Adjei, Alex A.

3507 Purpose: To detect IGF-1R on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as a biomarker in the clinical development of a monoclonal human antibody, CP-751,871, targeting IGF-1R. Experimental Design: An automated sample preparation and analysis system for enumerating CTCs (Celltracks) was adapted for detecting IGF-1R positive CTCs with a diagnostic antibody targeting a different IGF-1R epitope to CP-751,871. This assay was utilized in three phase I trials of CP-751,871 as a single agent or with chemotherapy and was validated using cell lines and blood samples from healthy volunteers and patients with metastatic carcinoma. Results: There was no interference between the analytical and therapeutic antibodies. CP-751,871 was well tolerated as a single agent, and in combination with docetaxel or carboplatin and paclitaxel, at doses ranging from 0.05 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg. Eighty patients were enrolled on phase 1 studies of CP-751,871, with 47 (59%) patients having CTCs detected during the study. Prior to treatment 26 patients (33%) had CTCs, with 23 having detectable IGF-1R positive CTCs. CP-751,871 alone, and CP-751,871 with cytotoxic chemotherapy, decreased CTCs and IGF-1R positive CTCs; these increased towards the end of the 21-day cycle in some patients, falling again with retreatment. CTCs were commonest in advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer (11/20). Detectable IGF-1R expression on CTCs before treatment with CP-751,871 and docetaxel was associated with a higher frequency of PSA decline by more than 50% (6/10 vs 2/8 patients). A relationship was observed between sustained falls in CTCs counts and PSA declines by more than 50%. Conclusions: IGF-1R expression is detectable by immunofluorescence on CTCs. These data support the further evaluation of CTCs in pharmacodynamic studies and patient selection, particularly in advanced prostate cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prediction models aim to use available data to predict a health state or outcome that has not yet been observed. Prediction is primarily relevant to clinical practice, but is also used in research, and administration. While prediction modeling involves estimating the relationship between patient factors and outcomes, it is distinct from casual inference. Prediction modeling thus requires unique considerations for development, validation, and updating. This document represents an effort from editors at 31 respiratory, sleep, and critical care medicine journals to consolidate contemporary best practices and recommendations related to prediction study design, conduct, and reporting. Herein, we address issues commonly encountered in submissions to our various journals. Key topics include considerations for selecting predictor variables, operationalizing variables, dealing with missing data, the importance of appropriate validation, model performance measures and their interpretation, and good reporting practices. Supplemental discussion covers emerging topics such as model fairness, competing risks, pitfalls of “modifiable risk factors”, measurement error, and risk for bias. This guidance is not meant to be overly prescriptive; we acknowledge that every study is different, and no set of rules will fit all cases. Additional best practices can be found in the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines, to which we refer readers for further details.

Abstract Purpose: To review key aspects of the design and conduct of early clinical trials (ECT) of immunotherapy agents. Experimental Design: The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies Task Force 2019 included experts from academia, nonprofit organizations, industry, and regulatory agencies. The review focus was on methodology for ECTs testing immune-oncology therapies (IO) used in combination with other IO or chemotherapy. Results: Although early successes have been seen, the landscape continues to be very dynamic, and there are ongoing concerns regarding the capacity to test all new drugs and combinations in clinical trials. Conclusions: Optimization of drug development methodology is required, taking into account early, late, and lower grade intolerable toxicities, novel response patterns, as well as pharmacodynamic data.

Abstract Purpose Preclinical and clinical data have shown promise in using antiangiogenic agents to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We conducted this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent pazopanib in patients with MPM. Materials and Methods Patients with MPM who had received 0–1 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible to receive pazopanib at a dose of 800 mg daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6), with a preplanned interim analysis for futility. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS, adverse events assessment and clinical benefit (complete response, partial response [PR], and stable disease [SD]). Results Thirty-four evaluable patients were enrolled, with a median age of 73 years (49–84). The trial was closed early because of lack of efficacy at the preplanned interim analysis. Only 8 patients (28.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2–48.7%) in the first 28 evaluable were progression-free at 6 months. PFS6 was 32.4% (95% CI, 17.4–50.5). There were 2 PR (5.9%) and 16 SD (47.1%). The overall median PFS and OS were 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0–6.0) and 11.5 months (95% CI: 5.3–18.2), respectively. The median PFS and OS for the previously untreated patients was 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.7–8.5) and 16.6 months (95% CI, 6.6–30.6), respectively; and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.3–4.2) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0–11.9), respectively, for the previously treated patients. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 23 patients (67.6%). Conclusion Single-agent pazopanib was poorly tolerated in patients with MPM. The primary endpoint of PFS6 was not achieved in the current study. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number. NCT00459862. Implications for Practice Single-agent pazopanib did not meet its endpoint in this phase II trial in malignant mesothelioma. Pazopanib is well tolerated in mesothelioma patients with a manageable toxicity profile. There is a need to better identify signals of angiogenesis that can be targeted in mesothelioma. Encouraging findings in frontline treatment warrant further investigations in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

Background: The DIAL study is testing the efficacy of dual immunomodulation in patients with advanced aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), the trial combines the use of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (nivolumab) with an agonist of the CD27 receptor (varlilumab) in a randomized phase 2 design. CD27, a co-stimulatory receptor, regulates T cell activation in the context of T cell receptor (TCR) engagement through interaction with CD70. T cell exhaustion plays a major role in immune evasion in B-NHL. Varlilumab is an agonistic IgG1 monoclonal antibody that recognizes CD27 leading to prevention or reversal of exhaustion in pre-clinical models. Varlilumab also demonstrates direct anti-tumoral activity in xenograft models of human lymphoma cell lines via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Phase 1 data supports the safety and tolerability of single-agent varlilumab in advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT01460134). We hypothesize that CD27 activation synergizes with PD-1 inhibition resulting in a superior anti-lymphoma effect compared to PD-1 blockade alone. The study will also evaluate the effect of these agents on tumor and immune cells using immunohistochemistry (IHC), mass cytometry (CyTOF), multiplex ELISA, imaging mass cytometry (IMC), and whole exome sequencing. Methods: The trial is enrolling patients with advanced aggressive B-NHL. Standard inclusion criteria and prior treatment with at least 2 lines of standard therapy are required. Prior autologous stem cell transplant and/or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is allowed. Patients with active CNS disease are excluded. Eligible patients are randomized to treatment with single-agent nivolumab (group 1) or dual immunotherapy with nivolumab and varlilumab. Group 1 is allowed to cross-over at the time of progression. Nivolumab will be administered intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (240 mg) for 4 months followed by monthly dosing thereafter (480 mg). Varlilumab will be given IV every 4 weeks (3 mg/kg). Response assessment will be done by PET-CT scan every 12 weeks. Primary outcome is overall response rate (ORR) according to the LYRIC criteria. The trial will enroll 48 patients per arm, allowing 80% power to detect at least 20% increase in ORR in the experimental arm (group 2) assuming a 25% ORR in the control arm (group 1). The trial is registered (NCT03038672) and open to participation to members of the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN) and Early Drug Development Opportunity Program (EDDOP). Figure Disclosures Tun: BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mundi-pharma: Research Funding; DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding. Bartlett:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Kline:Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Awan:Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lazaryan:Kadmon: Consultancy. Ansell:Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Diefenbach:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding.

Background: c-MYC activation is an early event of myeloma pathogenesis. It upregulates the expression of the glutaminase 1 (GLS1) enzyme which converts glutamine to glutamate in the mitochondria. Glutamate is required for the biosynthesis of various molecules in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (i.e., glutamine anaplerosis). CB-839 HCl is a first-in-class, orally available, selective, noncompetitive inhibitor of GLS1. This inactivation of GLS1 results in an increase of glutamine and a decrease of glutamate and several TCA cycle intermediates within cancer cells, leading to a decrease in their proliferation and/or an increase in cell death. In the phase 1 study, CX-839-002, the safety and tolerability of CB-839 HCl was evaluated in patients with hematological tumors (multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), either as monotherapy or in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone. It was determined to be well tolerated and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. Proteasome inhibitors (PI) are the cornerstone agents in the treatment of myeloma. They disrupt normal protein homeostasis causing an induction of cellular proteotoxic stress, thus, making it an effective strategy against myeloma plasma cells, which naturally mass-produce large quantities of immunoglobulin proteins. PI-resistant MM cells are associated with changes in cellular bioenergetics that favor the increased use of mitochondrial respiration for energy production. Given the increased reliance of PI-resistant MM cells on mitochondrial respiration, and the critical role of glutamine for cellular respiration, inhibition of glutamine metabolism is a rational molecular strategy for the treatment of PI-resistant MM. Furthermore, pre-clinical studies demonstrate the in vitro and ex vivo synergism of CB-839 HCl with carfilzomib (CFZ) in terms of its cytotoxicity and anti-proliferation capacity in various primary human myeloma cell lines and primary patient myeloma cells respectively. As a result, this novel combination of glutaminase inhibition with proteasome inhibition appears promising as a therapeutic combination in MM and warrants further clinical investigation. Methods: This study is a phase 1, multicenter clinical trial of CB-839 HCl in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. Part A of this trial is a 3+3 dose escalation design and Part B is a dose expansion cohort at the RP2D determined in Part A. Up to a maximum of 42 patients will be enrolled at participating ETCTN sites. CFZ will be administered in its usual weekly dosing schedule of days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day schedule along with dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. CB-839 will be started at a dose level of 400 mg twice daily and will be investigated to a maximum dose of 800 mg twice daily. Prior to day 1 of Cycle 1, we will administer a 7 day lead in of CB-839 monotherapy before combining it with CFZ. Key inclusion criteria are having relapsed/refractory myeloma with at least 2 prior lines of therapy and prior exposure to PIs, immunomodulators and Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, having measurable disease, adequate hematologic reserve, kidney function and liver function. Key exclusion criteria are being refractory or intolerant to CFZ, adverse cardiac history, central nervous system disease and AL amyloidosis. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the MTD or recommended phase II dosing (RP2D) of CB-839 HCl in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability as well as the overall response rate (ORR) associated of CB-839 HCl in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone. Correlative objectives will evaluate plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of CB-839 HCl and carfilzomib when used in combination. They will also evaluate potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as resistance mechanisms using genomic DNA, RNA, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and metabolomics-based assessment platforms. Recruitment is ongoing and this trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03798678. Disclosures Baz: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Neparidze:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Research Funding; Eidos Therapeutics: Other: Member of Independent Diagnostic Committee; MMRF/Synteract: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are a heterogeneous group of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is often grouped and managed as DLBCL, yet PMBCL is biologically and clinically different. Although about two-third of patients are cured with initial therapy, those who are refractory or progress within the first two years do poorly and will die from their disease. There is an unmet need for effective therapeutic approaches in this patient population. Evasion of the host immune responses is an important mechanism for inducing resistance to cancer therapy. Strategies to block molecular and cellular mediators of cancer induced immunosuppression such as programmed death -1 receptor (PD-1) have been explored. Targeting PD-1 immune checkpoints has the potential to play a major role in cancer therapy by reversing tumor immune escape. Trials using PD-1 blockers in advanced hematological malignancies demonstrated remarkable activity in Hodgkin lymphoma. Unfortunately, results in the DLBCL cohort with nivolumab were marginal and short lived. A phase 1b trial in heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory (RR) PMBCL using pembrolizumab (a PD-1 blocker) showed that it was safe and active with an ORR of 41%. In recent years, several signaling pathways implicated in DLBCL pathogenesis have been targeted, including the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. Copanlisib, a pan-PI3K inhibitor, with particularly potent PI3K-α/PI3K-δ inhibition, showed activity in both indolent and aggressive NHL, with a safer toxicity profile than the FDA-approved agent idelalisib. In a preclinical DLBCL mouse model, treatment with copanlisib resulted in effective down regulation of tumor‐infiltrating T-regulatory cells (Tregs). In the same model, copanlisib, when combined with a surrogate anti‐mouse PD‐1, showed in vivo responses in 75% vs 0% in the monotherapy groups. These data support the rational for the combination of copanlisib and checkpoint blockade in DLBCL. We developed a phase 2 prospective study with two RR cohorts (DLBCL and PMBCL), treated with the combination of copanlisib and nivolumab. Study Design: copanlisib hydrochloride 60 mg is given IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycles 1-8 and days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles. Nivolumab 240 mg IV is given on days 1 and 15 of cycles 1-8 and 480 mg on day 1 of subsequent cycles. Cycles repeat every 28 days for up to 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Copanlisib dose will be determined using a safety cohort in 6 patients. The primary outcome is to assess ORR defined as complete and partial responses (CR+PR). Secondary outcomes are to evaluate safety of the combination; to assess progression free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), CR rate, and overall survival (OS). Exploratory objectives are to characterize the effects of the copanlisib and nivolumab combination regimen on tumor cells, tumor microenvironment and the immune response in RR DLBCL and PMBCL. We will also do Lymph3CX assay as an integrated biomarker to distinguish between DLBCL and PMBCL. Key inclusion criteria: adult patients with RR DLBCL and PMBCL who have measurable disease with at least one lesion that is >15mm in the longest diameter on cross-sectional imaging; After failure of ASCT or after failure of frontline therapy in subjects who declined or are not ASCT candidates; and have appropriate organ function. Key exclusion criteria: High grade B-cell lymphomas; Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease or patients on any prohibited therapies; History of active CNS involvement or leptomeningeal involvement This study is expected to enroll a maximum of 96 (6 safety cohort, 44 DLBCL and 46 PMBCL) evaluable patients. We anticipate accruing 10 additional patients to account for ineligibility, cancellation, or other reasons. Therefore, the study is expected to accrue a maximum of 106 patients. The largest success proportion where the proposed treatment regimen would be considered ineffective in DLBCL is 25% and 30% in PMBCL. The smallest success proportion that would warrant subsequent studies with the proposed regimen is 45% in DLBCL and 50% in PMBCL. This design has a 90% power with a 1-sided 10% level test. This study is conducted through NCI-CTEP (NCI Protocol #10193; NCT03484819) and is funded by Bayer. The study is to open in fall of 2019 at 11 ECTCN sites, and is available to interested sites to join in. Figure. Disclosures Bennani: Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board. Nowakowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rimsza:NanoSting: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoSting [Institution]. Ansell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: IDH mutated gliomas are critically dependent on glutaminase for glutamate biosynthesis. CB-839 is a novel glutaminase-1 inhibitor which has demonstrated efficacy in both genetically engineered and patient derived IDH mutated glioma cells, especially in combination with radiation. These preclinical studies evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic impact of combining CB-839 with TMZ in patient derived xenograft (PDX) glioma models. Methods: GBM164 is a PDX model derived from an IDH1 mutant, 1p/19q non-codeleted glioma. D- and L-2HG levels in untreated GBM164 tumors were compared to GBM6 tumors (IDH wildtype glioma PDX) by GC/MS. Athymic nude mice bearing GBM164 flank tumors were treated with CB-839 (200 mg/kg PO BID x 9 doses) and/or temozolomide (50 mg/kg PO daily x 5 doses) and sacrificed four hours after the last dose to harvest plasma, normal brain and flank tumor. Tumor metabolomics were assessed by GC/MS. DNA damage signaling in tumors was assessed by Western blotting for KAP1 / Chk1 / Chk2 phosphorylation and H2AX / Rad51. Tumor, plasma and brain pharmacokinetics were assessed by LC/MS/MS. Results: Total 2HG levels in GBM164 were 18-fold higher than GBM6. CB-839 monotherapy reduced tumor glutamate (18% reduction, p = 0.15) and aspartate (30% reduction, p = 0.06) when compared to vehicle, however these changes did not reach statistical significance. The combination of CB-839 and TMZ more significantly reduced both tumor glutamate (30% reduction, p = 0.03) and aspartate (34% reduction, p < 0.001) when compared to TMZ monotherapy. CB-839 did not significantly increase DNA damage compared to vehicle, and the combination of CB-839 and TMZ did not significantly increase DNA damage compared to TMZ monotherapy. The mean tumor: plasma ratios of CB-839 concentrations were 0.68 and 0.58 in mice treated with CB-839 monotherapy and CB-839/TMZ, respectively. The mean brain: plasma ratios of CB-839 concentrations were 0.07 and 0.12 in mice treated with CB-839 monotherapy and CB-839/TMZ, respectively. Conclusion: The addition of CB-839 to TMZ significantly reduces glioma aspartate and glutamate in an IDH1 mutant PDX glioma model, without any impact on DNA damage. Survival studies are in progress to assess the efficacy of CB-839 when used in combination with RT and/or TMZ. Citation Format: Sani Haider Kizilbash, Danielle M. Burgenske, Samuel McBrayer, Sandhya Devarajan, Shiv K. Gupta, Taro Hitosugi, Lihong He, Mark A. Schroeder, Brett L. Carlson, Marina Gelman, Charles A. Kunos, Joel M. Reid, Alex A. Adjei, Jann N. Sarkaria. The addition of CB-839 to temozolomide significantly reduces glioma aspartate and glutamate in an IDH mutated patient derived glioma xenograft model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3870.