Abdelnabi, Mahmoud

This cohort study evaluates the association between measured lipoprotein(a) level and incident venous thromboembolism.

Abstract Aims Nutritional counselling is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), yet the evidence base for specific dietary interventions within CR remains fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map the range of nutritional interventions evaluated in adult CR programmes, characterize their reported outcomes, and identify key gaps in current evidence and practice. Methods and results Following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reporting according to PRISMA-ScR, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to June 2026. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, and observational studies evaluating an explicitly described nutritional intervention within a structured CR programme in adults with established cardiovascular disease. Of 2765 identified records, 35 studies met eligibility criteria. Interventions spanned Mediterranean and heart-healthy dietary patterns, calorie-restriction and weight-loss programmes, comprehensive lifestyle interventions, structured nutrition education and counselling, supplementation, functional foods, and individualized diet prescriptions. Across categories, improvements in body weight, central adiposity, and adherence to cardioprotective dietary recommendations were commonly reported, particularly when nutrition was delivered with repeated contact and individualized support. Effects on lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, blood pressure, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes were more variable. Conclusion Nutritional interventions within CR were most consistently associated with improvements in intermediate behavioural, anthropometric, and cardiometabolic outcomes, particularly when structured and reinforced over time. However, heterogeneity in study design, intervention delivery, comparator groups, outcome reporting, and follow-up duration precludes definitive conclusions about comparative efficacy, optimal intervention format, or the magnitude of benefit. Greater standardization, longer follow-up, and further evaluation of personalized nutritional strategies are needed to strengthen the nutritional component of CR.

Abstract Rationale Chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) is characterized by persistent pulmonary vascular obstruction due to unresolved thromboemboli despite at least three months of anticoagulation. Although resting hemodynamics often remain normal, affected patients frequently develop functional limitation due to exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, ventilatory inefficiency, limited stroke volume augmentation, or preload insufficiency. Such exercise-induced pathophysiological dysregulation can significantly impair quality of life and contribute to poor long-term outcomes. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is an established treatment for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH), offering significant improvements in hemodynamics and survival. Its role in CTED, however, remains unclear. While CTED has traditionally been managed with anticoagulation and supportive therapy, emerging evidence suggests PEA may provide symptomatic and functional benefit in selected CTED patients. Given the ongoing uncertainty regarding the role of PEA in CTED, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to define its safety profile and clinical efficacy in this patient subset. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was conducted from database inception to March 1, 2025. Of 2,244 records screened, 34 full-text articles were assessed, and seven met the inclusion criteria. Results Across the included studies, the pooled baseline mean values were 20.48 ± 3.03 mm Hg for mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), 2.83 ± 1.11 Wood units for pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and 397 ± 100.08 m for the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Pulmonary Endarterectomy (PEA) was consistently associated with significant improvements in hemodynamic and functional outcomes; PEA reduced mPAP by 3.58 mmHg (pooled Standardized Mean Change (SMC)=-1.03; 95% CI, -1.23 to -0.83; P < .05), PVR by 0.86 Woods units (pooled SMC=-0.86; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.67; P < .05), while, conversely, increased 6MWD by 37.49 m (pooled SMC, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.67; P < .05). Study-level effect sizes for 6MWD ranged from 0.21 to 1.47 (Figure 1A). This clinical improvement is further reflected in the enhancement of the NYHA functional class, as illustrated in Figure 1B. Conclusion PEA was associated with significant reductions in mPAP and PVR, as well as a considerable improvement in functional capacity in patients with CTED, with robust results across multiple tests for bias, influence, and sensitivity analyses. These findings support PEA as a viable therapeutic option for selected patients with CTED, although further research is warranted. This abstract is funded by: None

Background: Indications for TAVR explant have been established, although limited data exist regarding pre-TAVR baseline characteristics that predict eventual explantation. Methods: The TriNetX network, a database comprising medical records from over 105 institutions, was used. Two cohorts were created: those who underwent TAVR without explant and those requiring subsequent TAVR explant and SAVR. Predictors of explantation were analyzed by multivariate models. Results: Among the 63,377 patients undergoing TAVR, 273 (0.4%) required explantation. Patients in the explant group were younger (69.1 ± 11.3 vs. 78.1 ± 8.8 years; p < 0.001), more likely to have a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (10.6% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001) and had higher LDL levels (88.2 ± 41.3 vs. 80.7 ± 34.6 mg/dL; p = 0.011). They also had increased post-TAVR rates of acute kidney injury (9.2% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.004) and paravalvular leak (5.9% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.001). Age at TAVR (HR 1.04; CI 1.03–1.06), baseline TAA (HR 1.69; CI 1.09–2.63), history of infective endocarditis (HR 1.92; CI 1.10–3.35), and higher LDL (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03) were independent predictors for explantation. Conclusions: Younger age at TAVR, TAA, history of endocarditis, and elevated baseline LDL were notable predictors of explantation. These findings highlight the necessity of pre-procedural assessment and follow-up in high-risk patients to optimize TAVR durability.

Abstract Background Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS) and Marfan’s syndrome are associated with cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmias. However, atrial fibrillation (AF) risk in these populations has not been frequently reported. This study assessed the AF risk in VEDS and Marfan's syndrome patients using propensity score-matched analysis from an international database. Methods The TriNetX Research Network, an international database with de-identified patient data from over 100 centers, was used to pull patients with a diagnosis of VEDS and Marfan's Syndrome. Baseline characteristics (e.g., demographics, cardiovascular comorbidities, etc.) were collected, and propensity score matching was performed to balance the cohorts. Rates of AF were collected across both cohorts, and risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival were used to assess outcomes. Results A total of 1,114 and 23,172 patients had VEDS and Marfan’s syndrome, respectively. After propensity score matching, each cohort included 1,091 balanced patients regarding demographics and clinical characteristics. When compared in the matched cohorts, AF incidence was lower in VEDS (4.6%) compared to Marfan’s syndrome (8.6%), with a risk difference of -0.040 (95% CI: -0.061, -0.020; z = -3.794; p &lt; 0.001). The risk ratio was 0.532 (95% CI: 0.381, 0.742), and the odds ratio was 0.509 (95% CI: 0.358, 0.726), indicating a significantly lower risk of AF in VEDS. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an AF survival probability of 84.23% in VEDS and 78.20% in Marfan’s syndrome (log-rank p = 0.071). The hazard ratio was 0.723 (95% CI: 0.508, 1.029), which didn’t reach statistical significance (p = 0.579). Conclusion Patients with VEDS have a significantly lower risk of developing AF compared to those with Marfan’s syndrome. However, no significant difference in AF survival probability was observed. These findings suggest significant differences in the arrhythmic burden between these connective tissue disorders, which can direct future risk stratification and management strategies.Figure 1

Abstract Background Loeys-Dietz Syndrome (LDS) is a rare connective tissue disorder characterized by mutations indifferent genes including TGFRB2, TGFBR1, TGFB2, TGFB3, and SMAD3, which significantly increase the risk of vascular abnormalities, including aneurysms and dissections. These vascular events can involve various arterial territories, although the thoracic aorta is of most concern. The current literature is limited on characterizing the aortic and extra-aortic vascular manifestation on larger cohorts of patients. Purpose This study aims at analyzing the rates of aneurysms and dissections across different vascular territories inpatients with LDS. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of individuals diagnosed with LDS at our institution. Medical records were reviewed for imaging findings, including CT scans, MRIs, and ultrasounds, to identify the presence of aneurysms and dissections. Vascular territories involved included the aortic arch (ascending, and descending aorta), coronary, cerebral, carotid, vertebral, renal, splanchnic, and peripheral arteries. Results A total of 94 patients with LDS were included. 76 patients (81%) had an ascending aortic aneurysm, and 21 patients (22.5%) had an abdominal aortic aneurysm. 49 patients (52%) had aneurysms in other vascular territories, with some patients having multiple aneurysms in different regions. These included 9 patients (9.5%) with carotid, 3 patients (3.2%) with vertebral, 5 patients (5.3%) with splenic, 11 patients (11.7%) with mesenteric, 2 patients (2.1%) with renal, 15 patients (15.9%) with iliac/femoral, 6 patients (6.4%) with subclavian, 23 patients (24.5%) with cerebral, and 10 patients (10.6%) with coronary aneurysms. For aortic dissections, 13 patients (14%) had type A and 9 patients (9.5%) had type B dissections. Additionally, 20 patients had dissections in other vascular territories, with some patients experiencing dissections in multiple regions. These included 8 patients (8.5%) with carotid, 8 patients (8.5%) with vertebral, 1 patient (1.1%) with renal, 3 patients (3.2%) with iliac, 2 patients (2.1%) with coronary, and 3 patients (3.2%) with innominate artery dissections. Conclusion Aortic involvement is the most common in patients with LDS; however, these patients are also at an increased risk of developing aneurysms and dissections in various vascular territories. This highlights the importance of screening and close follow-up in these patients, potentially through whole-body imaging to identify such abnormalities. Further research is needed to identify patients at higher risk for aneurysms and dissections compared to others.

Abstract Background Loeys-Dietz Syndrome (LDS) is a connective tissue disorder caused by mutations in the TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 genes, leading to significant cardiovascular complications, particularly aortic aneurysms and dissections. Due to the progressive nature of these issues, patients often require multiple cardiac interventions throughout their lives, although this has not been comprehensively reviewed in the literature. Purpose This study aims to review trends in cardiac interventions in LDS patients to better understand the surgical course these patients go through in their lives. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of individuals diagnosed with LDS at our institution. Medical records were reviewed for data on demographics and types of interventions (e.g., aortic surgeries, valve procedures) were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the frequency of interventions with comparisons made between intervention types. Results A total of 94 patients with LDS were included in the study. Among them, 69 patients (73.4%) had an ascending aortic aneurysm, and 13 patients (14%) had a type A aortic dissection. A total of 60 patients underwent aortic root replacement surgery due to aneurysm or dissection, with 10 patients (11%) having the procedure following the occurrence of a dissection. Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) was found in 34 patients (36%). Valvular interventions were performed as follows, with some patients undergoing repairs on multiple valves: 12 patients (13%) had mitral valve repair, 10 patients (11%) had tricuspid valve repair, and the aortic valve was the most intervened upon, with 37 patients (39.5%) undergoing either replacement or repair. In total, 45 patients (48%) underwent at least one valvular intervention. Additionally, 4 patients (4.5%) underwent ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure, 3 (3.5%) underwent atrial septal defect (ASD) closure, and 3 (3.5%) had both defects closed. 29 patients (31%) had a patent foramen ovale, with 17 of these patients (59%) undergoing PFO closure. Finally, 16 patients (17%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Conclusion Patients with LDS often require multiple surgeries and interventions throughout their lives due to the progressive nature of the disease and its impact on the cardiovascular system. The high incidence of aortic aneurysms, dissections, and valvular abnormalities necessitates frequent surgical management, with many patients undergoing interventions such as aortic root replacement, valve repairs, and septal defect closures. Given the complex and multifaceted cardiovascular involvement in LDS, close monitoring and timely intervention are crucial for optimizing outcomes and improving quality of life for these patients.

Abstract Background Marfan syndrome (MFS) predisposes individuals to aortic dissections. Recent data suggest that atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF/AFL) may increase complications and mortality in MFS patients; however, their independent role in aortic dissection remains unclear. Purpose This study aims to assess the risk of aortic dissection in MFS patients with and without AF/AFL. Methods Using the TriNetX database and ICD-10 codes, 2,447 MFS patients with AF/AFL and 20,520 without were identified. Demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity) were evaluated, and aortic dissection outcomes were compared using risk ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Patients in the AF/AFL cohort were older (mean age 60.9 ± 16.7 years vs. 38 ± 16.6 years) and had higher proportions of males (62.51% vs. 56.76%) and white patients (74.67% vs. 66.3%). Aortic dissections occurred in 13.9% of MFS patients with AF/AFL compared to 3.4% of those without, resulting in a risk difference of 10.5% (95% CI: 9.0%–11.9%) and a risk ratio of 4.04 (95% CI: 3.547–4.603). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly lower survival rates in the AF/AFL cohort (74.07% vs. 90.63%; log-rank test, p &lt; 0.0001), with a hazard ratio of 4.232 (95% CI: 3.686–4.858). Conclusion In MFS patients, those with AF/AFL were over four times more likely to experience aortic dissection and had over four times the hazard of mortality. Screening and managing AF/AFL may be essential to preventing aortic dissections and improving outcomes in this population.Figure 1

Abstract Background/Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is common among elderly patients and is associated with a high risk of complications. Managing ACS, particularly dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), poses challenges due to the increased risk of recurrent hemorrhagic and ischemic events in this population. Purpose This study evaluated cardiovascular outcomes in patients ≥75 years that were initiated on DAPT with aspirin (ASA) plus either ticagrelor or clopidogrel following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods We used the TriNetX repository to identify adult patients (≥75 years) diagnosed with AMI between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021, who subsequently initiated DAPT and were not on anticoagulation. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: ASA + ticagrelor and ASA + clopidogrel. Outcomes assessed included major bleeding, repeat coronary intervention, all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, stroke, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and pacemaker implantation. Follow-up time was restricted to one year. A 1:1 propensity score matching algorithm was applied using the greedy nearest-neighbor method with a caliper of 0.1 pooled standard deviations to ensure balance (i.e., comorbidities, medications, laboratory values) between the two cohorts. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR), and Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HR). Results Before propensity score matching (PSM), 19,859 patients were in the ASA + ticagrelor cohort, and 47,032 were in the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Post-PSM, 19,746 patients remained in each cohort, with a mean age of 82.2 years and a mean follow-up duration of 298.77 days for the ASA + ticagrelor cohort and 297.59 days for the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. The ASA + ticagrelor cohort had a higher incidence of major bleeding (aOR 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08–1.31]) and pacemaker implantation (aOR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.02–1.29]) compared to the ASA + clopidogrel cohort. Event-free survival analysis showed lower survival rates for major bleeding (HR 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07–1.30]) and pacemaker implantation (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01–1.28]). No significant differences were observed between cohorts in repeat coronary interventions (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.88–1.03]), atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97–1.08]), all-cause mortality (aOR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.96–1.12]), all-cause hospitalization (aOR 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97–1.05]), or stroke (aOR 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86–1.04]). Conclusions In elderly patients, DAPT with ASA + ticagrelor was associated with higher rates of major bleeding and need for pacemaker compared to ASA + clopidogrel. Given the similar risks of recurrent coronary intervention and mortality between the two regimens, these findings highlight the need for careful consideration when selecting ticagrelor over clopidogrel in this population.

Abstract Background Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS) and Marfan’s syndrome are associated with cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmias. However, ventricular tachycardia (VT) risk in these populations has not been frequently reported. Purpose This study aims to assess the VT risk in VEDS and Marfan's syndrome patients through an international database. Methods The TriNetX database was used to pull patients with a diagnosis of VEDS and Marfan's Syndrome. Baseline characteristics (e.g., demographics, cardiovascular comorbidities, etc.) were collected, and propensity score matching was performed to balance the cohorts. Risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival were used to assess outcomes. Results A total of 1,114 and 23,172 patients had VEDS and Marfan’s syndrome, respectively. After propensity score matching, each cohort included 1,091 balanced patients regarding demographics and clinical characteristics. The cohorts were balanced with a mean age of 37.7 ± 16.0 years in both groups. 68.7% and 68.8% were females in the VEDS and Marfan cohorts, the majority being White (82.2% in VEDS, 82.9% in Marfan’s). VT Incidence was lower in VEDS (0.9%) compared to Marfan’s syndrome (2.6%), with a risk difference of -0.016 (p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier survival showed higher survival in VEDS (99.44%) vs. Marfan’s (94.04%, log-rank p = 0.002). The risk ratio for VT in VEDS was 0.357 (95% CI: 0.174, 0.732). Conclusion VEDS patients have a significantly lower VT risk compared to those with Marfan’s syndrome. These findings suggest significant differences in the arrhythmic burden between these connective tissue disorders, which can direct future risk stratification and management strategies.