Reeves, Ronald K.

Background: The National SCI Model Systems (SCIMS) Database was established in 1973 to study longitudinal data from persons with traumatic SCI (TSCI). The SCIMS provides an ideal platform to explore the feasibility of a parallel data collection effort to understand the characteristics of individuals with nontraumatic SCI (NTSCI). In the current data collection cycle (2021-2026), all SCIMS centers gathered data specific to NTSCI. Objectives: To (1) describe the demographic and injury-specific characteristics of participants with NTSCI and (2) assess neurological changes from admission to discharge. Methods: The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination data of participants with NTSCI who were enrolled at an SCIMS center were extracted from the medical records at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Data from 178 participants with NTSCI were analyzed. Results: Among the 93 participants who had adequate ISNCSCI data on admission, only 8.6% had neurological complete injuries. More participants had paraplegia ( n = 58, 62.4%) than tetraplegia ( n = 35, 37.6%). For participants with full ISNCSCI data at both admission and discharge ( n = 47), there were significant improvements in the lower extremity motor score and pinprick and light touch scores on discharge. Conclusion: On admission to acute rehabilitation, more people with NTSCI had paraplegia than tetraplegia, and neurological incomplete injuries were more common. People with NTSCI experienced significant improvement in ISNCSCI neurological variables by the time of discharge from rehabilitation.

Background: Physical inactivity is highly prevalent among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), contributing to secondary health conditions and reduced quality of life (QOL). Objectives: To examine the independent associations between adherence to SCI cardiorespiratory fitness guidelines and health and psychosocial outcomes, while controlling for relevant covariates. Method: We conducted a multisite, cross-sectional study of adults with traumatic SCI stratified by self-reported leisure-time physical activity: no activity (28%), some activity (41%), and met guidelines (26%). Multivariable regression models analyzed associations between physical activity (PA) group and outcomes of hospitalization, self-perceived health, resilience (SCI-QOL Resilience), pain, depression (PHQ-8), QOL (SWLS), and social integration (CHART-SF). Results: The study included 361 participants (no activity, 28%; some activity, 41%; met guidelines, 26%). Meeting PA guidelines was associated with better self-perceived health (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, P < .001) and higher resilience (β = 1.78, P = .04) compared to the No Activity group. However, hospitalization risk was unexpectedly higher for both the Some Activity (risk ratio [RR] 1.93, P = .005) and Met Guidelines (RR 1.75, P = .03) groups. After adjusting for covariates, PA was not significantly associated with pain, depression, QOL, or social integration; instead, higher income was consistently associated with better outcomes in these domains. Conclusion: Adherence to SCI exercise guidelines is associated with enhanced self-perceived health and resilience. However, PA alone was not associated with broader psychosocial outcomes in this model, where socioeconomic factors such as income appeared to play a significant explanatory role.

Background: The Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) began studying traumatic SCI (TSCI) in 1970. The National Institute of Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) provided pilot funding during the 2021-2026 SCIMS funding cycle to perform an initial study of individuals with nontraumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI). Objectives: To describe the demographic and etiological profiles and inpatient rehabilitation outcomes of the SCIMS NTSCI pilot cohort. Methods: This was a descriptive study of adults with NTSCI admitted to SCIMS centers who consented to medical records abstraction and completed survey questionnaires near the completion of inpatient rehabilitation. Results: One hundred eighty-seven people with NTSCI consented to participate and provided data. The etiology of patients’ NTSCI was degenerative vertebral causes ( n = 67), tumor-malignant ( n = 29), tumor-benign/unknown ( n = 16), vascular ( n = 28), infection ( n = 26), and other NTSCI causes ( n = 21). The average age was 59.2 years. Over 40% of the population was age 60-74 years. The population was 35% female, 59.5% non-Hispanic White, 21.6% non-Hispanic Black, and 11.4% Hispanic. Age, sex, race, and ethnicity distributions did not differ significantly across etiology groups. Only symptom onset time ( P = .002) and marital status ( P = .005) were significantly different between groups. Vascular disorders onset was less than a day in 60% of cases. Greater than 60% of tumor-malignant, vascular, and other NTSCI individuals were married or living with a partner. Conclusion: The US SCIMS program can recruit a population of NTSCI research participants that is consistent with previously published results. Ongoing study of NTSCI through the US SCIMS could provide important data akin to that available regarding TSCI.

Abstract Background After high‐level spinal cord injury (SCI), motor recovery of wrist extensors has significant functional consequences as it can facilitate grasp through tenodesis. A small seminal study from 1993 established widely used prognostic rules for wrist extensor recovery, though these have not been replicated with larger, real‐world samples since inception. Objective To determine the prognostic value of initial C5 sharp‐dull discrimination, C5 motor strength, and C6 motor strength on predicting 1‐year ipsilateral wrist extensor motor recovery for patients with SCI with neurological level of C4 or C5. Design Retrospective cohort replication study. Setting SCI Model Systems. Participants 35,675 total individuals with acute traumatic SCI with 219 cases of initial wrist extensor weakness (0/5–2/5) meeting inclusion criteria. Intervention Not applicable. Main outcome measure Recovery of wrist extensor strength to ≥3/5 at 1 year. Results The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 57% (95% CI, 47.4%–66.1%) and 66% (56.0%–75.1%) if initial C5 sharp‐dull discrimination was present, 61% (52.7%–69.3%) and 82% (71.4%–89.7%) if initial C5 myotome strength was at least antigravity, and 74% (63.7%–82.5%) and 74% (65.5%–81.4%) if initial C6 myotome strength was at least a 1/5 or 2/5. Synthesizing these three rules, an updated branched nomogram for functional wrist extensor recovery prediction was created. Conclusions In isolation, none of the previously established wrist extensor motor recovery predictive rules had as high of a prognostic value when using a larger dataset. As such, singular reliance on these prediction rules to identify who will gain 1‐year antigravity wrist extension should be approached with decreased certainty. The best positive and negative predictors were trace C6 strength and absent C5 strength, respectively. An updated nomogram provides more nuanced prognostic information to guide clinical care following acute SCI.

Background Successful utilization of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) requires a comprehensive understanding of its rules, terminology, and several complex concepts. There have been no studies investigating classification accuracy since the newest ISNCSCI revision (2019). Objectives To evaluate classification accuracy of SCI professionals using the 2019 ISNCSCI edition, identify common mistakes and areas of confusion, and assess associations between experience in ISNCSCI classification and performance. Methods Members of the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and attendees of the ISCoS Annual Scientific Meeting 2021 were invited to complete an online survey that included six ISNCSCI cases to classify. Results A total of 107 persons completed the survey, with overall classification accuracy of 74.6%. Accuracy was highest for injury completeness (95.3%) and sensory level (91.1%) and lowest for motor zone of partial preservation (ZPP; 54.7%) and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade (57.3%). Newer concepts, including the appropriate documentation of non-SCI conditions and classification of ZPP in incomplete injuries, contributed to several common errors. There was a significant association between overall classification accuracy and self-rated experience in the ISNCSCI classification ( p = .017). Experience with the ISNCSCI examination, experience in SCI medicine, and occupation were not found to be significantly associated with overall classification accuracy. Conclusion Classification accuracy of an international cohort of SCI professionals was modest but greater than previous reports. Knowledge deficits about the 2019 ISNCSCI updates are prevalent and contribute to common classification errors. Further training in the utilization of the ISNCSCI is needed.

This prospective, observational pilot study was conducted on an academic inpatient rehabilitation unit. Ninety-three persons with spinal cord dysfunction or severe neurological illness participated. All completed admission surveys; 46 completed surveys six months after discharge. The aims were to describe admission and post-discharge spirituality and associations between spirituality and rehabilitation outcomes. At admission, participants reported spirituality similar to that of other samples of medical patients. After discharge, frequency of private spiritual practices increased and spiritual and existential well-being decreased. No significant associations were detected between spirituality and rehabilitation outcomes. Findings suggest the importance of spirituality to the participants and future research with a larger sample and modifications to the methodology.