Laughlin, Ruple S.

AbstractIntroduction/AimsFemoral neuropathies can cause severe, prolonged debility, yet there have been few clinical and electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies addressing this condition. The aim of this study was to better understand the etiologies, EDx features, and clinical course of femoral neuropathy.MethodsWe identified patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1, 1999 and July 31, 2019, with possible new femoral neuropathy ascertained via International Classification of Diseases‐versions 9 and 10 diagnosis codes presenting within 6 months of symptom onset.ResultsA retrospective review of 1084 records was performed and we ultimately identified 159 patients with isolated femoral neuropathy for inclusion. The most common femoral neuropathy etiologies were compressive (40%), perioperative stretch (35%), and inflammatory (6%). Presenting symptoms included weakness (96%), sensory loss (73%), and pain (53%). Presenting motor physical exam findings demonstrated moderate weakness (34%) or no activation (25%) of knee extension and mild (32%) or moderate (35%) weakness of hip flexion. Seventy‐two percent of patients underwent EDx testing, including 22 with femoral motor nerve conduction studies. Treatment often involved physical therapy (89%) and was otherwise etiology‐specific. In patients with follow‐up data available (n = 154), 83% had subjective clinical improvement at follow‐up with a mean time to initial improvement of 3.3 months and mean time to recovery at final follow‐up of 14.8 months. Only 48% of patients had nearly complete or complete recovery.DiscussionIn our cohort, the most common etiologies of femoral neuropathy were compression or perioperative stretch with high initial morbidity. Although motor recovery is common, improvement is often prolonged and incomplete.

Purpose: Complex repetitive discharges (CRDs) are incompletely understood needle electromyography (EMG) waveforms seen in both myopathic and neurogenic disorders including radiculopathies. This study aimed to clarify the significance of CRDs in patients with radiculopathies. Methods: This case–control study randomly identified 100 patients with needle EMG evidence of radiculopathy demonstrating at least one CRD in the electrodiagnostically involved myotome between January 2017 and January 2022. These patients were compared with 100 randomly selected patients with EMG evidence of radiculopathy without CRDs controlled for sex, age at EMG testing, and affected nerve root segment. Patient clinical symptoms, neurologic examination, EMG features, and imaging were analyzed. A paired sample t-test for categorial data and χ2 test for nonparametric data were used for statistical analysis with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: Patients with radiculopathies with CRDs had longer disease duration averaging 59 months (range 1–480) compared with patients with radiculopathies without CRDs averaging 26 months (range 1–192, P < 0.01). Clinical symptoms of paresthesias and weakness were both significantly more common in patients with radiculopathies with CRDs than those without CRDs (P < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). Needle EMG demonstrated a greater average number of muscles with neurogenic motor unit potentials per radiculopathy in patients with radiculopathies with CRDs compared with those without CRDs. Imaging studies of patients with radiculopathies with CRDs were more likely to reveal evidence of nerve root compression (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The presence of CRDs in patients with radiculopathies is consistent with clinically more symptomatic radiculopathies and a longer duration of nerve root compromise.

AbstractIntroduction/AimsComplex repetitive discharges (CRDs) are spontaneous electromyography (EMG) waveforms often associated with chronic neurogenic or myopathic diseases, but incidentally identified CRDs have also been described. In this study we describe the distribution and possible significance of incidentally seen CRDs in otherwise normal electrodiagnostic studies.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with CRDs incidentally documented on otherwise normal electrodiagnostic studies at Mayo Clinic from January 2013 through December 2020. Each patient's clinical symptoms, referral reason, electrodiagnostic report, and imaging studies were analyzed using descriptive statistics.ResultsNinety‐four patients (86 females; mean age, 62 years; range, 20 to 86 years) and 107 CRDs were studied. The most common neuromuscular reasons for electrodiagnostic referrals included radiculopathy, peripheral neuropathy, and myopathy. Mean symptom duration was 43 months (range, 1 to 312 months). Eighty‐five patients had a CRD identified in one muscle (range, in all patients, one to five muscles). CRDs were identified most frequently in tensor fasciae latae (n = 21), biceps brachii (n = 16), and gluteus maximus (n = 9). Of the 58 patients in whom imaging was available, 46 (79%) had abnormalities that corresponded to the myotome in which the CRDs were visualized, most commonly L5 (n = 19) and C6 (n = 12). Of these 46 patients, 28 (61%) were referred for radicular or limb pain.DiscussionCRDs can be incidentally noted on otherwise normal electrodiagnostic studies, most commonly in L5 and C6 myotomes. The mechanism of CRDs in the absence of electrodiagnostic features of axon loss or remodeling is unknown.

Abstract Introduction/Aims Carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome (CTS, CuTS) are common among patients with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure‐palsies (HNPP) and Charcot–Marie‐Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) and may impact quality of life. We aimed to evaluate the utility of nerve decompression surgeries in these patients. Methods Medical records were reviewed for patients with PMP22 mutations confirmed in Mayo Clinic laboratories from January 1999 to December 2020, who had CTS and CuTS and underwent surgical decompression. Results CTS occurred in 53.3% of HNPP and 11.5% of CMT1A, while CuTS was present in 43.3% of HNPP and 5.8% of CMT1A patients. CTS decompression occurred in 10‐HNPP and 5‐CMT1A patients, and CuTS decompression with/without transposition was performed in 5‐HNPP and 1‐CMT1A patients. In HNPP, electrodiagnostic studies identified median neuropathy at the wrist in 9/10 patients and ultrasound showed focal enlargements at the carpal and cubital tunnels. In CMT1A, median and ulnar sensory responses were all absent, and the nerves were diffusely enlarged. After CTS surgery, pain, sensory loss, and strength improved in 4/5 CMT1A, and 6/10 HNPP patients. Of clinical, electrophysiologic and ultrasound findings, only activity‐provoked features significantly correlated with CTS surgical benefit in HNPP patients (odds ratio = 117.0:95% confidence interval, 1.94 > 999.99, p = 0.01). One CMT1A and one HNPP patient improved with CuTS surgery while 2 HNPP patients worsened. Discussion CTS symptom improvement post‐surgery can be seen in CMT1A and (less frequent) in HNPP patients. CuTS surgery commonly worsened course in HNPP. Activity‐provoked symptoms in HNPP best informed benefits from CTS surgery.