OBJECTIVE Management of locally invasive colorectal carcinoma at any stage currently involves surgical excision followed by chemoradiotherapy; however, the prognosis is poor, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 5%. Failure to achieve gross-total resection is associated with poorer OS, and patients with residual tumor postresection (R1 or R2 resection) have a median OS of 7 months compared with 23 months in those who undergo resection with negative margins (R0 resection). For tumors that have invaded the sacrum, sacrectomy becomes necessary to achieve R0 resection. The objective of this study was to provide a descriptive multicenter account of resection for locally invasive colorectal carcinoma with sacral invasion, focusing on the association of tumor morphometry with surgical planning and perioperative outcomes. METHODS Demographic, comorbidity, clinical, tumor-specific, operative characteristic, and outcome data were collected on all patients who underwent resection of colorectal carcinoma with concurrent sacral resection between January 2005 and May 2022. Patients were grouped into those having undergone surgery for purely palliative intent, or those with resection with attempt at local control and dichotomized into level of osteotomy (either proximal or distal to the S2–3 level). RESULTS Twenty-two patients (median age 50.5 [IQR 43.3–60.0] years, 54.5% female) underwent sacrectomy for colorectal carcinoma. Operative records indicated intent for local control in 14 patients and palliative in the remaining 8 patients. Palliative surgical intent was based primarily on the presence of distant metastases. There was no significant difference in median local progression-free survival between patients undergoing osteotomy proximal to the S2–3 level and those undergoing osteotomy distal to the S2–3 level. CONCLUSIONS En bloc resection is believed to offer the best local control in patients with locally invasive colorectal carcinoma. The present descriptive series highlights outcomes of en bloc resection with partial or full sacrectomy in patients with tumors showing local extension into the sacrum. Complications are common, most often in the form of wound dehiscence or infection, and many patients require placement in a rehabilitation or intermediate-care facility upon discharge. However, for those with stage III (locally aggressive) disease, median OS exceeds 16 years, suggesting that such aggressive management with en bloc resection may be warranted in properly selected patients.
Novel Standalone Motion-Sparing Pelvic Fixation Prevents Short-Term Insufficiency Fractures After Midsacrectomies Without Sacrificing Normal, Mobile Lumbar Segments Traditionally Used for Stabilization
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sacrectomy is often the treatment of choice to provide the greatest chance of progression-free and overall survival for patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the sacrum. After midsacrectomy, the stability of the sacropelvic interface is diminished, resulting in insufficiency fractures. Traditional stabilization involves lumbopelvic fixation but subjects normal mobile segments to fusion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether standalone intrapelvic fixation is a safe adjunct to midsacrectomy, avoiding both sacral insufficiency fractures and the morbidity of instrumenting into the mobile spine. METHODS: A retrospective study identified all patients who underwent resection of sacral tumors at 2 comprehensive cancer centers between June 2020 and July 2022. Demographic, tumor-specific, operative characteristics and outcome data were collected. The primary outcome was presence of sacral insufficiency fractures. A retrospective data set of patients undergoing midsacrectomy without hardware placement was collected as a control. RESULTS: Nine patients (5 male, 4 female), median age 59 years, underwent midsacrectomy with concomitant placement of standalone pelvic fixation. No patients developed insufficiency fractures during the 216 days of clinical and 207 days of radiographic follow-up. There were no adverse events attributable to the addition of standalone pelvic fixation. In our historical cohort of partial sacrectomies without stabilization, there were 4/25 patients (16%) with sacral insufficiency fractures. These fractures appeared between 0 and 5 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: A novel standalone intrapelvic fixation after partial sacrectomy is a safe adjunct to prevent postoperative sacral insufficiency fractures in patients undergoing midsacrectomy for tumor. Such a technique may allow for long-term sacropelvic stability without sacrificing mobile lumbar segments.