Boxer, Adam L.

AbstractBackgroundThe ALLFTD Consortium aims to characterize preclinical and prodromal stage of familial Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (f‐FTLD) to prepare for clinical trials in FTLD.MethodWe prospectively followed 320 asymptomatic participants of the ALLFTD Consortium who are family members of f‐FTLD with a mutation in MAPT (n = 106), GRN (n = 74), or C9orf72 (n = 140), and describe the ratings on the eight domains of CDR® plus NACC FTLD (FTLD‐CDR) in those who phenoconverted to Mild Behavioral and/or Cognitive Impairment (MBCI). MBCI was diagnosed by the proposed research criteria for MBCI‐FTD (Barker MS, et al. Brain 2022). Participants who were diagnosed as MBCI but returned to asymptomatic at the following visit were excluded from the FTLD‐CDR assessment. ANOVA was used to compare continuous variables, and chi‐square test was used to compare categorical variables across the groups.ResultThirty‐six participants (15 MAPT, 9 GRN, 12 C9orf72) developed MBCI during follow‐up visits, 13 participants (5 MAPT, 3 GRN, 5 C9orf72) were diagnosed as MBCI but were characterized as asymptomatic at the following visit, and 271 participants stayed asymptomatic. Percentage of male in MBCI participants was 50% (MAPT 60%, GRN 33%, C9orf72 50%, p = 0.45). Age at phenoconversion to MBCI was 53.6±13.0 years old, the youngest in MAPT and the oldest in GRN participants (MAPT 44.3±8.3, GRN 63.1±11.3, C9orf72 56.4±10.8, p<0.001). Abnormal rating on each of the eight CDR® plus NACC FTLD domains at the initial visit of MBCI phenoconversion were observed in: “Memory” 36% (MAPT 33%, GRN 33%, C9orf72 44%, p = 0.95); “Orientation” 8% (MAPT 7%, GRN 8%, C9orf72 11%, p = 0.93); “Judgment/Problem Solving” 44% (MAPT 47%, GRN 50%, C9orf72 33%, p = 0.73); “Community Affairs” 22% (MAPT 27%, GRN 17%, C9orf72 22%, p = 0.82); “Home/Hobbies” 25% (MAPT 40%, GRN 8%, C9orf72 22%, p = 0.16); “Personal Care” 0%; “Behavior/Comportment/Personality” 44% (MAPT 60%, GRN 42%, C9orf72 22%, p = 0.19); “Language” 31% (MAPT 13%, GRN 50%, C9orf72 33%, p = 0.12).ConclusionThe three most common FTLD‐CDR domains initially disturbed in the prodromal stage of fFTLD were “Behavior/Comportment/Personality”, “Judgment/Problem Solving”, and “Memory”, while “Orientation” was intact in the majority of the individuals. Memory impairment without disorientation was seen in one‐third of the prodromal fFTLD participants.

AbstractBackgroundThe DEMQOL (Dementia Quality of Life) scale is a patient reported questionnaire and proxy form that captures subjective life quality. Participants in ALLFTD and their Study Partners (SP) complete these questionnaires at each study visit.MethodWe analyzed the DEMQOL in participants and their SPs when the SP was reported to be a spouse or equivalent. Analyses focused on the final overall quality of life (QoL) rating for the participant (poor, fair, good, or very good).ResultDEMQOL responses from 907 dyads (participant: mean age 58.3±13.4 years, 44% female, and mean education 15.9±2.5 years) were analyzed. Participants rated their overall QoL as very good (45.8%), good (36.5%), fair (14%), and poor (3.5%). SPs rated their participant’s overall QoL as very good (33.6%), good (41%), fair (19.4%), and poor (6%). There was a discordance in ratings between participants and SPs (p<0.0001); in almost 50% of cases, participants rated their QoL better (33.2%) or worse (15.2%) than their SP rated their QoL. When considering disease severity (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD global score), participants rated their QoL better than their SP rated their QoL (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0: 19.4%, CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5: 42%, and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 1+: 33.2%), worse than (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0: 15.1%, CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5: 13.3%, and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 1+: 15.2%), or the same (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0: 65.6%, CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5: 44.8%, and CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 1+: 51.6%).ConclusionAmong participants and SPs, similarities and differences in QoL ratings are fairly consistent regardless of global CDR®+NACC‐FTLD rating. Generally, participants are equally or more optimistic about QoL than their SPs. Longitudinal analyses are forthcoming.

AbstractBackgroundSmartphone‐based cognitive and motor tests enable frequent remote assessments in observational research studies and clinical trials, limiting travel burden and increasing access to research for underrepresented groups. One such smartphone tool is the ALLFTD Mobile App, which was designed to capture the clinical features of neurodegenerative diseases via a battery of cognitive, speech, and motor tasks. In this study, we focus on recruiting a demographically diverse normative sample. We have partnered with the UCSF Brain Health Registry (BHR) to recruit 1,000 cognitively healthy participants across the lifespan. Here we describe the study design and initial feasibility results.MethodsWe designed an automated workflow in which participants never interact with the study team except for troubleshooting. BHR participants without reported cognitive impairment were contacted by email to participate in this study (n = 668). Interested participants downloaded the app onto their smartphone and completed in‐app electronic consent. They were asked to complete three ∼30‐minute sessions of cognitive, motor and speech measures over two weeks. Adherence was determined by evaluating the completion rate of app tasks. In a subset who completed a user experience questionnaire (n = 116), responses were quantified using descriptive statistics.ResultsThe current enrollment rate is 23.20% (155/668) of contacted participants. Average age is 62 (SD = 8.2, range = 25‐84). Average adherence is 76%. Participants reported a range of perceived task difficulty: 38% indicated tasks were “very easy” or “somewhat easy”, 26% indicated they were “neutral,” 36% found the tasks “somewhat difficult,” and none reported them to be “very difficult.” The time commitment was reported to be acceptable by 97% of participants, and 20% were willing to complete additional tasks. Over half (59%) of participants indicated that they preferred using a smartphone to complete cognitive assessments over traditional pen‐and‐paper measures.ConclusionsOur preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of recruiting participants, including older adults, through a registry and conducting remote smartphone testing via a fully automated workflow that is highly scalable. Future analysis will study the effects of demographic factors on feasibility and investigate the reliability and validity of the app measures in this sample.

AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to assess axonal integrity in MAPT mutation carriers and early white matter (WM) neurodegeneration in asymptomatic carriers using traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measurements, i.e., fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI).MethodWe included available multi‐shell diffusion MRI data from 21 MAPT mutation carriers (16 asymptomatic; 5 symptomatic) and 31 non‐carrier family members as controls from the ALLFTD consortium. We used linear mixed‐effect models to assess WM abnormalities measured with FA and MD, neurite density index (NDI) and orientation dispersion index (ODI), combined across hemispheres. Separate models were conducted in all MAPT mutation carriers relative to controls while accounting for relatedness and age, then in symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers relative to controls. ComBat was used to harmonize data across sites.ResultIn models contrasting all MAPT carriers versus controls, WM alterations involved the cingulum bundle (FA, ODI), fronto‐temporal, entorhinal (FA, MD, NDI), and the inferior temporal WM (FA) after correcting for multiple comparisons (Fig. 1). In models contrasting symptomatic and asymptomatic MAPT carriers versus controls, symptomatic carriers had widespread involvement of the fronto‐temporal WM including the cingulum (FA, ODI), entorhinal (MD, FA, NDI), amygdala (MD, NDI) and inferior temporal (FA) areas after correcting for multiple comparisons. Asymptomatic carriers showed higher entorhinal MD and lower inferior temporal and cingulum FA relative to controls, and a more widespread pattern of higher ODI involved the medial temporal, superior temporal and occipital WM as well as long association and projection fibers including the internal capsule, cingulate bundle and fronto‐occipital fasciculi, although they were not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.ConclusionTraditional DTI and novel NODDI measurements revealed some extent of overlap as well as divergences in patterns of WM abnormalities, indicating axonal loss is a feature of neurodegeneration in MAPT mutation carriers. Our results suggest that traditional DTI and novel NODDI measurements may have different sensitivities to WM alterations in MAPT mutation carriers, and that axon‐based metrics, particularly ODI measurements, may be more sensitive to the early WM involvement during the asymptomatic stage of the disease.

AbstractBackgroundTMEM106B, a lysosomal trafficking protein, is an important genetic susceptibility risk factor for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). In GRN mutation carriers, minor allele homozygosity in the TMEM106B rs1990622 SNP modulates the risk of FTLD. TMEM106B is often the main component of amyloid fibrils in FTLD with TDP43 aggregates. TMEM106B has been quantified in human brain specimens, but its role as a fluid biomarker is unknown. Here, we investigate the clinical value of CSF TMEM106B in FTLD.MethodsCSF TMEM106B was quantified with SOMAmer proteomics (v3.0, SomaLogic®) in an original cohort of C9orf72, GRN and MAPT symptomatic and asymptomatic mutation carriers and family non‐carrier controls, recruited through ALLFTD (n = 182), and a validation cohort of sporadic neuropathology‐confirmed FTLD‐tau and FTLD‐TDP43, clinically‐diagnosed progressive supranuclear palsy – Richardson syndrome (PSP‐RS) and age‐matched controls (n = 96). CSF TMEM106B was correlated with disease severity, measured by the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration module global scores (CDR+NACC/FTLD); brain volume, measured with Bayesian linear mixed‐effect modeling, using age, sex and total‐intracranial volume‐corrected permutations with threshold‐free cluster enhancement; and CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) measured with Simoa. TMEM106B SOMAmer specificity was validated in cell culture overexpression systems and human brain specimens with high TMEM106B burden.ResultsIn both cohorts, there were no differences in CSF TMEM106B by sex, phenotype or neuropathological diagnosis, except for lower levels in PSP‐RS compared to controls (‐0.31 Log2‐fold change, p < 0.001). CSF TMEM106B did not correlate with age. Regardless of disease‐causing mutation, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with worse disease severity (Figure 1 and 2). CSF TMEM106B was lower in homozygous TMEM106B rs1990622 protective allelein C9orf2 and MAPT, but not in GRN mutation carriers (Figures 3). CSF TMEM106B showed a trend for inverse correlation with NfL in the whole sample (r = ‐0.135, p = 0.052), and correlated positively with left frontal volume in symptomatic FTLD mutation gene carriers (p < 0.05).ConclusionCSF TMEM106B is quantifiable in CSF in vivo. CSF TMEM106B levels are affected by an interaction of disease severity and FTLD and TMEM106B genotypes. Further work is needed to determine its value as a clinical biomarker.

AbstractBackgroundThe pathophysiological mechanisms driving frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) disease progression and corresponding biomarkers that capture these changes are not fully understood. We leveraged high‐throughput proteomics to identify networks of co‐expressed CSF proteins and candidate biomarkers for prediction of disease progression in adults with autosomal dominant FTLD mutations.Method113 adults carrying autosomal dominant FTLD mutations (C9orf72/GRN/MAPT) and 38 noncarrier controls from the ALLFTD consortium completed baseline lumbar puncture and longitudinal neuropsychological testing. CSF was assayed for SOMAmer proteomics on SOMAscan® v3.0 (4,140 proteins). Network analysis identified weighted protein co‐expression modules, which were annotated via gene ontology and cell‐type enrichment analysis. Disease age estimates that capture proximity to symptom onset were derived from a Bayesian disease progression model incorporating genotype‐specific clinical (cognition, CDR®+NACC FTLD) and biomarker (brain volume, plasma NfL) information. At baseline, local‐weighted regression examined module z‐scores (based on mean/SD of module levels [first principal component] in noncarriers) in relation to disease age. Longitudinal linear mixed‐effects models examined global cognitive trajectories in relation to baseline module z‐scores, as well as individual proteins within prognostic modules.ResultNetwork analysis identified 32 CSF protein co‐expression modules (37 to 223 proteins/module). 16 modules showed mutation‐related deviations from noncarriers. Deviations in ion transport, neurodevelopmental, metabolic, and transcriptional modules occurred several decades before estimated symptom onset (disease age: ‐30 to ‐20 years) and persisted across disease age. Deviations in neuroinflammatory and ubiquitination/autophagy modules occurred ∼10 years before estimated symptom onset. Sharp deviations in RNA binding, protein phosphorylation, neurogenesis, synaptic function, and lysosomal modules occurred near symptom onset (disease age: ‐1 to 4 years). Baseline synaptic and neurogenesis modules were the strongest prognosticators of cognitive decline (module x time: bs>.10, ps<.05). Within these modules, individual proteins with stronger intramodular connectivity exhibited stronger associations with cognitive decline (e.g., synaptic/transmembrane module: r = .40, p = 2.85e‐6; e.g., EPHA5, LRRTM2).ConclusionLarge‐scale analysis of the CSF proteome reveals a biologically‐diverse landscape of protein networks associated with presymptomatic and symptomatic stages of autosomal dominant FTLD. Synaptic and neuron‐enriched protein networks exhibited prodromal deviations that forecasted incipient cognitive decline. ‘Hub’ proteins derived from these affected networks warrant further validation as candidate biomarkers for early FTLD disease progression.