Lin, Yi

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib is an orally administered, selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 & 6 that is dosed on a twice daily continuous schedule. Abemaciclib has demonstrated clinical efficacy with a generally tolerable safety profile in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 (NCT02107703) and in combination with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) in MONARCH 3 (NCT02246621). These analyses were conducted to evaluate if patient and disease characteristics may better inform in whom and when abemaciclib should be initiated to define optimal treatment strategies. Methods: MONARCH 2 and 3 enrolled patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. In MONARCH 2, patients whose disease had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy were treated with abemaciclib/placebo plus fulvestrant. In MONARCH 3, patients were treated with abemaciclib/placebo plus NSAI as initial therapy for advanced disease. An exploratory pooled analysis of the two studies was performed to determine significant prognostic factors. Efficacy results (progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate [ORR] in patients with measurable disease) were examined for patient subgroups corresponding to each of the identified significant prognostic factors. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) methodology was performed to examine the association between treatment-free interval (TFI) following adjuvant endocrine therapy and outcomes of endocrine therapy alone or in combination with abemaciclib in MONARCH 3. Results: Analyses of clinical factors in over 1000 patients confirmed the following to have prognostic value: bone-only disease, liver metastases, tumor grade, progesterone receptor (PgR) status, and ECOG performance status. Prognosis was poor in patients with liver metastases, PgR-negative tumors, and high-grade tumors. While all subpopulations benefited from the addition of abemaciclib to endocrine therapy regardless of prognosis, substantial benefit of abemaciclib was observed in poor prognosis subgroups, characterized by large increases in PFS (hazard ratios = 0.4 to 0.5) and ORR (over 30%). In addition, STEPP analysis of TFI on a subset of the MONARCH 3 population showed that patients with the shortest TFI appeared to have a poorer prognosis and received more benefit from the addition of abemaciclib compared to patients with longer TFI. Conclusions: This exploratory analysis has provided data that could help optimize treatment strategies by identifying that patients with poor prognostic factors may receive greater benefit from the addition of abemaciclib to endocrine therapy. Citation Format: Goetz MP, O'Shaughnessy J, Sledge Jr. GW, Martin M, Lin Y, Forrester T, Mockbee C, Smith IC, Di Leo A, Johnston S. The benefit of abemaciclib in prognostic subgroups: An exploratory analysis of combined data from the MONARCH 2 and 3 studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-02.

AbstractWaldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an immunoglobulin M‐associated lymphoma, with majority of cases demonstrating MYD88 locus alteration, most commonly, MYD88L265P. Owing to low prevalence of the wild‐type (WT) MYD88 genotype in WM, clinically relevant data in this patient population are sparse, with one study showing nearly a 10‐fold increased risk of mortality in this subgroup compared to patients with MYD88L265P mutation. We studied a large cohort of patients with MYD88L265P and MYD88WT WM, evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 1995 and 2016, to specifically assess the impact of these genotypes on clinical course. Of 557 patients, MYD88L265P mutation status, as determined by allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction, was known in 219, and 174 (79%) of those exhibited MYD88L265P, 157 of 174 patients had active disease. Of 45 (21%) patients with MYD88WT genotype, 44 had active disease. The estimated median follow‐up was 7.0 years; median overall survival was 10.2 years (95% CI: 8.4‐16.5) for MYD88L265P versus 13.9 years (95% CI: 6.4‐29.3) for the MYD88WT (P = 0.86). The time‐to‐next therapy from frontline treatment and the presenting features were similar in the two patient populations. For patients with smoldering WM at diagnosis, the median time‐to‐progression to active disease was 2.8 years (95% CI: 2.2‐3.8) in the MYD88L265P cohort and 1.9 years (95% CI: 0.7‐3.1) in the MYD88WT cohort (P = 0.21). The frequency of transformation to high‐grade lymphoma, or the development of therapy‐elated myelodysplastic syndrome was higher in the MYD88WT cohort (16% versus 4% in the MYD88L265P, P = 0.009). In conclusion, MYD88L265P mutation does not appear to be a determinant of outcome, and its presence may not be a disease‐defining feature in WM. Our findings warrant external validation, preferably through prospective studies.

AbstractExperience with intensive chemotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) using VDT PACE regimen and its modifications (VDT PACE‐like regimens: VPLRs) outside TOTAL THERAPY trials is limited. We analyzed the outcomes of 141 patients with RRMM who received VPLRs at our center between 2006 and 2017 in an intent‐to‐treat analysis. Median age was 59.7 years and 66.7% of patients were male. A median of 2.2 years (range 0.02‐11.4) separated diagnosis of myeloma and inititation of VPLR. High‐risk cytogenetics were present in 52.4% patients. Patients received a median of 4 (range 1‐14) prior therapies, including stem cell transplant (SCT) in 66.7% patients. Ninety‐five (67.4%) patients received VDT PACE, 20 (14.2%) patients received VD PACE and 26 (18.4%) patients received other VPLRs. Patients received a median of 1 cycle (range 1‐9) of VPLR. We observed ≥ minimal response in 68.4%, ≥ partial response (PR) in 54.4% and ≥ very good PR in 10.3% patients. Median progression‐free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI, 1.9‐3.9) and median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months (CI, 6.2‐9.9). One‐hundred and sixteen (82.3%) patients received some therapy after VPLR; 71 (61.2%) received systemic chemotherapy, while 45 (38.8%) underwent SCT. Median OS for those who received SCT after VPLR was 15.1 months (CI, 10.3‐20.8). Age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.3 [CI, 1.4‐3.7]; P = 0.0008) and R‐ISS III stage (HR‐ 2.4 [CI, 1.3‐4.0]; P = 0.003) predicted shorter OS in patients receiving VPLR. VPLRs are effective in heavily pre‐treated RRMM. In fit patients, SCT can be used to consolidate the response to VPLR.

AbstractOutside of clinical trials, experience with daratumumab‐based combination therapies (DCTs) using bortezomib (V)/lenalidomide (R)/pomalidomide (P), and dexamethasone (d) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is limited. We reviewed the outcomes of 126 patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of any DCT. Median age at DCT initiation was 67 (range, 43‐93) years. High‐risk cytogenetics was present in 33% patients. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1‐14) and time to first DCT from diagnosis was 4.3 years (range, 0.4‐13.0). Seventeen (13%) patients were refractory to single agent daratumumab. Fifty‐two (41%), 34 (27%), 23 (18%), and 17 (14%) received DPd, DRd, DVd and “other” DCTs, respectively. Overall response rate was 47%. Median follow‐up was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐6.1). Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐7.8). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) with any regimen. Median PFS (months) was worst for penta‐refractory MM (n = 8) vs quadruple refractory MM (n = 18) and others (n = 100) (2.2 [95% CI, 1‐2.4] vs 3.1 [95% CI, 2.1‐NR] vs 5.9 [95% CI, 5.0‐NR]; P < .001); those who were refractory to ≥1 agents used in the DCT vs others (4.9 [95% CI, 3.1‐6.0] vs 8.2 [95% CI, 4.6‐NR]; P = .02); and those who received >2 prior therapies vs others (5.0 months [95% CI, 3.7‐5.9] vs NR [95% CI, NR‐NR]; P = .002). Non‐hematologic toxicities included infections (38%), fatigue (32%), and infusion reactions (18%). Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicities were seen in 41% of patients. DCTs are effective in RRMM. ORR and PFS in heavily pretreated patients are lower than those reported in clinical trials.

SummaryThe management of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) relies predominantly on small trials, one of which has demonstrated activity of dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide (DRC) in the frontline setting. We report on the efficacy of DRC, focusing on relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients. Ibrutinib, a recently approved agent in WM demonstrated limited activity in patients with MYD88WT genotype. Herein, we additionally report on the activity of DRC based on the MYD88L265P mutation status. Of 100 WM patients evaluated between January 2007 and December 2014 who received DRC, 50 had R/R WM. The overall response rate (ORR) was 87%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and time‐to‐next‐therapy (TTNT) were 32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15–51) and 50 (95% CI: 35–60) months, respectively. In the previously untreated cohort (n = 50), the ORR was 96%, and the median PFS and TTNT were 34 months (95% CI: 23–not reached [NR]) and NR (95% CI: 37–NR), respectively. Twenty‐five (86%) of 29 genotyped patients harbored MYD88L265P. The response rates and outcomes were independent of MYD88 mutation status. Grade ≥3 adverse effects included neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (7%) and infections (3%). Similar to the frontline setting, DRC is an effective and well‐tolerated salvage regimen for WM. In contrast to ibrutinib, DRC offers a less expensive, fixed‐duration option, with preliminary data suggesting efficacy independent of the patients’ MYD88 status.

Abstract Introduction: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. ZUMA-1 is a multicenter registrational trial of axi-cel in patients with refractory, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In a pre-specified interim analysis, ZUMA-1 met its primary endpoint with a 76% objective response rate and 47% complete response. The incidence of Grade 3 and higher (Gr 3+) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NE) was 13% and 29%, respectively, in 93 patients with 1 month follow-up (Neelapu ASH 2016). We present novel immune signatures of Gr 3+ CRS and NE by analyzing the axi-cel-related biomarker profile in association with clinical outcomes. Methods: In this interim analysis of 62 patients, 44 serum analytes pre- and post-axi-cel treatment were measured via ELISA at multiple timepoints during the first month. The number of CAR+ cells in blood was determined by qPCR. Kinetics and association of these markers with CRS and NE were analyzed. The treatment-related profile was defined by analytes with at least double an increase over baseline in at least 50% of patients. These analytes were selected and evaluated for association with Gr 3+ CRS or NE. Immune signatures were determined based on p-values applied to peak or cumulative levels of analytes and adjusted for multiplicity (stepdown method). Results: Out of 44 analytes measured, 12 demonstrated an increase by double over baseline in at least 50% of patients. This axi-cel-related biomarker profile includes immune proliferative/modulating cytokines, pro-inflammatory cytokines, markers of myeloid activation, and chemokines. Markers with the highest median-fold increase were IFNγ (44x), IL-10 (31x), IL-6 (26x), IL-15 (20x), and GRZB (17x). These peaked within 7-14 days and generally returned to baseline within 1 month post-treatment. Within this panel of 12 analytes elevated post-axi-cel treatment, markers associated with Gr 3+ CRS (p&lt;0.05) were IL-10, IL-6, IL-2Rα, IL-8, MCP-1, IFNγ, IL-1Rα, and IP-10. Markers associated with Gr 3+ NE (p&lt;0.05) were IL-6, IL-15, IL-8, and MCP-1. Peak levels of CAR T cells in blood, occurring within 14 days post-infusion, were associated with Gr 3+ NE (p=0.02) but not Gr 3+ CRS (p=0.6). A majority of patients with Gr 3+ NE had only Gr 0-2 CRS (16/22) while nearly 50% of patients with Gr 3+ CRS had Gr 0-2 NE (5/11). Conclusions: Biomarker and clinical evaluation suggests mechanistic differences underlying CRS and NE following axi-cel treatment. While Gr 3+ NE was associated with CAR T cell expansion, Gr 3+ CRS was instead associated with a broader array of serum markers, many linked to systemic myeloid activation. Further understanding of these immune signatures may provide insight into managing AEs associated with anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. Citation Format: Frederick L. Locke, John Rossi, Xiaodong Xue, Sattva S. Neelapu, Daniel H. Ryan, Armin Ghobadi, Lazaros J. Lekakis, David Miklos, Caron A. Jacobson, Ira Braunschweig, Olalekan Oluwole, Tanya Siddiqi, Yi Lin, John Timmerman, Patrick M. Reagan, Marika Sherman, Janice Nagatani, Xiao Zhang, Lynn Navale, William Y. Go, Jeff Wiezorek, Adrian Bot. Immune signatures of cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events in a multicenter registrational trial (ZUMA-1) in subjects with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (KTE-C19) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT020. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT020

SummaryThe significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in light chain (AL) amyloidosis has not been previously explored. We studied 1019 newly diagnosed patients and correlated the elevation of LDH above the upper limit of normal (ULN) with disease characteristics and outcome. Four hundred and nine patients had an LDH above ULN, representing 40% of the study population. Patients with an elevated LDH were older, were less likely to be male and had more extensive organ involvement compared to patients with a normal LDH. Patients with high LDH had greater cardiac and renal dysfunction. Elevated LDH was an independent prognostic marker for overall survival and for death within 6 months of diagnosis, but this was restricted to patients not eligible for stem cell transplant. Serum LDH may act as a marker for organ damage and should be explored as a potential marker for tissue healing and organ recovery.

Key Points PVD is an active combination in relapsed lenalidomide-refractory MM patients. PVD with weekly bortezomib offers a simpler, more convenient, and well-tolerated regimen option.

Summary This study aimed to describe the patterns of care and outcomes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma ( DLBCL ) after failure of front line anthracycline‐based immunochemotherapy ( IC ). Patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma were prospectively enrolled in Molecular Epidemiology Resource ( MER ) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellzence. All DLBCL and primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma ( PMBL ) patients treated with front‐line anthracycline‐based IC were followed for relapse. Patients with relapse on follow‐up and subsequently retreated were included in this analysis. 1039 patients received anthracycline‐based IC between 2002 and 2012, of which 244 relapsed and were subsequently retreated. Across all therapies, overall survival at 4 years ( OS 4) from relapse was 28% and 103 patients ultimately underwent autologous haematopoietic cell transplant (auto HCT ) with OS 4 from auto HCT of 51%. Patients relapsing after 12 months from initial diagnosis had OS 4 of 47% but those with a transient or no response to initial therapy had OS 4 of only 13%. Outcomes of relapsed or refractory DLBCL differ substantially when categorized by response to initial therapy, timing of relapse and opportunity to undergo auto HCT . The design and interpretation of uncontrolled trials should account for this heterogeneity in patients with relapsed DLBCL .