He, Rong

Abstract Objectives Patients with clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) are at increased risk of developing myeloid neoplasia (MN). We evaluated whether a simple flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCIP) assay could differentiate the risk of development of MN in patients with CCUS. Methods Bone marrow aspirates were assessed by FCIP panel in a cohort of 80 patients identified as having CCUS based on next-generation sequencing or cytogenetics from March 2015 to May 2020, with available samples. Flow cytometric assay included CD13/HLA-DR expression pattern on CD34-positive myeloblasts; CD13/CD16 pattern on maturing granulocytic precursors; and aberrant expression of CD2, CD7, or CD56 on CD34-positive myeloblasts. Relevant demographic, comorbidity, and clinical and laboratory data, including the type and extent of genetic abnormalities, were extracted from the electronic health record. Results In total, 17 (21%) patients with CCUS developed MN over the follow-up period (median survival follow-up, 28 months [95% confidence interval, 19-31]). Flow cytometry immunophenotyping abnormalities, including the aberrant pattern of CD13/HLA-DR expression, as detected at the time of the diagnosis of CCUS, were significantly associated with risk of developing MN (hazard ratio, 2.97; P = .006). Additional FCIP parameters associated with the development of MN included abnormal expression of CD7 on myeloblasts and the presence vs absence of any FCIP abnormality. Conclusions A simple FCIP approach that includes assessment of CD13/HLA-DR pattern on CD34-positive myeloblasts can be useful in identifying patients with CCUS at higher risk of developing MN.

e19014 Background: Stromal Antigen 2 ( STAG2), located on Xq25, is the most mutated (m) cohesin-complex gene in myeloid neoplasm (MN) patients (pts). mSTAG2 is present in around 5% of MN and has been linked to secondary AML and potential poor impact on outcome. Methods: We retrospectively screened MN pts who had next-generation sequencing (NGS) (OncoHeme) performed at Mayo Clinic between 2018-2021. m STAG2 pts were included at the date of NGS. Charts were reviewed for clinical information after obtaining IRB approval. BlueSky Software V7.40 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Characteristics: 70 pts with mSTAG2 MN were identified, their median age was 72 years (range 25-91); with 55 pts (79%) being males. Complete blood counts showed median white blood cell count of 2.8 x109/L, hemoglobin of 8.9 gm/dL and platelets of 89 x109/L. The diagnosis was MDS in 38 pts (54%), AML in 20 (29%), MDS/MPN in 9 (13%), MPN in 2 (3%), and CCUS in 1 (1%). 11 cases (16%) were defined as therapy-related MN (tMN). Cytogenetics were normal in 45 pts (64%) and abnormal in 22 (31%). 10/50 non-AML pts progressed to AML (after median time of 9.8 months). Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was done in 20 pts (29%). mSTAG2: median VAF (mVAF) was 50% (range, 5%-100%). Males had higher mVAF compared to females (64% vs. 27%, p= .001), and tMN pts had higher mVAF compared to de novo (dn) MN pts (66% vs. 43%, p= .03). mVAF had no correlation with disease classification (50% in AML, 52% in MDS, 41% in MDS/MPN, 36% in MPN and 5% in CCUS, p= .5). STAG2 mutations were nonsense, frameshift, and splice site in 50%, 37%, and 13%, respectively. Co-mutations : median number of co-mutations was 3 (range, 0-6). Most common co-mutations were ASXL1 (66%), SRSF2 (37%), TET2 (36%), RUNX1 (29%), IDH2 (21%), BCOR (20%) and U2AF1 (16%) while least common were TP53, SETBP and ZRSR2 (1% each). Neither number (p= .08) nor type of co-mutation correlated with MN classification. There was no difference in the co-mutational pattern between tMN and dnMN pts. Survival : median overall survival (mOS) was 16.3 months with a median follow up time of 24.5 months. Pts who received HCT had better OS compared to non-HCT pts (mOS not reached vs. 14.9 months, p= .003). Pts with an isolated m STAG2 had better OS than co-mutated pts (p= .04), while the type of STAG2 mutation did not affect OS (p= .3). Pts with tMN had worse OS than dnMN pts (9.9 vs. 20.4 months, p= .02). VAF ≥75% had a negative impact on OS (20.5 vs 8.1 months, p= .008). mOS did not differ based on MN diagnosis. On multivariate analysis, only HCT (HR 0.3, p= .01) and VAF ≥75% (HR 2.3, p= .02) had impact on OS. Conclusions: mSTAG2 was more common in elderly males and MDS diagnosis. mSTAG2 was uncommon as an isolated mutation, indicating a possible role in disease progression with preferred certain co-mutations ( ASXL1/SRSF2/RUNX1/IDH2). mOS was poor regardless of MN diagnosis indicating a molecularly driven significance of an aggressive disease. The study needs to be validated by larger studies.

e19010 Background: Mutated DEAD-box helicase 41 (m DDX41), and mutated GATA2 are germline mutations associated with familial predisposition syndromes. In this study, we compare the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes (OS) of m DDX41 and m GATA2 MN patients (pts). Methods: We retrospectively screened pts who had next-generation sequencing (NGS) (OncoHeme panel) performed at Mayo Clinic. 4,524 consecutive pts (2018-2021) were screened for DDX41 mutations and 3,872 for GATA2 mutations (2015-2020) and included 36 MN pts with m DDX41 genetic alterations, and 55 m GATA2 MN pts. m GATA2 cases were included at NGS date while m DDX41 were included at diagnosis date. Germline workup was not done in all cases. JMP 16.2.0 Software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Patient characteristics: The most common diagnosis was MDS (N = 22, 61% in m DDX41 N = 17, 31% in m GATA2 group; p = .0044). MDS/MPN overlap was seen in m GATA2 group only; (29% vs. 0%; p = .0004). Majority of pts were males with median age of 68 and 67 years for m DDX41 and m GATA2 pts; respectively (p = .7). m DDX41 pts had higher hemoglobin, platelets, and MCV (< .0001, 0.005, < .0001; respectively) and significantly lower white blood cells (WBC) count compared to m GATA2 pts (< .0001). All m DDX41-AML pts were (ELN) intermediate-risk, and 64% of m DDX41 MDS were intermediate risk (IPSS-R). In contrast, of m GATA2 pts 62% of AML were adverse risk and 44% of MDS very high risk. Majority of m DDX41 pts had normal karyotype (N = 32; 91% vs. N = 19, 37%; p < .0001), had isolated mutations (N = 23; 64%) and the most common co-mutations were DNMT3A (38%), ASXL1 (30%), JAK2 (23%). The majority of m GATA2 pts were co-mutated (96%) with a different co-mutation pattern ASXL1 (60%), SRSF2 (34%), RUNX1 (19%). Germline data: One m GATA2 pts had proven germline mutation, and 10/11 (91%) m DDX41 pts were confirmed Survival and progression in MDS/AML: After median follow-up of 30 months in MDS/AML, 7 (21%) m DDX41 and 23 (77%) m GATA2 pts died with superior OS in m DDX41 compared to m GATA2 pts with median OS of (136.7 vs. 6.8 months, p < .0001). Seven (31%) of 22 m DDX41 and 6 (35%) m GATA2 MDS pts progressed into AML with a median time to progression of (11.2 vs. 5.2 months, p = .045). The leukemia free survival (LFS) for m DDX41 MDS pts was significantly longer than LFS of m GATA2 MDS pts (24.4 vs. 6 months, p < .0001). Conclusions: We compare the outcomes of two unique mutations associated with germline predisposition. We found m DDX41 pts had fewer cytogenetic aberrations, no MDS/MPN overlap, and lower WBC count. Majority of m DDX41 MDS/AML pts were intermediate risk category, compared to predominance of adverse risk disease in m GATA2 pts, translating into better OS and LFS. This study is limited by the small size, lack of germline workup in all cases, and retrospective nature. However, it supports the favorable prognosis and indolent course of m DDX41 pts recently described.

AbstractTherapy‐related myeloid neoplasms (t‐MN) are aggressive malignancies in need of effective therapies. The BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. However, the effectiveness of venetoclax has not been studied in a large cohort of t‐MN. We retrospectively analyzed 378 t‐MN patients, of which 96 (25.4%, 47 therapy‐related acute myeloid leukemia, 1 therapy‐related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, 48 therapy‐related myelodysplastic syndrome) received venetoclax. Median interval from t‐MN to venetoclax initiation was 2.9 (Interquartile range [IQR] 0.7–12) months, and patients received a median of 3 (IQR 1–4) cycles. The composite complete remission (CRc) rate, median progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 39.1%, 4.9 months, and 7 months, respectively. The upfront use of venetoclax and achieving CRc were associated with improved survival, whereas the presence of Chromosome 7 abnormalities was associated with an inferior survival. Neither the TP53‐status nor the percent bone marrow blast predicted the likelihood of CRc or survival. Paired genetic analysis performed at venetoclax initiation and failure did not show the evidence of the selection of the TP53‐mutated clone. In a propensity‐matched analysis, the use of venetoclax‐based regimen as the first‐line therapy was associated with a superior survival compared to hypomethylating agent (HMA)‐based first‐line therapy (9.4 vs. 6.1 months, p = .01). We conclude that the upfront use of venetoclax with HMA improved survival, though PFS and OS remain poor. As the phenotype at diagnosis or the percent blasts did not predict outcomes, venetoclax should be studied in all t‐MN phenotypes.

Abstract Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are linked to relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The LSC17 gene expression score robustly captures LSC stemness properties in AML and can be used to predict survival outcomes and response to therapy, enabling risk-adapted, upfront treatment approaches. The LSC17 score was developed and validated in a research setting. To enable widespread use of the LSC17 score in clinical decision making, we established a laboratory-developed test (LDT) for the LSC17 score that can be deployed broadly in clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories. We extensively validated the LSC17 LDT in a College of American Pathologists/Clinical Laboratory Improvements Act (CAP/CLIA)-certified laboratory, determining specimen requirements, a synthetic control, and performance parameters for the assay. Importantly, we correlated values from the LSC17 LDT to clinical outcome in a reference cohort of patients with AML, establishing a median assay value that can be used for clinical risk stratification of individual patients with newly diagnosed AML. The assay was established in a second independent CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory, and its technical performance was validated using an independent cohort of patient samples, demonstrating that the LSC17 LDT can be readily implemented in other settings. This study enables the clinical use of the LSC17 score for upfront risk-adapted management of patients with AML.

Abstract Background: Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a well-described entity and known to carry a worse prognosis, compared to de novo AML. In the current study, we sought to describe the presenting features and outcome of patients with AML, in the setting of previous history of cancer with or without exposure to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Methods: A Mayo Clinic database of patients with AML was queried to identify patients with a previous history of cancer, both hematologic and solid tumors. A comparative analysis of presenting features, treatment details and survival were performed between patients with therapy-related AML (Group A) and those with AML and a history of cancer that had been managed with surgery alone (Group B). Results: A total of 250 patients (median age 68 years, range 19-90; 60% males) with AML and a previous history of cancer (both hematologic and solid) were identified; 182 (73%) cases were determined to be therapy-related AML (Group A) while the remaining 68 (27%) did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy for their antecedent cancer (Group B) (Table). Among group A patients 106 (58%) were exposed to chemotherapy, 37 (20%) to radiotherapy and 39 (22%) to combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy for their cancer. At the time of AML diagnosis, adverse karyotype was noted in 91 (51%) group A and 12 (19%) group B patients (p&lt;0.0001); the incidence of adverse karyotype in patients exposed to chemotherapy vs radiotherapy alone vs combined chemoradiotherapy was 54% (57/106), 30% (11/37), and 59% (23/39) respectively (p=0.04). Group A patients, compared to those in group B, included more females (46% vs 24%; p=0.001), and more preceding hematologic malignancies (p=&lt;0.0001). Next generation sequencing was performed in 74 patients and the results showed no significant difference between groups A and B (Table). Treatment and outcome in Groups A and B: Intensive and less intensive AML-directed chemotherapy were given to 100 (55%) and 44 (24%) patients in group A and 38 (56%) and 14 (21%) patients in group B (P=0.8). 79 (65%) remissions (complete remission (CR) 42 (29%) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) 37 (26%) were documented in Group A and 37 (71%) remissions (CR: 21 (40%) and CRi=16 (31%) in Group B (P=0.2). After a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range: 0.9-217), 184 deaths were documented: 132 (72.5%) in Group A and 52 (76.5%) in Group B (P=0.5). 52 (36%) patients from Group A and 25 (48%) from Group B relapsed (P=0.1). The median (range) overall survival (OS) rates of patients from Group A was 13 (9-17) months and that of Group B was 14 (10-35) months (P=0.6). The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 52%, 28%, and 24% in Group A; and 62%, 33%, and 24% in Group B patients (Fig 1). Multivariable analysis identified relapse (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.7) and failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 2.8 95% CI 1.9-4.7) as risk factors for inferior survival (Fig 2a and 2b). The median (range) relapse free survival of patients in Group A was 28 (17 -81) and that of Group B was 27 (14 - 76) months (P=0.9) (Fig 2c). 28 patients underwent allogenic stem-cell transplant (25 in CR1 and 3 in CR2), 23 in Group A and 5 in Group B; the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of patients who underwent allogenic stem cell transplant were 88%, 72%, and 72% regardless of the group (Fig 2d). Conclusion: The current study did not find significant differences between AML patients with previous history of cancer with or without exposure to chemo/radiotherapy, in terms of either response to AML-directed therapy or overall or relapse-free survival, despite a higher prevalence of adverse karyotype in therapy-related AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Patnaik: Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Al-Kali: Astex: Other: Research support to institution; Novartis: Research Funding. Litzow: Pluristem: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee.