Carlson, Matthew L.

Objective Management of small vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial, as patients are typically candidates for all three management options including microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or wait-and-scan. This study compares patient satisfaction across treatment modalities in patients with small VS. Study Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Survey distributed to members of the Acoustic Neuroma Association and Mayo Clinic patients. Methods Patients with small (<1 cm in any location) sporadic VS who completed at least one survey regarding treatment history and patient satisfaction were included. Results Among 346 patients with small VS, 106 (31%) underwent microsurgery, 78 (23%) radiosurgery, 152 (44%) wait-and-scan, and 10 (3%) multimodal treatment. Collectively, 307 (89%) patients indicated “Yes, I am happy with my treatment type and in hindsight I would not change anything,” and 39 (11%) indicated “No, in hindsight I would have chosen a different treatment type.” Satisfaction differed significantly by treatment group with 85, 86, 96, and 40% of patients in the microsurgery, radiosurgery, wait-and-scan, and multimodal groups reporting that they were satisfied with treatment, respectively (p < 0.001). Satisfaction also differed significantly among those undergoing upfront treatment with microsurgery or radiosurgery (81%), initial wait-and-scan followed by treatment (88%), and wait-and-scan only groups (96%; p = 0.001). Specifically, the wait-and-scan only group demonstrated greater satisfaction compared with the other two treatment strategies (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions Patient satisfaction with the management of small VS is generally high. Management with wait-and-scan, even if treatment is eventually pursued, may offer higher patient satisfaction compared with upfront treatment.

Abstract Cochlear implantation after microsurgical resection of intralabyrinthine schwannomas has shown promising results in a limited number of small studies with safe and favorable outcomes. Cochlear implantation is a mainstream treatment for advanced bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and, more recently, has been applied to patients with single-sided deafness. The case presented is a 66-year-old gentleman with a history of progressive right-sided sensorineural hearing loss and bothersome tinnitus with a right intralabyrinthine schwannoma involving the semicircular canals, vestibule, and basal turn of the cochlea. The authors describe concomitant cochlear implantation after microsurgical resection of an intralabyrinthine schwannoma. Intralabyrinthine schwannomas represent an uncommon subtype of benign tumors arising from the terminal branches of the vestibulocochlear nerve. Symptoms often include sensorineural hearing loss, dizziness, and tinnitus, and in this location, symptoms often arise at a small tumor size. In this featured case, we present a patient who underwent gross total tumor resection and cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation and treatment of tinnitus. Six months after surgery, the patient achieved good device performance, scoring 46% on consonant–nucleus–consonant word testing and 66% on AzBio sentence testing, and subjective improvement in his tinnitus.

Objective To assess quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after modified subtotal petrosectomy with ear canal closure (mSTP) for chronic otitis media. Study Design Survey study. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Patients with chronic otitis media. Interventions mSTP. Main Outcome Measures Survey results from enrolled patients on the validated disease-specific Chronic Ear Survey (CES) and Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test-15 (COMOT-15) regarding their current state of health and, if surgery was performed within 3 years of enrollment, their state of health before mSTP. Results A total of 23 patients were studied, including 19 who underwent surgery within 3 years of enrollment. Postoperatively, mean total CES scores were 80 and COMOT-15 scores were 41, with a higher CES and a lower COMOT-15 indicating better QoL. There were statistically significant improvements after mSTP in the CES activity restriction (25% difference; p = 0.008), symptom (17% difference; p = 0.007), and medical resource (13% difference; p = 0.03) domain and total (18% difference; p = 0.006) scores. In addition, there were statistically significant improvements in the COMOT-15 ear symptom (−22% difference; p < 0.001) domain and total (−16% difference; p = 0.01) scores; however, improvements in the hearing function and mental health domains did not achieve statistical significance. Postoperative COMOT-15 total scores were significantly better for patients who underwent aural rehabilitation compared to those who did not (−17% difference; p < 0.001). Conclusion Modified subtotal petrosectomy with ear canal closure is a useful intervention for patients with recalcitrant chronic otitis media, offering improved QoL in appropriately selected patients. Aural rehabilitation, when feasible, provides the potential for further QoL improvement.

OBJECTIVE Facial nerve function, hearing preservation, and tumor control have been the primary benchmarks used to assess vestibular schwannoma (VS) outcomes. Acknowledging the frequent discrepancy between what physicians prioritize and what patients value, there has been increasing prioritization of patient-reported outcome measures when evaluating the impact of VS diagnosis and its treatment. Motivated by reported limitations of prior instruments used to assess quality of life (QOL) in patients with VS, the authors describe the development and validation of a new disease-specific QOL measure: the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index. METHODS The content development phase comprised identification of clinically important domains and prioritization of feelings or concerns individuals with VS may have. The validation phase encompassed determining how items were grouped into domains and eliminating redundant items. Both phases leveraged data from cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys, expertise from a multidisciplinary working group, and patients with a broad range of experiences with VS (n = 42 during content development and n = 263 during validation). Domain scores from the new instrument were assessed for reliability and correlation with other measures of similar constructs. RESULTS The VSQOL Index consists of 40 items that evaluate the impact of VS diagnosis and its management on QOL, treatment satisfaction, and employment and is estimated to take 8–10 minutes to complete. Domain scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) and demonstrate excellent psychometric properties, including content, construct, and convergent validity and both internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas 0.83 to 0.91) and test-retest reliability (reliability coefficients 0.86 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS The VSQOL Index is a valid and reliable measure that overcomes several limitations of prior instruments, including omission or underrepresentation of domains that frequently impact well-being, such as pain, cognition, satisfaction or regret surrounding treatment decisions, and occupational limitations, to comprehensively evaluate the impact of VS diagnosis or its treatment on QOL.

Objective Spontaneous tumor shrinkage during wait-and-scan management of sporadic vestibular schwannoma is generally considered an uncommon phenomenon. However, most data informing this understanding stem from single-slice linear tumor measurements taken in the axial imaging plane. The objective of the current work was to characterize the regression capacity of sporadic vestibular schwannomas using volumetric tumor measurements. Study Design Retrospective cohort study using slice-by-slice, three-dimensional volumetric tumor measurements. Setting Three tertiary referral centers. Patients Patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Interventions Wait-and-scan. Main Outcome Measures Regression-free survival rates with regression defined as a decrease of at least 20% of the tumor volume. Results Among 952 patients undergoing a total of 3,505 magnetic resonance imaging studies during observation, 123 experienced volumetric tumor regression after diagnosis at a median of 1.2 years (interquartile range, 0.6–2.9 yr). Volumetric regression-free survival rates (95% confidence interval; number still at risk) at 1, 3, and 5 years after diagnosis were 94% (92–95%; 662), 86% (83–89%; 275), and 78% (73–82%; 132), respectively. Among 405 patients who demonstrated an initial period of tumor growth but continued wait-and-scan management, 48 experienced volumetric regression at a median of 1.2 years (interquartile range, 0.8–2.6 yr) after initial growth. Volumetric regression-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after initial growth were 94% (92–97%; 260), 84% (79–89%; 99), and 75% (67–83%; 43), respectively. Ultimately, only 82 of the 952 patients studied showed exclusively volumetric tumor regression (i.e., without any periods of tumor growth) by the time of last follow-up. Conclusion Spontaneous volumetric tumor shrinkage during wait-and-scan management occurs more frequently than suggested by previous studies using linear tumor measurements and can even occur after previous episodes of documented tumor growth. These data further highlight the dynamic nature of vestibular schwannoma growth. To this end, the application of natural history data to patient management requires a nuanced approach that parallels the complex tumor behavior of vestibular schwannoma.

ObjectiveTo characterize the geographic distribution of US otolaryngology residents based on geographical population density to determine current status and identify potential opportunities for otolaryngology residency program expansion.MethodsThe locoregional population of otolaryngology residency programs was analyzed (as defined by the US Census) and the number of resident trainees per 100,000 people in each region was calculated. Otolaryngology residency program location was determined by mailing address, and program size was determined by AAMC public data.ResultsThe average metropolitan city in the United States contained 2.07 otolaryngology trainees per 100,000 people. Cities with low trainee numbers per population included Phoenix, AZ (0.20 trainees per 100,000 people); Las Vegas, NV (0.26 per 100,000); Dallas, TX (0.26 per 100,000), Atlanta, GA (0.33 per 100,000); and Miami, FL (0.34 per 100,000). Comparing otolaryngology to other surgical subspecialties demonstrated similar distributions. Metropolitan centers with a population over 1 million without full academic representation in otolaryngology were also identified and included Charlotte, NC; Orlando, FL; Austin, TX; Providence, RI; Jacksonville, FL; Raleigh, NC; and Grand Rapids, MI.ConclusionStrategic residency training program expansion should be considered in cities that exhibit a low trainee to population ratio. Although many factors ultimately determine program expansion or development of new training programs, this study provides substantiated population data describing where expansion could be prioritized.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 133:1600–1605, 2023

The indications for cochlear implantation have expanded to include individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss in the impaired ear and normal hearing (NH) in the contralateral ear, known as single-sided deafness (SSD). There are additional considerations for the clinical assessment and management of adult cochlear implant candidates and recipients with SSD as compared to conventional cochlear implant candidates with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The present report reviews the current evidence relevant to the assessment and management of adults with SSD. A systematic review was also conducted on published studies that investigated outcomes of cochlear implant use on measures of speech recognition in quiet and noise, sound source localization, tinnitus perception, and quality of life for this patient population. Expert consensus and systematic review of the current literature were combined to provide guidance for the clinical assessment and management of adults with SSD.

Background and Purpose After cochlear implantation, metallic artifact can obscure nearby structures on CT images, which is problematic in patients with facial nerve stimulation (FNS). This study evaluated the usefulness of co-registered pre- and post-operative examinations to evaluate the cochlear implant and adjacent structures. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was completed of consecutive patients that underwent CT imaging of the temporal bone before and after placement of a cochlear implant. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently reviewed all available examinations. All examinations were assessed for the presence or absence of dehiscence of the osseous ridge between the cochlea and facial nerve canal (FNC). Pre-operative and fused pre- and post-operative examinations were compared in their ability to visualize the osseous ridge using a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = unfused images were substantially superior to 5 = fused images were substantially superior). The electrode closest to the FNC were noted. Results Of 34 included patients, 13 (38.2%) were female and 21 (61.8%) were male; average age was 72.2. Seven patients (20.6%) had frank dehiscence between the cochlea and FNC. Fused images were superior to the post-operative study alone for assessing the integrity of the osseous partition between the cochlea and FNC and for reducing artifact from the electrode array (average Likert scores for both reviewers were 4.4 and 4.7). There was good agreement between reviewers in noting electrode closest to the FNC (concordance correlation coefficient=0.82). Conclusions Following cochlear implantation, co-registered pre- and post-operative CT images are superior to conventional images in assessing the anatomic relationship between the cochlea and FNC.

ObjectiveTo determine how social media is used in the dissemination of new information within otolaryngology, and to emphasize the importance of standardizing Twitter hashtag use.MethodsBased on the 2019 SCImago journal rankings, the Twitter posts from the accounts of the top three journals covering each otolaryngology subspecialty were reviewed from August 1, 2020 to May 1, 2021. Twitter posts from the primary otolaryngology‐related academic societies were also reviewed during this timeframe. A list of hashtags was generated based on a combination of the most common otolaryngologic procedures and most commonly used hashtags in the social media space. This list was then crowd‐sourced with 10 fellowship‐trained otolaryngologists for each subspecialty.ResultsHashtag use among key stakeholders in the otolaryngology social media space varies considerably. For instance, #HNSCC, #HeadAndNeckSquamousCellCarcinoma, #HeadAndNeckCancer, #HeadAndNeckCancers, #OropharyngealCancer, #OropharynxCancer, #OralCancer, and #OPSCC were all commonly used hashtags to identify posts discussing oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. #HeadAndNeckCancer and #HNSCC were most popular and used in a total of 85 and 65 tweets, respectively. #HeadAndNeckCancer was found alone in 32 out of 85 tweets (38%), whereas #HNSCC was found alone in 27 out of 65 tweets (42%). A standardized hashtag ontology covering all subspecialties within otolaryngology is proposed herein.ConclusionsAdoption of a standardized social media ontology within otolaryngology will improve information dissemination across all key stakeholders. Laryngoscope, 133:1595–1599, 2023