Carlson, Matthew L.

Abstract Introduction Ki-67 is often used as a proliferation index to evaluate how aggressive a tumor is and its likelihood of recurrence. Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are a unique benign pathology that lends itself well to evaluation with Ki-67 as a potential marker for disease recurrence or progression following surgical resection. Methods All English language studies of VSs and Ki-67 indices were screened. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they reported series of VSs undergoing primary resection without prior irradiation, with outcomes including both recurrence/progression and Ki-67 for individual patients. For published studies reporting pooled Ki-67 index data without detailed by-patient values, we contacted the authors to request data sharing for the current meta-analysis. Studies reporting a relationship between Ki-67 index and clinical outcomes in VS for which detailed patients' outcomes or Ki-67 indices could not be obtained were incorporated into the descriptive analysis, but excluded from the formal (i.e., quantitative) meta-analysis. Results A systematic review identified 104 candidate citations of which 12 met inclusion criteria. Six of these studies had accessible patient-specific data. Individual patient data were collected from these studies for calculation of discrete study effect sizes, pooling via random-effects modeling with restricted maximum likelihood, and meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference in Ki-67 indices between those with and without recurrence was calculated as 0.79% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–1.30; p = 0.0026). Conclusion Ki-67 index may be higher in VSs that demonstrate recurrence/progression following surgical resection. This may represent a promising means of evaluating tumor recurrence and potential need for early adjuvant therapy for VSs.

Objective: To characterize current awareness, perceptions, and literacy surrounding hearing loss among the adult population in the United States. Study Design: National cross-sectional survey study. Setting: United States. Patients: Adults between 50 and 80 years of age in the United States. Results: Survey respondents included 1,250 adults between the ages of 50 and 80 years, including 500 who indicated at least moderate hearing loss and were using hearing aids and 750 who denied having hearing loss and were not using hearing aids. Only 9% of patients were able to correctly identify what constitutes a “normal” or “average” range for hearing. By comparison, a “normal” range of values for vision, blood pressure, and total cholesterol were identified correctly by 93%, 85%, and 52% of the 1,250 surveyed adults, respectively. When asked to rank the importance of addressing hearing loss within the context of 10 other common health conditions, hearing loss was ranked third to least important. When considering annual health maintenance, respondents indicated they were “very likely” to have an annual physical exam (72%), a cholesterol test (70%), an eye exam (66%), and bring their pet to a veterinarian (59%) over twice as frequently as having their hearing evaluated (27%). When evaluating awareness surrounding associations between hearing loss and other health and social issues, less than one-fourth indicated strong awareness about links between hearing loss and depression, employability and income, fall risk, dementia, and type 2 diabetes. While most patients acknowledge the potential impacts of hearing loss on safety, quality of life, and health, less than half believe that hearing loss is treatable and less than 20% believe that hearing loss is preventable. Conclusion: Despite widespread literacy of what constitutes normal vision, blood pressure, and total cholesterol levels, respondents exhibit substantially poorer understanding of “normal” hearing levels. Most adults believe that few treatment options exist for the management of hearing loss. Underlying the uniformly limited literacy surrounding hearing loss and its treatment options is the adult population's lack of appreciation for the long-term health sequelae of untreated hearing loss.

ObjectiveTo characterize the catchment area and patient profile of large cochlear implant (CI) centers in the United States.Study DesignMulti‐institutional retrospective case series.SettingTertiary referral CI centers.MethodsPatients who underwent CI surgery at 7 participating CI centers between 2015 and 2020 were identified. Patients’ residential zip codes were used to approximate travel distances and urban vs rural residential areas.ResultsOver the 6‐year study period (2015‐2020), 6313 unique CI surgical procedures occurred (4529 adult, 1784 pediatric). Between 2015 and 2019, CI procedures increased by 43%. Patients traveled a median 52 miles (interquartile range, 21‐110) each way; patients treated at rural CI centers traveled greater distances vs those treated at urban centers (72 vs 46 miles, P <. 001). Rural residents represented 61% of the patient population and traveled farther than urban residents (73 vs 24 miles, P <. 001). Overall, 91% of patients lived within a 200‐mile radius of the institution, while 71% lived within a 100‐mile radius. In adults, multiple regression analysis redemonstrated an association between greater travel distances and (1) older age at the time of CI and (2) residential rural setting (both P <. 001, r2 = 0.2).ConclusionsWhile large CI centers serve geographically dispersed populations, most patients reside within a 200‐mile radius. Strategies to expand CI utilization may leverage remote programming, telemedicine, and strategic placement of new centers and satellite clinics to ameliorate travel burden.

AbstractObjectiveDescribe the presentation and management strategy for patients with symptomatic foramen of Huschke (FH).PatientsAdults with persistent FH confirmed on imaging.InterventionsDiagnosis and management of symptomatic persistent FH.Main outcome measureResolution of otologic symptoms.ResultsA total of four patients with symptomatic, radiographically‐confirmed persistent FH were included. The majority of patients endorsed otalgia (n = 4) and otorrhea (n = 3), and only one patient was noted to have a conductive hearing loss. All patients were noted to have dynamic movement of an external auditory canal mass with mandible manipulation on examination, and all patients had an identifiable fistula on imaging. Patients underwent surgical intervention, including both preauricular (n = 2) and transcanal (n = 2) approaches, and all endorsed symptomatic resolution after convalescence.ConclusionsPersistent FH remains an uncommon and potentially underrecognized cause of otologic symptoms. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion, and one must rely on both key examination findings and imaging to confirm this diagnosis. In appropriately selected patients, surgical intervention can provide durable symptomatic resolution.Level of evidenceIV

Abstract Background The current study aims to characterize the natural history of sporadic vestibular schwannoma volumetric tumor growth, including long-term growth patterns following initial detection of growth. Methods Volumetric tumor measurements from 3505 serial MRI studies were analyzed from unselected consecutive patients undergoing wait-and-scan management at three tertiary referral centers between 1998 and 2018. Volumetric tumor growth was defined as a change in volume ≥20%. Results Among 952 patients undergoing observation, 622 experienced tumor growth with initial growth-free survival rates (95% CI) at 1, 3, and 5 years following diagnosis of 66% (63–69), 30% (27–34), and 20% (17–24). Among 405 patients who continued to be observed despite demonstrating initial growth, 210 experienced subsequent tumor growth with subsequent growth-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years following initial growth of 77% (72–81), 37% (31–43), and 24% (18–31). Larger tumor volume at initial growth (HR 1.13, P = .02) and increasing tumor growth rate (HR 1.31; P &lt; .001) were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent growth, whereas a longer duration of time between diagnosis and detection of initial growth was protective (HR 0.69; P &lt; .001). Conclusions While most vestibular schwannomas exhibit an overall propensity for volumetric growth following diagnosis, prior tumor growth does not perfectly predict future growth. Tumors can subsequently grow faster, slower, or demonstrate quiescence and stability. Larger tumor size and increasing tumor growth rate portend a higher likelihood of continued growth. These findings can inform timing of intervention: whether upfront at initial diagnosis, after detection of initial growth, or only after continued growth is observed.

Objectives: Compare speech perception performance growth and benchmark score achievement among adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with single-sided deafness (SSD) versus bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss. Study Design: Retrospective matched cohort analysis. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Adults with SSD or bilateral moderate to profound hearing sensorineural hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation from 2014 to 2019. Interventions: Cochlear implantation. Main outcome measures: Time-to-benchmark speech perception score (CNC, AzBio in quiet) and speech performance within first postoperative year. Results: Thirty-three SSD patients were matched to 66 bilateral hearing loss patients (referent cohort) for duration of deafness and preoperative ipsilateral CNC scores. Although SSD patients were more likely to achieve benchmark CNC scores more quickly compared with matched referents, this difference did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.78–3.82; p = 0.18). AzBio scores showed similar trends (HR 1.40; 95% CI 0.66–2.98; p = 0.38). At last follow-up, the SSD cohort had lower CNC (median 54% vs. 62%; p = 0.019) and AzBio scores (median 72% vs. 84%; p = 0.029) compared to the referent cohort. Conclusions: No significant difference in speech perception performance growth (i.e., time-to-benchmark speech perception score) was identified between SSD and bilateral hearing loss CI recipients, although patients with bilateral hearing loss achieved higher scores in the implanted ear within the first year of follow-up.

AbstractPersistent underutilization of cochlear implants (CIs) in the United States is in part a reflection of a lack of hearing health knowledge and the complexities of care delivery in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. An evaluation of the patient experience through the CI health care delivery process systematically exposes barriers that must be overcome to undergo treatment for moderate-to-severe hearing loss. This review analyzes patient-facing obstacles including diagnosis of hearing loss, CI candidate identification and referral to surgeon, CI evaluation and candidacy criteria interpretation, and lastly CI surgery and rehabilitation. Pervasive throughout the process are several themes which demand attention in addressing inequities in hearing health disparities in the United States.

Objectives/Hypothesis To review hearing preservation after microsurgical resection of sporadic vestibular schwannomas according to tumor size. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Methods Baseline, intraoperative, and postoperative patient and tumor characteristics were retrospectively collected for a cohort who underwent hearing preservation microsurgery. Serviceable hearing was defined by a pure tone average ≤50 dB and word recognition score ≥50%. Results A total of 243 patients had serviceable hearing preoperatively. Fifty (21%) tumors were confined to the internal auditory canal, and the median tumor size was 16.2 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 11.3–23.2) for tumors with cerebellopontine angle extension. Serviceable hearing was maintained in 64% of patients with tumors confined to the internal auditory canal, 28% with cerebellopontine angle extension <15 mm, and 9% with cerebellopontine angle extension ≥15 mm. On multivariable analysis, the odds ratios of acquiring nonserviceable hearing postoperatively for tumors extending <15 mm and ≥15 mm into the cerebellopontine angle were 5.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13–15.53; P < .001) and 22.11 (95% CI 7.04–69.42; P < .001), respectively, compared with intracanalicular tumors. Conclusions The strongest predictor of hearing preservation with microsurgery after multivariable adjustment is tumor size. Approximately 10% of patients with tumors ≥15 mm of cerebellopontine angle extension will retain serviceable hearing after microsurgery. Furthermore, hearing preservation techniques offer cochlear nerve preservation and cochlear patency allowing for possible future cochlear implantation. An attempt at hearing preservation, including avoiding surgical approaches that necessarily sacrifice hearing, is worthwhile even in larger tumors if serviceable hearing is present preoperatively. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 132:1657–1664, 2022