Kashyap, Rahul

Abstract Background Although visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in various parts of India, management is still a challenge due to multiple drug resistance. Here we describe a case of a 50 years old female who was diagnosed with visceral leishmaniasis at a tertiary care hospital in northern parts of India and was managed with a repeated trial of liposomal Amphotericin B. Methods Case Discussion: The patient presented in the outpatient department with recurrent fever, mild intermittent abdominal discomfort associated with generalized weakness for the past one month. On per abdomen examination the patient had splenomegaly with spleen palpable 8 cm below the left costal margin. Blood investigations were suggestive of pancytopenia (leukocyte of 1800/cumm, Hemoglobin 7 g/dl, Platelet count: 80,000/cumm) along with severe neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count: 400/cumm) . The CT abdomen showed massive splenomegaly (23 cm) with mild hepatomegaly . Leishmania Immunoglobulin G was positive. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hyperproliferative marrow with plasmacytosis (12-15%). Bone marrow Leishman-Donovan bodies were negative. Serum immunofixation was negative for M spike and serum light chain assay was also negative. She was managed with liposomal Amphotericin B (3mg/kg) for 7 days and was subsequently discharged. After 3 months, the patient again presented with continuous fever, lethargy, running nose, palpitations. Her blood work-up revealed severe pancytopenia again. She was tested for Leishmania anti- rk39 antibody, which was positive. She was given a repeat trial of Liposomal Amphotericin B with a different regimen-3 mg/kg dose on Day 1 to 5, followed by 6th dose on Day 14, followed by 7th dose on Day 21, as per the FDA approved regimen. Patient recovered well. The most recent total leukocyte counts eventually improved to 4800 with normal differential count. Platelets increased to 180,000, Hemoglobin was around 10.8g/dl and spleen was non palpable on physical examination. Results Treatment of leishmania can become complicated due to resistance to various drugs especially when a single agent is being given. Conclusion But in resource limited countries different regimens of liposomal amphotericin B can be tried which might be helpful due to speedy clinical recovery and cost effectiveness. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

AbstractHealthcare workers (HCWs) have faced an increased amount of mental health struggles amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic. However, those in conflict‐based settings with fragile healthcare systems meet additional challenges. This study reviews violence, conflict and mental health among HCWs in five countries: Syria, Palestine, Yemen, Afghanistan and Lebanon. Our study reports that HCWs are targeted by violence, bombings, mistreatment and different forms of abuse, including verbal and physical. With the additional burdens of the pandemic including prolonged working hours, limited resources and insufficient humanitarian aid, the healthcare workers fall victim to increased levels of burnout and mental illnesses. The situation leads to dire consequences on their personal lives and professional development, compelling them to quit their job or country all together. Although healthcare workers remain resilient in these conflict‐based settings, immediate interventions are required to prevent violence against them and cater to their rapidly declining mental health.

ImportanceThere is limited evidence for therapeutic options for pediatric COVID-19 outside of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).ObjectiveTo determine whether the use of steroids within 2 days of admission for non–MIS-C COVID-19 in children is associated with hospital length of stay (LOS). The secondary objective was to determine their association with intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, inflammation, and fever defervescence.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study analyzed data retrospectively for children (<18 years) who required hospitalization for non–MIS-C COVID-19. Data from March 2020 through September 2021 were provided by 58 hospitals in 7 countries who participate in the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) COVID-19 registry.ExposureAdministration of steroids within 2 days of admission.Main Outcomes and MeasuresLength of stay in the hospital and ICU. Adjustment for confounders was done by mixed linear regression and propensity score matching.ResultsA total of 1163 patients met inclusion criteria and had a median (IQR) age of 7 years (0.9-14.3). Almost half of all patients (601/1163, 51.7%) were male, 33.8% (392/1163) were non-Hispanic White, and 27.9% (324/1163) were Hispanic. Of the study population, 184 patients (15.8%) received steroids within 2 days of admission, and 979 (84.2%) did not receive steroids within the first 2 days. Among 1163 patients, 658 (56.5%) required respiratory support during hospitalization. Overall, patients in the steroids group were older and had greater severity of illness, and a larger proportion required respiratory and vasoactive support. On multivariable linear regression, after controlling for treatment with remdesivir within 2 days, country, race and ethnicity, obesity and comorbidity, number of abnormal inflammatory mediators, age, bacterial or viral coinfection, and disease severity according to ICU admission within first 2 days or World Health Organization ordinal scale of 4 or higher on admission, with a random intercept for the site, early steroid treatment was not significantly associated with hospital LOS (exponentiated coefficient, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09; P = .42). Separate analyses for patients with an LOS of 2 days or longer (n = 729), those receiving respiratory support at admission (n = 286), and propensity score–matched patients also showed no significant association between steroids and LOS. Early steroid treatment was not associated with ICU LOS, fever defervescence by day 3, or normalization of inflammatory mediators.Conclusions and RelevanceSteroid treatment within 2 days of hospital admission in a heterogeneous cohort of pediatric patients hospitalized for COVID-19 without MIS-C did not have a statistically significant association with hospital LOS.

Objective As of early 2021, there have been over 3.5 million pediatric cases of SARS-CoV-2, including 292 pediatric deaths in the United States. Although most pediatric patients present with mild disease, they are still at risk for developing significant morbidity requiring hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. This study was performed to evaluate if the presence of concurrent respiratory viral infections in pediatric patients admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 was associated with an increased rate of ICU level of care. Design A multicenter, international, noninterventional, cross-sectional study using data provided through The Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Network Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study database. Setting The medical ward and ICU of 67 participating hospitals. Patients Pediatric patients younger than 18 years hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results A total of 922 patients were included. Among these patients, 391 required ICU level care and 31 had concurrent non–SARS-CoV-2 viral coinfection. In a multivariate analysis, after accounting for age, positive blood culture, positive sputum culture, preexisting chronic medical conditions, the presence of a viral respiratory coinfection was associated with need for ICU care (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–9.4; P < 0.01). Conclusions This study demonstrates an association between concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection with viral respiratory coinfection and the need for ICU care. Further research is needed to identify other risk factors that can be used to derive and validate a risk-stratification tool for disease severity in pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of prior use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs) with mortality and outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Multicenter, international COVID-19 registry. Subjects: Adult hospitalized COVID-19 patients on antihypertensive agents (AHAs) prior to admission, admitted from March 31, 2020, to March 10, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were compared between three groups: patients on RAASIs only, other AHAs only, and those on both medications. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were performed after controlling for prehospitalization characteristics to estimate the effect of RAASIs on mortality and other outcomes during hospitalization. Of 26,652 patients, 7,975 patients were on AHAs prior to hospitalization. Of these, 1,542 patients (19.3%) were on RAASIs only, 3,765 patients (47.2%) were on other AHAs only, and 2,668 (33.5%) patients were on both medications. Compared with those taking other AHAs only, patients on RAASIs only were younger (mean age 63.3 vs 66.9 yr; p < 0.0001), more often male (58.2% vs 52.4%; p = 0.0001) and more often White (55.1% vs 47.2%; p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, gender, race, location, and comorbidities, patients on combination of RAASIs and other AHAs had higher in-hospital mortality than those on RAASIs only (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% CI [1.19–1.38]; p < 0.0001) and higher mortality than those on other AHAs only (OR = 1.09; 95% CI [1.03–1.15]; p = 0.0017). Patients on RAASIs only had lower mortality than those on other AHAs only (OR = 0.87; 95% CI [0.81–0.94]; p = 0.0003). Patients on ACEIs only had higher mortality compared with those on ARBs only (OR = 1.37; 95% CI [1.20–1.56]; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who were taking AHAs, prior use of a combination of RAASIs and other AHAs was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than the use of RAASIs alone. When compared with ARBs, ACEIs were associated with significantly higher mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.