Meschia, James F.

Stroke subtype classification, applying standard criteria to clinical data, can reduce the heterogeneity of ischemic stroke for genetics studies. To date, most of the replicated genetic loci for ischemic stroke appear subtype-specific. Increasing homogeneity of phenotype comes with a trade-off in sample size, which influences the potential for successful identification of new loci. We estimated genetic associations using the union and intersection of two widely used stroke subtyping systems to assess the influence of sample size and homogeneity on test statistics. Methods: The Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN) study used both the Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) and the Trial of ORG10172 Acute Stroke Trial (TOAST) classification systems. The CCS generates both a causal and a phenotypic subtype. Using all available data from case-control strata from the a previously performed GWAS, we focused on three main stroke subtypes: cardioembolic (CE), large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and small artery occlusion (SAO). We estimated genetic associations with the union of the two CCS outputs and TOAST ( eg called CE by at least one method) and the intersection ( eg called CE by all three methods). Our modelling approach included a fixed-effects meta-analysis, i.e. pooling stratum specific estimates from logistic regression models using 10 principle components to account for genetic ancestry responsible for population stratification. Results: The majority of confirmatory findings from SiGN ( PITX2 and ZFHX3 for CE and HDAC9 for LAA) were evident in both models and in both the union and intersection of the subtyping systems. Some findings ( TSPAN2 in LAA) showed up best in the intersection with stronger corresponding p-values and odds ratios whereas other findings (12q24 for SAO) appear stronger in all of the union analyses, but were also evident in intersection analyses. We identify 16 potential novel loci, 6 of which appear in numerous analyses. Conclusion: Both expanding and refining stroke subtypes may help in the identification of additional stroke genetic risk variants and should be considered as complementary to a single classification system. We are pursuing replication of the novel findings.

Introduction: Careful selection and timely activation of clinical sites in multicenter clinical trials is critical for successful enrollment, subject safety, and generalizability of results. Methods: In the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial (CREST-2), a multidisciplinary Site Selection Committee evaluated applicants referred via participation in CREST, CREST principal investigators (PIs) and other investigators, StrokeNet and industry partners. Data for consideration included performance metrics in CREST and other carotid trials and a site selection questionnaire containing information on the investigators as well as quantitative data on carotid procedures performed. Any FDA warning letters were reviewed. Results: The Committee met bi-weekly for 36 months (n=64 meetings). Applications from 176 sites between March 2014 and July 2016 were evaluated: 153 were approved, 7 are under Committee review, 5 were approved but withdrew, 5 were placed on a waiting list, and 6 were rejected. One-hundred-four sites have completed the regulatory and training requirements to randomize: 51 (49%) academic medical centers, 31 (30%) private hospital-based centers, 16 (15%) private office-based practices, and 6 (6%) Veterans Administration medical centers. The mean times from application-to- approval was 5.2 weeks (interquartile range, 1.9, 6.2), and from approval-to-randomization status was 46.7 weeks (interquartile range, 35.4, 51.7). Specialties of the 104 site PIs are vascular surgery for 35 (33.7%), cardiology for 30 (28.8%), neurology for 25 (24%), neurosurgery for 8 (7.7%), interventional radiology for 4 (3.8%), and interventional neuroradiology for 2 (1.9%). Conclusions: Careful site selection is time-consuming for prospective sites and for trial leadership. Times from application-to-site-approval were modest (mean = 5.2 weeks), in contrast to the times for completing regulatory and training requirements (mean = 46.7 weeks). However, subject enrollment by teams from a wide range of medical centers led by a multi-disciplinary cohort of PIs will promote the generalizability of trial results.

Introduction: Outcomes from endovascular procedures are highly dependent on the experience and skill of the operating physician. The multi-disciplinary CREST-2 Interventional Management Committee (IMC) was charged with credentialing a cohort of skilled interventionists with adequate contemporary case volumes. Methods: Applicants were required to submit 25 consecutive cases completed within 5 years as primary operator out of a required total experience of ≥ 50 cases (≥ 20 for operators completing training). Interventionists not approved on initial review were asked to submit additional cases (with procedural angiograms), the number depending on quality and recent-quantity of the cases. Results: The IMC has had 102 meetings, and 283 interventionists have been evaluated: 104 (37%) interventionists were cardiologists, 64 (23%) vascular surgeons, 42 (15%) neurosurgeons, 32 (11%) neuroradiologists, 26 (9%) neurologists, 9 (3%) interventional radiologists, and 6 (2%) other. The mean total experience among the 226 interventionists with available information was 220±263 carotid stent cases (median 135; range 10-2500). A total of 7037 cases have been reviewed by the IMC, dating from August 2001 to April 2016, with 3366 symptomatic, 3541 asymptomatic and 130 undetermined. The range of cases reviewed per interventionist was 5 to 50. Of the 251 interventionists with sufficient periprocedural follow-up data, no stroke events were reported by 152 (60.5%), and at least one or more stroke events were reported by 99 (39.5%). The IMC has approved 115 interventionists, 29 at the first review and 86 subsequently, based upon submission and review of 631 additional contemporary cases (mean=7 cases per interventionist); 122 have approval pending submission of additional cases; 33 have been denied; 8 have been deferred; 4 have been approved for the CREST-2 Companion Registry only; and 1 is pending decision. Discussion: Rigorous evaluation and credentialing of carotid stenters in CREST-2 has been demanding, for the candidates and for the evaluators. Yet the cohort of interventionists so selected should be able to provide the high-quality stenting outcomes necessary for acceptance of the trial results.

Introduction: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is a highly heritable trait and a significant contributor to stroke risk and severity. Vascular risk factors contribute to WMH severity; however, knowledge of the determinants of WMH in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is still limited. Hypothesis: WMH volume (WMHv) varies across AIS subtypes and is modified by vascular risk factors. Methods: We extracted WMHv from the clinical MRI scans of 2683 AIS subjects from the MRI-Genetics Interface Exploration (MRI-GENIE) study using a novel fully-automated, volumetric analysis pipeline. Demographic data, stroke risk factors and stroke subtyping for the Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) were performed at each of the 12 international study sites. WMHv was natural log-transformed for linear regression analyses. Results: Median WMHv was 5.7cm 3 (interquartile range (IQR): 2.2-12.8cm 3 ). In univariable analysis, age (63.1 ± 14.7 years, β=0.04, SE=0.002), prior stroke (10.2%, β=0.66, SE=0.08), hypertension (65.4%, β=0.75, SE=0.05), diabetes mellitus (23.1%, β=0.35, SE=0.06), coronary artery disease (17.6%, β=0.04, SE=0.002), and atrial fibrillation (14.6%, β=0.48, SE=0.07) were significant predictors of WMHv (all p<0.0001), as well as smoking status (52.2%, β=0.15, SE=0.05, p=0.005), race (16.5% Non-Caucasian, β=0.25, SE=0.07) and ethnicity (8.2% Hispanic, β=0.30, SE=0.11) (all p<0.01). In multivariable analysis, age (β=0.04, SE=0.002), prior stroke (β=0.56, SE=0.08), hypertension (β=0.33, SE=0.05), smoking status (β=0.16, SE=0.05), race (β=0.42, SE=0.06), and ethnicity (β=0.34, SE=0.09) were independent predictors of WMHv (all p<0.0001), as well as diabetes mellitus (β=0.13, SE=0.06, p=0.02). WMHv differed significantly (p<0.0001, unadjusted) across CCS stroke subtypes: cardioembolic stroke (8.0cm 3 , IQR: 4.2-15.4cm 3 ), large-artery stroke (6.9cm 3 , IQR: 3.1-14.7cm 3 ), small-vessel stroke (5.8cm 3 , IQR: 2.5-13.5cm 3 ), stroke of undetermined (4.7cm 3 , IQR: 1.6-11.0cm 3 ) or other (2.55cm 3 , IQR: 0.9-8.8cm 3 ) causes. Conclusion: In this largest-to-date, multicenter hospital-based cohort of AIS patients with automated WMHv analysis, common vascular risk factors contribute significantly to WMH burden and WMHv varies by CCS subtype.

Introduction: Occurrence of stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) after carotid endarterectomy or stenting have each been associated with increased later mortality. Methods: In the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) 69 strokes, 37 protocol MIs, and 19 biomarker + only events occurred within 30 days among 2272 patients followed up to 10 years. Mortality was determined and compared for patients with stroke, MI, or biomarker + only to those without. Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, sex, symptomatic status and treatment were calculated to assess the relationship between mortality and stroke and mortality and MI status. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. Results: Patients with peri-procedural stroke had a 67% greater likelihood of long-term mortality compared to those without stroke (HR=1.67, 95% CI 1.15,2.43; p<0.007)(Figure A). Patients with a protocol MI had a 249% greater likelihood of mortality, and biomarker+ only patients had a 104% greater likelihood of mortality, compared to those without MI (HR=3.49; 95%CI 2.20,5.53, p<0.0001; and HR=2.04; 95% CI 1.09,3.83, p=0.03)(Figure B). Discussion: Stroke, MI, and biomarker + only events following CEA or CAS are associated with increased long-term mortality. The higher risk for MI may be a marker for patients with serious underlying heart disease, rather than causal, providing an opportunity to decrease long-term mortality through aggressive diagnostic evaluation and preventive treatment.

Introduction: In observational studies, higher plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) has been associated with increased risk of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Common DNA sequence variants within the cholesteryl ester transfer protein ( CETP ) gene decrease CETP protein activity and increase plasma HDL-C; as such, medicines that inhibit CETP and raise HDL-C are in clinical development to combat coronary artery disease. Hypothesis: Common CETP DNA sequence variants associated with higher HDL-C also increase risk for ICH. Methods: We performed a two-stage case-control genetic association study in Caucasians. The discovery phase utilized data on 12 independent loci within CETP (+/- 50 kilobases) from 3 genome-wide association studies of ICH. Replication involved direct genotyping in 5 additional studies. We also constructed a genetic risk score with 7 independent CETP variants and tested it for association with HDL-C and ICH risk. We used principal component analysis to account for population structure and a Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.004 (12 tests) to declare statistical significance. Results: The discovery phase included 1149 ICH cases (43% lobar hemorrhages) and 1238 controls. Twelve variants were nominally associated (p<0.05) with ICH, with the strongest association at the rs173539 locus (Figure 1: OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.11-1.41; p=6.0x10 -4 ) and no heterogeneity across studies (I 2 =0%). This association was replicated in 1625 cases (43% lobar hemorrhages) and 1845 controls (OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.02-1.24; p=0.03). A genetic score of independent CETP variants known to increase HDL-C by ~2.85 mg/dL was strongly associated with ICH risk (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.44-2.40; p=1.4x10 -6 ). Conclusion: Genetic variants in CETP associated with increased HDL-C raise the risk of ICH. Given ongoing therapeutic development in CETP inhibition and other HDL-raising strategies, further exploration of potential adverse cerebrovascular outcomes is warranted.

Introduction: The MRI-Genetics Interface Exploration (MRI-GENIE) study is the first international collaboration that aims to facilitate genetic discoveries in clinical cohorts of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We have amassed the largest-to-date collection of AIS cases with brain MRI scans and genome-wide genotyping to test the role of genetic susceptibility in MRI-based cerebrovascular traits. Objective/Hypothesis: To elucidate the genetic architecture of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden in AIS patients. Methods: Using a novel automated algorithm, we extracted WMH volume (WMHv) from clinical MRI scans of 2704 AIS patients (age 63.1 ± 14.7 years, 60.6% male) of European ancestry. Quality control (QC) measures were undertaken per subject and per SNP, excluding subjects with non-European ancestry and poor genotyping, as well as SNPs deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and high levels of missingness. Imputation to the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC version r1.1) was conducted for 1712 remaining subjects with 2.8 million SNPs on the Michigan Imputation Server. After exclusion of poorly imputed SNPs (R 2 <0.5) and SNPs with minor allele frequency < 1%, 7.7 million SNPs remained for further analysis. Genome-wide association testing of natural log-transformed WMHv on the allelic dosage per SNP was adjusted for age, sex and principal components 1-10. Results: Genome-wide association testing has identified a novel locus on chromosome 2 (T allele at rs72856504) near the LDL Receptor related Protein 1B gene (LRP1B) that was significantly associated with WMHv burden in AIS (β=0.54, SE=0.098, p=3.65*10 -8 ). Conclusion: We have identified a novel locus (T allele rs72856504) on chromosome 2 near the LRP1B gene, which is specific for WMH in AIS and has not been previosuly described in stroke-free WMH cohorts. A replication effort involving additional independent cohorts of AIS patients with brain MRI and genome-wide genotyping is ongoing.

Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 show increased serum concentrations of neurofilament light chain that correlate with worse clinical outcomes.

Stroke is a leading cause of the adult disability epidemic in the United States, with a major contribution from poststroke cognitive impairment and dementia (PSCID), the rates of which are disproportionally high among the health disparity populations. Despite the PSCID’s overwhelming impact on public health, a knowledge gap exists with regard to the complex interaction between the acute stroke event and highly prevalent preexisting brain pathology related to cerebrovascular and Alzheimer disease or related dementia. Understanding the factors that modulate PSCID risk in relation to index stroke event is critically important for developing personalized prognostication of PSCID, targeted interventions to prevent it, and for informing future clinical trial design. The DISCOVERY study (Determinants of Incident Stroke Cognitive Outcomes and Vascular Effects on Recovery), a collaborative network of thirty clinical performance clinical sites with access to acute stroke populations and the expertise and capacity for systematic assessment of PSCID will address this critical challenge. DISCOVERY is a prospective, multicenter, observational, nested-cohort study of 8000 nondemented ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients enrolled at the time of index stroke and followed for a minimum of 2 years, with serial cognitive evaluations and assessments of functional outcome, with subsets undergoing research magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography and comprehensive genetic/genomic and fluid biomarker testing. The overall scientific objective of this study is to elucidate mechanisms of brain resilience and susceptibility to PSCID in diverse US populations based on complex interplay between life-course exposure to multiple vascular risk factors, preexisting burden of microvascular and neurodegenerative pathology, the effect of strategic acute stroke lesions, and the mediating effect of genomic and epigenomic variation.

Background and Purpose: Despite a higher incidence of stroke and a more adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile in Blacks and Hispanics compared with Whites, carotid artery revascularization is performed less frequently among these subpopulations. We assessed racial differences in high-grade (≥70% diameter-reducing) carotid stenosis. Methods: Consecutive clients in a Nationwide Life Line for-Profit Service to screen for vascular disease, 2005 to 2019 were evaluated in a cross-sectional study. The prevalence of high-grade stenosis, defined by a carotid ultrasound peak systolic velocity of ≥230 cm/s, was assessed. Participants self-identified as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or other. Race/ethnic differences were assessed using Poisson regression. The number of individuals in the United States with high-grade stenosis was estimated by applying prevalence estimates to 2015 US Census population estimates. Results: The prevalence of high-grade carotid stenosis was estimated in 6 130 481 individuals. The prevalence of high-grade stenosis was higher with increasing age in all race-sex strata. Generally, Blacks and Hispanics had a lower prevalence of high-grade stenosis compared with Whites, while Native Americans had a higher prevalence. For example, for men aged 55 to 65, the relative risk of stenosis compared with Whites was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.29–0.55) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.46–0.81) for Blacks and Hispanics, respectively; and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.12–2.10) for Native Americans. When these prevalence estimates were applied to the Census estimates of the US population, an estimated 327 721 individuals have high-grade stenosis, of whom 7% are Black, 7% Hispanic, and 43% women. Conclusions: Despite their having a more adverse cardiovascular risk profile, there was a lower prevalence of high-grade carotid artery stenosis for both the Black and Hispanic relative to the White clients. This lower prevalence of high-grade stenosis is a potential contributor to the lower use of carotid revascularization procedures in these minority populations.