Panse, Jens

Abstract Background Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an ultra-rare blood disease characterized by uncontrolled complement activation with potentially life-threatening complications. Therapeutic options comprise both terminal complement inhibition, targeting C5 to prevent intravascular hemolysis (IVH), and proximal complement inhibition, intervening upstream within the complement cascade to address IVH and extravascular hemolysis (EVH). Pegcetacoplan, the first C3 and C3b inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in complement inhibitor (CI)–experienced (CIexp) and –naïve (CInaive) patients in two phase 3 studies with a three year follow up (PEGASUS [NCT03500549] and PRINCE [NCT04085601]). The aim of this study was to describe real world clinical and treatment outcomes in CIexp and CInaive PNH patients prescribed pegcetacoplan. Methods Data were drawn from the Adelphi PNH II Disease Specific Programme™, a real-world cross-sectional survey of hematologists and their consulting PNH patients. Data were collected from November 2023–January 2025 in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, and the US. Patients prescribed pegcetacoplan for ≥3 months were included and described as CIexp if they had previously been treated with CI, or CInaive if patients had never been prescribed CI therapy. Physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes. Patients provided data on patient-reported outcomes, including the EQ-5D-5L and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue. Response to pegcetacoplan was categorized as no, minor, partial, good, major or complete response per SAAWP-response criteria (Risitano et al, 2019). Analyses were descriptive. Results Overall, 54 physicians provided data for 77 patients prescribed pegcetacoplan (54 CIexp patients and 23 CInaive patients). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 45.0 (33.5–55.0) years (CIexp, 47.0 [37.0–60.8]; CInaive, 39.0 [30.0–45.0]), 63.6% (Cexp, 64.8%; Cnaive, 60.9%) were male, 57.9% (CIexp, 50.9%; CInaive, 73.9%) were in employment. Median (IQR) time since diagnosis was 2.4 (1.3–4.9) years (Cexp, 3.1 [2.0–5.5]; Cnaive, 1.3 [0.8–2.3]) with median (IQR) time since start of pegcetacoplan initiation being 0.6 (0.4–1.0) year (CIexp, 0.6 [0.4–0.9]; CInaive, 0.6 [0.5–1.2]). Clinical outcomes were measured at treatment initiation and the time of survey, and reported as median (IQR). Hemoglobin levels increased from 9.0 (8.0–9.2) to 11.0 (10.3–12.1) g/dL, and 9.0 (7.0–10.5) to 11.5 (10.6–12.0) g/dL, for Cexp (n=52) and Cnaive (n=21), respectively. Lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased from 490 (295–594) to 260 (189–377) U/L for Cexp (n=53), and 275 (214–775) to 220 (187–278) U/L for Cnaive (n=18). Absolute reticulocyte counts decreased from 200 (135–275) to 113 (105–217) x109/L for Cexp (n=19) and 160 (113–250) to 110 (100–134) x109/L for CInaive (n=7). Positive movement by at least one response category since pegcetacoplan initiation were observed in 85.2% CIexp (n=27) and 61.5% CInaive (n=13); with patients classified as having a ‘good’, ‘major’ or ‘complete’ response increasing from 3.7% to 74.1% for CIexp and 23.1% to 69.2% for CInaive. Perceived severity of PNH improved after pegcetacoplan initiation, with ‘mild’ severity increasing from 13.0% to 68.5% and 34.8% to 87.0%; patients experiencing no fatigue increased from 5.6% to 57.4% and 8.7% to 65.2%, for CIexp and CInaive, respectively. For both CIexp and CInaive, complete treatment adherence was reported for 87.0% of patients. Since pegcetacoplan initiation, proportion of ‘well’ or ‘very well’ controlled PNH patients increased from 14.8% to 96.3% for CIexp and 52.2% to 100.0% for CInaive. Overall, 25 patients self-reported data (n=14 CIexp; n=11 CInaive). Patients reported a mean (Standard Deviation [SD]): EQ-5D VAS score of 66.8 (16.0) and 76.7 (18.7); EQ-5D utility score of 0.86 (0.16) and 0.91 (0.13); FACIT-Fatigue 41.1 (9.5; n=13)and 37.1 (12.2; n=11) for CIexp and CInaive, respectively. Conclusion Improvements in clinical values, perceived PNH severity, control of PNH, and both physician and patient-reported fatigue were observed in CIexp and CInaive patients. These data suggest that pegcetacoplan has positive outcomes regardless of prior CI exposure. These findings indicate that the efficacy of pegcetacoplan in a real-world clinical practice is consistent with results from clinical trials and other real-world evidence for both CIexp and CInaive patients.

Abstract Introduction: Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is a clonal mast cell disease driven by the KIT D816V mutation in ~95% of cases and is associated with symptoms of mast cell activation and tissue infiltration. It can cause chronic, debilitating symptoms − including life-threatening anaphylaxis and impaired bone health. While historically most patients have relied on symptom-directed best supportive care (BSC) therapies, avapritinib is used as a new standard of care targeting KIT D816V, the primary driver for SM. Avapritinib is an oral, potent, selective KIT D816V inhibitor, and the first and only approved targeted therapy for adult patients with ISM in the USA and the EU. Approval was based on results from the phase 2 PIONEER trial. Here, we present the findings from ~3.5-year long-term follow-up. Methods: Adults with centrally confirmed ISM and uncontrolled moderate-to-severe symptoms who completed the randomized dose-finding (Part 1), or randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (Part 2) portions of PIONEER (NCT03731260) rolled over to the open-label, long-term extension (Part 3). This cumulative analysis includes patients who initiated avapritinib at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily (QD) in either Parts 1, 2, or 3. All patients received BSC. Per investigator discretion and based on disease burden, dose titration up to 50 mg QD of avapritinib was permitted in Part 3. Long-term efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in symptoms and QoL, using the ISM-Symptom Assessment Form (ISM-SAF; ©2018 Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi Company) and the Mastocytosis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MC-QoL). Safety was also assessed. Results: Overall, 226 patients initiated avapritinib 25mg QD across Parts 1, 2, and 3. This longer-term analysis is inclusive of 65 patients who dose titrated from 25 mg to 50 mg QD in Part 3. Median (range) treatment duration was 40.0 months (0.7‒67.2) as of February 21, 2025. Longer-term efficacy data with ~3.5 years of follow-up demonstrated sustained disease-related symptom improvements. The mean change (standard deviation [SD]) in total symptom score (TSS, per ISM-SAF), was −19.80 (19.81) at Week 144 (Month 33) and −20.43 (20.57) at Week 168 (Month 39) from a baseline of 48.08 (19.47). Additionally, avapritinib-treated patients demonstrated durable improvement in their most severe symptoms (mean change [SD] from baseline of −3.35 [3.02] at Month 33 and −3.47 [3.19] at Month 39) per ISM-SAF. Sustained responses were observed across all individual symptom domains (0–30) with mean changes (SD) at Month 33 and Month 39 of −3.77 (5.52) and −3.84 (6.05) for the gastrointestinal domain, −8.21 (7.70) and −8.20 (7.85) for the skin domain, and −4.66 (6.24) and −4.87 (6.51) for the neurocognitive domain. The mean percent change (SD) in MC-QoL was −34.67 (40.16) at Month 33 and −40.72 (33.24) at Month 39 from a baseline of 54.24 (18.32). Treatment with avapritinib was well tolerated, and its safety profile was similar to the previously reported placebo-controlled portion. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were Grades 1–2, and 7% of patients experienced Grade ≥3 TRAEs of which diarrhea, neutrophil count decrease, and weight increase occurred in >1 patient. No Grade ≥3 TRAEs of increase in transaminases were observed. Edema (peripheral and periorbital), the most frequently reported TRAE, was mostly Grade 1 and occurred most frequently during the first 3–4 months of treatment. Three patients (1%) experienced serious adverse events assessed as treatment related. However, none led to treatment discontinuation and no trends were observed. After approximately 3.5 years of follow-up, low rates of treatment discontinuations (n=7, 3%) due to TRAEs were observed. Conclusion: Longer follow-up of patients with ISM treated on the PIONEER trial, including some on avapritinib for up to 5 years, demonstrates that prolonged avapritinib therapy continues to be effective and well tolerated. Additional prospective analyses will be needed to determine effects of selective KIT D816V-inhibition on anaphylaxis. These data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of avapritinib as a chronic treatment for adult patients with ISM.

Abstract Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) comprises a spectrum of subtypes characterized by neoplastic mast cell (MC) infiltration of tissues and release of MC mediators. Non-advanced SM (NonAdvSM), including indolent SM (ISM), smoldering SM (SSM), and bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM) subtypes, is the most prevalent form of SM. NonAdvSM can be associated with debilitating symptomology which can significantly impair quality of life. The gain-of-function somatic KIT c.2447 C>T (p.D816V) mutation is found in up to 95% of patients with SM. Bezuclastinib (CGT9486) is an oral, potent, and selective type 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against KIT D816V. Results from Summit (NCT05186753) Part 1 informed the recommended phase 2 dose (100 mg QD bezuclastinib) for Part 2. We report topline results from the 24-week assessment of Summit Part 2. Methods: Summit is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase 2 trial of bezuclastinib in patients with NonAdvSM who had inadequate symptom control despite best supportive care (BSC) medications. The primary endpoint was 24-week mean change from baseline in Mastocytosis Symptom Severity Daily Diary (MS2D2) total symptom score (TSS) (range 0–110), which is a fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome measure of NonAdvSM symptom severity. Key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase, KIT p.D816V variant allele frequency (VAF), bone marrow (BM) MC burden, and MS2D2 TSS, ≥30% TSS reduction. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 100mg QD bezuclastinib + BSC or PBO + BSC. Results: As of May 22, 2025, 179 patients were enrolled in Part 2: 119 were randomized to receive bezuclastinib and 60 to placebo. Patients enrolled were representative of the NonAdvSM population with moderate to severe symptoms. Median age (range) was 51 (23-78) years; 65.9% female; mean (SD) baseline MS2D2 TSS 55.6 (19.8); 82% of patients had ISM, 11% had BMM, and 7% had smoldering SSM. At baseline, median (range) KIT p.D816V VAF in whole blood, BM MC burden, and serum tryptase was 0.25% (0-34%), 10% (1-75%), and 40 (6-692) ng/mL, respectively. Bezuclastinib demonstrated statistically significant superiority to placebo on all primary and key secondary endpoints. At Week 24, bezuclastinib led to significantly greater symptom improvement vs placebo (LS mean [95% CI] MS2D2 TSS change: –24.3 [–27.6 to –21.1] vs –15.4 [–19.6 to –11.2]; placebo-adjusted difference: –8.9 points; P=0.0002). A ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase was achieved in 87.4% of bezuclastinib-treated patients vs 0% on placebo (P<0.0001). Significantly more patients receiving bezuclastinib achieved ≥50% reductions in KIT D816V VAF, serum tryptase, BM MCs (P<0.0001), MS2D2 TSS (P=0.01), and ≥30% reduction in MS2D2 TSS (P=0.0004). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were low grade (gr; 70% Gr 1) and reversible. The most common TEAEs (≥10%) in any treatment group and occurring in greater frequency in the bezuclastinib arm were hair color changes (69.5% vs 5.0%), altered taste (23.7% vs 0%), nausea (22.0% vs 13.3%), increased ALT/AST (22.0% vs 6.6%), headache (17.8% vs 11.7%), alopecia (11.9% vs 3.3%), and increased ALP (10.2% vs 3.3%). TEAEs (≥10%) that occurred more often in the placebo group were diarrhea (13% vs 18%), dizziness (10% vs 12%), fatigue (7% vs 12%), and arthralgia (6% vs 15%). ALT/AST elevations ≥Gr 3 were experienced by 5.9% of patients. The only hepatic adverse events (AEs) reported were transient lab abnormalities; none required hospitalization. Treatment-related AEs requiring dose reductions occurred in 11% of patients receiving bezuclastinib. All discontinuations (5.9%) due to treatment-related AEs were due to transaminase elevations; all fully resolved. Conclusions: At 24-weeks, bezuclastinib 100 mg QD demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements in symptom burden and biomarkers of disease vs placebo in patients with NonAdvSM. The treatment was generally well-tolerated and effective across a population that is representative of the real-world NonAdvSM population, including SSM. These results support the use of bezuclastinib to reduce SM burden and symptoms in pts with NonAdvSM, and a potentially disease-modifying impact.

Background and Significance: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare heterogeneous disease characterized by the aberrant accumulation of neoplastic mast cells (MC). In about 95% of adult patients, SM is driven by a gain-of-function mutation (D816V) in exon 17 of KIT. Advanced SM (AdvSM) is a life-threatening form of SM and includes three subtypes: aggressive SM (ASM), SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). Despite improvement in disease control with approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), there is still unmet need for improved tolerability and efficacy in AdvSM treatments. Bezuclastinib, an oral and selective type 1 TKI that potently inhibits KIT D816V, is being studied in patients diagnosed with AdvSM in the Apex study (NCT04996875). Results from the Part 1 dose optimization portion of Apex were presented previously. Part 1 randomized 32 patients 1:1:1:1 to receive bezuclastinib at 50, 100, or 200 mg BID or 400 mg QD. Initial results from the Part 1 dose optimization portion of the Apex trial in patients with AdvSM demonstrated encouraging safety profile and signs of clinical activity, as well as deep reductions across biomarkers of MC burden including bone marrow MC burden, serum tryptase levels, and KIT D816V variant allele fraction (VAF). In addition, 94%, 93%, and 100% of patients demonstrated ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase, KIT D816V VAF, and bone marrow MC burden, respectively. Exposure achieved with 100 mg BID of bezuclastinib original formulation resulted in optimal efficacy and safety outcomes. 150 mg QD of an optimized formulation is expected to deliver bezuclastinib exposures consistent with the 100 mg BID of the original formulation. Part 2 is further evaluating the efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib in patients with AdvSM at the selected Part 2 dose of 150mg QD of the optimized formulation. Study Design and Methods: Apex is a multicenter, Phase 2 open-label study of bezuclastinib in patients with AdvSM as defined per the WHO criteria. Enrollment includes previously treated and treatment-naïve patients. Part 2 is enrolling approximately 65 patients including up to 15 patients without measurable mIWG C-findings. The Part 2 expansion portion of the Apex study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib in patients with AdvSM, including ASM, SM-AHN, or MCL. Key eligibility criteria include measurable disease (centrally adjudicated) according to modified IWG-MRT-ECNM criteria and clinically acceptable laboratory values including platelet count ≥50,000/µL. The primary efficacy endpoint of Part 2 is overall response rate (ORR = complete response [CR] + complete remission with partial hematologic recovery [CRh] + partial response [PR] + clinical improvement [CI]) per mIWG-MRT-ECNM criteria according to mIWG-MRT-ECNM response criteria and will be confirmed by a Central Response Review Committee. Secondary endpoints include further characterization of safety and tolerability, pure pathologic response, biomarker response (including changes in bone marrow MC burden, serum tryptase level, and KIT D816V mutational burden), duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Apex Part 2 is actively enrolling. Study sites are enrolling in North America, Asia-Pacific, and Europe. In addition, a high-risk SM-AHN sub-study assessing the safety and feasibility of the combination of bezuclastinib 150 mg QD and azacitidine may enroll up to 20 patients who are currently receiving or indicated for azacitidine and have biopsy-proven SM with an associated high- or very high-risk myeloid neoplasm. Patients with SM-AHN from Part 1 or Part 2 who have demonstrated AHN progression may enroll in an additional rollover cohort to receive bezuclastinib with concomitant azacitidine or hydroxyurea.

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare and severe hematologic disorder caused by somatic mutation(s) in hematopoietic stem cells, which results in dysregulation of complement activation and complement-mediated hemolysis. Several complement inhibitors are approved for PNH, including the intravenous or subcutaneous C5 inhibitors (C5is) eculizumab, ravulizumab, and crovalimab; the subcutaneous self-administered C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan; and the oral factor B inhibitor iptacopan and factor D inhibitor danicopan (as add-on therapy to a C5i). Although oral self-administered medications would be expected to lighten treatment burden over injectable medications in patients with PNH, adherence to anticomplement therapies is essential to maintain stable hematologic response while avoiding adverse events of breakthrough hemolysis and thrombosis. Real-world adherence to pegcetacoplan in patients with PNH was evaluated and compared with reported real-world adherence to long-term oral therapies for chronic conditions. Methods: A descriptive review of recent literature was conducted to summarize real-word oral medication adherence rates in chronic conditions. The Medical Subject Headings “compliance, medication” and “administration, oral” were applied in PubMed, and yielded reports on oral antidiabetic medications (OADs) in type 2 diabetes, oral anticoagulants (OACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF), and oral oncolytics in hematologic cancers; observational, real-world studies reporting medication adherence rates were reviewed and summarized. Adherence to pegcetacoplan therapy among patients with PNH in the US postmarketing setting was calculated as the percentage of patients who take pegcetacoplan as prescribed (adherence definition) based on the number of days patients had pegcetacoplan vials in their possession (dispensed) divided by the total number of days in a dispensing period (proportion of days covered) using central pharmacy prescription refill data. Results: In general, patients who take ≥80% of prescribed doses are considered adherent; using this definition, adherence rates among patients receiving long-term therapies for chronic conditions are typically 50% to 60% but vary greatly [Kleinsinger F. Perm J. 2018;22:18-033]. For example, reported OAD adherence rates in type 2 diabetes vary across countries (42% in Switzerland [Huber CA et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e3994] to 67% in Canada [Simard P et al. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:547]) and by medication types (36.7% with thiazolidinediones to 47.3% with dipeptidyl peptidase 4-inhibitors [Farr AM et al. Adv Ther. 2014;31:1287]). OAC adherence rates in AF range widely (~40% to ~90%), differing across countries, patient populations (incident AF vs. post cardiovascular event), OAC types (warfarin, direct OACs), and follow-up period lengths. OAC adherence is also influenced by patient demographic and clinical characteristics and regional determinants in US Medicare beneficiaries [Hernandez I et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e011427]. Interestingly, an inverse relationship between oral medication adherence and dosing frequency is observed in chronic diseases in general (progressively decreasing adherence rates from once-daily to twice, 3-times, and 4-times daily dosing regimens [Coleman CI et al. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18:527]), and with OACs in AF [Vrijens B, Heidbuchel H. Europace. 2015;17:514]. As with other chronic conditions, nonadherence to oral oncolytics in hematologic cancers is more prevalent than suspected (32.7%) and associated with poorer clinical response [Noens L et al. Blood. 2009;113:5401], which can further increase the economic burden on patients [Dashputre AA et al. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020;26:186]. Pegcetacoplan adherence for PNH in the US postmarketing setting from launch (2021) to date (2024) was estimated at 97%, well above the 80% threshold defining medication adherence in the literature. Conclusions: Real-world patients with PNH who self-administer pegcetacoplan subcutaneously have adherence rates exceeding the reported real-world adherence rates for oral medications in chronic conditions, especially those with high dosing frequencies. Retaining a stable hematologic response and preventing potentially life-threatening complications in PNH relies on continuous patient adherence to lifelong anticomplement therapies.

Introduction Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is a rare clonal mast cell disease driven by the KIT D816V mutation in nearly all patients. Patients with ISM can present with debilitating acute and chronic cutaneous, gastrointestinal, neurocognitive, and systemic symptoms caused by the release of inflammatory mediators from abnormal mast cells. In some patients, symptoms are not adequately controlled with best supportive care (BSC) medications. Elenestinib (BLU-263) is a novel, investigational, oral, next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potently and selectively inhibits KIT D816V with limited central nervous system penetration and pharmacokinetics (PK) that support once daily dosing. HARBOR (NCT04910685) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study assessing efficacy and safety of elenestinib in patients with ISM. Methods Eligible adult patients with ISM, confirmed following central review of bone marrow (BM) pathology, clinical, and laboratory findings per World Health Organization criteria and a moderate-to-severe symptom score based on minimum mean total symptom score (TSS) of the ISM-Symptom Assessment Form (ISM-SAF©2018), were stratified by baseline serum tryptase (<20 ng/mL vs ≥20 ng/mL) and randomly assigned 3:1 to elenestinib 25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg once daily + BSC (“elenestinib”) or placebo + BSC (“placebo”). The primary objective of Part 1 was to determine the recommended dose based on safety, PK, and pharmacodynamics. Secondary endpoints included changes in biomarkers of disease burden (serum tryptase, KIT D816V variant allele fraction [VAF], and BM mast cells) and ISM-SAF TSS. Three additional open-label PK groups enrolled patients at 50 mg, 75 mg, and 100 mg to further characterize PK and safety. Results As of data cutoff on July 3, 2023, a total of 122 patients with ISM have received their assigned treatment in Part 1 of the study; 39 were blinded and randomized to elenestinib or placebo, and 83 were treated with open-label elenestinib in the PK groups (21 patients at 50 mg, 34 patients at 75 mg, and 28 patients at 100 mg). Baseline demographics were similar to those reported for the general ISM population. After 12 weeks of therapy, symptom improvement was observed for all dose cohorts, and symptom reduction by TSS was greater for patients on elenestinib versus placebo in the blinded portion of Part 1. Patients receiving elenestinib at 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses showed reduction (mean percent) from baseline for tryptase (-15.4%, -50.9%, and -68.4% vs 3.3%, respectively) and KIT D816VVAF (-37.5%, -70.3%, and -77.0% vs -2.5%, respectively) as compared to placebo. Similar reductions in TSS and disease-related biomarkers were observed in the open-label PK cohorts. After a median treatment duration of 35.3 weeks, elenestinib was well-tolerated at all dose levels. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events and no treatment-related adverse events that led to drug discontinuation. Conclusion Elenestinib at all tested doses demonstrated beneficial effects on disease-related symptoms and biomarkers of mast cell burden in this large and maturing cohort of patients with ISM with a moderate-to-severe symptom burden. Elenestinib was well tolerated across all dose levels with a promising early benefit-risk profile in ISM. These preliminary findings will inform dosing for the planned Part 2 of HARBOR, which will examine elenestinib versus placebo in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled setting.