McEvoy, Marian T.

ABSTRACTBackgroundDrug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), or drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a delayed and severe immune response to certain medications. We investigated vancomycin‐induced DiHS/DRESS, notable for frequent and severe organ involvement, to describe its specific histopathology and the correlations between histopathologic and clinical findings.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted to identify patients between 2006 and 2022 who received vancomycin, had archived skin biopsy specimens, and were scored as having probable or definite DiHS/DRESS. Clinical features were retrospectively collected, and biopsy specimens were reviewed by a board‐certified dermatopathologist. A subset of histopathologic and clinical features was analyzed for statistical correlation.ResultsTwenty‐three patients met the inclusion criteria. Most biopsy specimens (87%) showed an eczematous reaction pattern; 17 (74%) showed a secondary reaction pattern. Spongiosis (87%) and neutrophilic infiltration (91%) were common epidermal characteristics. The dermal inflammatory infiltrate was frequently superficial (87%) and consistently included plasma cells (96%). Eosinophils were present in the dermis in 70% of cases. Parakeratosis negatively correlated with liver involvement and positively correlated with desquamative rash. Epidermal lymphocytes were negatively correlated with the RegiSCAR score.ConclusionsVancomycin‐associated DiHS/DRESS histopathology was characterized by a frequent eczematous reaction pattern, multiple coexisting reaction patterns, and epidermal neutrophilic infiltration.

AbstractBackgroundDermatology grand rounds are popular educational activities among dermatologists and trainees, contributing to improved knowledge and skills. Dermatology hospital conferences at Mayo Clinic Dermatology are separate from dermatology grand rounds in that they focus on inpatient consultations and dermatology admissions.ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the types of cases presented during dermatology hospital grand rounds and evaluate the educational value of this continuing medical education (CME)‐accredited activity.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed all inpatient dermatology cases presented during hospital grand rounds at Mayo Clinic Dermatology in Rochester, MN from 2019 to 2022; this study also reviewed the compiled surveys of faculty participants at our institution from 2019 to 2022.ResultsA total of 389 cases met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The most common diagnostic category was inflammatory/autoimmune diseases (157 cases, 40%), followed by infection or infestation (73 cases, 19%), drug‐induced eruptions (49 cases, 13%), neoplastic or metastatic diseases (41 cases, 11%), genetic/congenital disorders (21 cases, 5%), depositional/nutritional/metabolic conditions (15 cases, 4%) and wound/traumatic/iatrogenic dermatoses (12 cases, 3%), which were the least common. Most cases were presented for discussion of diagnosis and management (246 cases, 63%), but others focused on the arrival of diagnosis (119 cases, 31%) or management alone (24 cases, 6%). The compiled surveys of faculty participants (n = 50) indicated high satisfaction with dermatology hospital grand rounds, with the majority expressing that evidence‐based research was incorporated and positively impacted their practice. Most respondents indicated that hospital conference participation improved knowledge (97%), competence (64%), clinician performance (54%), patient outcomes (52%) and team performance (50%).ConclusionsThe cases presented during these conferences spanned from challenging inflammatory diseases to simple dermatoses, with over 800 literature references reviewed. Dermatology hospital grand rounds provide high value as a CME‐accredited activity for dermatology faculty, even for those without a specific interest in hospital/inpatient dermatology.

Introduction Dermatologic complaints are a common reason for emergency department visits. Methods Retrospective chart review from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. Patients in the Mayo Clinic Emergency Department receiving dermatology consultation were included. Results Dermatitis (24.7%, n = 113), infection (20.4%, n = 93), and drug reaction (10.3%, n = 47) accounted for the majority of diagnoses. Emergency department providers often provide no diagnosis (38%) or a differential diagnosis (22%), and dermatology consultation frequently alters diagnosis (46%) and treatment (83%). Patients receiving in-person consultations are admitted more frequently than those receiving teledermatology consultations (40% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). Primary diagnostic concordance with subsequent dermatology evaluation is high for in-person (94%) and teledermatology (88%) consultations. Discussion This is the largest study of emergency department dermatology consultations in the United States and the first to compare in-person and teledermatology emergency department consultation utilization in clinical practice. These modalities are utilized in a complementary fashion at our institution, with severe dermatologic diagnoses seen in-person. The valuable role of emergency department dermatologists is highlighted by frequent changes to diagnosis and treatment plans that result from dermatology consultation. Furthermore, our data suggest that teledermatology is an effective modality with the potential to expand access to dermatologic expertise in the emergency department setting.

AbstractBackgroundHospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies are medically complex and commonly affected by dermatologic conditions.MethodsRetrospective chart review from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, at Rochester Methodist Hospital (Rochester, Minnesota, USA). Patients hospitalized on hematology and BMT services receiving dermatology consultation were included.ResultsIn all, 578 consultations (63% male, median age 61 years) were reviewed. Drug reactions (22%), infection (17%), and malignant neoplasm (10%) accounted for nearly half of diagnoses. Exanthematous drug reaction (10%), graft‐versus‐host disease (7%), and lymphoma or leukemia cutis (6%) were the commonest individual diagnoses. There were significantly more drug reactions in severe neutropenia (33.2% vs. 15.0%), neutrophilic dermatoses in myeloid neoplasm (5.2% vs. 0.3%), and viral infection in lymphoid neoplasm (8.3% vs. 1.2%). Consultation frequently altered treatment (68%), diagnostic workup (63%), and the primary service’s initial diagnostic impression (53%). Biopsies were performed in 52% of consultations and helped secure a diagnosis 73% of the time. A total of 16.4% of consultations did not receive a definitive final diagnosis, and 18.5% were resolved in one visit.ConclusionThis is the largest study to date of hospital dermatology consultation in hematology patients. Biopsies are utilized frequently and are diagnostically useful. The complexity of this patient population is evidenced by the fact that a final diagnosis remains elusive in a number of cases despite the multiple visits required for the vast majority of consultations. Nevertheless, dermatology consultation alters diagnosis and treatment in the majority of patients, highlighting the critical role dermatologists have in the care of these patients.

Background: Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF) is a variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that has clinical overlap with a variety of inflammatory follicular unit disorders. However, we describe distinctive presentations of FMF with acneiform features that can be diagnostically challenging, leading to diagnostic delay. Objective: To highlight the importance of histopathologic and immunohistochemical evaluation for diagnostic confirmation of presumed inflammatory follicular unit–based disorders that are unusual in presentation or unresponsive to standard therapies. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study of 5 consecutive patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of FMF was conducted. The clinical, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular genetic features of cases are presented. Results: We describe 5 patients with clinical and histopathologic presentations of FMF masquerading as hidradenitis suppurativa, furunculosis, or acne vulgaris (age range 34–66 years, 4:1 female to male). Clinical morphologies included open and closed comedones, inflammatory pustules, papules and nodules, follicular papules with keratotic plugging, cysts, and scarring involving the face, trunk, and intertriginous areas. All patients failed to respond to standard therapies, including topical and oral antibiotics, topical and oral retinoids, or topical corticosteroids, before receiving the diagnosis of FMF. Lesional skin biopsies showed a perifollicular CD4-positive T-lymphocytic infiltrate with pilotropism, intrafollicular mucin deposition, foreign-body granulomatous inflammation, acute inflammation, and follicular epithelial necrosis. None had concurrent systemic mycosis fungoides. Limitations: Small retrospective cohort study. Conclusion: We present these cases to expand the clinical and histopathologic spectrum of FMF that may strikingly resemble acneiform disorders and to highlight the importance of diagnostic reconsideration with histopathologic evaluation.

Background Recent investigations suggest that inflammation and autoimmunity might have a role in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). Given that abnormal ventriculovascular coupling often coexists with AF, we hypothesize that autoimmune vasculitis plays a significant role in the pathogenetic mechanism of AF. Methods and Results A standardized retrospective population‐based case–control study was conducted to evaluate the association between autoimmune vasculitis and AF, and all‐cause mortality. The study included 8459 patients with a new diagnosis of AF and 8459 age‐, sex‐, and registration calendar year–matched controls in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2010. The association of each clinical characteristic, diagnosis, and treatment was assessed using conditional logistic regression to account for the matched case–control study design. Cox proportional hazards regression models and Kaplan‐Meier curves were used to detect independent predictors of mortality and examine cumulative survival. Of a total of 16 918 patients (mean age 72.3+14.4 years; 48.7% women), 320 (1.9%) were diagnosed with autoimmune vasculitis before the index date during the 30‐year period. Among the cases, the prevalence of any autoimmune vasculitis was 2.3%, whereas the frequency of autoimmune vasculitis in controls was 1.5% ( P <0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of autoimmune vasculitis in AF cases was 1.5 times higher than in controls (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04–2.01; P =0.03). Patients with AF and autoimmune vasculitis had worse 5‐year survival than those without autoimmune vasculitis or AF (44.7% versus 77.2%; log‐rank P <0.001). Conclusions Autoimmune vasculitis is significantly associated with AF and independently confers worse survival. These observations may represent one mechanism linking autoimmunity and inflammation to the pathogenesis and prognosis of AF.

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies suggest that calciphylaxis is a thrombotic condition in which arteriolar thrombosis leads to painful skin infarcts and consequent morbidity and mortality. Paradoxically, warfarin is implicated as a risk factor for calciphylaxis. Our objective is to report the use of oral direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors (termed direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) in patients with calciphylaxis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed records of 16 patients with calciphylaxis who received concomitant administration of novel anticoagulants. Patient data, including demographics, comorbidities, other treatments, and adverse events, were abstracted from the health records.ResultsEleven patients (69%) had chronic kidney disease (stage ≥3A), and eight (50%) received dialysis. Apixaban was the most frequently used agent (n = 11 [69%]). Dabigatran (n = 4 [25%]) and rivaroxaban (n = 2 [13%]) were reserved for patients with mild renal impairment (stage ≤2). One clinically relevant but nonmajor bleeding event occurred. There were no major bleeding events. Nine patients (56%) were alive at last follow‐up, and five (31%) had complete resolution of their calciphylaxis (mean follow‐up, 523 days; range, 26–1884 days).ConclusionDOACs were safe and well tolerated in patients with calciphylaxis, in this initial experience. Several patients had improvement or resolution of calciphylaxis in response to therapy that included DOACs. The degree of renal impairment should guide DOAC choice. Randomized trials are required to determine treatment efficacy.