Reinholz, Anna K.

Purpose To (1) report the long‐term outcomes associated with both operative and nonoperative management of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD), (2) identify factors associated with failure of nonoperative management, and (3) determine whether delay in surgery affects final outcomes. Methods All patients who received a diagnosis of capitellar OCD from 1995‐2020 within a geographic cohort were included. Medical records, imaging studies, and operative reports were manually reviewed to record demographic data, treatment strategies, and outcomes. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: (1) nonoperative management, (2) early surgery, and (3) delayed surgery. Delayed surgery (surgery ≥6 months after symptom onset) was considered failure of nonoperative management. Results Fifty elbows with a mean follow‐up period of 10.5 years (median, 10.3 years; range, 1‐25 years) were studied. Of these, 7 (14%) were definitively treated nonoperatively, 16 (32%) underwent delayed surgery after at least 6 months of failed nonoperative treatment, and 27 (54%) underwent early surgical intervention. When compared with nonoperative management, surgical management resulted in superior Mayo Elbow Performance Index pain scores (40.1 vs 33, P = .04), fewer mechanical symptoms (9% vs 50%, P < .01), and better elbow flexion (141° vs 131°, P = .01) at long‐term follow‐up. Older patients trended toward increased failure of nonoperative management ( P = .06). The presence of an intra‐articular loose body predicted failure of nonoperative management ( P = .01; odds ratio, 13). Plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging had poor sensitivities for identifying loose bodies (27% and 40%, respectively). Differences in outcomes after early versus delayed surgical management were not observed. Conclusions Nonoperative management of capitellar OCD failed 70% of the time. Elbows that did not undergo surgery had slightly more symptoms and decreased functional outcomes compared with those treated surgically. The greatest predictors of failure of nonoperative treatment were older age and presence of a loose body; however, an initial trial of nonoperative treatment did not adversely impact the success of future surgery. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Purpose To compare the clinical efficacy in the resolution of patellar instability, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs), and complication and reoperation rates between patients who underwent grooveplasty (proximal trochleoplasty) and patients who underwent trochleoplasty as part of a combined patellofemoral stabilization procedure. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify a cohort of patients who underwent grooveplasty and a cohort who underwent trochleoplasty at the time of patellar stabilization. Complications, reoperations, and PRO scores (Tegner, Kujala, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores) were collected at final follow‐up. The Kruskal‐Wallis test and Fisher exact test were performed when appropriate, and P < .05 was considered significant. Results Overall, 17 grooveplasty patients (18 knees) and 15 trochleoplasty patients (15 knees) were included. Seventy‐nine percent of patients were female, and the average follow‐up period was 3.9 years. The mean age at first dislocation was 11.8 years overall; most patients (65%) had more than 10 lifetime instability events and 76% of patients underwent prior knee‐stabilizing procedures. Trochlear dysplasia (Dejour classification) was similar between cohorts. Patients who underwent grooveplasty had a higher activity level ( P = .007) and a higher degree of patellar facet chondromalacia ( P = .008) at baseline. At final follow‐up, no patients had recurrent symptomatic instability after grooveplasty compared with 5 patients in the trochleoplasty cohort ( P = .013). There were no differences in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores ( P = .870), Kujala scores ( P = .059), or Tegner scores ( P = .052). Additionally, there were no differences in complication rates (17% in grooveplasty cohort vs 13% in trochleoplasty cohort, P > .999) or reoperation rates (22% vs 13%, P = .665). Conclusions Proximal trochlear reshaping and removal of the supratrochlear spur (grooveplasty) in patients with severe trochlear dysplasia may offer an alternative strategy to complete trochleoplasty for the treatment of trochlear dysplasia in complex cases of patellofemoral instability. Grooveplasty patients showed less recurrent instability and similar PROs and reoperation rates compared with trochleoplasty patients. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Background: There are limited data on the incidence of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) in the United States (US) population. Purpose: To determine the incidence of symptomatic capitellar OCD in a representative US subpopulation and identify changes in its incidence over time and to investigate the relationship between the incidence of capitellar OCD and patient sex and age. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients aged ≤24 years from Olmsted County, Minnesota, with symptomatic capitellar OCD over a 25-year period (1995-2019). Patients with acute osteochondral injuries, Panner disease, and hereditary arthropathy were excluded. Poisson regression was utilized to identify the predictors of a capitellar OCD diagnosis. Incidence rates (per 100,000) were assessed for changes over time. Age groups of younger (10-15 years) versus older (16-24 years) patients were compared. Results: A total of 45 patients (78% male) were identified. The mean age was 14.5 years (range, 10-24 years); 31 patients were in the younger group, and 14 patients were in the older group. Sport participation was seen in 89%of patients; 90% were overhead athletes, and 58% were throwing athletes. The incidence of capitellar OCD was 6.0 per 100,000 overall, 9.5 per 100,000 for male patients, and 2.6 per 100,000 for female patients. The incidence was highest for male patients in the younger group (15.3/100,000) and lowest for female patients in the older group (0.8/100,000). The estimated incidence rate ratio for younger versus older patients was 3.3 ( P < .001), and the incidence rate ratio for male versus female patients was 3.5 ( P < .001). There were no changes in the incidence of capitellar OCD over time as a continuous or 5-year categorical variable ( P = .290 and P = .460, respectively). Overall, 82% of patients were treated surgically. There were no significant changes in surgical rates over time. Conclusion: In this US subpopulation, the overall incidence of symptomatic capitellar OCD between the ages of 10 and 24 years was 6.0 per 100,000 over the 25-year period studied, which is higher than previously reported US estimates. Incidence rates and treatment strategies did not change significantly over time.

Background: Surgical and nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries seek to mitigate the risk of knee instability and secondary meniscal injury. However, the associated risk and timing of secondary meniscal tears have not been completely elucidated. Purpose: To compare risk and timing of secondary meniscal injury between patients receiving nonoperative management, delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and early ACLR using a machine learning survival analysis. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A geographic database was used to identify and review records of patients with a diagnosis of ACL rupture between 1990 and 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients undergoing ACLR were matched 1:1 with nonoperatively treated controls. Rate and time to secondary meniscal tear were compared using random survival forest algorithms; independent models were developed and internally validated for predicting injury-free duration in both cohorts. Performance was measured using out-of-bag c-statistic, calibration, and Brier score. Model interpretability was enhanced using global variable importance and partial dependence curves. Results: The study included 1369 patients who underwent ACLR and 294 patients who had nonoperative treatment. After matching, no significant differences in rates of secondary meniscal tear were found ( P = .09); subgroup analysis revealed the shortest periods of meniscal survival in patients undergoing delayed ACLR. The random survival forest algorithm achieved excellent predictive performance for the ACLR cohort, with an out-of-bag c-statistic of 0.80 and a Brier score of 0.11. Significant variables for risk of meniscal tear for the ACLR cohort included time to return to sports or activity ≤350 days, time to surgery ≥50 days, age at injury ≤40 years, and high-impact or rotational landing sports, whereas those in the nonoperative cohort model included time to RTS ≤200 days, visual analog scale pain score >3 at consultation, hypermobility, and noncontact sports. Conclusion: Delayed ACLR demonstrated the greatest long-term risk of meniscal injury compared with nonoperative treatment or early ACLR. Risk factors for decreased meniscal survival after ACLR included increased time to surgery, shorter time to return to sports or activity, older age at injury, and involvement in high-impact or rotational landing sports. Pending careful external validation, these models may be deployed in the clinical space to provide real-time insights and enhance decision making.

Background: Little is known about the benefits and outcomes of meniscal repair in patients older than 60 years. Purpose: To (1) report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of meniscal repair in patients aged ≥60 years and compare them with matched patients who underwent meniscectomy and (2) identify procedural failures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: We included 32 knees in 32 patients aged ≥60 years (20 female, 12 male; mean age, 64.5 ± 4.6 years) who underwent meniscal repair surgery at a single medical institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, and meniscal tear type with a comparison cohort who underwent meniscectomy (n = 49 patients [49 knees]; 32 female, 17 male). For all patients, demographic information, clinical history, physical examination findings, treatment details, and radiographic images were reviewed and analyzed. At final follow-up (mean, 42.2 months; range, 13-128 months), patients completed the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. Clinical failure was defined as revision surgery and/or progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A matched-pairs t test was used to analyze differences between the 2 treatment groups, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the rates of knee osteoarthritis and progression to TKA. Results: The majority of patients had a medial meniscal tear (72.8%), whereas the lateral meniscus was torn in 27.2% of cases. Most tears were located in the meniscal root (56.8%), followed by the posterior horn (34.6%) and midbody (8.6%). At final follow-up, all outcome scores were higher in the repair group compared with the meniscectomy group (IKDC, 78.9 ± 13.4 vs 56.0 ± 15.4; KOOS, 86.6 ± 11.9 vs 61.7 ± 16.2; Lysholm, 88.3 ± 13.3 vs 68.7 ± 15.2, respectively; P < .001 for all). Clinical failure was observed in 22% of patients in the repair group. Conclusion: All clinical outcome scores were higher in the meniscal repair group compared with the matched meniscectomy group at final follow-up. The clinical failure rate of the repair group was 22%. These findings support meniscal repair in selected patients aged ≥60 years.

Background: Diagnosis and treatment of posterior shoulder instability (PSI) has improved with advances in imaging and surgical technique. However, the relationship between PSI and osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear. Purpose: To evaluate a population-based cohort to (1) determine the rate of symptomatic OA, (2) identify patient characteristic risk factors for OA, and (3) evaluate the effect of posterior capsulolabral repair on OA progression. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After review of 324 patient records, we included 115 patients (14 female, 101 male) diagnosed with PSI between January 1994 and July 2012 with an average follow-up of 12.5 years (range, 5-23 years). Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, injury characteristics, surgical details (if any), and radiographic progression of OA. Kaplan-Meier survival was used to estimate survival free of OA; characteristics associated with OA progression were determined via univariate Cox regression models, and associated 95% CIs and hazard ratios (HRs) are presented. Results: Overall, 14% (16/115) of patients had radiographic progression of symptomatic glenohumeral arthritis, with 5-year survival of 88.3% (95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%). Older age at the time of instability diagnosis was associated with arthritis progression (10-year unit HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.26-3.03). Patients who underwent surgery demonstrated increased radiographic progression of OA (HR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.23-13.23). There was a trend of increased OA in patients treated with labral debridement compared with repair despite lower baseline levels of OA; however, this difference was not statistically significant ( P = .09). Conclusion: Symptomatic glenohumeral arthritis is not seen routinely in patients with PSI. Although uncommon, an age of at least 30 years at the time of diagnosis and surgical intervention were identified as risk factors for developing symptomatic arthritis at long-term follow-up.

Objectives: Distal biceps tendon tears, although rare, significantly impair patient’s elbow mobility and function. There is a paucity of contemporary literature reporting long term outcomes of distal biceps (DB) injuries. Therefore, the authors sought to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed distal bicep tears and report on (1) patient demographics and injury characteristics of all patients with distal bicep pathology, (2) outcomes of all patients with non-operatively managed DB pathology, and (3) outcomes of all patients with operatively managed DB pathology. Methods: Patients with an MRI-confirmed distal biceps rupture from 1996 to 2016 were identified through an institutional image database. Patients from the initial search were then cross-referenced with the [REDACTED] 1 to ensure record availability. Patients were included if they had complete medical records and ≥5 years of clinical follow-up. Patients with inflammatory arthritis and enthesitis, polytrauma, or incidental findings without clinical assessment were excluded. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of distal biceps tears and obtain further subject details. Results: A total of 158 patients (22 female, 136 male) with a mean age 51.5 years (44.8-61.2) were identified and included. Baseline patient demographics including BMI, smoking status, dominant-handedness, laborer occupation, and gender were gathered (Table 1). Patients had a mean clinical follow-up of almost 14 years (Table 1, range 8.4 -17.8). Outcomes of the 52 non-operative and 106 operatively managed patients, included severe complications, functional outcomes, and health-related productivity loss are reported in Table 2. There were 7 re-operations (4%), 5 re-ruptures (3%), and overall 35% of the operatively treated cohort experienced a complication. Conclusions: Patients with distal bicep pathology tended to be a male laborer in their 50s without clinically significantly associated risk factors. The majority of patients regained full ROM, and 83% were able to return to work without modifications, irregardless of operative or non-operative management. At long term follow up, patients treated operatively were more likely to report missing time from work and averaged more days missed than their non-operatively treated counterparts. Additionally, operative patients had no statistically significant gains functional outcomes, and were subject to potential post-operative complications. Surgeon bias may play a role in deciding treatment for distal biceps tears. As such, careful patient selection for surgical intervention for distal biceps pathology should be employed; surgeons should consider restricting surgical intervention to patients who have significant clinical symptoms or fail non-operative management. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Objectives: Background: Although they are common, there remains a paucity of data regarding traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations (ASI) associated with anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures (AGRF) in older patients. Purpose: To describe the incidence of AGRF in this population following ASI, identify risk factors for AGRF, compare treatment strategies, and compare clinical outcomes of patients with and without an associated AGRF. Methods: An established geographic medical record system was used to identify patients >50 years of age with ASI between 1994 and 2016. Patients with radiographic evidence of AGRF were identified and matched 1:1 to patients without AGRF. Comparative analysis was conducted to determine differences between groups. Results: Overall, 186 patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 10.4 years (range, 2.0 – 25.4). Of these, 42 (22.6%) had AGRF and were matched to 42 control patients without AGRF. Average age was 58.9 and 58.2 years for the AGRF and control groups, respectively. Rates of surgical intervention (29% vs. 43%), recurrent instability (14% vs. 17%), progression of osteoarthritis (34% vs. 39%), and conversion to arthroplasty (2% vs. 5%) were similar between AGRF and control cohorts. Control patients were more likely to report recurrent pain (p=.046). For patients with AGRF, increased bone fragment size (OR 1.1) and increased BMI (OR 1.2) correlated with an increased risk for surgery. The cut-off value for surgery in patients with AGRF was a fragment size ≥33% of the glenoid width. Conclusions: In patients ≥ 50 years at presentation of ASI, 22.6% presented with an associated AGRF. Increased fragment size and greater patient BMI were significant factors associated with undergoing surgical intervention; however, most patients did not require surgery. Patients without AGRF were more likely to report recurrent pain, possibly due to a higher prevalence of rotator cuff derangement. Overall, the presence of an AGRF did not portend a worse prognosis as treatment strategies and long-term outcomes in terms of recurrent instability, progression of osteoarthritis, and conversion to arthroplasty were similar between patients with and without AGRF at the time of ASI diagnosis.

Objectives: Anterior shoulder instability (ASI) is a well-studied topic in young patients, however there is a dearth of knowledge about older patients with this pathology. The goals of this study were to describe patient demographics, injury characteristics and outcomes in patients >50 years old with anterior shoulder instability along with historical trends in diagnosis and treatment. Methods: An established geographic database was used to identify 179 patients who experienced new onset anterior shoulder instability after the age 50 between 1994-2016. Mean age was 59.7 years, mean BMI was 31.3 and 54.2% were female. The dominant arm was involved in 62.2% of instability events. 26.8% of our study population were laborers and 50% reported current or former smoking habits. The primary etiology for ASI involved trauma in 96.6% of cases. Comparative analysis was performed to identify differences between age groups. Mean follow up time was 11 years. Results: The overall incidence of ASI in our study population was 28.8/100,000 person years with the highest incidence in the age cohort 60-64 at 38.9/100,000 person years. At initial presentation, 73% of all patients were found to have a lesion apparent on either XR or MRI. Rotator cuff tears were found in 92.4% of all patients undergoing MRIs. 26.2% ultimately progressed to surgery at a mean time of 1.57 years after injury. 53% of all surgical procedures involved a rotator cuff repair whereas only 25% were performed for instability. In terms of historical trends, the one-year rate of obtaining an MRI after an ASI event has increased from 10% in the late 1990s to 46% in 2015-16. Similarly, the one-year rate of performing surgery has increased from 5.1% to 47% from 1994-1999 to 2015-2016. Conclusions: In our cohort, patients over the age of 50 with ASI were found to often have concomitant pathology on imaging, however only ¼ of all patients required surgery. Although the rate of ASI has stayed relatively stable over the last 20 years, the rate of obtaining an MRI and of surgical management has increased. [Figure: see text]

Objectives: Distal biceps tendon tears, although rare, significantly impair patient’s elbow mobility and function. There is a paucity of literature reporting outcomes of partial thickness tears to inform management strategies. Therefore, the authors sought to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed partial thickness distal biceps tears and report on (1) demographics and treatment strategies, (2) outcomes and complications, and (3) any identifiable risk factors for progression to surgery or full thickness tear. Methods: Patients who experienced a partial thickness distal biceps tear confirmed on MRI from 1996 to 2016 were identified by a musculoskeletal radiologist through an institutional image database. Patients were included if they had complete medical records and at least one visit of clinical follow-up. Patients with inflammatory arthritis and enthesitis, polytrauma, or incidental findings without clinical assessment were excluded. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and obtain study details. Multivariate logistic regression models were created using baseline characteristics, injury details and physical exam findings in order to predict operative intervention. Results: Overall, 111 patients (22F, 89M, age: 53.6 years ± 13) were identified and included. Baseline injury characteristics and patient demographics including weakness in elbow flexion, forearm supination, and patient reported sensation at time of injury were all found to be statistically different between treatment groups (Table 1). Patients were followed to a mean of 10 years of clinical follow up. Within the cohort, 57 patients were treated non-operatively, while 54 were treated operatively. Patients who received surgical intervention were more likely to report missing time from work and greater loss of productivity due to missed time (Table 2); however, almost 90% of patients returned to work without restrictions, regardless of treatment modality (88% vs 88%, Table 2). For surgical patients, there were 5 re-operations (9%), 3 re-ruptures (6%), and overall, 31% of the operatively treated cohort experienced a complication. Results of the final multivariate logistic regression model are included in Table 3; final model variables included age at initial consult, tenderness to palpation tendon insertion on exam, and supination weakness. Of these, supination weakness at initial consult was found to be a statistically significant predictor for surgical intervention (p=.001, OR=24.8). Conclusions: Operative patients tended to be male with more profound supination weakness; these patients tended to report increased loss of productivity due to time missed after treatment. At 10 year clinical follow up 31% experienced some complication and 9% underwent a re-operation. However, patients demonstrated uniform ability to return to work without modification and no statistical differences in functional outcomes, regardless of treatment modality. Patients who suffer from a partial distal biceps tear should be counseled that operative management represents a balance of returning function with potential complications and increased loss of productivity. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]