Back to Authors

Redolfi, Alberto

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-9059

A5073183618 | I4210114614

Mayo Clinic

Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli

Citations 9

Survey of Protocols for the Manual Segmentation of the Hippocampus: Preparatory Steps Towards a Joint EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease | May 16, 2018 | Volume: 26 | Issue: s3 | Pages: 61-75

10.3233/jad-2011-0004 | PMID 21971451

Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC‐ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 20, 2015 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 175-183

10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.002 | PMID 25616957

AbstractBackgroundThe European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Harmonized Protocol (HarP) is a Delphi definition of manual hippocampal segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that can be used as the standard of truth to train new tracers, and to validate automated segmentation algorithms. Training requires large and representative data sets of segmented hippocampi. This work aims to produce a set of HarP labels for the proper training and certification of tracers and algorithms.MethodsSixty‐eight 1.5 T and 67 3 T volumetric structural ADNI scans from different subjects, balanced by age, medial temporal atrophy, and scanner manufacturer, were segmented by five qualified HarP tracers whose absolute interrater intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.953 and 0.975 (left and right). Labels were validated as HarP compliant through centralized quality check and correction.ResultsHippocampal volumes (mm3) were as follows: controls: left = 3060 (standard deviation [SD], 502), right = 3120 (SD, 897); mild cognitive impairment (MCI): left = 2596 (SD, 447), right = 2686 (SD, 473); and Alzheimer’s disease (AD): left = 2301 (SD, 492), right = 2445 (SD, 525). Volumes significantly correlated with atrophy severity at Scheltens' scale (Spearman's ρ = <−0.468, P = <.0005).Cerebrospinal fluid spaces (mm3) were as follows: controls: left = 23 (32), right = 25 (25); MCI: left = 15 (13), right = 22 (16); and AD: left = 11 (13), right = 20 (25). Five subjects (3.7%) presented with unusual anatomy.ConclusionsThis work provides reference hippocampal labels for the training and certification of automated segmentation algorithms. The publicly released labels will allow the widespread implementation of the standard segmentation protocol.
Delphi definition of the EADC‐ADNI Harmonized Protocol for hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 15, 2014 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 126-138

10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.009 | PMID 25130658

Abstract Background This study aimed to have international experts converge on a harmonized definition of whole hippocampus boundaries and segmentation procedures, to define standard operating procedures for magnetic resonance (MR)‐based manual hippocampal segmentation. Methods The panel received a questionnaire regarding whole hippocampus boundaries and segmentation procedures. Quantitative information was supplied to allow evidence‐based answers. A recursive and anonymous Delphi procedure was used to achieve convergence. Significance of agreement among panelists was assessed by exact probability on Fisher's and binomial tests. Results Agreement was significant on the inclusion of alveus/fimbria ( P = .021), whole hippocampal tail ( P = .013), medial border of the body according to visible morphology ( P = .0006), and on this combined set of features ( P = .001). This definition captures 100% of hippocampal tissue, 100% of Alzheimer’s disease‐related atrophy, and demonstrated good reliability on preliminary intrarater (0.98) and inter‐rater (0.94) estimates. Discussion Consensus was achieved among international experts with respect to hippocampal segmentation using MR resulting in a harmonized segmentation protocol.
Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC‐ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation

Alzheimer's & Dementia | May 21, 2013 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 184-194

10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.001 | PMID 23706515

AbstractBackgroundHippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a Delphi panel converge on a set of landmarks.MethodsOne hundred percent of anatomic landmark variability across 12 different protocols for manual segmentation was reduced into four segmentation units (the minimum hippocampus, the alveus/fimbria, the tail, and the subiculum), which were segmented on magnetic resonance images by expert raters to estimate reliability and AD‐related atrophy.ResultsIntra‐ and interrater reliability were more than 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, except for the alveus/fimbria, which were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Of all AD‐related atrophy, the minimum hippocampus contributed to 67%; tail, 24%; alveus/fimbria, 4%; and the subiculum, 5%.ConclusionsAnatomic landmark variability in available protocols can be reduced to four discrete and measurable segmentation units. Their quantitative assessment will help a Delphi panel to define a set of landmarks for a harmonized protocol.
O2‐11‐02: Definition of harmonized protocol for hippocampal segmentation

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 19, 2012 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4S_Part_7 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.685

IC‐P‐034: Definition of harmonized protocol for hippocampal segmentation

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 19, 2012 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4S_Part_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.066

IC‐03‐05: Estimating the impact of differences among protocols for manual hippocampal segmentation on Alzheimer's disease‐related atrophy: Preparatory phase for a harmonized protocol

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.017

P1‐299: Estimating the impact of differences among protocols for manual hippocampal segmentation on Alzheimer's disease‐related atrophy: Preparatory phase for a harmonized protocol

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_6 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.578

IC‐03‐02: Survey of segmentation protocols for manual hippocampal volumetry: Preparatory phase for an EADC‐ADNI harmonization protocol

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 11, 2010 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4S_Part_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.164