Hesley, Gina K.

Summary: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery is an effective surgery for the treatment of lymphedema in the extremities. Indocyanine green lymphography is the reference standard for visualizing lymphatics for LVA surgery, but it has several limitations; most notably, superficial dermal congestion can mask deeper lymphatic vessels. To overcome the limitations, we add contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography. We have previously reported that CEUS lymphography can identify lymphatic vessels for LVA surgery that indocyanine green lymphography does not. Here, we describe how we perform CEUS lymphography, including workflow, technique, and documentation. Before informed consent, the patient must be screened for possible adverse reactions to microbubbles. The procedure involves multiple intradermal injections of the microbubble agent at various sites along the extremity. After each injection, imaging for microbubble uptake by lymphatic vessels is performed using an ultrasound scanner with contrast-specific software. We use sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres (Lumason/SonoVue; Bracco Suisse SA), but we are investigating the performance of other Food & Drug Administration–approved microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography. Having a systematic approach to marking the skin can mitigate the hindrance of marking over ultrasound coupling gel. Another benefit of CEUS lymphography is the rapid identification of neighboring veins compatible in size and location for anastomosis. We hold regular scheduled multidisciplinary meetings for coordination of care, discussion of outcomes, quality assurance, and ongoing innovation.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the safety and tolerability of MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for the treatment of facet joint–mediated pain in human subjects for whom conventional treatment had failed. Secondarily, to evaluate effectiveness of the procedure. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent MRgFUS at our institution were retrospectively identified. Chart review was performed to obtain relevant clinical and technical data. All patients had chronic low back pain and positive comparative medial branch blocks. Results Twenty-six MRgFUS treatments in 20 patients were included. Mean sonication energy was 1436.6 Joules. The procedure was technically successful in all patients. Of the treated patients, 29.6% experienced short-term worsening of low back pain immediately after the procedure, all by 1–4 points on a 0–10 scale. One patient (3.8%) reported temporary worsening of preexisting radicular symptoms after the procedure. Of 21 treatments with clinical follow-up of at least 3 months available, 12 (57.1%) had >3 months’ pain relief, 2 (10%) had <3 months’ benefit, 6 (30%) reported no benefit, and 1 (5%) patient was lost to follow-up. In patients who reported at least some benefit with prior conventional radiofrequency ablation, 8/10 (80%) benefited from the MRgFUS procedure. Conclusion The present study demonstrates that MRgFUS ablation of the lumbar facet joints is a safe and tolerable procedure in human subjects and could provide another option for patients for whom radiofrequency ablation had failed. More than half of all patients received significant durable pain relief, which jumped to 80% for patients who had experienced at least some benefit from prior radiofrequency ablations.

Arterial stiffness is recognized as a highly clinically relevant and independent prognostic biomarker of cardiovascular disease. Arterial dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (ADUV) uses acoustic radiation force to generate propagating waves in the arterial wall and measures the wave motion to estimate arterial mechanical properties from fitting phase velocity dispersion curves to a waveguide model. ADUV measurements were made with a Verasonics V1 system with a L7-4 linear array transducer in 63 human subjects (27 male/36 female) from ages 50–88 years old. We made measurements at 10 time points within the cardiac cycle, termed cardiac stages. We estimated the phase velocity (median of cp from 400-600 Hz) and G determined from matching the dispersion curves with those from a waveguide model incorporating the artery diameter and wall thickness. Within the same study visit, we measured the intima-media thickness and diameter changes through the cardiac cycle with a General Electric Logiq E9 or E10 scanner. We also tonometry to determine the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. We report here comparisons of median phase velocity, cp, and inverted shear modulus, G, at different stages of the cardiac cycle with clinical metrics of arterial stiffness.

AbstractThere are very few true breast emergencies. While infrequent, women do present to emergency departments or urgent care centres with breast‐related concerns. In this case‐based review, both common and uncommon urgent and emergent breast lesions are presented, emphasising ultrasound characteristics and imaging optimisation to improve accurate diagnosis and appropriate recommendations.

Background: Women with uterine fibroids often seek uterine-preserving treatments, rather than hysterectomy. Imaging-defined endpoints following nonsurgical treatments for fibroids are limited. Materials and Methods: Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow (FIRSTT), a randomized controlled trial of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS), enrolled premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. In this subanalysis, we report imaging results up to 36 months after UAE or MRgFUS. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline for all women and during the 36 months after treatment if they did not meet other study endpoints. The main outcome of this subanalysis was fibroid volume reduction (defined both in terms of total fibroid load and volume of the largest fibroid), uterine volume reduction, and nonperfused volume. Results: During 2010–2014, 25 of the 37 women who were randomized and treated at Mayo Clinic had a 24-month follow-up MRI (11 UAE; 14 MRgFUS); among these women, 15 (7 UAE and 8 MRgFUS) had a 36-month follow-up MRI. Average age for the cohort was 44.1 (standard deviation, SD = 4.4) years. Nine patients had a second fibroid procedure by 36 months (seven in the MRgFUS arm and two in UAE arm). Median total fibroid load reduction was ∼50% in both treatment arms at both 24- and 36-month follow-up. Volume of the largest fibroid decreased more in the MRgFUS arm, whereas uterine volume decreased more in the UAE arm (neither reached statistical significance). At 24 months, median nonperfused volume was higher in the UAE arm (92%) than the MRgFUS arm (10%). Conclusions: Similar fibroid volume reduction was seen for the MRgFUS and UAE treatments in this comparative effectiveness study. Nonperfused volume 24 months after the procedure was higher in the UAE arm than in the MRgFUS arm. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00995878, clinicaltrials.gov