Ibrahim, Ramzi

Abstract Aims We evaluated clinical outcomes with GLP-1 RA use post-TAVI in patients with T2D. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) lower cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their impact in patients with valvular heart disease, including those undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), remained unexplored. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network, including 25 184 adults (≥18 years) with T2D who underwent TAVI (2015–2023). Patients were stratified based on GLP1-RA initiation within 14 days post-TAVI. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory data were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for events from one-month post-TAVI until the most recent follow-up. PSM yielded 1101 patients per group, with a mean age of 73 years and 39% female. Mean follow-up duration was 2.2 ± 1.1 and 2.6 ± 1.8 years for GLP1-RA users and non-users, respectively. GLP1-RA use was also associated higher survival probability (HR: 0.708 [95% CI: 0.583–0.859]), and lower rates of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.790 [95% CI, 0.706–0.885]), major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.849 [95% CI: 0.749–0.963]), and acute heart failure exacerbation (HR: 0.785 [95% CI: 0.677–0.909]), acute kidney injury (HR: 0.843 [95% CI: 0.719–0.988]), and major kidney events (HR: 0.665 [95% CI: 0.510–0.866]). No differences were observed in acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, or cardiac arrest. Conclusion In patients with T2D undergoing TAVI, GLP1-RA use is associated with significant survival benefits and improved cardiorenal outcomes. However, these findings are limited by the observational design, high comorbidity burden, lack of data on medication compliance, and specific cause of death. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these benefits.

Background Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) are established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, but their combined impact on mortality and sex differences remains unclear. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 97 396 patients with measured Lp(a) and HDL-C. Groups were stratified by Lp(a) (≥50 vs. <50 mg/dl) and HDL-C [low (<40), optimal (40–60), high (>60 mg/dl)]. Mortality was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier curve and Cox models. Results Over a median of 5.9 years, 7794 deaths occurred. Compared to optimal HDL-C/low Lp(a) (reference), high HDL-C/low Lp(a) had the lowest mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–0.91], while low HDL-C/high Lp(a) had the highest risk (aHR: 1.55; 1.41–1.71). High HDL-C protective effect was insignificant with elevated Lp(a) (aHR: 0.98; 0.89–1.08). Sex-stratified analyses revealed divergent effects: women with high HDL-C/high Lp(a) retained the HDL-C protective effect (aHR: 0.82; 0.72–0.93), whereas men faced increased risk (aHR: 1.22; 1.05–1.42). Conclusion Elevated Lp(a) enhances mortality risk despite elevated HDL-C levels, with sex-specific differences: women retain mortality benefits from high HDL-C despite elevated Lp(a), whereas men with concurrent elevations in HDL-C and Lp(a) experienced mortality risks comparable to those with low HDL-C. Findings underscore sex-specific CV risk stratification incorporating HDL-C and Lp(a), challenging the HDL-C universal protective role.

Background: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a major contributor to death among ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluate the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis by searching the electronic database up to April 2025. Seven studies, including 1192 patients, were identified. A random-effect model was used to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trial sequential analysis was conducted to assess sample size adequacy. Results: Among Ischemic heart disease patients with ICDs, VT ablation was associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks (RR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.34–0.74]), a trend toward reduced VT storm (RR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.40–1.04], p = 0.07), and lower rates of cardiovascular hospitalization (RR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.53–1.01], p = 0.06) compared to ICD alone. However, no significant differences were observed when compared to patients receiving ICD plus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Additionally, VT ablation showed no significant impact on mortality or VT/VF recurrence compared to either ICD alone or ICD with AADs. Trial Sequential Analysis provided conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence outcomes, while further data are required for other outcomes. Conclusion: Among ischemic heart disease patients with ICD, VT ablation reduces ICD shocks, VT storm, and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD-only, but offers no significant advantage over ICD combined with antiarrhythmic drugs. VT ablation does not impact mortality or the recurrence of VT/VF. Trial Sequential Analysis confirmed conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, while additional data is needed for other outcomes.

Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the standard of care for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Data regarding the optimal timing of CIED reimplantation after TLE are not well established. Objective: This study aims to assess the 5-year outcomes of early (≤7 days) versus non-early (>7 days) CIED reimplantation following TLE for CIED infection using a multi-national database. Methods: Using the TriNetX Analytics Research Network, we included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TLE for CIED infection between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2020. Patients were further categorized into two groups: early CIED reimplantation (≤7 days from TLE) and non-early CIED reimplantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed by including patient demographics, LVEF, cardiac comorbidities and medications. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality and cardiac adverse events during a 5-year study period. Results: A total of 1668 patients in the early CIED reimplantation group and 1550 in the non-early group were identified. After PSM, 1327 patients in each group were analyzed. Compared to non-early group, early CIED reimplantation group was associated with significantly higher odds of all-cause hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 1.837, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.532-2.203) and repeated device infection (OR: 1.569, 95% CI: 1.314-1.873) at 5-year follow-up. However, no significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (OR: 0.927, 95% CI: 0.778-1.104), HF exacerbation (OR: 1.021, 95% CI: 0.855-1.218), cardiac arrest (OR:0.924, 95% CI: 0.739-1.157), stroke (OR: 1.169, 95% CI: 0.915-1.494), cardiac thrombus (OR: 1.163, 95% CI: 0.749-1.808), major bleeding (OR: 1.079, 95% CI: 0.857-1.358) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.923, 95% CI: 0.759-1.123) between the two groups. Conclusion: Early reimplantation of CIED following TLE of infected devices was associated with worse outcomes in all-cause hospitalization and repeated device infection. Further large prospective studies are needed to define the optimal timing of device reimplantation.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is increasingly recognized as a cause of acute coronary syndrome, particularly in young to middle-aged women. While most presentations are associated with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a subset of patients present with acute systolic dysfunction. The characteristics of patients who recover their LVEF are not clearly defined. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 495 patients with angiographically confirmed SCAD treated at three Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Rochester, and Florida) from 1994 to 2023. Patients with a prior history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, and congenital heart disease were excluded. Baseline LVEF at SCAD presentation was categorized into <35%, 35–39%, 40–49%, and ≥50%. Follow-up LVEF was assessed by echocardiography performed between 30 days and 1 year post-SCAD. The primary outcome was improvement in LVEF to ≥50% at follow-up. Results: A total of 495 SCAD patients were included. At presentation, 26% had reduced LVEF: 6% had LVEF <35%, 5% had LVEF between 35–39%, and 15% had LVEF between 40–49%. Patients who did not normalize their EF at follow-up were slightly younger (45 vs. 48 years, p=0.04), were more likely to have had an in-hospital cardiac arrest (13% vs. 4%, p=0.01), required mechanical circulatory support during their care, and had SCAD involving the left main artery (11% vs. 2%, p=0.01). Predictors of EF normalization included SCAD which involved the obtuse marginals (15% vs. 4%, p<0.05). The group with the lowest EF at presentation had the highest probability of persistent EF <50% at follow-up (32% for those with LVEF <35%) while patients who had normal EF at presentation had a 6% chance of having EF <50% at follow-up (Figure 1). Conclusions: Our study shows that the majority of SCAD patients have normal EF at presentation. 80% of those with reduced EF at presentation will normalize at follow-up. Predictors of low EF at follow-up included dissection involving the left main artery, lower EF at SCAD presentation, in-hospital arrest and use of mechanical circulatory support.

Abstract Aims Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a critical intervention for advanced heart failure (HF), serving as destination therapy or bridge to transplantation. Obesity and diabetes impact outcomes in patients with LVADs. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) demonstrate cardiovascular benefits; however, their role in patients with LVADs remains underexplored. We evaluated the association of GLP1-RA therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with LVADs. Methods This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX database, a research network database from 98 healthcare organizations. We queried for all adult LVAD recipients (≥18 years) and were stratified into GLP1-RA users and non-users. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) balanced demographics, comorbidities, medication use and laboratory data. Outcomes included heart transplantation rates, heart failure hospitalizations, all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations and cardiovascular events. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Results After PSM, we included a total of 1036 adult LVAD recipients (518 GLP1-RA users, 518 matched non-users) with a mean follow-up time of 311.6 ± 98.4 days for the GLP1-RA cohort and 304.0 ± 111.5 days for the non-GLP1-RAs cohort. Mean age was 56.7 ± 12.2 years in the GLP1-RA cohort and 58.0 ± 12.5 years in the non-GLP1-RA cohort. Females comprised 28.0% of both cohorts while White patients represented 52.1% of the GLP1-RA group and 53.1% of the non-GLP1-RA group. GLP1-RA users had higher heart transplantation rates [n = 98 (18.9%) vs. n = 44 (8.5%); aOR 2.514 (95% CI: 1.720–3.673)]. Acute HF events and all-cause hospitalizations were lower among GLP1-RA users compared with non-users [n = 288 (55.6%) vs. n = 357 (68.9%); aOR 0.565 (95% CI: 0.438–728) and n = 324 (62.5%) vs. n = 390 (75.3%); aOR 0.548 (95% CI: 0.420–0.716)]. No differences were observed when comparing the GLP1-RA cohort with the non-GLP1-RA cohort in regard to all-cause mortality [n = 32 (6.2%) vs. n = 44 (8.5%); aOR 0.709 (95% CI: 0.442–1.138)], stroke [n = 42 (8.1%) vs. n = 58 (11.2%); aOR 0.700 (95% CI: 0.461–1.062)] or cardiac arrest [n = 18 (3.5%) vs. n = 17 (3.3%); aOR 1.061 (95% CI: 0.541–2.082)]. Conclusions GLP1-RA therapy in patients with advanced HF and LVADs is potentially associated with improved heart transplantation rates while decreasing hospitalization and acute HF event rates.