Back to Authors

Camm, A. John

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-2871

A5012637936 | I4401726869

Mayo Clinic

City St George's, University of London

Citations 15

P2895Evaluation of the effect of oral anticoagulants on all-cause mortality within 3 months of the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation: results from the GARFIELD-AF prospective registry

European Heart Journal | August 29, 2018 | Volume: 39 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehy565.p2895

2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

EP Europace | January 17, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e1-e160

10.1093/europace/eux274 | PMID 29016840

2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary

EP Europace | January 5, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 157-208

10.1093/europace/eux275 | PMID 29016841

HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the State of Genetic Testing for the Channelopathies and Cardiomyopathies

Europace | August 2, 2011 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1077-1109

10.1093/europace/eur245 | PMID 21810866

EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy

Europace | July 31, 2010 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1480-1489

10.1093/europace/euq275 | PMID 20675674

Abstract The purpose of this Consensus Statement is to focus on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) deactivation in patients with irreversible or terminal illness. This statement summarizes the opinions of the Task Force members, convened by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), based on ethical and legal principles, as well as their own clinical, scientific, and technical experience. It is directed to all healthcare professionals who treat patients with implanted ICDs, nearing end of life, in order to improve the patient dying process. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote device deactivation. Rather, the ultimate judgement regarding this procedure must be made by the patient (or in special conditions by his/her legal representative) after careful communication about the deactivation's consequences, respecting his/her autonomy and clarifying that he/she has a legal and ethical right to refuse it. Obviously, the physician asked to deactivate the ICD and the industry representative asked to assist can conscientiously object to and refuse to perform device deactivation.