Zhang, Wenqiu

Abstract Background Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in high-grade brain tumors is characterized by contrast accumulation on diagnostic imaging. This window of opportunity study correlates contrast imaging features with the tumor distribution of BBB-permeable (levetiracetam) and -impermeable (cefazolin) drugs. Methods Patients with a clinical diagnosis of a high-grade brain tumor underwent MRI for surgical planning. Cefazolin and levetiracetam were administered prior to skin incision, and serial plasma and image-registered tumor samples were collected during the operation. Drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS, tissue drug levels were corrected for residual blood, and tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Intraoperative microdialysis was performed in a subset of patients to measure the same two drugs. Results Tumor (n = 125) and plasma (n = 261) samples were available for analysis from 42 operative cases. Across all samples, the tumor-to-plasma ratio was significantly lower for cefazolin (marginal mean [MM]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19) as compared to levetiracetam (MM: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.75; P < .001). When compared between contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions, tumor-to-plasma ratios for cefazolin varied by 4.4-fold (0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.35 vs. 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08, respectively; P < .001), and varied for levetiracetam by 1.4-fold (0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97 vs. 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66, respectively; P < .001). These results were confirmed with the intra-operative microdialysis and a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Conclusions This study demonstrates significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in drug delivery for both levetiracetam and cefazolin within high-grade brain tumors that is not necessarily predicted by clinical MR imaging and may reflect tumor-induced changes in both perfusion and BBB integrity.

Abstract Purpose: Navtemadlin is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of MDM2, which has completed a phase 0 window-of-opportunity study in glioblastoma (GBM). To optimally interpret the clinical data, a detailed analysis of navtemadlin pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy was performed in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Experimental Design: Response to navtemadlin was characterized in vitro and in vivo in GBM PDXs with and without MDM2 amplification. Efficacy in vivo was integrated with measured plasma and intra-tumoral drug levels to develop a translational PK/efficacy model comparing exposure effective in PDX to exposure achieved in phase 0 patient samples. Results: In vitro, navtemadlin showed robust on-target activity in TP53–wild-type GBM. In vivo efficacy strongly correlated with MDM2 amplification status. In subcutaneous PDXs, navtemadlin significantly extended survival when dosed at 25 mg/kg in an MDM2-amplified PDX compared with 100 mg/kg in a non-amplified PDX. Central nervous system distribution was limited by blood–brain barrier efflux (Kp_brain = 0.009). In an MDM2-amplified orthotopic PDX model, navtemadlin was ineffective at 100 mg/kg; when established in mice with deficient blood–brain barrier efflux (Rag−/−Abcb1a−/−Abcg2−/−), 25 mg/kg doubled survival. A tumor PK/efficacy model was built to define target exposure for efficacy in GBM, using the effective 25 mg/kg dose. Modeled exposures exceeded this threshold in three (of 16) tumor samples from phase 0 study patients at the 240 mg dose level. Conclusions: Navtemadlin efficacy was highly dependent on adequate brain penetration. Our translational PK/efficacy model suggests that the minimum effective tumor exposures were achieved only in a minority of patients with GBM.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and highly infiltrative brain tumor with poor prognosis. Radiation therapy induces DNA damage, and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways modulate resistance to radiation therapy. Inhibiting DDR pathways by targeting ATM, a key enzyme involved in the repair of DNA double strand breaks, leads to radiosensitization and enhances cytotoxicity. Clinical translation of radiosensitizers for GBM may be influenced by a lack of effective drug delivery across the blood brain barrier (BBB). The purpose of this study is to determine the key preclinical pharmacokinetic parameters and mechanisms that influence the CNS delivery of WSD0628, a novel ATM inhibitor. In vitro clonogenic survival assays using U251 GBM cells indicate that WSD0628 shows significant radiosensitization, with a >70% decrease in surviving colonies in the presence of 10nM or higher drug concentrations in combination with 2.5 to 10 Gy radiation as compared to radiation alone. We evaluated the systemic pharmacokinetics and CNS distribution of WSD0628 in FVB wild-type mice and FVB mice lacking Pgp and Bcrp (Mdr1a/b−/−Bcrp1−/−, triple knockout) after a 1, 5, 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) dose. Clearance decreased with increase in dose and a greater than dose proportional increase in exposure was observed. WSD0628 is rapidly absorbed and is bioavailable after oral administration. Tissue distribution coefficients were determined as the ratio of exposure in tissue to plasma (Kp = AUCtissue/AUCplasma). Kp,brain was 0.22 ± 0.05, and Kp, spinal cord was 0.30 ± 0.09 in the wild-type mice. For wild-type mice, Kp,uu,brain was 0.20 ± 0.05 and Kp,uu,spinal cord was 0.26 ± 0.08, determined by correcting for binding to CNS tissues and plasma. The brain distribution of WSD0628 was only modestly increased (1.4 times) in the triple knockout mice with Kp,brain of 0.32 ± 0.06 and Kp,spinal cord of 0.41 ± 0.08. Organ distribution of WSD0628 at steady-state was studied after intraperitoneal implantation of Alzet osmotic pumps primed to release WSD0628 at 7.5 ug/hr for 25 hours. Tissue distribution coefficients, determined by organ-to-plasma steady-state concentration ratios, were highest for liver and kidneys, followed by heart, lungs and CNS. Survival studies conducted in mice bearing orthotopic GBM patient derived xenografts show a significant improvement in survival in mice receiving a combination of WSD0628 and radiation as compared to radiation alone. In conclusion, WSD0628 is a robust radiosensitizer and has moderate brain penetration that is not limited by the efflux transporters Pgp and Bcrp. Based on preliminary efficacy studies in mice, WSD0628 shows potential for treatment of GBM tumors. Evaluations are underway to determine tumor free concentrations and quantification of corresponding biomarkers. Combining this knowledge of PK of WSD0628 with the dynamics of the targeted biological pathway will inform a PK-PD-efficacy model and predict effective dosage regimens for future preclinical and clinical trials. Citation Format: Sneha Rathi, Ann Mladek, Zhiyi Xue, Ju-Hee Oh, Wenjuan Zhang, Wenqiu Zhang, Jiayan Le, Jann S. Sarkaria, William F. Elmquist. Systemic and CNS distributional pharmacokinetics of WSD0628, a novel radiosensitizer: Implications for the treatment of brain tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B028.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and infiltrative primary malignant brain tumor. Current standard-of-care for newly diagnosed GBM patients includes maximal safe surgical resection, followed by concurrent radiation with temozolomide (TMZ), and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy. However, despite aggressive treatments, GBM patients have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 14.6 months and a 5-year survival rate of 6.8%. The p53 protein is a critical tumor suppressor in the cell cycle. The expression level of p53 is tightly controlled by its negative regulator, murine double minute 2 (MDM2). Amplification of the MDM2 gene, found in 14 % of GBMs, can inactivate p53, leading to loss of tumor suppressor functions. Therefore, we are investigating a potent MDM2 antagonist – BI-907828 in GBM to restore the p53 tumor suppressor function by inhibiting the p53/MDM2 interactions. We aim to evaluate the PK/PD of BI-907828 and demonstrate a new translational paradigm to rethink the “Delivery – Potency – Efficacy” relationship in drug discovery and development for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. BI-907828 was evaluated for cytotoxicity and the inhibition effect to MDM2-p53 pathway. Systemic PK and transport mechanisms controlling CNS distribution were evaluated in wild-type and transgenic mice that lack of efflux transporters P-gp and BCRP. BI-907828 unbound fractions in cell media, mouse and human specimens were determined by using rapid equilibrium dialysis to evaluate “active” concentrations. Efficacy measures, including survival and free drug distribution in tumor were assessed in mouse orthotopic GBM xenografts. BI-907828 exhibited potent inhibition of MDM2-p53 pathway and promoted cell death in GBM TP53 wild-type cells. MDM2-amplified cells are highly sensitive to BI-907828, with an effective unbound concentration of 0.1 nM. The CNS distribution of BI-907828 is limited by BBB efflux mediated by P-gp, resulting in a brain free partition coefficient Kp,uu of 0.002. Despite this seemingly “poor” BBB penetration, weekly administration of 10 mg/kg BI-907828 significantly extended median survival of orthotopic GBM108 xenografts to 218 days compared to 28 days with vehicle treatment (P < 0.0001). These studies show that efficacy of BI-907828 in orthotopic models is related to high potency even though its CNS distribution is severely limited by BBB efflux. In another words, in this case, this little drug distribution to brain is “enough” for extending survival of orthotopic GBM108 xenografts. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of drug “Delivery – Potency – Efficacy” relationship is warranted in drug discovery development, especially for treatment of CNS tumors. Citation Format: Wenjuan Zhang, Rachael Vaubel, Juhee Oh, Ann Mlade, Surabhi Talele, Wenqiu Zhang, Katie Waller, Danielle Burgenske, Jann Sarkaria, William Elmquist. How much is enough? BI-907828: a MDM2-p53 antagonist with limited BBB penetration but potent efficacy in glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Brain Cancer; 2023 Oct 19-22; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B025.

Abstract MDM2–p53 inhibition may be effective in glioblastoma (GBM). This study evaluates the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of BI-907828, a potent antagonist of MDM2, in GBM, and demonstrates a translational paradigm with a focus on a unified “Delivery – Potency – Efficacy” relationship in drug development for central nervous system(CNS) tumors. BI-907828 was tested for cytotoxicity and MDM2–p53 pathway inhibition. Systemic pharmacokinetics and transport mechanisms controlling CNS distribution were evaluated in mice. BI-907828 free fractions in cell media, mouse and human specimens were measured to determine “active” unbound concentrations. Efficacy measures, including overall survival and target expression were assessed in mouse orthotopic GBM xenografts. BI-907828 exhibited potent inhibition of MDM2–p53 pathway and promoted cell death in GBM TP53 wild-type cells. MDM2-amplified cells are highly sensitive to BI-907828, with an effective unbound concentration of 0.1 nmol/L. The CNS distribution of BI-907828 is limited by blood–brain barrier (BBB) efflux mediated by P-gp, resulting in a Kp,uu_brain of 0.002. Despite this seemingly “poor” BBB penetration, weekly administration of 10 mg/kg BI-907828 extended median survival of orthotopic GBM108 xenografts from 28 to 218 days (P < 0.0001). This excellent efficacy can be attributed to high potency, resulting in a limited, yet effective, exposure in the CNS. These studies show that efficacy of BI-907828 in orthotopic models is related to high potency even though its CNS distribution is limited by BBB efflux. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of the “Delivery – Potency – Efficacy” relationship is warranted in drug discovery and development, especially for treatment of CNS tumors.

AbstractBrain tumours have a poor prognosis and lack effective treatments. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) represents a major hurdle to drug delivery to brain tumours. In some locations in the tumour, the BBB may be disrupted to form the blood–brain tumour barrier (BBTB). This leaky BBTB enables diagnosis of brain tumours by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; however, this disruption is heterogeneous throughout the tumour. Thus, relying on the disrupted BBTB for achieving effective drug concentrations in brain tumours has met with little clinical success. Because of this, it would be beneficial to design drugs and drug delivery strategies to overcome the ‘normal’ BBB to effectively treat the brain tumours. In this review, we discuss the role of BBB/BBTB in brain tumour diagnosis and treatment highlighting the heterogeneity of the BBTB. We also discuss various strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB/BBTB to treat both primary and metastatic brain tumours. Recognizing that the BBB represents a critical determinant of drug efficacy in central nervous system tumours will allow a more rapid translation from basic science to clinical application. A more complete understanding of the factors, such as BBB–limited drug delivery, that have hindered progress in treating both primary and metastatic brain tumours, is necessary to develop more effective therapies.

Effective treatments for brain tumors remain one of the most urgent and unmet needs in modern oncology. This is due not only to the presence of the neurovascular unit/blood–brain barrier (NVU/BBB) but also to the heterogeneity of barrier alteration in the case of brain tumors, which results in what is referred to as the blood–tumor barrier (BTB). Herein, we discuss this heterogeneity, how it contributes to the failure of novel pharmaceutical treatment strategies, and why a “whole brain” approach to the treatment of brain tumors might be beneficial. We discuss various methods by which these obstacles might be overcome and assess how these strategies are progressing in the clinic. We believe that by approaching brain tumor treatment from this perspective, a new paradigm for drug delivery to brain tumors might be established.