Ibrahim, Ramzi

Background In low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) is practically used to define low flow and prompt dobutamine stress echocardiography to discern pseudo-severe AS. In patients with preserved LVEF, stroke volume index (SVI) <35 mL/m² is typically used. However, both are volume-based surrogates. Transaortic flow rate (TAFR), calculated as stroke volume divided by left ventricular ejection time, may better reflect true flow. Nonetheless, comparative data between TAFR and established metrics remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of TAFR in symptomatic low-gradient severe AS. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with low-gradient severe AS (AVA ≤1 cm 2 and peak velocity (Vmax) <4 m/s or mean gradient (MG) <40 mm Hg) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement at Mayo Clinic sites (2017–2023). The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Among 475 patients included (mean age 85±8 years; 49% women), 242 (51%) had TAFR <220 mL/s, 165 (35%) had EF <50%, and 221 (47%) had SVI <35 mL/m 2 . Low TAFR was significantly associated with higher 1-year mortality even after stratifying by EF or SVI. In multivariate analysis, TAFR was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.19 to 4.76, p=0.014) after adjusting for reduced LVEF, low SVI, gender, chronic kidney disease and mitral and tricuspid regurgitation. Conclusions In patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe AS, low TAFR, not SVI or LVEF, is independently associated with mortality and may offer more accurate measure of flow state for clinical staging.

Background: Disparities exist in the representation of genders in cardiovascular clinical trials. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, understanding regarding the representation of women in AF-related clinical trials remains limited. Therefore, this systematic review sought to evaluate the representation of women in AF-related clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials using the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases from 1996 to January 1st, 2024, focusing on AF-related lifestyle interventions, pharmacological treatments, catheter ablation, and device therapies for AF. Data extraction and analysis encompassed trial characteristics, participant demographics, and funding sources. The primary outcome was the prevalence of female enrollees, quantified through participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs). This was estimated overall and stratified by funding source, intervention type, and enrollment region. Results: Of the 103 clinical trials involving 218,322 participants (39.5% female), the PPR ranged from 0.00 to 1.73, with an average PPR of 1.03. Meanwhile, 43% of the trials exhibited female under-representation (PPR, <0.8). University-funded trials showed higher female enrollment (mean PPR, 0.951) compared to industry/government-funded trials (mean PPR, 0.800). No differences were observed in the representation of women when comparing enrollment regions or intervention types. Conclusions: Despite advancements in AF management, gender disparities persist in AF-related clinical trial representation, particularly in industry/government-funded studies compared to university-funded trials. Thus, addressing implicit biases and enforcing sex equality guidelines are critical steps toward more inclusive cardiovascular research.

Abstract Background Individuals with cancer are at increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), yet selecting optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains challenging due to competing risks of thrombosis and bleeding. Aims This study examined patterns of DAPT use and associated outcomes following AMI in patients with active cancer. Methods Using the TriNetX global registry, we identified adults hospitalised with AMI and active cancer between January 2015 and January 2020. Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and AMI readmission up to five years. Results Among 20,000 patients, 78.6% received clopidogrel, 17.6% ticagrelor, and 3.9% prasugrel as their second antiplatelet agent. Those prescribed clopidogrel were older (72.6 ± 10.5 years) than those on ticagrelor (69.8 ± 10.9) or prasugrel (67.2 ± 10.4; p &lt; 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, including hypercholesterolemia (clopidogrel: 62% vs ticagrelor: 53% and prasugrel: 58%) and hypertension (clopidogrel: 77% vs ticagrelor: 69% and prasugrel: 72%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, five-year mortality was lower with prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (clopidogrel 29.1%, prasugrel 23.6%, p = 0.03; ticagrelor 30.1%, prasugrel 23.6%, p = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in major bleeding rates between treatment groups. Conclusion Clopidogrel remains the most frequently used second antiplatelet in patients with active cancer presenting with AMI. However, ticagrelor and prasugrel were associated with improved long-term survival without increasing bleeding risk. These findings suggest the need for further evaluation of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors in this high-risk population.

Abstract Aims Obesity is linked with worse outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). While both bariatric surgery (BS) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) promote weight loss and may improve cardiometabolic risk, their comparative outcomes in HCM remain unclear. Methods and results Adults with HCM and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m were divided into two cohorts: (i) GLP-1 RA users who never had BS, and (ii) BS patients who never received GLP-1 RA. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance demographics, comorbidities, and medications. Outcomes over 24 months include all-cause mortality, acute heart failure (HF) hospitalization, arrhythmias, change in BMI, and cardiovascular symptoms. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox models. Of 5002 patients, 955 were included in each matched cohort after matching (mean age 54 ± 13 years, 70% female, BMI 40.0 kg/m). GLP-1 RA was associated with a significantly lower observed rate of all-cause mortality compared with BS (2.0% vs. 4.4%; HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27–0.80; P = 0.004) and HF hospitalization (8.7% vs. 14.0%; HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.46–0.79; P &lt; 0.001). Similarly, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower incidence of composite cardiovascular outcomes (10.7% vs. 17.2%; HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47–0.77; P &lt; 0.001). Rates of arrhythmia and cardiovascular symptoms were comparable between the two groups. BMI reduction was greater after bariatric surgery (−4.0 vs. −2.6 kg/m; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion In obese patients with HCM, GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality and fewer HF events compared with BS. Future studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Background. Liver transplant recipients face high risks of cardiometabolic events after transplant, driven by posttransplant weight gain, diabetes, hypertension, as well as immunosuppression-related side effects. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) improve metabolic and cardiorenal outcomes in nontransplant populations, but their role in liver transplant recipients remains understudied. Methods. This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX data (January 2010–December 2023) to compare outcomes in liver transplant recipients prescribed GLP1RAs (semaglutide, dulaglutide, liraglutide) within 1-mo posttransplant (n = 546) versus nonusers (n = 37 153). Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced demographics, comorbidities, and medications (n = 541 per group). Outcomes included mortality, hospitalizations, cardiovascular/renal/respiratory events, and graft outcomes. Results. Over a mean follow-up 838.5 d (SD 291.9) in the GLP1RA cohort and 884.3 d (SD 313.7) in the non-GLP1RA group, GLP1RA use was associated with a 43% lower all-cause mortality (7.0% versus 12.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.566; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.381-0.841) and 39% fewer hospitalizations (60.4% versus 74.5%; HR, 0.613; 95% CI, 0.530-0.710). Acute heart failure (HR, 0.386; 95% CI, 0.285-0.524), renal failure/dialysis (HR, 0.489; 95% CI, 0.413-0.579), and respiratory failure (HR, 0.484; 95% CI, 354-0.662) risks were significantly reduced. No differences were observed in graft failure/rejection, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation/flutter, ventricular tachycardia, or ischemic optic neuropathy. Conclusions. Early GLP1RA initiation in liver transplant recipients was associated with reduced mortality, hospitalizations, respiratory, and cardiorenal complications without compromising graft safety. These findings support GLP1RAs as a promising adjunct therapy, warranting prospective trials to confirm benefits in this high-risk population.

aims: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the SVEAT score in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in comparison with the well-established HEART and TIMI scores. background: Acute chest pain (ACP) is a common symptom in emergency departments. Various risk stratification tools have been developed to assess patients presenting with ACP. The Simple Vascular Event Assessment Tool (SVEAT) is the most recent scoring system introduced, based on five variables: Symptoms of chest pain, history of Vascular disease, ECG, Age, and Troponin-I. objective: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the SVEAT score in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in comparison with the well-established HEART and TIMI scores. method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across five databases until June 22, 2024. Four studies comprising 1,520 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The predictive accuracy of the SVEAT, HEART, and TIMI scores for 30-day MACE was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic, with values over 75% indicating significant heterogeneity. Indirect comparisons among the scores were performed using the Z-test. result: Pooled AUC for the SVEAT score was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98), indicating superior predictive accuracy compared to the HEART (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.92) and TIMI (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.96) scores. However, significant heterogeneity (I² = 90.6%) was observed across studies, potentially due to variations in patient demographics, clinical settings, and outcome definitions. Despite the higher AUC, indirect Z-test comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences between the scoring systems. conclusion: SVEAT score demonstrates potential as an accurate tool for predicting 30-day MACE in patients with ACP. other: N/A

This cohort study examines the association of bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in B-cell malignant disease with increased risk of pericardial effusion and cardiovascular outcomes.

Background: Indications for TAVR explant have been established, although limited data exist regarding pre-TAVR baseline characteristics that predict eventual explantation. Methods: The TriNetX network, a database comprising medical records from over 105 institutions, was used. Two cohorts were created: those who underwent TAVR without explant and those requiring subsequent TAVR explant and SAVR. Predictors of explantation were analyzed by multivariate models. Results: Among the 63,377 patients undergoing TAVR, 273 (0.4%) required explantation. Patients in the explant group were younger (69.1 ± 11.3 vs. 78.1 ± 8.8 years; p < 0.001), more likely to have a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (10.6% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001) and had higher LDL levels (88.2 ± 41.3 vs. 80.7 ± 34.6 mg/dL; p = 0.011). They also had increased post-TAVR rates of acute kidney injury (9.2% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.004) and paravalvular leak (5.9% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.001). Age at TAVR (HR 1.04; CI 1.03–1.06), baseline TAA (HR 1.69; CI 1.09–2.63), history of infective endocarditis (HR 1.92; CI 1.10–3.35), and higher LDL (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03) were independent predictors for explantation. Conclusions: Younger age at TAVR, TAA, history of endocarditis, and elevated baseline LDL were notable predictors of explantation. These findings highlight the necessity of pre-procedural assessment and follow-up in high-risk patients to optimize TAVR durability.