transfected with ERa (Hs578T and U2OS), we examined the relative effects of TAM and its primary metabolites on ERa protein levels by western blotting, ERa transcriptional activity by luciferase reporter assays and real-time RT-PCR, and on ER positive breast cancer cell growth through the use of proliferation assays.
 Results: We have discovered that endoxifen induces ERa protein turnover through proteasomal degradation similar to that of ICI in a concentration and time-dependent manner. These findings are in stark contrast to TAM, N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (NDT) and 4HT, which stabilize the ER. Optimal degradation occurs only at endoxifen concentrations observed in human CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (> 40 nM) and persists even in the presence of TAM (300 nM), 4HT (7 nM), and NDT (700 nM) at concentrations observed in patients receiving tamoxifen therapy. In contrast, reducing endoxifen concentrations to those observed in a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer (20 nM), without altering TAM, 4HT, and NDT, results in ER stabilization. High endoxifen concentrations (100-1000 nM) completely block estrogen (E2)-induced ER transcriptional activity even in the presence of TAM, 4HT, and NDT, while low endoxifen concentrations (20-40 nM) do not. Further, low concentrations of endoxifen (20 nM) do not significantly alter E2-induced cell proliferation; however, high concentrations of endoxifen (100-1000 nM) completely block this process. Discussion: Our data demonstrate that endoxifen is a potent anti-estrogen that targets ERa for proteasomal degradation, blocks ERa transcriptional activity and inhibits E2-induced breast cancer cell proliferation. Importantly, these effects of endoxifen are observed at concentrations found in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers and are maintained even in the presence of TAM, 4HT and NDT. These studies suggest that endoxifen may be the primary metabolite responsible for tamoxifen's effectiveness in the treatment of ER positive breast cancer and provide the impetus to evaluate whether TAM-related side-effects, such as thrombo-embolism and endometrial hyperplasia/carcinoma, are inversely associated with a patient's ability to metabolically activate tamoxifen. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 19.