Back to Authors

Orscelik, Atakan

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-3076

A5030597727 | I180670191

Mayo Clinic

University of California, San Francisco

Citations 37

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in M1 occlusion patients with or without hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Neuroradiology Journal | December 26, 2023 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 454-461

10.1177/19714009231224446 | PMID 38146685

Background The comparison of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) outcomes between patients with the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (HMCAS) and non-HMCAS is important to evaluate the impact of this radiological finding on treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between HMCAS and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing thrombectomy, comparing the outcomes over non-HMCAS. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library to identify studies on MT outcomes for M1 occlusions of HMCAS over non-HMCAS. Inclusion criteria encompassed modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and successful recanalization. Using R software version 4.1.2, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results The meta-analysis was performed for 5 studies with 724 patients. There was no association found between presence of HMCAS and achieving mRS 0–2 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.29–1.47; p = .544). Mortality analysis also showed no significant association with presence of HMCAS (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.37–1.65; p = .520). No significant difference in sICH risk (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.24–9.66; p = .646) was found between groups. Recanalization analysis showed a non-significant positive association (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.67–2.28; p = .501). Heterogeneity was observed in all analyses. Conclusion Our findings showed that there is no statistically significant difference in mRS scores, mortality, sICH, and recanalization success rates between the HMCAS and non-HMCAS groups.
Distal versus conventional transradial access for diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Interventional Neuroradiology | November 8, 2023 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 881-890

10.1177/15910199231210411 | PMID 37936400

Background Distal transradial artery access (dTRA) has received increasing consideration for performing diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures. In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dTRA compared to conventional transradial access (cTRA) for cerebral angiography and neurointerventions. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies investigating outcomes of dTRA and cTRA in neurointerventions. The primary outcome was technical success rates. Secondary outcomes included access site complication rates, crossover rates to alternative vessels, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. The random effects model was used to calculate the mean difference (MD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (Cl). Results Eight retrospective observational studies with a total of 1477 patients who underwent 1175 diagnostic cerebral angiography and 516 neurointerventional procedures using 546 dTRA and 1164 cTRA approaches were included in our meta-analysis. The technical success rate was similar between dTRA and cTRA groups (95.8% vs 91.4%; OR:1.65; 95% Cl: 0.52 to 5.22; P = 0.40). Similarly, no difference was seen in dTRA and cTRA regarding access site complications (2% vs 1.4%; OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.47 to 3.61; P = 0.61) and access site crossover (2.1% vs 5.3%; OR: 0.55; 95% Cl: 0.28 to 1.05; P = 0.07). After resolving heterogeneity among included studies, dTRA was associated with a shorter fluoroscopy time (MD: −0.91 min; 95% CI: −1.74 to −0.09; P = 0.03) and lower contrast volume (MD: −8.32 mL; 95% CI = −14.7 to −1.94; P = 0.011). Conclusion Our findings suggest that the dTRA approach is a safe and effective alternative to the cTRA approach in patients undergoing cerebral angiography and neurointerventions.
Middle meningeal artery embolization combined with surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma: A single-center experience of 75 cases

Interventional Neuroradiology | August 28, 2023 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 162-169

10.1177/15910199231196453 | PMID 37635326

Background Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a challenging and common neurosurgical condition. Our goal is to demonstrate that middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization combined with surgical evacuation can be a promising adjuvant option for treatment of cSDHs and prevent recurrence in symptomatic patients who require surgical treatment. Method We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent MMA embolization using polyvinyl alcohol particles and surgical evacuation with burr hole or craniotomy in a single center for the treatment of new and recurrent cSDHs. The primary outcome was recurrence of cSDH requiring surgical rescue during follow up, and secondary outcomes were defined as >50% decrease in the maximum width of cSDHs on the longest follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan, complications following procedure, and improvement in modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Results A total of 51 patients successfully underwent 72 MMA embolization procedures (96% of the total 75 cases in the cohort) combined with surgical evacuation. Seventy cases (93.3%) achieved at least 50% reduction in the size of the cSDHs on the last CT imaging. A surgical evacuation was required in five cases (6.7%) due to cSDH recurrence during the follow-up period. There were three complications (6.0%) related to embolization procedure. Forty patients (78.4%) showed improvement in mRS score. There was one mortality (2%) regardless of the embolization and evacuation. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of adjunct MMA embolization in significantly reducing size and recurrence of cSDHs.
Endovascular treatment outcomes of vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Interventional Neuroradiology | August 14, 2023 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 804-811

10.1177/15910199231194687 | PMID 37574971

Background Vertebrobasilar junction (VBJ) aneurysms represent a relatively rare and often anatomically complex subgroup of saccular aneurysms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) of VBJ aneurysms. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to 20 December 2022. We included primary studies assessing the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes for VBJ aneurysms treated with endovascular techniques. We excluded surgically managed studies. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.1. We calculated pooled prevalence rates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results In this meta-analysis, a total of 76 VBJ aneurysms from seven studies were included for quantitative analysis. The results showed that the rate of adequate occlusion (complete + near complete occlusion) was 94.1% (95% CI = 76.71–98.71), and the rate of complete occlusion was 77.7% (95% CI = 63.07–87.65). A modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 was achieved in 93.9% of patients (95% CI = 67.65–99.14). The mortality rate was found to be 5.9% (95% CI = 0.97–28.55), and the retreatment rate was 4.6% (95% CI = 1.50–13.36). The overall ischemic complication rate was 4.7% (95% CI = 0.73–25.4), while the overall hemorrhagic complication rate was 4.6% (95% CI = 1.5–13.36). Conclusions The treatment of VBJ aneurysms with EVT is effective in achieving curative treatment and is associated with good clinical outcomes and low mortality rates. These findings provide important insights into the clinical and angiographic outcomes and the complication rates of EVT for VBJ aneurysms.
2b Or 2c-3? A meta-analysis of first pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b vs multiple pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c-3 following mechanical thrombectomy for stroke

Interventional Neuroradiology | August 8, 2023 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 33-38

10.1177/15910199231193925 | PMID 37551104

Background Procedural success following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is assessed using the thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether outcomes differed between first pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b and multiple pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c-3. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included original studies in which outcomes were stratified based on first pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b and multiple pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c-3. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of modified Rankin Scale 0-2. Secondary outcomes of interest were rates of modified Rankin Scale 0-1, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. We calculated odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results Four studies with 1554 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Rate of modified Rankin Scale 0–2 (odds ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.70–1.18; P -value = 0.49), modified Rankin Scale 0–1 (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = 0.86–1.71; P -value = 0.27), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.47–3.98; P -value = 0.57), and mortality (odds ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.67–1.25; P -value = 0.56) did not differ between first pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b and multiple pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c-3. There was no heterogeneity among included studies for modified Rankin Scale 0–2, modified Rankin Scale 0–1, or mortality; however, there was moderate heterogeneity among studies for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage ( I 2 = 53%, P -value = 0.12). Conclusions Clinical and safety outcomes did not differ between first pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b and multiple pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c-3. Future prospective studies and clinical trials should determine whether first pass thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b is a viable endpoint to thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c-3.
Impact of branch arteries on efficacy of endoluminal flow diverters: Insights from posterior communicating artery aneurysms

Interventional Neuroradiology | July 12, 2023 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 780-789

10.1177/15910199231186036 | PMID 37437217

Background Flow diverter treatment may inevitably require jailing of the branch vessels. While the patency of covered branch arteries and associated safety risks have been a topic of substantial interest, the question of whether the characteristics of branch vessels affect flow diversion's efficacy remains unanswered. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of branch arteries on the efficacy of endoluminal flow diverters, specifically focusing on posterior communicating artery (Pcomm) aneurysms. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases with predefined keywords. Studies providing data for flow diversion outcomes in Pcomm aneurysms were included. Outcomes of interest included complete and adequate aneurysm obliteration, ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, and Pcomm occlusion in the follow-up period. A random or fixed effects model was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and pooled event rates with their corresponding confidence intervals (CI). Results The overall complete and adequate aneurysm occlusion rates were 72.25% (95% CI: 64.46–78.88%) and 88.37% (95% CI: 84.33–92.6), respectively. Fetal-type Pcomm aneurysms had significantly lower complete aneurysm occlusion rates than the nonfetal-type Pcomm aneurysms (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05–0.29). Overall ischemic and hemorrhagic complication rates were 2.62% (95% CI = 0.71–5.32) and 0.71% (95% CI: 0–2.24), respectively. There were no significant associations between Pcomm morphology and complications (OR: 3.61, 95% CI = 0.42–31.06 for ischemic complications and OR: 2.31, 95% CI = 0.36–14.6 for hemorrhage). Overall Pcomm occlusion rate was 32.04% (95% CI = 19.96–47.13), and the Pcomm patency was significantly lower in nonfetal-type Pcomm aneurysms (OR: 0.10, 95% CI = 0.02–0.44). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that flow diversion is a safe treatment option for Pcomm aneurysms, regardless of fetal-type Pcomm morphology. However, on the other hand, our findings indicate that Pcomm anatomy or the presence of jailed large branches can affect the efficacy of flow diverter treatment.
The safety profile of single antiplatelet therapy with flow diverters: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Interventional Neuroradiology | April 18, 2023 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 732-740

10.1177/15910199231168669 | PMID 37071551

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is frequently used in treating cerebral aneurysms with flow diverters (FDs), whereas single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) is used mostly with coated FDs and in ruptured aneurysms. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the safety profile of SAPT in FDs. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, and Scopus were searched to 1st November 2022. Outcomes of interest included ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, conversion to DAPTs, and in-stent stenosis rates under long-term SAPT. SAPT is divided into aspirin (ASA) vs. non-ASA group (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Subgroup analysis was performed for ruptured vs. non-ruptured aneurysms and coated vs. non-coated FDs. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.2. Results Twelve studies with 240 total patients (43 patients in the ASA group and 197 patients in the non-ASA group) were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled ischemic occlusion rate was 9.8% (95% CI = 4.87−18.95: p-value = 0.09) for SAPTs. The ASA group had significantly higher ischemic complication rates compared to the non-ASA group (20.8% vs. 6.3%, respectively, p-value = 0.02). The pooled hemorrhagic complication rate was 3.5% (95% CI = 1.38−8.81: p-value > 0.99). The hemorrhagic rates of ASA group were 9.3%% (95% CI = 3.54−22.30) over the non-ASA group 2.1% (95% CI = 0.58−7.54) ( p-value > 0.99). The overall in-stent stenosis rate was 2.3% (95% CI = 1.06−5.14: p-value > 0.99). The ischemic complication rates were comparable between coated vs non-coated FDs (10.7% vs. 5.5% p-value = 0.39). In stent stenosis rate were 1.9% (95% CI = 0.72−4.96) in coated FDs over 4.4% (95% CI = 1.11−16.11) ( p-value = 0.32). The ruptured and non-ruptured groups also showed comparable results in terms of ischemic (17.6% vs. 7.1% respectively, p-value = 0.24) and hemorrhagic complications (9.8% vs. 1.1%, respectively, p-value = 0.08). Conclusions Flow diverter treatment under ASA monotherapy resulted in relatively high ischemic complication rates. However, SAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor monotherapy is promising for coated FDs and ruptured aneurysm treatments. Given the overall small sample size and also the likely presence of known and unknown biases regarding choice of antiplatelet therapy between groups, larger cohort studies are needed to evaluate SAPT treatment outcomes.