Goetz, MP

Abstract Background: During tumor progression, activation of Aurora A kinase (AURKA) is associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) reprogramming and expansion of a subpopulation of tumor initiating cells harboring a CD44+/CD24low/- phenotype [D'Assoro, Oncogene 2014]. These cells are characterized by their capacity to self-renew, resist drug therapies, and promote distant metastases. In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, activation of AURKA is associated with down-regulation of ERα expression and resistance to endocrine therapy. Alisertib, a selective inhibitor of AURKA, can reverse EMT and restore tumor ERα expression and sensitivity to endocrine therapy [Opyrchal, PLoS One 2014]. As a single agent in HR+ advanced BC, alisertib was associated with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 54% and median PFS of 7.9 months [Melichar, Lancet Oncol 2015]. The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and clinical activity of alisertib with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with HR+ advanced BC. Methods: In this standard 3+3 dose-escalation phase I study, pts were assigned to two different oral doses of alisertib (40-50 mg BID on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28-day cycle) in combination with standard dose fulvestrant (500 mg IM on day 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then day 1 q 28-day cycle thereafter). Eligibility included HR+ advanced BC, postmenopausal status, measurable disease or nonmeasurable bone disease by RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, unlimited prior endocrine therapies, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. Results: Ten pts enrolled September 2014 - April 2015, and 9 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (one excluded due to ineligibility). The median pt age was 59 (range 48, 73). Prior endocrine therapies included AI (9, 100%), fulvestrant (6, 67%), and everolimus/exemestane (5, 56%). Eight pts (89%) had prior chemotherapy. A median of 4 cycles of therapy have been administered (range 1+, 9+). There were no severe (grade 3+) toxicities reported during cycle 1 at either dose level, thus the MTD was not reached. The cycle 1 grade 1/2 adverse events regardless of attribution were fatigue (6, 67%), neutropenia (5, 56%), anemia (5, 56%), leukopenia (4, 44%), diarrhea (3, 33%), nausea (3, 33%), and mucositis (1, 11%). As of June 3, 2015, 2 pts have discontinued treatment due to disease progression, and 7 remain on treatment with stable disease (Table). One pt with bone only disease had a near CR on PET scan. Dose LevelAlisertib Dose (BID)Treatment Cycles≥ Grade 3 Toxicity, All CyclesProgression-Free Survival (days)1 (n=3)40 mg4, 7+, 9+ 117, 170+, 223+2 (n=6)50 mg1+, 2, 3+, 3+, 4+, 5+grade 4 neutropenia (1 pt)28+, 56, 56+, 57+, 112+, 116++ indicates patients still receiving treatment Conclusion: Alisertib in combination with fulvestrant was well-tolerated. The recommended phase II dose is 50 mg twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 q 28-day cycle with standard dose fulvestrant. Promising antitumor activity was observed. Correlative tissue evaluation of AURKA expression and other EMT biomarkers is underway. Funding: This work was funded by Takeda Oncology and supported by NIH Grant K12 CA90628 [TCH]. Citation Format: Haddad TC, D'Assoro AB, Suman VJ, Opyrchal M, Goetz MP, Ingle JN. A phase I trial to evaluate the safety of the addition of alisertib to fulvestrant in hormone receptor positive (HR+), advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-04.

Abstract Background Activating mutations in PIK3CA occur in approximately 40% ER+BC. MK-2206 (M), a pan-AKT inhibitor, induced apoptosis of ER+ BC under estrogen deprivation in preclinical studies. We conducted this neoadjuvant trial to determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of M plus anastrozole (A) for PIK3CA mutant (Mut) ER+ BC. Methods This single arm open label study of M+A used a 2-stage Simon phase II design (stage 1, n=16; stage 2, n=13, alpha=0.10, power=0.90) to test whether pCR rate <1% (based on historical data with A alone), against the alternative that pCR rate ≥15% in PIK3CA Mut ER+ BC. At least 1 pCR in stage 1 was required to proceed to stage 2. Eligible patients (pts) with clinical stage II or III ER+HER2- BC were pre-registered and proceeded to a research tumor biopsy for PIK3CA sequencing, followed by treatment with daily A monotherapy for 28 days (cycle 0). Pts with PIK3CA Mut BC were subsequently registered, underwent a second biopsy, and started M (150mg PO weekly) with daily A on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) for a maximum of four 28-day cycles followed by surgery. Goserelin was added for premenopausal pts. A tumor biopsy on C1D17, 17 days post the start of M, was performed. Those with C1D17 Ki67 >10% discontinued study treatment. pCR was defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and the lymph nodes. Tumor specimens collected at all timepoints are being analyzed for markers of proliferation, apoptosis, and PI3K pathway activity, gene expression microarray, intrinsic subtypes, and next generation sequencing of 83 genes. Results Of the 51 pts pre-registered, 35 pts did not register due to no PIK3CA mutation (n=22), inadequate specimen for testing (n=6), physician/pt decision (n=7). The remaining 16 pts (median age: 58, range: 40-77 years) received combination therapy. Three pts did not complete 4 cycles due to C1D17 Ki67 >10% (n=2) and intolerability (grade (Gr) 4 transaminase elevation in C1, n=1). Other severe toxicities possibly related to M included Gr 3 rash (25%) and pruritus (12.5%). Of the 13 pts completed study therapy and underwent surgery, all had residual disease in the breast and 7 also had positive nodes. Table 1 summarized changes in Ki67 during treatment. ComparisonsnAbsolute changes in Ki67 median (range)Wilcoxon signed rank p-valueC1D1 relative to pre-registration11-17.0% (-49.8 to 4.1%)0.0020C1D17 relative to pre-registration14-16.4% (-51.4 to 4.1%)0.0004C1D17 relative to C1D112-1.5% (-18.6 to 15.8%)0.9697C1D1, biopsy post 28 days of A alone; C1D17 biopsy post 17 days on combination therapy Although Ki67 levels post A monotherapy (C1D1) or M+A (C1D17) were significantly lower than that of pre-registration samples, Ki67 did not differ between C1D17 and C1D1 samples. Other correlative studies are ongoing and results will be presented. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, biomarker analysis on serial biopsy specimens demonstrated that M+A is unlikely to be more effective than A alone in PIK3CA Mut ER+ BC. This trial demonstrated the feasibility of genomic sequencing for pt selection and the value of a small, well-designed proof-of-principle neoadjuvant trial for the evaluation of targeted agents. Citation Format: Ma CX, Suman VJ, Goetz M, Northfelt D, Burkard M, Ademuyiwa F, Naughton M, Margenthaler J, Aft R, Gray R, Tavaarwerk A, Wilke L, Haddad T, Moynihan T, Loprinzi C, Hieken T, Hoog J, Guo Z, Han J, Vij K, Mardis E, Sanati S, Al-Kateb H, Doyle L, Erlichman C, Ellis MJ. A phase II neoadjuvant trial of MK-2206, an AKT inhibitor, in combination with anastrozole for clinical stage 2 or 3 PIK3CA mutant estrogen receptor positive HER2 negative (ER+HER2-) breast cancer (BC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-04.

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 20% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Clinical management of TNBC is limited to surgery, chemotherapy and radiation due to lack of estrogen receptor alpha and HER2 expression. Recently, we have shown that approximately 40% of TNBCs express estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) and have begun to explore the possibility that this receptor could be utilized as a novel therapeutic target for this disease. Methods: To examine the biological functions of ERβ in TNBC, novel ERβ expressing TN cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were developed. In vitro experiments were employed to determine alterations in the global gene expression profiles, biological pathways, proliferation rates, and cell cycle progression following estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Cell line xenografts were also established in athymic ovariectomized nude mice to examine tumoral responses to ERβ targeting agents and to investigate gene and protein expression patterns as well as potential serum biomarkers indicative of therapeutic response. Additionally, using the resources of the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY), we have identified, and begun to analyze, ERβ+ and ERβ- patient derived xenografts (PDX) established from women with TNBC. Results: Our studies have revealed that both estrogen and multiple ERβ-specific agonists elicit significant anti-proliferative effects in ERβ+ TNBC cells primarily through a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest. These anti-proliferative effects appear to be mediated by cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which are highly induced following estrogen and ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treated cells decreased the proliferation rates of multiple non-ERβ expressing cell lines; effects that were completely reversed when cystatins were depleted from the media. In addition, we have shown that activation of ERβ, and the subsequent induction of cystatin gene expression, leads to suppression of canonical TGFβ signaling through multiple mechanisms including suppression of TGFβR2 expression, induction of Smad7 expression and blockade of TGFβ ligand-mediated activation of this pathway both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, ERβ+ TNBC PDXs exhibit significantly decreased tumor growth rates in estrogen-treated mice compared to ERβ- TN breast tumors. Conclusions: Our in vitro and in vivo data show that estrogen and ERβ-specific agonists elicit anti-cancer effects in ERβ+ TNBC. These effects appear to be mediated, in part, by cystatins through their inhibitory effects on canonical TGFB signaling, a pathway known to drive TNBC progression. Importantly, these data lay the foundation for studies aimed at examining the ability to therapeutically target ERβ in TNBC patients. Citation Format: Reese J, Bruinsma E, Subramaniam M, Suman V, Pitel K, Kalari K, Yu J, Wang L, Goetz M, Ingle J, Hawse J. ERβ elicits tumor suppressive effects in triple negative breast cancer through the induction of cystatins and suppression of TGFβ signaling. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-01.

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib, a small molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, induces G1 cell cycle arrest in Rb-proficient human cancers.1 The clinical safety profile of abemaciclib enables continuous oral dosing to achieve sustained target inhibition, resulting in single-agent antitumor activity against multiple human cancers. The drug also reaches relevant concentrations in the central nervous system and, in patients taking the drug orally, can be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid.2 For women with previously treated hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), abemaciclib as a single agent achieved a six-month clinical benefit rate of 61.1% and an objective response rate of 33.3%.3 Clinical trials investigating abemaciclib combined with fulvestrant4 or aromatase inhibitors5 have led to randomized Phase 3 studies for women with HR+ breast cancer.6,7 Methods: This Phase 1b study (NCT02057133) with multiple cohorts evaluates safety and tolerability of abemaciclib combined with endocrine or HER2-targeted therapies for MBC. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of abemaciclib when given in combination with other therapies. Cohorts were opened to enrollment sequentially. Patients with HR+ HER2 negative MBC received abemaciclib orally every 12 hours (Q12H) in combination with the following standard therapies daily until progression: letrozole (Part A), anastrozole (Part B), tamoxifen (Part C), exemestane (Part D), or exemestane plus everolimus (Part E). Patients with HER2 positive MBC received abemaciclib orally Q12H in combination with trastuzumab every 21 days until progression (Part F). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.0 and tumor response was assessed radiographically using RECIST v1.1. Results: Abemaciclib has been combined with multiple targeted therapies for the treatment of women with MBC. We previously reported safety and early efficacy results for the combinations of abemaciclib with letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, and exemestane plus everolimus.5 Due to limited follow-up at that time, the efficacy results were not mature. Safety, PK, and efficacy results with approximately 6 months of additional follow-up will be reported across all parts of the study. The most common treatment-emergent AEs include effects on the gastrointestinal and hematopoietic systems. Consistent with previously reported results for both single-agent abemaciclib and the combination of abemaciclib with fulvestrant, tumor responses have been observed among women receiving abemaciclib in combination with targeted therapies for MBC. Conclusions: This study for women with MBC demonstrates the potential for abemaciclib to be combined with therapies targeting specific signaling pathways. References: 1Gelbert et al. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(5):825-37. 2Shapiro et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2500). 3Tolaney et al. SABCS 2014: Abstract 763. 4Patnaik et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 534). 5Tolaney et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 522). 6Llombart et al. SABCS 2014: OT1-1-07 (MONARCH 2, NCT02107703). 7Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr TPS624) (MONARCH 3, NCT02246621). Citation Format: Goetz MP, Beeram M, Beck T, Conlin AK, Dees EC, Dickler MN, Helsten TL, Conkling PR, Edenfield WJ, Richards DA, Turner PK, Cai N, Chan EM, Pant S, Becerra CH, Kalinsky K, Puhalla SL, Rexer BN, Burris HA, Tolaney SM. Abemaciclib, an inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, combined with endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies for women with metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-25.

Abstract Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have prognostic and potentially predictive significance in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer. However, quantitative TIL measurement is not routinely performed. It is unclear why some tumors attract large quantities of TIL while others do not. We sought to confirm the association between TIL and pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and to further use next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify genes and gene pathways associated with the presence/absence of TIL. Methods: We studied 140 women with high risk stage I-III breast cancer, enrolled in the Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY), obtaining serial biopsies for DNA/RNA sequencing and MRI imaging to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with taxane (+/- trastuzumab+/-pertuzumab for HER2+ disease) followed by AC or (F)EC. Diagnostic pre-NAC core needle biopsies and surgical resection specimens post-NAC were available from 110 patients. Stromal TIL were semi-quantitated on a scale of 1-4 (with 1: ≤10/hpf, 2: subtle infiltrate >10/hpf, 3: moderate infiltrate readily visible at low power magnification, 4: dense infiltrate with innumerable lymphocytes). For this analysis, low TIL was defined as scores of 1-2 vs. high defined as 3-4. Using pre-NAC biopsies, RNAseq was performed using the Illumina HiSeq2000 and the Mayo Analysis Pipeline for RNAseq (MAP-Rseq) for quality control, sequence alignment, and gene counts. The quantity of TIL was associated with transcripts across the transcriptome after conditional quantile normalization. Differentially expressed genes were obtained using EdgeR analysis, using a false discovery rate of 0.05, and pathways were evaluated using GAGE methods. Results: The pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/I rates by stromal TIL status within each molecular subtype are presented in the table. A diverse spectrum of 1344 genes with differential expression between tumors with high vs. low stromal TIL was identified. The genes with >2.0-fold change (FC) and p<1e-09 included S100A7 (4.49 FC), LCN2 (2.48 FC), and ART3 (2.82 FC) (genes known to be involved in immune regulation), as well as TDRD1 (2.71 FC) (a gene related to ERG [ETS-related gene] expression). In addition, the "regulation of actin cytoskeleton" pathway was upregulated in tumors with high TIL, while the "Hedgehog signaling" and "Wnt signaling" pathways were downregulated. Molecular SubtypeStromal TILspCR rate n (%)RCB-0/I rateLuminal AHigh------Luminal ALow0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)Luminal BHigh1/9 (11.1%)1/8 (12.5%)Luminal BLow3/24 (12.5%)6/23 (26.1%)ER+/HER2+High3/9 (33.3%)4/9 (44.4%)ER+/HER2+Low1/6 (16.7%)1/6 (16.7%)ER-/HER2+High8/9 (88.9%)7/7 (100%)ER-/HER2+Low4/8 (50.0%)6/8 (75.0%)Triple NegativeHigh10/19 (52.6%)13/19 (68.4%)Triple NegativeLow7/14 (50.0%)9/13 (69.2%) Conclusions: We identified genes and gene pathways associated with high TIL expression in breast tumors prior to NAC that provide insight into the interactions between TIL and tumors. TIL can be easily semi-quantitated on H&E and along with these novel biomarkers, may contribute to the personalization of breast cancer therapy. Citation Format: Moyer AM, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, McLaughlin SA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Sinnwell JP, Carlson EE, Dockter TJ, Jones KN, Felten SJ, Conners AL, Wieben ED, Ingle JN, Wang L, Weinshilboum RM, Visscher DW, Goetz MP. Differential mRNA expression patterns in breast tumors with high vs. low quantity of stromal tumor–Infiltrating lymphocytes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-05.

Abstract Background: Abnormalities of the PI3kinase/AKT/mTOR signaling network are common in BC. This pathway is associated with resistance to endocrine therapies among HR+ tumors. Everolimus, an mTOR-inhibitor, increases the biological activity of endocrine therapy. S1207 evaluates the role of everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting. Methods: Specific aims/ design: Randomized phase III double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Primary objective is to assess whether the addition of everolimus to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy improves invasive disease-free survival (DFS) among patients with high risk, HR+ BC. Secondary objectives include overall survival, distant recurrence-free survival, safety, adherence and QoL. Patients are randomized to receive standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in combination with one year of everolimus (10 mg PO daily) or placebo. Submission of tissue specimens/blood samples is required for translational studies Eligibility criteria: Patients with histologically confirmed HER2-negative and HR+ invasive BC treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (if indicated) are eligible if they have: node-negative disease and tumors >2cm and a recurrence score (RS) >25; 1-3 positive nodes and RS >25 or grade 3 in the absence of RS; >4 positive lymph nodes regardless of RS. Patients >1 positive lymph node after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy are eligible. Statistics/Target accrual:Parallel randomization design with equal allocation to the two treatment groups, the study will randomize 3,500 patients. All analyses are intent-to-treat with the primary analysis conducted 3 years after the last patient is randomized. The study has 90% power (with 2-sided α=0.05) to detect an effective hazard ratio of 0.75 for everolimus versus placebo, corresponding to a gain in DFS of approximately 4.3% at 5 years. All patients will be followed for 10 years. Support: NIH/NCI NCTN Grants CA180888, 180819, 180868, 180821,180822 189867, and in part by Novartis Clinical trial information: NCT01674140. Citation Format: Chavez-MacGregor M, Barlow WE, Pusztai L, Goetz MP, Rastogi P, Ganz PA, Mamounas EP, Paik S, Bandos H, Gralow J, Lew DL, Hortobagyi GN. Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy +/- one year of everolimus in patients with high-risk, hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): SWOG/NRG/Alliance S1207 (NCT01674140). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-11.

Abstract Background: CYP2D6 is the rate limiting enzyme responsible for the metabolic activation of tamoxifen (tam) to endoxifen. Compared to CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM), tam-treated CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) have higher endoxifen concentrations, more vasomotor symptoms (Goetz, MP J Clin Oncol 2005), and are more likely to discontinue tam (Rae, JM 2009. Pharmacogenomics J). Additionally, higher endoxifen concentrations are associated with a stepwise increase in tam side-effects (Lorizio, W Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012). The data regarding CYP2D6 genotype and recurrence is mixed. Venlafaxine is a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor not known to alter tam pharmacokinetics (PK) and commonly recommended for tam induced hot flashes. We conducted a multicenter pharmacological study to determine whether venlafaxine altered the PK of tam and to determine the distribution of CYP2D6 genotypes in this population Methods: Women taking tam for at least 4 weeks and for whom venlafaxine was recommended for the treatment of hot flashes were eligible. Blood samples were collected prior to and 8–16 weeks following initiation of venlafaxine for steady state tam and metabolites. Genotyping was performed for alleles associated with no (PM; *3, *4, *5,*6); reduced (intermediate, IM; *10, 17 and *41); and ultra-rapid (UM; *1×2) metabolism. Power calculations demonstrated that 17 patients with paired samples were required (two-sided alpha=0.05 t-test, 90% power) to detect a 25% change in endoxifen levels after at least 8 weeks of concurrent treatment. Results: 30 women (median age 48.5) initiated venlafaxine. CYP2D6 genotypes were within Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE). CYP2D6 UM allele frequency (6.7%) was higher while CYP2D6 *4 (13.3%) was lower than expected compared to an unselected population (0.5 and 21% respectively; Sachse Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997), resulting in the absence of CYP2D6 PM/PM. Mean (min/max) baseline endoxifen concentrations (8.73; 1.5–20.5 ng/ml) were correlated with CYP2D6 phenotype as follows: intermediate (EM/PM, PM/IM): 6.8 (1.5–11.2); extensive (EM/EM, EM/IM): 9.4 (1.5–20.5) and ultra-rapid (UM/EM: 11.0; 7.8–14) (r2 = 0.35 p = 0.05). In patients with paired samples (n = 20), venlafaxine resulted in a 23% decrease in endoxifen (−2.06 ng/ml; 95% CI −0.69 to −3.04; p = 0.004), but not tam, NDMT, or 4HT concentrations. Following initiation of venlafaxine, CYP2D6 genotype was no longer associated with endoxifen concentrations (r2 = 0.28 p = 0.23). For women with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism [EM/PM (n = 9) or PM/IM (n = 1)], venlafaxine lowered endoxifen concentrations (−2.98 ng/ml) to a level (5.41 ng/ml) reported to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence in adjuvant tam treated patients (Madlensky, L Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011). Conclusions: In this study, women with tam-induced vasomotor symptoms requiring venlafaxine were comprised predominantly of CYP2D6 EM and UM metabolizers. Venlafaxine significantly decreased endoxifen concentrations. Although the optimal concentration of endoxifen is unknown, given prior data linking low endoxifen concentrations with recurrence, venlafaxine should be used with caution in tam treated patients. (Supported by R01CA133049) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-08.

Abstract Background: In AI refractory MBC, TAM anti-tumor activity is limited (median PFS 4.5 months). In patients (pts) receiving TAM in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, breast cancer recurrence has been shown to differ based upon CYP2D6 genotype and Endx exposure. In collaboration with NCI, Z-Endx (NSC #750393) was synthesized and preclinical pharmacology studies demonstrated that oral Z- Endx resulted in > 20 fold Endx exposure compared to an equivalent dose of TAM and significantly greater anti-tumor activity than TAM in AI sensitive and resistant MCF7 xenografts. We conducted a phase I study of Z-Endx in women with ER+, AI refractory MBC to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and a dose associated with steady state concentrations (Css) of ≥ 2 uM, based on the IC50 of recently identified Endx substrates: PKC and PI3K. Methods: Pts were enrolled to an accelerated titration schedule (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, and then to a 3+3 design. Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, end of cycle 2, and after 6 cycles. PK was performed on days 1-2, 3, 7, 14, and 28, and prior to subsequent cycles. Results: 23 women with AI refractory MBC (median 56 yrs, range 41-83) received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (Table 1). The median number of prior chemotherapies and hormonal therapies in the metastatic setting were 2 and 2, respectively. Dose escalation continues at 160 mg/day and the MTD has yet to be determined. Cmax and AUC increased in a dose-dependent manner. A 20 and 100 mg/day dose yields Css of 0.39 and 2.48 uM, respectively. Significant anti-tumor activity was observed including 1 pt (100 mg/day) with a PR lasting 225 days; 1 pt (80 mg/day) with a 30% reduction in tumor size (PFS 169 days) and 2 pts (60 and 80 mg/day) with stable disease for >270 days. No eye toxicity was observed. Conclusions: In women with AI refractory MBC, the MTD of Z-Endx HCl has not been determined but Endx Css concentrations of > 2 uM and substantial anti-tumor activity has been observed. Following completion of the 160 mg/day dose, expansion at 20 and 100 mg/day will commence to perform translational studies and further characterize Endx pk. A randomized phase II examining two different doses of Z-Endx is planned in AI refractory MBC. Supported in part by CA 133049, CA69912, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083. Table 1Dose Level (mg/day)Number of Treatment CyclesModerate or Severe Toxicities ReportedTumor ResponseProgression-free Survival (days)28 day Z-Endx Css (uM) 20 (n = 2)2; 3Gr 2 hot flashes (1 pt)----60; 850.39 40 (n = 2)2; 6noneStable (1 pt)61; 1670.66 60 (n = 6)1; 2; 2; 5; 8; 14Gr 4 Triglycerides (1 pt);Gr 3 thromboembolic event (1 pt); Gr 2 hot flashes, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia (1 pt)Stable (3 pts)125+; 56; 57; 132; 232; 4331.01 80 (n = 3)4; 6; 10Gr 2 hot flashesStable (3 pts)113; 169; 2961.61 100 (n = 3)1; 2; 8Gr 2 nausea (1 pt); Gr 2 irritability (1 pt)PR (1 pt)30; 56; 2252.48 120 (n = 3)1; 2; 4Gr 2 hypersomnia, paresthesia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (1 pt)—39; 54; 1082.18 * Bold face toxicities occurred during cycle 1 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD3-4.

Abstract Background: Endoxifen (Endx) is being developed as a drug for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer (BC). We previously demonstrated that Endx was superior to TAM in both a letrozole (L) sensitive and resistant MCF7/AC1 model. Tamoxifen (TAM) and its most commonly studied metabolite, 4-hydroxy TAM (4HT), are known to activate critical ER co-regulators such as SRC3, which are oncogenic, and contribute to acquired and de novo endocrine resistance. While both Endx and 4HT are more potent inhibitors of genomic ERα functions compared to TAM, the effects of Endx on non-genomic signaling have not been characterized and its efficacy as an anti-cancer agent compared to RAD001 in AI resistant BC is unknown. Methods: We evaluated the 1 hour in vitro effects of TAM, 4HT, Endx, and L, in terms of activation of multiple signaling cascades using an MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells and long term estrogen deprived (LTED) cells (MDA 361 and ZR75). Protein Docking studies (shape screening, pharmacophore modeling and ligand-protein docking) for oncogenic kinases, and their associated IC50's were determined for TAM and Endx. The in vivo activity of Endx (50 mg/kg, oral) was determined in MCF/AC1 L-resistant xenograft tumors and compared with L control (10 ug/day, sc), Exemestane (E) (250 ug/d, sc) and E+RAD001 (2.5 mg/kg/d, oral). Results: In MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, 1 hr treatment with either TAM (100 nM or 5 uM) or 4HT (100 nM or 5 uM) phosphorylated SRC3 (AIB1) and resulted in downstream activation (phosphorylation) of IGF1R, PDK1, AKT, and p70S6K. In contrast, Endx (100 nM and 5 uM) did not phosphorylate SRC3 nor any downstream kinases but resulted in a dose dependent decrease in AKT phosphorylation. Similar findings were observed in LTED cells MDA 361 and ZR75. Docking studies identified a significant decrease in the binding energy (>2 kcal/mol) of Endx compared to TAM for PKC and PI3K and subsequent kinase profiling demonstrated that Endx more potently inhibits PKCβ1 (IC50 357nM) and PI3KΔ (2.5uM) compared to TAM (IC50 4.8μM and 6.2μM respectively). Therefore, we evaluated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of Endx with E and E+RAD001 in MCF7 L-resistant xenograft tumors. After 9 weeks, the% change in tumor volume relative to baseline was significantly lower for both Endx (median -34%, p = 0.0002) and E+RAD001 (median +1.5%, p = 0.0002) as compared to L controls (median +301%). In contrast, E alone was non-significantly lower (median +172%, (p = 0.09). No significant differences were observed comparing Endx and E+RAD001 (p = 0.56). Conclusions: Endx inhibits PKCβ1 and PI3KΔ at concentrations that are pharmacologically relevant, and unlike TAM and 4HT, does not activate SRC3 nor induce oncogenic signaling pathways in AI resistant cells. Importantly, Endx elicits substantial anti-tumor effects in AI resistant models that are similar to the current standard of care of E+RAD001. These data suggest that Endx may be superior to TAM for the treatment of ER+ BC and may result in clinical benefit for patients with AI resistant disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-09-08.

Abstract Background: Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We and others have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-cancer effects of this drug and that endoxifen concentrations are an important factor with regard to tamoxifen efficacy. These studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which phase I clinical trials are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone. Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast gene expression profiles were compared to that of estrogen, tamoxifen, raloxifene and lasofoxifene by microarray and RT-PCR analyses in both estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and ERβ expressing cell lines. The in vivo effects of an anti-cancer dose of endoxifen (50mg/kg/day) on the skeleton were first analyzed in 3-month-old ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography, micro-Computed Tomography and histomorphometry. In a second set of studies, a pre-clinical rat model was used to determine the effects of endoxifen (10mg/kg/day) on the skeleton in both a pre- and post-menopausal setting. Results: Endoxifen treatment of ERα and ERβ expressing mouse osteoblast cells led to dramatically different gene expression profiles when compared to that of estrogen and other anti-estrogens. In ovariectomized mice, daily administration of endoxifen led to significant increases in bone mineral density and content throughout the skeleton relative to vehicle control treated animals. The numbers and activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts were also found to be significantly higher in endoxifen treated mice. In the pre-clinical model system, endoxifen treatment of 4 month-old ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats significantly protected against bone loss following estrogen depletion primarily due to suppression of osteoclast mediated bone resorption. Importantly, in sham operated rats (thus retaining ovarian function), endoxifen treatment enhanced bone volume and trabecular thickness and did not suppress osteoclast activity. Conclusions: These data are the first to examine the effects of the novel breast cancer therapy, endoxifen, on bone and reveal that the molecular mechanisms of action of this compound are substantially different than that of other SERMs. Endoxifen was shown to protect against bone loss following estrogen depletion in both mice and rats and interestingly, enhanced bone mass in ovary intact rats, an observation that is in stark contrast to the known effects of tamoxifen which induces bone loss in the “pre-menopausal” setting. These studies suggest that endoxifen may have superior bone-beneficial effects compared to tamoxifen, and if efficacy is confirmed in later phase trials, endoxifen may represent a better drug of choice for a sub-set of breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-05-01.