Back to Authors

Pruessner, Jens C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-2980

A5057051288 | I4210105618

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Citations 14

Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems for Identification of Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Cultures from Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | April 12, 2012 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2034-2039

10.1128/jcm.00330-12 | PMID 22495566

ABSTRACTThe Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) instruments were evaluated for the identification of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) by a blinded comparison to conventional biochemical or molecular methods. Two hundred NFGNB that were recovered from cultures from cystic fibrosis patients in the University of Iowa Health Care (UIHC) Microbiology Laboratory between 1 January 2006 and 31 October 2010 were sent to Mayo Clinic for analysis with the Bruker Biotyper (software version 3.0) and to bioMérieux for testing with Vitek MS (SARAMIS database version 3.62). If two attempts at direct colony testing failed to provide an acceptable MALDI-TOF identification, an extraction procedure was performed. The MS identifications from both of these systems were provided to UIHC for comparison to the biochemical or molecular identification that had been reported in the patient record. Isolates with discordant results were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing at UIHC. After discrepancy testing, the Bruker Biotyper result agreed with the biochemical or molecular method, with 72.5% of isolates to the species level, 5.5% to the complex level, and 19% to the genus level (3% not identified). The level of agreement for Vitek MS was 80% species, 3.5% complex, 6% genus, and 3.5% family (7% not identified). Both MS systems provided rapid (≤3 min per isolate) and reliable identifications. The agreement of combined species/complex/genus-level identification with the reference method was higher for the Bruker Biotyper (97% versus 89.5%,P= 0.004) but required an extraction step more often. Species-level agreement with the reference method was similar for both MS systems (72.5% and 80%,P= 0.099).
IC‐03‐05: Estimating the impact of differences among protocols for manual hippocampal segmentation on Alzheimer's disease‐related atrophy: Preparatory phase for a harmonized protocol

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.017

P4‐064: Differences Between Segmentation Protocols for Manual Hippocampal Volumetry: Preliminary Results for an Eadc‐adni Harmonization Effort

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 26, 2010 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4S_Part_20 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2010.08.124

IC‐03‐02: Survey of segmentation protocols for manual hippocampal volumetry: Preparatory phase for an EADC‐ADNI harmonization protocol

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 11, 2010 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4S_Part_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.164