Ospina, Naykky Maruquel Singh

Abstract Disclosure: D. Segura Torres: None. K. Raygoza: None. M. Garcia: None. J.P. Brito: None. M.E. McDonnell: None. M. Corrigan: None. C.R. McCartney: None. R. Dhaliwal: None. N.M. Singh Ospina: None. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) improve healthcare quality by guiding decision making. Recent trends in CPG development emphasize incorporating race/ethnicity terms and health equity considerations. However, the appropriateness of how race/ethnicity is utilized remains uncertain. Objective This study seeks to evaluate the use of race/ethnicity in published Endocrine Society (ES) CPG and elucidate the context in which race and ethnicity terms are used. Methods: We identified 30 active clinical practice guidelines from ES up to January 2023. Two reviewers independently and in duplicate: a) located statements addressing race/ethnicity using an electronic search with 24 keywords, b) determined the statements' location within guidelines, and c) classified them based on content using frameworks by Cerdena and Gilliam. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Exclusions were made for statements not addressing race and ethnicity terms in the appropriate context (e.g., “minority” of the panel disagreed), as well as for those in references or duplicates. Results: We reviewed 30 clinical practice guidelines, with 19 of them containing statements related to race or ethnicity. After applying exclusion criteria, we identified a final analytic sample of 114 statements. The majority of these statements were found in the body of the clinical guidelines (79%), followed by the evidence-to-decision framework (14%), and clinical recommendations (7%).The predominant classification were statements in which there was biologization of race/ethnicity 55% (n=63). Discussions on racial/ethnic disparities accounted for 23% (n=26) of the statements, with 31% (n=8) of these including explicit considerations of social context. Additionally, there were descriptions of race-specific treatment or diagnosis/screening in 14% (n=16) and 9% (n=10) of the statements, respectively.Less commonly statements of race/ethnicity reflected the consideration of ancestry as a code for race/ethnicity (n=7, 6%), identified ancestry as a risk factor for disease (n=19, 6%), highlighted racial/ethnic groups as understudied n=6, 5%), normalized findings to the majority group (White centeredness) (n=7, 6%), and other categories (7%). None of the statements employed race/ethnicity terms to emphasize cultural humility or the value of inclusivity in guideline committees. Conclusion: We systematically analyzed how race and ethnicity terms are used in ES CPGs. Our findings align with prior assessments made in non-ES CPG, highlighting the prevalent biologization of race and ethnicity constructs. Addressing this trend and incorporating socio-structural context considerations could bolster the impact of clinical guidelines in promoting health equity. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Abstract Disclosure: S. Maraka: None. R. Owen: None. N.M. Singh Ospina: None. M. Knox: None. T. Dodds: None. H. Spencer: None. A. Albashaireh: None. A. Shah: None. S. Syed: None. S. Naqvi: None. H. Motahari: None. S. Thumma: None. E. Ambrogini: None. J.P. Brito: None. Objective: Levothyroxine (LT4) therapy has not been shown to improve quality of life (QoL), thyroid-related symptoms, cardiovascular events, or mortality for patients with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in clinical trials. We conducted this pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effects of LT4 discontinuation among adults with SCH. Methods: We aimed to randomize 50 adults 1:1 to continue receiving LT4 (25-75 mcg/day) for SCH or discontinue it (switch to placebo). The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included changes in QoL measures (Thyroid-specific QoL Patient-Reported Outcome [ThyPRO]-Hypothyroid Symptoms and Tiredness scores, EuroQoL 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire [EQ-5D]) assessed at baseline and 6 months post-randomization, and incidence of adverse events (overt hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, atrial fibrillation, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, fracture, mortality). Higher scores for ThyPRO indicate more symptoms and tiredness and for EQ-5D, better health state. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation). Analysis of covariance model adjusting for age and baseline measure of the variable was performed for the outcomes based on the intention-to-treat principle. Results: Fifty participants were enrolled (33% recruitment rate); 24 were randomized to the LT4 and 26 to the discontinuation group. Five patients were excluded post-randomization due to lack of ascertainment of SCH diagnosis (final N=45; 21 LT4, 24 discontinuation). There was no statistically significant difference at baseline between the discontinuation and LT4 groups in age [65.7 (10.6) vs. 71.0 (7.9) yrs], gender (male 75 vs. 86%), LT4 dose (25 mcg; 29.2 vs. 33.3%, 50 mcg; 54.2 vs. 47.6%, 75 mcg; 16.7 vs. 19.0%), TSH [3.1 (1.0) vs. 3.2 (1.4) mIU/L], TPOAb positivity (17 vs. 19%), ThyPRO-Hypothyroid Symptoms [27.1 (20.4) vs. 21.1 (18.4)] and Tiredness score [33.2 (23.7) vs. 31.1 (23.9)], and EQ-5D [0.746 (0.229) vs. 0.758 (0.193)]. A patient in the discontinuation group withdrew for personal reasons (98% completion rate). Two patients in the discontinuation group met study criteria to restart LT4 (TSH>10 mIU/L; n=1, fatigue; n=1). At final visit, 34.8% of patients in the discontinuation group had mild SCH compared to 9.5% of patients on LT4 (p=0.07). There was no statistically significant difference between the discontinuation and LT4 groups in ThyPRO-Hypothyroid Symptoms [28.3 (22.8) vs. 22.9 (19.5)], Tiredness [27.6 (22.8) vs. 32.8 (22.1)], and EQ-5D score [0.750 (0.232) vs. 0.741 (0.180)]. A patient suffered rib fracture (placebo); no other adverse event of interest was reported. Conclusion: This pilot clinical trial showed the feasibility and safety of discontinuing LT4 in patients with SCH. These findings support proceeding with a larger multi-site clinical trial to fully assess the effects of LT4 discontinuation. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023