Carlson, Matthew L.

Objective To describe the development, implementation, and validation of a radiology-administered protocol to obtain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants without magnet removal. Study Design Retrospective review and description of novel care pathway. Methods A radiology-administered protocol was designed based on careful input from the radiology safety committee and neurotology. Radiology technologist training modules, consent instructions, patient educational material, clinical audits, and other safeguards were implemented, with samples provided in this report. The primary outcomes measured included instances of magnet displacement during MRI and premature termination of MRI studies secondary to pain. Results Between June 19, 2018, and October 12, 2021, 301 implanted ears underwent MRI without magnet removal, including 153 devices housing diametric MRI-conditional magnets, and 148 implants with conventional axial (i.e., nondiametric) magnets. Among cases with diametric MRI-conditional magnets, all studies were completed without magnet dislodgement or need to terminate imaging early due to pain. Among cases with conventional axial (nondiametric) magnets, 29 (19.6%) MRI studies were stopped prematurely secondary to pain or discomfort; the overall rate of this event was 9.6% (29 of 301) among the entire study cohort. In addition, 6.1% (9 of 148) experienced confirmed magnet displacement despite headwrap placement; the overall rate among all cases was 3.0% (9 of 301). Eight of these patients received successful external magnet reseating through manual pressure on the external scalp without surgery, and one required surgical replacement of the magnet in the operating room. There were no documented instances of hematoma, infection, device or magnet extrusion, internal device movement (i.e., gross receiver-stimulator migration), or device malfunction in this cohort related to MRI. Conclusions We present the successful implementation of a radiology-administered protocol designed to streamline care for cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant recipients who require MRI and ease clinical demands for otolaryngology providers. Examples of resources developed, including a process map, radiology training modules, consent instructions, patient educational materials, clinical audit, and other procedural safety measures are provided so interested groups may consider adapting and implementing related measures according to need.

Objectives To investigate the associations of age and year of cochlear implantation (CI) with CI incidence among adults 20 years and older residing in the US. Study Design Deidentified cochlear implant data were acquired from prospective patient registries from two cochlear implant manufacturers (Cochlear Americas and Advanced Bionics), which supply an estimated 85% of cochlear implants in the US. Population estimates for severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss by age group were extracted from Census and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Setting US CI centers. Patients Adults 20 years and older who underwent CI. Interventions CI. Main Outcome Measures CI incidence. Results The study cohort included 30,066 adults 20 years and older who underwent CI from 2015 to 2019. When combining actual and estimated data from all three manufacturers, the annual number of cochlear implants increased 5,406 in 2015 to 8,509 in 2019. Overall, the incidence of CI among adult traditional (bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss) CI candidates increased from 244 per 100,000 person-years in 2015 to 350 in 2019 (p < 0.001). Although the elderly (80 years and older) population had the lowest incidence of CI, this cohort experienced the largest growth from an incidence of 105 per 100,000 person-years to 202 during the study period. Conclusions Despite growing incidence among those with qualifying hearing loss, cochlear implants remain widely underutilized. Elderly adults continue to exhibit the lowest relative cochlear implant utilization rates; however, trends over the last half-decade suggest a shift has occurred, resulting in improved access among this underserved subset.

OBJECTIVE Preoperative differentiation of facial nerve schwannoma (FNS) from vestibular schwannoma (VS) can be challenging, and failure to differentiate between these two pathologies can result in potentially avoidable facial nerve injury. This study presents the combined experience of two high-volume centers in the management of intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs. The authors highlight clinical and imaging features that can distinguish FNS from VS and provide an algorithm to help manage intraoperatively diagnosed FNS. METHODS Operative records of 1484 presumed sporadic VS resections between January 2012 and December 2021 were reviewed, and patients with intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs were identified. Clinical data and preoperative imaging were retrospectively reviewed for features suggestive of FNS, and factors associated with good postoperative facial nerve function (House-Brackmann [HB] grade ≤ 2) were identified. A preoperative imaging protocol for suspected VS and recommendations for surgical decision-making following an intraoperative FNS diagnosis were created. RESULTS Nineteen patients (1.3%) with FNSs were identified. All patients had normal facial motor function preoperatively. In 12 patients (63%), preoperative imaging demonstrated no features suggestive of FNS, with the remainder showing subtle enhancement of the geniculate/labyrinthine facial segment, widening/erosion of the fallopian canal, or multiple tumor nodules in retrospect. Eleven (57.9%) of the 19 patients underwent a retrosigmoid craniotomy, and in the remaining patients, a translabyrinthine (n = 6) or transotic (n = 2) approach was used. Following FNS diagnosis, 6 (32%) of the tumors underwent gross-total resection (GTR) and cable nerve grafting, 6 (32%) underwent subtotal resection (STR) and bony decompression of the meatal facial nerve segment, and 7 (36%) underwent bony decompression only. All patients undergoing subtotal debulking or bony decompression exhibited normal postoperative facial function (HB grade I). At the last clinical follow-up, patients who underwent GTR with a facial nerve graft had HB grade III (3 of 6 patients) or IV facial function. Tumor recurrence/regrowth occurred in 3 patients (16%), all of whom had been treated with either bony decompression or STR. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative diagnosis of an FNS during a presumed VS resection is rare, but its incidence can be reduced further by maintaining a high index of suspicion and undertaking further imaging in patients with atypical clinical or imaging features. If an intraoperative diagnosis does occur, conservative surgical management with bony decompression of the facial nerve only is recommended, unless there is significant mass effect on surrounding structures.

Abstract Background and Purpose Artifact from cochlear implant electrodes degrades image resolution on CT. Here, we describe the use of coregistered pre‐ and postoperative CT images to reduce metallic artifact from the electrodes to assess its position more accurately within the cochlear lumen. Methods Pre‐ and postoperative CTs were reviewed after coregistration/overlay of both exams. Images were evaluated by two neuroradiologists for scalar location of electrodes tip (± scalar translocation), tip fold over, and angular depth of insertion. Results Thirty‐four patients were included in the final cohort. Transscalar migration was present in three (8.8%) cases (one case demonstrated tip fold over), with initial disagreement regarding transscalar migration in 1 out of 34 patients (2.9%). Agreement regarding depth of insertion was present in 31 (91.1%) cases. Five‐point Likert scales were used to compare the ability to resolve the proximity of electrodes to the lateral/outer cochlear wall without and with overlay, which is a qualitative measure of artifact from the array. Likert scores showed definitive benefit of metal artifact reduction using overlayed images with an average score of 4.34. Conclusion This study demonstrates a novel technique of using fused coregistration of pre‐ and postoperative CTs for the purpose of artifact reduction/electrode localization. It is anticipated that this technique will permit more accurate localization of the electrodes for improvement in surgical technique and electrode array design.