Brown, Paul D.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used as a primary treatment modality for intracranial meningiomas. We aim to describe clinical outcomes after single-fraction SRS for sporadic intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with sporadic meningiomas who underwent SRS (Gamma Knife) as primary treatment modality from April 1997 to February 2022. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Six hundred sixteen patients (653 tumors) underwent SRS with median follow-up of 6.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.1-10.5 years). The median tumor volume was 4.5 cm 3 (IQR 2.0-8.0 cm 3 ). The median margin dose was 15.0 Gy (IQR 14.0-16.0). In-field progression was noted in 7 tumors (1.1%) and marginal progression in 2 tumors (0.3%) for a raw failure rate of 1.4%. PFS estimates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 99.8%, 99.0%, and 93.2%, respectively. Factors associated with reduced PFS on univariable analysis included older age (hazards ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% CI, 1.05-1.22, P < .001), male sex (HR 5.44, 95% CI, 1.45-20.4, P = .010), increasing tumor volume (HR 1.06, 95% CI, 0.99-1.13, P = .028), and lower tumor margin dose (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.43-0.97, P = .006). Treatment-related complications were noted in 56 patients (9.1%), of which 45 (7.3%) were temporary, 5 (0.8%) were minor, and 6 (1.0%) were permanent and/or required intervention. Radiosurgical parameters associated with treatment-related complications included increased number of isocenters (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.14, P < .001), higher 12-Gy volume (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.03-1.09, P < .001), larger tumor volume (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.02-1.10, P < .001), and lower maximal dose (OR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.82-0.98, P = .11). CONCLUSION: SRS is effective as a primary treatment modality for sporadic, small-volume to medium-volume intracranial meningiomas. Pre-emptive SRS should be discussed as a safe management strategy compared with observation alone for incidentally discovered meningiomas.

TPS2092 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. GBM is universally recurrent and associated with dismal outcomes. Re-irradiation (reRT) is ideal for evaluating combination therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM) due to its multifactorial mechanism of action, including downstream immunomodulatory activity. RT (especially multi-fraction) increases immunogenicity in preclinical models by promoting immune activation, immune migration, and antigen uptake. Additionally, a recent study demonstrated enhanced PD-L1 expression in the glioma tumor microenvironment (TME) following RT, and combining stereotactic RT with a PD-1 inhibitor improved survival in murine models. Retifanlimab is a humanized monoclonal anti-PD1 IgG4 antibody that received FDA approval for adults with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is a treatment for radiation necrosis/cerebral edema with less immune suppression than corticosteroids. In a previous Phase 2 study, hypofractionated RT (HFRT), retifanlimab, and bevacizumab was associated with a 9-month overall survival (OS) rate of 71.4%. To demonstrate the efficacy of this regimen compared to HFRT and bevacizumab, we have designed a new randomized controlled Phase 2 trial. We hypothesize that combination reRT with retifanlimab will produce a more robust anti-tumor immune response and improve OS compared to reRT without retifanlimab. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled Phase 2 study of retifanlimab, bevacizumab, and HFRT for adult patients with rGBM. Patients are randomized 1:1 to the experimental (bevacizumab + retifanlimab + HFRT) or control cohort (bevacizumab + HFRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60, ≥ 4 months since administration of any prior bevacizumab, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg at the time of randomization. The primary endpoint is 9-month OS. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression-free survival, objective response rate, neurologic assessment by NANO criteria, and adverse events profile. Protocol treatment will continue up to two years, or until progression or intolerable toxicity. Survival follow up will continue every two months, up to four years. Seven of the planned 94 patients have been enrolled as of submission on 1/28/25. Clinical trial #: NCT06160206. Funding provided by Incyte. Clinical trial information: NCT06160206 .

2011 Background: Radiation therapy forms the mainstay of management for patients with brain metastases. Published randomized trials have found improved quality of life with stereotactic radiation (SRS/SRT) over whole brain radiation (WBRT) in patients with ≤ 4 brain metastases; comparative trials in patients with >4 brain metastases are lacking. In addition, prior randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) over traditional WBRT, but no study has compared SRS/SRT to HA-WBRT. Accordingly, we conducted a multicenter, phase 3 randomized trial comparing SRS/SRT to HA-WBRT in patients with 5-20 brain metastases. Methods: Eligible patients were age 18-80 with 5-20 brain metastases secondary to a solid primary other than small cell lung cancer, were naïve to prior brain-directed radiation, and lacked leptomeningeal disease. The primary endpoint was the average of patient-reported symptom severity and interference over the first six months post-baseline relative to baseline, using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) module, a validated instrument assessing 22 symptoms and 6 interference measures integral to quality of life, each scored 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology/interference in function. The target effect size was a symptom severity of 0.70, corresponding to 50% of the observed difference between patients with a good (90-100) versus poor (≤80) Karnofsky performance status; with 80% power and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, 196 patients were required. Results: Between 4/2017-5/2024, 196 patients enrolled, 98 in each arm. The median number of brain metastases was 14 (IQR 11-18); 25% of patients underwent prior neurosurgical resection. Baseline mean MDASI-BT symptom severity scores were 2.2 (SRS/SRT arm) and 1.9 (HA-WBRT arm), p=0.20; respective interference scores were 3.5 and 3.2 (p=0.40). The average of weighted post-baseline severity and interference scores relative to baseline indicated lower symptomatology/inference in the SRS/SRT arm, meeting the primary endpoint of the study (difference between SRS/SRT and HA-WBRT: -1.06, p<0.001). Averaged post-baseline symptom severity scores minus baseline were -0.03 and 0.59 in the SRS/SRT and HA-WBRT arms, respectively (difference -0.62, with lower symptom severity in the SRS/SRT arm, p<0.001); respective interference estimates were -0.62 and 0.89 (difference -1.50, with lower interference in the SRS/SRT arm, p<0.001). Median survival was 8.3 and 8.5 months in the SRS/SRT and HA-WBRT arms, respectively (p=0.30). Conclusions: This phase 3 randomized trial indicates that patients with 5-20 brain metastases experience fewer symptoms and less interference in function after SRS/SRT as opposed to HA-WBRT, without compromise of survival, supporting SRS/SRT as the standard of care in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03075072 .

Abstract Background Instruments to assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) should generate high-quality evidence. Reliable PRO evidence is essential to policymakers, in conjunction with outcomes such as survival and radiological response, to understand the net clinical benefit of antitumor treatments. This study aimed to establish the content validity of 215 identified PRO measures used in patients with brain tumors. Methods A survey (n = 148 items) was developed reflecting aspects of the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Patients with brain tumors, their proxies, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were asked to rate each survey item on relevance. An item was considered a relevant issue if ≥25% of the patients or proxies or ≥50% of the HCPs considered that item to be an issue. Next, all items in the identified PRO measures were linked to ICF and relevant items in the survey, and the percentage of content coverage was calculated. Results In total, 114 patients, 71 proxies, and 65 HCPs from different countries completed the survey. Fifty-six of 148 (37.8%) items in the survey were considered relevant. The most important aspects mentioned by both patients and proxies were difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, multitasking, and handling stress. Depending on the definition, between 35% and 49% of PRO measures were considered to have sufficient content validity (≥80% coverage). Conclusion The content validity was insufficient in more than half of the identified PRO measures, particularly multidimensional measures. Future research should investigate whether different approaches to PRO assessment better meet the needs of all stakeholders.

Abstract BACKGROUND Both radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) have meaningful single-modality anti-tumor activity against low-grade gliomas. ECOG-ACRIN E3F05 tested whether combined therapy with radiation and temozolomide is more effective than radiation alone in patients with grade II gliomas. METHODS Patients with grade II gliomas (central pathology review performed post hoc), no prior radiation/chemotherapy, and either age &gt; 40, uncontrolled symptoms/seizures, or progression after initial observation were randomized 1:1 to radiation 50.4 Gy alone in 28 fractions (Arm A) versus radiation 50.4 Gy with concomitant and 12 four-week cycles of post-radiation TMZ (Arm B). Randomization was stratified by 1p/19q codeletion status, age, KPS, pre-operative tumor diameter, and contrast enhancement. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS), quality of life, cognition, severe toxicities, and impact of codeletion status were secondary objectives. RESULTS The trial opened 1/09. Accrual was stopped in 1/14 after RTOG 9802 reported benefit from the addition of PCV chemotherapy to radiation in grade II gliomas. A total of 172 subjects were enrolled. Median age was 44 (range 19-78) and 54% male. 1p/19q codeletion was present in 44%. NCI CTCAE (version 4) grade 3+ toxicity was more common in participants treated with TMZ: thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (5%) versus none in the radiation alone arm. With a median follow-up of 117 months, OS was superior in Arm B (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.95, stratified log-rank p value 0.03). OS HRs were 0.56 and 0.53 for subjects with and without 1p/19q codeleted tumors, respectively. PFS did not differ between Arms A and B (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.44-1.28, p = 0.30). Five and ten-year OS were 78% and 70% in Arm B versus 70% and 47% in Arm A. CONCLUSION The addition of temozolomide to radiation improves overall survival in both co-deleted and non-co-deleted grade II gliomas.

OBJECTIVE It is uncertain which cochlear dose parameters significantly impact hearing after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of cochlear dose parameters on hearing outcomes for patients with serviceable hearing (SH). METHODS This was a historical cohort study performed at a single tertiary center that included patients with sporadic VS and SH who underwent single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery treatment from 2007 to 2022. Associations of cochlear dose parameters with time to non-SH and rates of change in pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS) following SRS were assessed. RESULTS A total of 205 patients with SH underwent SRS for a sporadic VS. At SRS, 54 (26%) tumors were confined to the internal auditory canal and 151 (74%) extended into the cerebellopontine angle. At 2, 5, and 10 years following SRS, 62%, 37%, and 15% of patients maintained SH, respectively. The median time to non-SH was 1.8 years. The median rates of change in PTA and WRS were 6.0 dB of hearing loss per year and −6.5% per year, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, each 1-Gy increase in minimum cochlear dose was significantly associated with time to non-SH (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.9), rate of change in PTA decibel hearing loss per year (parameter estimate [PE] 3.4, 95% CI 0.6–6.2), and rate of change in WRS percentage per year (PE −6.4, 95% CI −11.2 to −1.5). The associations of each 1-Gy increase in mean cochlear dose with hearing outcomes were only significant among patients with class B hearing (time to non-SH HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6; rate of change in PTA PE 3.6, 95% CI 1.2–5.9; and rate of change in WRS PE −5.7, 95% CI −9.7 to −1.7). CONCLUSIONS The minimum cochlear dose impacts hearing outcomes after SRS for VS and should be considered in radiosurgical treatment planning. In this cohort, the mean cochlear dose was only associated with hearing outcomes in the subgroup of patients with class B hearing at SRS.

Abstract BACKGROUND Fatigue is among the most common symptoms managed by patients with cancer. Hypothalamic pituitary axis dysfunction has an established role in a subset of patients with fatigue. Our primary aim was to longitudinally assess the impact of hypothalamic radiation exposure to patient self-reported fatigue. METHODS We included a sample of patients who received radiation therapy treated at a single institution from 2014-2024. The PROMIS-10 questionnaire (“How would you rate your fatigue on average,” scale 1-5) was used in standard clinical practice, with measures from 6 time points over 2 years. We performed descriptive statistics. Linear mixed models were used to assess the impact of hypothalamic radiation dose on fatigue scores. Mixed models were controlled for gender, age, time, tumor category (CNS vs. non-CNS), and modality (photon vs. proton). Models were fit with random intercepts for each Patient ID. RESULTS 1092 patients (43% female) with a median age of 54 years (range: 18-92) were included. Most patients were treated for CNS cancer (76%), with about 50% each photon and proton. Median hypothalamus radiation dose was 1306 cGy (range: 0.01-6138). Mean baseline fatigue (2.4) increased after treatment (2.7) remaining elevated at 3- and 6-months post-treatment (2.6, 2.5), returning near baseline at 1- and 2-years post-treatment (2.4, 2.3). Higher radiation dose (Estimate (SE): 0.014 (0.006), p=0.0266) and CNS cancer treatment (0.11 (0.051), p=0.0319) were significant predictors of higher fatigue in the mixed model. Male patients (-0.16 (0.042), p=0.0001) and time (-0.003 (0.0016), p=0.0398) were associated with lower fatigue. Age and treatment modality were not significant predictors of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS We found that higher hypothalamic radiation dose was related to more self-reported fatigue, which peaked by 6 months. This effect was seen more prominently in female patients and those treated for CNS disease. Treatment modality and age did not influence fatigue scores.

Abstract As cancer patients with intracranial metastatic disease experience increasingly prolonged survival, the diagnosis and management of recurrent brain metastasis pose significant challenges in clinical practice. Prior to deciding upon a management strategy, it is necessary to ascertain whether patients have recurrent/progressive disease vs adverse radiation effect, classify the recurrence as local or distant in the brain, evaluate the extent of intracranial disease (size, number and location of lesions, and brain metastasis velocity), the status of extracranial disease, and enumerate the interval from the last intracranially directed intervention to disease recurrence. A spectrum of salvage local treatment options includes surgery (resection and laser interstitial thermal therapy [LITT]) with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in the forms of external beam radiotherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. Nonoperative salvage local treatments also range from single fraction and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/FSRS) to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Optimal integration of systemic therapies, preferably with central nervous system (CNS) activity, may also require reinterrogation of brain metastasis tissue to identify actionable molecular alterations specific to intracranial progressive disease. Ultimately, the selection of the appropriate management approach necessitates a sophisticated understanding of patient, tumor, and prior treatment-related factors and is often multimodal; hence, interdisciplinary evaluation for such patients is indispensable.

OBJECTIVE Chordomas are rare tumors that originate from undifferentiated remnants of the notochord. Currently, there are no established guidelines regarding the choice of adjuvant radiation modality for patients surgically treated for chordomas. Using a nationwide, multicenter database, the authors aimed to compare long-term survival outcomes associated with the use of proton or photon adjuvant therapy for the management of chordomas of skull base and spine. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for chordoma cases from 2004 to 2017. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were extracted from the database. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted to investigate differences in outcome on propensity score–matched cohorts of patients treated with proton or photon adjuvant radiotherapy. RESULTS Of the 3490 patients available, 424 met the inclusion criteria for this study. In the prematching analysis, patients receiving adjuvant photon therapy were significantly older (median age 57.0 vs 45.0 years, p < 0.001) and were more commonly male (61% vs 43%, p < 0.001) compared with those receiving proton therapy. Races were equally distributed among radiotherapy modalities (p = 0.64). Patients with chordomas of the mobile spine or sacrum were less likely to receive proton compared with photon therapy (37% vs 58%). Patients receiving proton therapy were more often represented among private insurance holders (69% vs 52%, p < 0.001) as well as in the highest income quartile (52% vs 40%, p = 0.008). Patients traveled farther to receive proton, as opposed to photon, therapy (median 59.0 vs 34.9 miles, p < 0.001). On postmatching Kaplan-Meier analysis encompassing all chordoma cases, no difference in OS between photon and proton therapy was revealed (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.39–1.44; p = 0.39). A Kaplan-Meier analysis only including patients with skull base chordomas reached similar results (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.31–2.22; p = 0.71). In patients with spine chordomas, however, a significant difference was found, as proton therapy exhibited a superior OS over photon therapy (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09–0.81; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Based on this nationwide analysis, patients with private insurance and higher income were more likely to receive proton adjuvant radiotherapy, while those with spinal or sacral chordomas were less likely to receive this modality. Despite this disparity, an OS benefit was observed in patients with chordomas of the spine and sacrum who received adjuvant proton therapy, in comparison with a matched cohort of patients treated with photon therapy. Conversely, this advantageous outcome was not evident in cases of chordomas located at the skull base.