Subramaniam, Malayannan

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 20% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Clinical management of TNBC is limited to surgery, chemotherapy and radiation due to lack of estrogen receptor alpha and HER2 expression. Recently, we have shown that approximately 40% of TNBCs express estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) and have begun to explore the possibility that this receptor could be utilized as a novel therapeutic target for this disease. Methods: To examine the biological functions of ERβ in TNBC, novel ERβ expressing TN cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were developed. In vitro experiments were employed to determine alterations in the global gene expression profiles, biological pathways, proliferation rates, and cell cycle progression following estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Cell line xenografts were also established in athymic ovariectomized nude mice to examine tumoral responses to ERβ targeting agents and to investigate gene and protein expression patterns as well as potential serum biomarkers indicative of therapeutic response. Additionally, using the resources of the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY), we have identified, and begun to analyze, ERβ+ and ERβ- patient derived xenografts (PDX) established from women with TNBC. Results: Our studies have revealed that both estrogen and multiple ERβ-specific agonists elicit significant anti-proliferative effects in ERβ+ TNBC cells primarily through a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest. These anti-proliferative effects appear to be mediated by cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which are highly induced following estrogen and ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treated cells decreased the proliferation rates of multiple non-ERβ expressing cell lines; effects that were completely reversed when cystatins were depleted from the media. In addition, we have shown that activation of ERβ, and the subsequent induction of cystatin gene expression, leads to suppression of canonical TGFβ signaling through multiple mechanisms including suppression of TGFβR2 expression, induction of Smad7 expression and blockade of TGFβ ligand-mediated activation of this pathway both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, ERβ+ TNBC PDXs exhibit significantly decreased tumor growth rates in estrogen-treated mice compared to ERβ- TN breast tumors. Conclusions: Our in vitro and in vivo data show that estrogen and ERβ-specific agonists elicit anti-cancer effects in ERβ+ TNBC. These effects appear to be mediated, in part, by cystatins through their inhibitory effects on canonical TGFB signaling, a pathway known to drive TNBC progression. Importantly, these data lay the foundation for studies aimed at examining the ability to therapeutically target ERβ in TNBC patients. Citation Format: Reese J, Bruinsma E, Subramaniam M, Suman V, Pitel K, Kalari K, Yu J, Wang L, Goetz M, Ingle J, Hawse J. ERβ elicits tumor suppressive effects in triple negative breast cancer through the induction of cystatins and suppression of TGFβ signaling. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-01.

Abstract The Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGFβ)/SMAD signaling pathway can function as either a tumor suppressor or metastasis promoter during tumor progression. In normal epithelial cells and early stages of epithelial tumorigenesis TGFβ functions as a tumor suppressor to decrease cell proliferation or induce apoptosis. However, during malignant progression tumor cells no longer respond to the anti-proliferative effects of TGFβ, but instead undergo an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) whereby cells acquire a migratory and invasive phenotype which promotes tumor metastasis. Resolution of the dichotomy in TGFβ function and a further understanding of its tumor suppressor and metastasis promoting functions may uncover new strategies for the treatment of epithelial cancers. In previous studies we demonstrated an important role of the TGFβ-Inducible Early Gene-1 (TIEG1)/Krüppel-like Factor-10 (KLF10) as a central regulator of TGFβ/SMAD signaling and the anti-proliferative functions of TGFβ. In this study we examined the role of KLF10 in controlling the TGFβ-induced EMT in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. We show that depletion of KLF10 results in a more pronounced induction of EMT in human A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells as assessed by quantitative real-time PCR, changes in cellular morphology and immunofluorescence microscopy, and transcriptome-wide (RNA-seq) analyses. Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis shows that KLF10 directly binds to GC-rich sequences in the promoter region of the EMT-promoting transcription factor SLUG/SNAI2 to repress its transcription. Consistent with these findings, an analysis of KLF10 and SNAI2 expression in lung cancer revealed that while KLF10 levels are decreased in lung cancer vs. normal samples, SNAI2 levels are increased. Additional ChIP studies showed that KLF10 recruits HDAC1 to the SNAI2 promoter and is required for the removal of activating histone acetylation marks. These findings reveal a previously unknown function of KLF10 in suppressing TGFβ-induced EMT and represent a significant advancement in the understanding the molecular dichotomy of TGFβ function during tumor progression. Citation Format: Vivek Kumar Mishra, Vijayalakshmi Kari, Malayannan Subramaniam, Simon J. Baumgart, Sankari Nagarajan, Florian Wegwitz, Thomas C. Spelsberg, John R. Hawse, Steven A. Johnsen. Krüppel-like Transcription Factor-10 (KLF10) suppresses the TGFβ-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Chromatin and Epigenetics in Cancer; Sep 24-27, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A03.

Abstract Background: While the biological functions and clinical importance of ERα are well understood in breast cancer, much less is known about its most closely related family member, ERβ, particularly in the setting of triple negative disease. Additionally, the ability to therapeutically target ERβ in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has not been fully explored. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in a cohort of 71 TNBCs. To further define the biological functions of ERβ in TNBC, novel ERβ expressing triple negative cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were developed and comprehensively characterized at the level of global gene expression profiling, modulation of important biological pathways, cellular proliferation and response to targeted therapies. Results: In TNBCs from 71 patients, nuclear and cytoplasmic ERβ was detected at moderate to high levels in 24% and 32% of cases respectively. This moderate to high expression of both nuclear and cytoplasmic ERβ was associated with higher levels of Ki67. Of the 17 tumors expressing ERβ, 13 (76%) were negative for androgen receptor expression. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231-ERβ and Hs578T-ERβ cell lines, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation in response to both estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of these cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors, while suppressing the expression of many interleukins. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells inhibited the proliferation rates and blocked TGFβ signaling in non-ERβ expressing TNBC cells, effects that were completely reversed following depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of TNBCs, and most do not express the androgen receptor. In TNBC, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that estrogen or ERβ specific agonists would be expected to elicit anti-tumor effects when ERβ is expressed. These tumor suppressive effects of ERβ appear to be mediated in part through the actions of cystatins, and their inhibition of TGFβ signaling, suggesting that this family of secreted proteins may represent novel biomarkers for monitoring ERβ specific drug responsiveness and/or patient outcomes. Citation Format: Jordan M Reese, Malayannan Subramaniam, Vera J Suman, Xianglin Wu, Vivian Negron, Anne Gingery, Kevin S Pitel, Sejal S Shah, Heather E Cunliffe, Ann E McCullough, Barbara A Pockaj, Thomas C Spelsberg, Matthew P Goetz, James N Ingle, John R Hawse. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-06.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), unlike ERα, classically functions as a tumor suppressor in vitro. However, ERβ's biological functions in vivo and predictive/prognostic value in breast cancer are controversial. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in the following 3 cohorts: 1) a cohort with all breast cancer subtypes (n = 182), 2) a prospective NCCTG adjuvant tamoxifen trial for postmenopausal women with ERα positive breast cancer with long-term follow-up (n = 198) and 3) a cohort of 80 triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). To elucidate the biological functions of ERβ in breast cancer, novel ERβ expressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were developed and characterized using multiple techniques and were examined for responsiveness to various ERβ targeted therapies. Results: About one-third of all breast tumors, regardless of sub-type, were shown to express nuclear ERβ and this expression was independent of ERα or HER2. In the NCCTG 89-30-52 cohort, breast cancer recurrence rates were significantly associated with ERβ protein expression with 10 year recurrence rates of 25%, 15% and 4% for zero, low or high levels of ERβ expression respectively. Interestingly, in TNBCs, nuclear ERβ was expressed at intermediate or high levels in 24% of tumors. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231 cell line, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in response to estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Conversely, these same treatments induced proliferation of ERβ-expressing MCF7 cells which endogenously express ERα. However, ERβ expression sensitized MCF7 cells to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-estrogens. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which function as tumor suppressors, and potently inhibited canonical TGFβ signaling. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells suppressed the proliferation rates and inhibited TGFβ signaling in other TNBC cell lines, effects that were completely reversed following the depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of breast cancers and may have value as a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ may have clinical benefit in multiple breast cancer sub-types; however, the specific drug of choice may vary based on ERα status. Specifically, we have demonstrated that ERβ expression in ERα+ MCF7 cells sensitizes them to the effectiveness of anti-estrogens, an observation that was confirmed in women enrolled in a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen trial. In TNBCs, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that targeting ERβ with either estrogen or ERβ specific agonists will elicit anti-tumor effects through the induction of cystatins and inhibition of TGFβ signaling resulting in tumor regression and improved patient outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-03.

Abstract Background: Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We and others have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-cancer effects of this drug and that endoxifen concentrations are an important factor with regard to tamoxifen efficacy. These studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which phase I clinical trials are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone. Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast gene expression profiles were compared to that of estrogen, tamoxifen, raloxifene and lasofoxifene by microarray and RT-PCR analyses in both estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and ERβ expressing cell lines. The in vivo effects of an anti-cancer dose of endoxifen (50mg/kg/day) on the skeleton were first analyzed in 3-month-old ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography, micro-Computed Tomography and histomorphometry. In a second set of studies, a pre-clinical rat model was used to determine the effects of endoxifen (10mg/kg/day) on the skeleton in both a pre- and post-menopausal setting. Results: Endoxifen treatment of ERα and ERβ expressing mouse osteoblast cells led to dramatically different gene expression profiles when compared to that of estrogen and other anti-estrogens. In ovariectomized mice, daily administration of endoxifen led to significant increases in bone mineral density and content throughout the skeleton relative to vehicle control treated animals. The numbers and activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts were also found to be significantly higher in endoxifen treated mice. In the pre-clinical model system, endoxifen treatment of 4 month-old ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats significantly protected against bone loss following estrogen depletion primarily due to suppression of osteoclast mediated bone resorption. Importantly, in sham operated rats (thus retaining ovarian function), endoxifen treatment enhanced bone volume and trabecular thickness and did not suppress osteoclast activity. Conclusions: These data are the first to examine the effects of the novel breast cancer therapy, endoxifen, on bone and reveal that the molecular mechanisms of action of this compound are substantially different than that of other SERMs. Endoxifen was shown to protect against bone loss following estrogen depletion in both mice and rats and interestingly, enhanced bone mass in ovary intact rats, an observation that is in stark contrast to the known effects of tamoxifen which induces bone loss in the “pre-menopausal” setting. These studies suggest that endoxifen may have superior bone-beneficial effects compared to tamoxifen, and if efficacy is confirmed in later phase trials, endoxifen may represent a better drug of choice for a sub-set of breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-05-01.

Bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMMs) treated with granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) or macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF), differentiate into GM‐CSF‐induced mouse bone marrow‐derived macrophages (GM‐BMMs) or M‐CSF‐induced mouse bone marrow‐derived macrophages (M‐BMMs), which have an M1 or M2 profile, respectively. GM‐BMMs produce large amounts of proinflammatory cytokines and mediate resistance to pathogens, whereas M‐BMMs produce antiinflammatory cytokines that contribute to tissue repair and remodeling. M‐BMMs stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are in an antiinflammatory state, with an IL‐12lowIL‐10high phenotype. However, the regulation of this process remains unclear. Klf10 belongs to the family of Krüppel‐like transcription factors and was initially described as a TGF‐β inducible early gene 1. IL‐12p40 is upregulated in LPS‐stimulated M‐BMMs from Klf10‐deficient mice, but downregulated during Klf10 overexpression. Klf11, another member of the Krüppel‐like factor family, can also repress the production of IL‐12p40. Furthermore, Klf10 binds to the CACCC element of the IL‐12p40 promoter and inhibits its transcription. We have therefore identified Klf10 as a transcription factor that regulates the expression of IL‐12p40 in M‐BMMs.

Objective— Endothelial cell (EC) inflammatory status is critical to many vascular diseases. Emerging data demonstrate that mutations of Krüppel-like factor-11 (KLF11), a gene coding maturity-onset diabetes mellitus of the young type 7 ( MODY7 ), contribute to the development of neonatal diabetes mellitus. However, the function of KLF11 in the cardiovascular system still remains to be uncovered. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of KLF11 in vascular endothelial inflammation. Methods and Results— KLF11 is highly expressed in vascular ECs and induced by proinflammatory stimuli. Adenovirus-mediated KLF11 overexpression inhibits expression of tumor necrosis factors-α–induced adhesion molecules. Moreover, small interfering RNA–mediated KLF11 knockdown augments the proinflammatory status in ECs. KLF11 inhibits promoter activity of adhesion molecules induced by tumor necrosis factor-α and nuclear factor-κB p65 overexpression. Mechanistically, KLF11 potently inhibits nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway via physical interaction with p65. Furthermore, KLF11 knockdown results in increased binding of p65 to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and E-selectin promoters. At the whole organism level, KLF11 −/− mice exhibit a significant increase in leukocyte recruitment to ECs after lipopolysaccharide administration. Conclusion— Taken together, our data demonstrate for the first time that KLF11 is a suppressor of EC inflammatory activation, suggesting that KLF11 constitutes a novel potential molecular target for inhibition of vascular inflammatory diseases.

Abstract Background The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively; yet, much less is known about full-length ERβ (ERβ1) and even less about its 4 variant forms (ERβ2-5). We have recently implicated a role for ERβ1 in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to anti-estrogens. However, the ability of ERβ2-5 to modulate ERα and ERβ1 activity, and their association with cancer development, progression, and response to estradiol (E2) and anti-estrogens are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that the presence of ERβ variants may be of diagnostic and clinical relevance for breast cancer patients and describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody (MC10) that is able to detect their expression in tumor biopsies. Methods: Transient transfection and luciferase assays were used to determine the transcriptional activity of ERβ2-5 in response to E2 and anti-estrogens alone or in combination with ERα and ERβ1. A novel monoclonal antibody targeting all ERβ variants (MC10) was developed and characterized. The sub-cellular localization of ERβ2-5 was determined via confocal microscopy. Finally, the MC10 antibody was used to assess ERβ positivity in breast tumors and was compared to that of another monoclonal antibody which only detects ERβ1. Results: Unlike ERβ1, ERβ2-5 do not activate an estrogen response element (ERE) in response to E2 and instead, slightly repress the activity of this reporter construct. Expression of ERβ2-5 does not significantly alter the transcriptional activity of ERβ1 following E2 treatment. However, ERβ2, 3 and 5, but not ERβ4, significantly enhance the E2-induced transcriptional activity of ERα. Interestingly, expression of ERβ3, 4 and 5, but not ERβ2, enhance the ability of anti-estrogens to block ERα mediated transcriptional activity. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERβ1 and 2 are almost exclusively localized to the cell nucleus. However, ERβ3-5 exhibit significant cytoplasmic and peri-nuclear localization. Immunohistochemistry of breast cancer biopsies using the MC10 antibody revealed multiple staining patterns including tumors which exhibit primarily nuclear staining and others primarily cytoplasmic, both in the presence and absence of ERα. These results are in contrast to the almost exclusive nuclear staining obtained on the same tumors with an ERβ1-specific antibody. Conclusions: ERβ variants exhibit variable sub-cellular localization patterns and can influence the function of ERα, both in response to E2 and anti-estrogens. Therefore, the differential expression of ERβ variants and their cellular localization may influence breast cancer progression and/or therapeutic responses. The use of ERβ antibodies which do not detect all ERβ variants, or the use of a single ERβ antibody which does not discriminate between ERβ1 and its variants, is unlikely to reveal the complete biological significance of total ERβ expression in breast cancer and may in part explain the conflicting studies which have been reported for ERβ in the field. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.