Jegen, Dominika

Over 37% of pregnant women report excessive daytime sleepiness or hypersomnia during the first trimester, and commonly throughout the remaining trimesters of pregnancy and the postpartum period. The clinical presentation and symptoms of central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) such as narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia, or excessive daytime sleepiness secondary to shift work or obstructive sleep apnea may be confounded by physiological changes in sleep architecture and hormonal fluctuations occurring during pregnancy. These overlapping features may cause delays in diagnosis and treatment, impacting quality of life, maternal functioning, and overall health. Management of CDH during pregnancy and lactation requires careful consideration of maternal benefits, potential side effects of medications and fetal and neonatal safety. Here, we present a case of idiopathic hypersomnia and detail management and outcomes during pregnancy and lactation. We briefly review the existing literature on prevalence, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, objective findings, and risks posed by CDH in pregnancy and lactation. In this narrative review for primary care clinicians, we also summarize currently available evidence regarding the efficacy, teratogenic and other risks of pharmacologic agents used in the treatment of CDH in pregnancy and lactation. Lastly, we provide a clinical algorithm for management of CDH during pregnancy and lactation.

Objectives: To assess how social risk factors and socioeconomic status (SES) affect health care costs at a large, integrated health system of 45 clinics in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed administrative patient cost data from January 1 through December 31, 2022. Social risk factors (lack of financial resources, food insecurity, intimate partner violence, unmet transportation needs, and housing instability) were determined with patient questionnaires. Cost z -scores were compared across all risk-factor quartiles. We used a housing-based measure to objectively determine SES. Results: We analyzed data from 410 624 patients empaneled with 689 family medicine clinicians. Self-reported risk factor data were incomplete for 219 321 patients. Costs were higher for those with higher social risk (mean cost z -score: high risk = 0.38, low risk = 0.11; P < .001). In addition, higher costs were associated with increasing age, greater medical complexity (higher Adjusted Clinical Group scores), White race, and lack of financial resources. Although we observed geographic variations in cost, urban and rural locations did not have significant cost differences. Costs were similar across all quartiles of SES, and the absolute difference in cost z -scores between the highest and lowest SES quartiles was only 0.04. The multivariate analysis, which adjusted for age, medical complexity, race, sex, and objective SES, showed that these specific associations were substantially decreased and no longer significantly associated with mean cost z -scores. Conclusions: Patient-reported social risk factors were significantly associated with increased cost of care in a large, multispecialty health system in the midwestern US. These associations were decreased in the multivariate analysis. Results should be interpreted cautiously for readers outside the midwestern US, given potential responder bias and the racial homogeneity (92% White) of the study cohort.

Summary Bariatric surgery and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist medications (GLP-1RAs) are common and effective methods for treating obesity. Since bariatric surgery is associated with an increased risk of malnutrition, there are extensive post-operative dietary recommendations and nutritional monitoring guidelines. There is, however, less evidence regarding the risk of malnutrition with GLP-1RAs and little research on the use of GLP-1RAs in patients post-bariatric surgery. We present a clinical case in which a 39-year-old male on semaglutide therapy presented with severe weakness and inability to ambulate. His symptoms had developed over the prior 3 months following transoral outlet reduction surgery and worsened with an increase of his semaglutide dose to 1.7 mg/week. Physical examination demonstrated severe distal-predominant bilateral lower extremity weakness, loss of lower extremity reflexes, and impaired sensation distal to the T4 dermatome. Laboratory serum testing revealed thiamine and vitamin E deficiencies. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated mild homogeneous enhancement of the cauda equina nerve roots, neural foraminal narrowing, and disc protrusions without significant spinal canal stenosis. Given the absence of structural abnormalities, he was diagnosed with lumbosacral polyradiculopathy due to micronutrient deficiencies. Treatment included discontinuation of semaglutide and initiation of thiamine and vitamin E supplementation. He was admitted for inpatient rehabilitation therapy and demonstrated improvement of motor and sensory symptoms over the next month. With the increasing use of GLP-1RAs, it is crucial for clinicians, dietitians, and pharmacists to understand the risk and pathophysiologic processes of these medications when used in combination with other weight-loss therapies such as bariatric surgery. Learning points While there are robust pre- and post-operative micronutrient screening guidelines for patients undergoing bariatric surgery, nutritional monitoring guidelines are limited for patients on GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy or for patients with a history of bariatric surgery who are on GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy. The use of multiple weight-loss therapies that suppress appetite and nutrient intake may increase the risk of micronutrient deficiencies. Micronutrient deficiencies can have severe neurological manifestations, which may be correctable with nutritional supplementation. Avoid initiating GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in close proximity to bariatric surgery. Further research is needed focusing on patients using multiple weight-loss therapies. This may contribute to the development of specific nutritional and micronutrient monitoring guidelines for this population. Endocrinologists, bariatric surgeons, and primary care providers must work together to care for patients undergoing weight-loss interventions.

Introduction/Objectives: Little is known about the prevalence of patient-reported social risk factors and the use of the HOUSES Index, a simple, reliable method of assessing socioeconomic status (SES) based on publicly available housing data, in a predominantly rural, primary care population. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adult patients paneled to family medicine clinicians in a US Midwest health system as of December 31, 2022. Patients’ listed address determined HOUSES Index as quartile rank (Q1 lowest SES) and rural/urban status. Social risk data including housing, food, transportation, finances, and violence were collected from health record questionnaires. A mixed effect model was used to assess associations between social risk, HOUSES Index, and rurality. Results: Of the 352 355 patients included, rural patients were more likely than urban patients to report all social risk factors and had lower SES as measured by HOUSES quartiles. In the mixed effects analysis, HOUSES quartile was independently predictive of reporting an at-risk social risk factor (Q1 vs Q4 OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 2.19-2.37), but rurality was not (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.97-1.07) after adjusting for HOUSES. Conclusions: The increased prevalence of social risk factors among rural residents is largely explained by individual SES measured by HOUSES Index.

Toxins from ingested water can significantly affect overall physical health in children and adults. In the United States, domestic water wells are not commonly tested for any heavy metal contaminants. It is well-known that chronic arsenic ingestion from water is linked to serious health effects. We surveyed patients at our academic institution via emailed questionnaires in 2023 to determine whether those with children living at home reported different patterns of behavior around well water testing as compared to those without. Survey data were collected from 8994 respondents in the U.S. Midwest who reported using residential well water. Results were used to evaluate the influence of children in the home on testing behaviors, and secondarily, whether parental demographics affected testing frequency. Respondents with children at home did not report increased testing frequency compared to those without. In parents who did report testing, having more children, being younger, and living in Wisconsin were associated with an increased frequency. Parental gender, race, and ethnicity did not correlate with testing behaviors. A total of 70% of respondents did not feel concerned about their water safety and 85% were not concerned about arsenic specifically in their water. Increased risk of toxicity to children from arsenic does not appear to influence reported well water testing behavior among parents.

Background: Arsenic is a well-known toxin which may contaminate household water. It is harmful when ingested over prolonged periods of time. As a result, public health experts recommend that water should be screened and treated to prevent arsenic ingestion. In the United States, the responsibility of testing and treatment of private wells falls on homeowners. Despite recommendations for routine screening, this is rarely done. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of well water use in a Midwestern patient population, how patients and clinicians perceive the risks of arsenic in well water, and whether additional resources on well water testing are desired. These findings will be used to influence tools for clinicians regarding symptom and examination findings of chronic arsenic exposure and potentiate the distribution of informational resources on well water testing. Methods: Surveys were sent via email to all actively practicing primary care clinicians at the Mayo Clinic in the United States Midwest, and all active adult patients at the Mayo Clinic in the same region. Our team analyzed survey data to determine whether both patients and clinicians are aware of the health effects of chronic arsenic toxicity from well water, the need for routine well water testing and whether each group wants more information on the associated risks. Results: Both patients and primary care clinicians worry about arsenic exposure. Patients with well water are concerned about their water safety yet feel uninformed about testing options. Clinicians do not know how prevalent well water use is among their patients, feel uninformed about the chronic risks of arsenic exposure and the physical examination associated with it. Both groups unanimously want more information on testing options. Conclusions: Our findings show a significant reliance on well water use in the American Midwest, and unanimous support for the need for further well water testing information and resources for patients and their clinicians.