Louis, Erik K. St.

Background: Sleep disturbances are common in parkinsonian disorders; however, whether sleep disorders affect individuals with early-onset parkinsonism and whether they differ from individuals with typical-onset parkinsonism is unknown. Objective: To compare the prevalence and incidence of sleep disorders before and after parkinsonian motor symptom onset between individuals with early onset parkinsonism (age ≤50 at motor symptom onset) and typical-onset parkinsonism (age >50 at motor symptom onset). Methods: We used a population-based, 1991 to 2015 incident-cohort study of parkinsonism including 38 patients with early-onset and 1,001 patients with typical-onset parkinsonism. Presence or absence and type of sleep disorder as well as the relationship between motor and sleep symptoms were abstracted from the medical records. Rates of sleep disorders before and after onset of parkinsonism were compared with logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The prevalence of sleep disorders prior to the onset of parkinsonism in early vs. typical parkinsonism (24% vs. 16% p = 0.19) and incidence of sleep disorders after parkinsonism onset (5.85 cases per 100 person-years vs. 4.11 cases per 100 person-years; HR 1.15 95% CI: 0.74–1.77) were similar between the two groups. Early-onset parkinsonism had a higher risk for developing post-motor insomnia compared with typical-onset parkinsonism (HR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.02–2.93); the risk for developing all other sleep disorders considered was similar between groups. Conclusion: Sleep disorders are common in individuals with early-onset parkinsonism and occur with similar frequency to those with typical-onset parkinsonism, except for insomnia, which was more frequent in the early-onset group.

Abstract Introduction Sleep markers can assess prodromal risk for neurodegenerative disorders (NDD). In a recent study conducted by the Mayo Clinic, most isolated REM sleep behavior disorder patients preferred knowing about their risk for parkinsonism or dementia. In their email survey, patients indicated a strong preference for disclosure of prognostic NDD risk in order to spur family discussions and plan for the future. For this pilot study, the Mayo questions were modified in order to investigate the perspectives and preferences of community-based adults about potentially being at-risk of a NDD and how it might impact their lives. Methods A brief survey was administered to Rotary Club attendees prior to a presentation on sleep and neurodegenerative disease. Each question offered five responses: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, or strongly agree. Personal identifiers were not obtained. Thirty-four surveys were completed from approximately equal numbers of older men and women with estimated ages above 50 years. Personal information were not obtained (e.g., age and sex). Results When asked whether it was important to know their NDD risk given the fact that there are no known methods to prevent or cure the disease, most (83%) strongly agreed or agreed, while only 18% preferred not to know their NDD risk. The majority felt they would be more pessimistic about their future if identified as being at risk of NDD the (62% strongly agreed/agreed). Most believed their priorities and plans for living life would change (68% strongly agreed/agreed). Further, the vast majority felt that knowing NDD risk would help them plan for the future (89% strongly agreed/agreed), including planning for health resources and support (88% strongly agreed/agreed). Conclusion Eighty-three percent of those surveyed reported they would benefit from knowing if they were at risk of NDD, even though the majority would feel more pessimistic about their future. The vast majority (89%) responded that knowing their NDD risk would help them plan for the future. These results suggest that most community adults might be receptive to future sleep screening for NDD with results. Investigations are underway to confirm these findings in a broader community-based study. Support (if any) NIA-R44AG050326

Abstract Introduction Most older adults with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) are men, yet in younger adults there is greater parity between the sexes. Whether the clinical characteristics between women and men with iRBD may differ remains unclear. We aimed to analyze presenting clinical and demographic characteristics of iRBD in men and women. Methods We identified 130 women and 130 men with PSG confirmed iRBD who were matched for time of polysomnographic diagnosis, abstracted their clinical histories, and comparatively analyzed clinical characteristics between the sexes. Results RBD symptom onset average age (50.4 ± 20.0 vs. 55.4 ±16.9 years, p=0.03) and age at diagnosis (56.4 ±16.7 vs. 62.5 ± 13.3 years, p< 0.01) were younger in women than in men. Injury frequency was similar between groups. Antidepressant use prior to diagnosis (80.8% vs 53.0%, p< 0.01), psychiatric comorbidity (79.8% vs. 50.8%, p< 0.01) and chronic pain syndrome (39.2% vs. 17.4%, p< 0.01) diagnoses were more frequent in women than men. Insomnia (31.5% vs. 18.2%, p= 0.01), hypersomnoence (50.8% vs 37.9%, p=0.04) and overlap parasomnia disorder (13.8% vs 9.8%, p=0.06) were more frequent in women than men, while sleep apnea (43.1% vs. 70.5%, p < 0.01.) and vascular co-morbidity (62.3% vs 83.3%, p< 0.01) occurred more frequently in men than women. Autoimmunity was similar between sexes. Conclusion Women were younger when diagnosed, and had more frequent psychiatric diagnoses and antidepressant use, with different comorbid sleep disturbances and comorbidities than men with iRBD. Key sex differences in iRBD could imply different etiologies and aid accurate and timely diagnosis. Support (if any)

Abstract Introduction In a recent study, most patients diagnosed with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) preferred their physician discussed their risk for developing a future neurodegenerative disorder (NDD) such as parkinsonism or dementia (PD). In the Mayo Clinic email survey, 75% would lose trust in their physician if PD-risk was not discussed following an iRBD diagnosis. For this survey, questions were designed to investigate preferences for how sleep physicians might communicate to community-based adults about risk of a NDD. Methods A survey was administered to Rotary Club attendees prior to a sleep and neurodegenerative disease presentation, with options for responses being either strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, or strongly agree. Thirty-four surveys were obtained from approximately equal numbers of men and women with estimated ages above 50 years. Personal information were not obtained (i.e., sex and age). Results The vast majority of respondents wanted their physician to ask their preference prior to sharing NDD risk (86% strongly agreed or agreed), while virtually all would lose trust in their physician if he/she did not discuss their NDD risk (97% strongly agreed/agreed). If identified with NDD risk, responders would seek out information about medications and adaptive therapies that could delay onset (97% strongly agreed/agreed), while only about half currently had a good understanding of lifestyle patterns that might help delay onset (47% strongly agreed/agreed and 47% disagreed/strongly disagreed). Not knowing when memory problems might begin would cause most responders to feel anxious (85% strongly agreed/agreed). Conclusion Those surveyed wanted their physician to ask their preference prior to sharing NDD risk, but virtually all would lose trust in their health care provider if the information was known but not shared. There appears to be a role for physicians in educating those who may be at NDD risk about interventions that could delay onset of NDD, given approximately half have a limited understanding of lifestyle patterns that could help delay onset. Further, routine follow-up for changes in prodromal NDD biomarker severity might help to reduce anxiety in the 85% of those concerned about when memory problems might begin. Support (if any) NIA-R44AG050326

Abstract Introduction Nightshifts represent a substantial proportion of time dedicated to working in the inpatient setting, particularly among ICU staff. Our institution implemented a 24/7 in-person ICU attending model more than a decade ago. With practice growth and more than 200 ICU beds across disciplines, there are now at least 8 ICU attendings in-hospital all night. Yet, little is known about attending staff perceptions and desires about night work, so we began an exploratory analysis. Methods An online survey of 13 multiple-choice, slider scale, and open-ended questions were sent via email to critical care staff physicians of different disciplines within our institution. Results 69 out of 150 physicians completed the survey (46% response rate). Half were between 35 and 45 years old; 29% were age 45 to 55 years old. About half self-identified as a morningness chronotype. Most (84%) work 3- or 4-night shifts consecutively. Most viewed night shift work as having a negative influence on their quality of life (48% “somewhat negative” and 22% “very negative”) and on their health (51% “somewhat negative” and 24% “very negative”). Most would choose to work less nightshifts (37%) or none (29%). During nightshift assignments, about half (53%) self-report an average of 5 hours of sleep per 24-hour period; 18% self-report ≤ 4hours. Only 6% reported 7 or 8 hours of sleep. Mitigating strategies utilized during series of night shifts include use of caffeine (78%), naps (66%) and use of sleeping aids (21%). Outside of the nightshift series, more than half (56%) reported no sleep difficulties while 21% reported onset or maintenance insomnia. Conclusion At our large tertiary hospital employing an in-house nightshift model across multiple ICUs, most staff ICU physicians have a negative perception of night shift work on their quality of life and health. The majority of respondents would choose to work less or no night shifts. How self-reports of limited sleep (average 5 hours) per 24-hour period compare to objectively measured sleep duration in this population remains to be determined in the next phase of this study. Support (if any)