Back to Authors

Hartgers, Mindy L.

A5040564964 | I1330342723

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 15

Clinical and pathological features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas: A retrospective review of cases at Mayo Clinic.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e15757-e15757

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15757

e15757 Background: SPN is a rare neoplasia of the pancreas, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an epithelial low-grade malignant neoplasm, with a high-grade malignant transformation potential. Literature in this subject is scarce and limited only to small retrospective series. Methods: This is a retrospective study aiming to characterize patients with the diagnosis of SPN at Mayo Clinic between 1992 and 2016. Demographics, clinical and pathological features, recurrence rate and overall survival were recorded. Malignant SPN was defined as per the WHO 2010 classification (Perineural invasion, angioinvasion or deep tissue invasion) and compared to Benign SPN. Results: 44 patients with SPN were identified. 39 patients (88.6%) were female. Median age at diagnosis was 27.5 (Range: 13-64). The most frequent presentation was abdominal pain (52.6%), whereas 36.8% were diagnosed based on incidental imaging findings. Majority (60.4%) of the tumors were located at the pancreatic tail, and 48.5% were solid-cystic lesions. Vascular and lymph node involvement were infrequent. 15 cases (30.23%) were classified as malignant. Tumor size was associated with malignant behavior (Table). Three patients had a metastatic presentation. All but 1 patient were treated with surgery. R1 resection was more frequent in malignant SPN, and 2 patients experienced disease recurrence. Two Stage IV patients were treated with surgery and experienced long term survival, one of them without evidence of disease. There was only 1 death recorded. Conclusions: SNP presents predominantly on young women. The prognosis is excellent even in presence of malignant features, and a complete surgery remains as the main treatment. [Table: see text]
Prognostic factors and effects of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: Mayo Clinic experience.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e15703-e15703

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15703

e15703 Background: The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors and effects of adjuvant therapy for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who had pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: A cohort of 123 consecutive patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2006, through August 31, 2016 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Only patients with ampullary carcinoma by pathology review were included and were histologically classified as pancreaticobiliary or intestinal subtypes. Median follow-up duration was 41.0 months. Patient survival and its correlation with patient and tumor variables were tested by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Pancreatoduodenectomy was curative-intent in 120 out of 123 patients. All 123 patients underwent radical surgery, 32 patients (26.0%) had laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Among 123 patients, there were 76 men (61.8%).Median age at diagnosis was 67.2 years. 54 patients (45%) without metastatic disease upon surgery had adjuvant therapy (35 patients had chemotherapy only while 19 patient also had radiation). Median overall survival (OS) was 91.8 months. Poor performance status at disease diagnosis (ECOG > = 1), old age ( > = 70 years), primary tumor infiltration (T), lymph node metastasis (N), and advanced disease stage (TNM) had a significant negative impact on survival (p < 0.05 by univariate analysis). Gender, diabetes at disease diagnosis, laparoscopic surgery approach, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, and tumor size did not influence survival. In multivariate analysis, ECOG score > = 1, adjuvant treatment, primary tumor infiltration (T) and lymph node metastasis (N) remained statistically significant. Adjuvant therapy was independently associated with improved disease free survival (P = 0.0388) and overall survival (p = 0.030) for patients with advanced disease (stage IIB and above). Conclusions: Poor performance status and advanced disease stage are associated with decreased survival in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. Patients with advanced disease should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy.
Safety and tolerability of the bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based FLOX and IFL regimens in patients who developed fluoropyrimidine-induced coronary vasospasm during therapy with infusional 5-FU or capecitabine.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e15513-e15513

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e15513

Capecitabine and Temozolomide: Design, Implementation, and Preliminary Outcomes From a Pilot Project to Ensure Safe Prescribing of Oral Chemotherapy

Journal of Oncology Practice | July 16, 2010 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 210-212

10.1200/jop.200031 | PMID 21037876

Without adequate safety measures, oral chemotherapy can lead to undetected dosing errors. The Mayo Clinic launched a project to ensure that all capecitabine and temozolomide prescriptions receive an independent double check.
E-Mail and Photographs: A Case Report of a Patient-Initiated Diagnostic Tool in the Era of Electronic Communication

Journal of Palliative Medicine | February 23, 2010 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 335-337

10.1089/jpm.2009.0215 | PMID 20178438