Stan, Marius N.

Background: Severe pretibial myxedema (PTM) can be difficult to manage, highlighting the need to investigate newer therapies. Rituximab (RTX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) have been tried in Graves' orbitopathy. Since PTM and orbitopathy share a similar underlying pathophysiology, this study aimed to explore these therapies for progressive PTM. Methods: The electronic database was screened for PTM patients evaluated at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, from 2002 to 2016, and three patients who received IVIg and five who received RTX are reported. PTM pattern was classified as non-pitting edema, plaque and induration, nodular/nummular, and elephantiasis. PTM was confirmed by biopsy in six patients. Results: The patients' median age was 53.8 years, 75% were female, and all but one patient were either active or former smokers. All patients were euthyroid and had progressed despite various therapies prior to starting these agents. Six patients had a plaque and induration pattern, and two had a nodular pattern with elephantiasis. After therapy, six (75%) patients had PTM stability or improvement both subjectively and objectively (80% with RTX and 66% with IVIg). The three patients (one in the IVIg group and two in the RTX group) who had subjective improvement had a plaque pattern. One patient with elephantiasis had a transient response to IVIg and another had stability after RTX. Thyrotropin receptor antibody values and orbitopathy also improved in patients who demonstrated PTM improvement. No serious adverse events were reported, but one patient each had transient hypertension and injection-site thrombophlebitis after IVIg. Conclusions: Immunomodulation therapy was followed by PTM improvement or stability in most patients, with a slightly better response after RTX compared to IVIg. A validated response assessment instrument and larger series of patients are required to determine if the underlying disease process could be curtailed with these agents.

AbstractThe course and pathogenesis of Graves’ disease and Graves’ ophthalmopathy are interdependent, influencing each other’s therapeutic choices. Multiple factors including geographic location, access to medical services, patient and physician preferences influence the management of these conditions. Graves’ disease is classically managed with one of three treatment options – antithyroid drugs, radioactive iodine, and thyroidectomy. In recent years, there has been a shift towards antithyroid drugs, including long term therapy with these agents, given the advantage of avoiding hypothyroidism and the apparent safety of this approach. In addition, new therapies are (slowly) emerging, focusing on immunomodulation. Technological advances are opening doors to non-pharmaceutical interventions that aim to deal with both structural thyroid abnormalities as well as biochemical abnormalities of hyperthyroidism. Graves’ ophthalmopathy management is guided by its activity and severity status, with treatment options including smoking cessation, control of hyperthyroidism, local eye measures, glucocorticoids, selenium, orbital radiotherapy, and surgery. In addition to these established treatment choices, new immunotherapy-based approaches are being tested. Some of them (tocilizumab and teprotumumab) are very promising but further evaluation is needed before we can establish their role in clinical care. Agents identified as beneficial in Graves’ disease management will likely be tested in Graves’ ophthalmopathy as well. In the coming years, our main clinical responsibility will be to find the proper balance between the benefits and potential risks of these incoming therapies, and to identify the subgroups of patients where this ratio is most likely to favor a safe and successful therapeutic outcome.

Purpose: Thyroid autoimmunity affects approximately 5% of the population, and its investigation relies heavily on the use of autoantibodies. Thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies (TRAb) play a central role in the evaluation of Graves disease (GD), Graves ophthalmopathy (GO) and pretibial myxedema (PTM). However, there is still controversy regarding overall TRAb assay diagnostic accuracy and their prognostic utility. Methods: We reviewed and analyzed the literature reporting TRAb assays and their clinical utility. Results: Current assays measure the overall TRAb titer in a competitive manner (TSH binding inhibiting immunoglobulin assay) or biologic activity of the stimulating TSHR autoantibodies (thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin assay). Both types of assays have improved over time with advances in sensitivity and specificity. TRAb are particularly relevant in hyperthyroidism cases where use of iodinated contrast is not an option (e.g., pregnancy or recent use of iodinated contrast) or in cases of euthyroid eye disease, suspicious for GO. Third generation TRAb assays are useful for therapy selection in GD, prognostic predictions in GO and risk prediction for fetal and neonatal thyrotoxicosis. Discussion: Given the pathogenic role of TRAb, we expect that the future will bring useful evidence regarding their predictive role with respect to efficacy of therapeutic modalities for GO and PTM. We also hope to better understand the role of blocking and neutral antibodies against TSHR, and harness that ability for modulation of thyroid function or therapy of differentiated thyroid carcinoma managed with TSH suppression. Conclusions: Thyroid autoimmune diseases have seen tremendous gains in understanding their pathophysiology, largely antibody mediated. Better TRAb testing is becoming a springboard for providing individualized patient care.