Tasche, Kendall K.

Abstract Objective In 2024, the US News and World Report (USNWR)'s Best Hospitals began reporting complications following elective outpatient otolaryngology procedures in its ears, nose, and throat (ENT) ranking. However, this methodology has not been clinically adjudicated in a peer‐reviewed domain. We aimed to conduct manual health record adjudication to assess whether the USNWR methodology accurately attributes complications following elective outpatient otolaryngology procedures. Study Design Case‐cohort. Setting A case‐cohort of n = 80 elective, outpatient otolaryngology procedure/complication pairings from January 2019 to October 2023 across four academic medical centers using the 2024 USNWR otolaryngology procedure subgroups and Solventum Ambulatory Potentially Preventable Complications (AM‐PPC) software. Methods We used the AM‐PPC‐defined complication types as our standard of comparison for our clinical adjudication. Using the electronic health record, we adjudicated: (1) Was there agreement (yes/no) on complication type between our clinical adjudication and the Solventum AM‐PPC software? (2) Was the complication clinically related to, or a sequela of, the index otolaryngology procedure (yes/no)? Results The clinical adjudication agreed on complication type in 59/80 (74%) of patients, and 63/80 (79%) were judged to be clinically related to the index otolaryngology procedure. In total, 50/80 (63%) complications were adjudicated to be in agreement on both the complication type and clinical relatedness to the index procedure, while 9/80 (11%) complications did not agree with the complication type nor were clinically related to the index procedure. Conclusion Outpatient complications reported in the USNWR ENT rating lack the specificity to exclude patients whose complications are sequelae of chronic underlying conditions or related to concurrent, non‐otolaryngology procedures.

Abstract Objective To describe the presenting symptoms, treatment regimens, and outcomes associated with oropharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. Data Sources Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus via Elsevier. Review Methods This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses. A medical librarian conducted the literature search using controlled vocabulary and keywords, with investigator input. Eligible articles were clinical trials and observational studies reporting on clinical features, treatment, or outcomes for oropharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. Results Our search identified 233 unique citations, with 44 articles included covering 195 patients. The female‐to‐male ratio was 1.7:1, and the base of the tongue was the most common subsite (73%). Presenting symptoms were mainly pain/discomfort (n = 31), followed by a palpable mass (n = 19) and dysphagia (n = 12). At diagnosis, 22.3% (29 patients) had positive lymph nodes. Treatment was primarily surgical (n = 102), with definitive radiation therapy used in 58 cases. Disease progression was noted in 86 patients, 36% (n = 31) of whom developed distant metastases—primarily to the lungs (n = 26). Long‐term outcomes (n = 76) showed 3‐ and 5‐year overall survival rates of 71.5% to 100% and 47.6% to 79.0%, and disease‐free survival rates of 54.7% to 70.0% and 21.9% to 44.0%, respectively. Conclusion Among patients with available data, oropharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma appeared more common in women and has a predilection for the base of the tongue. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution, given the high proportion of missing data. These tumors appear to carry a higher risk for nodal metastases and may lead to poor outcomes.

Objective(s): To (1) report on the long-term recurrence rate of surgically managed pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and (2) assess long-term surgical outcomes after parotidectomy Methods: Cross-sectional survey of all patients with a pathologic diagnosis of PA who underwent surgical management in a tertiary care center from 01/1997 to 12/2023 and had access to an electronic patient portal. Surveys were delivered via electronic patient portal or phone call with 6 questions to assess recurrence and long-term surgical outcomes. Time to first recurrence and recurrence free survival were analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Results: Seven hundred-forty-five patients met inclusion criteria and received the survey, with a 56% response rate (n = 420). The clinical median follow-up length was 51 days, which extended to a median length of 6.2 years following the survey. The median change in follow-up length was 5.37 years ( P < .001). The recurrence rate was 1% at 5 years, with a median time to first recurrence of 7.54 years. 13% and 9% of responders reported facial asymmetry and incisional cosmetic concerns, respectively. 33% of patients reported experiencing Frey syndrome, which increased from 5.2% of survey responders with documented Frey syndrome at their original post-operative assessment. Conclusion: Long-term assessment of PA outcomes confirms low recurrence rates, suggesting regular surveillance of recurrence is likely unnecessary. Complaints of Frey syndrome increased in frequency with longer term follow-up, which should be considered during patient counseling. Level of Evidence: 3

Importance Standard adjuvant therapy for human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) is radiation therapy 60 Gy with or without cisplatin delivered in 30 fractions during 6 weeks. A phase 3 randomized clinical trial demonstrated decreased toxic effects and improved patient-reported outcomes with de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy (DART) compared with standard therapy; however, outcomes for patients treated in the clinical practice setting following trial adoption remain unknown. Objective To compare characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients treated with DART during clinical trials (on study) and in clinical practice settings (off study) and report progression-free survival (PFS) by risk category. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with DART in the MC1273 and MC1675 trials and in clinical practice after study completion at a multisite tertiary care center. Patients with surgically resectable HPV-OPSCC who underwent margin-negative resection between August 20, 2013, and March 21, 2023, and were treated with DART were included in the analysis. Those with prior head and neck cancer, pT0 or pT4 disease, unknown HPV status, metastatic disease at presentation, synchronous primary tumors, induction chemotherapy, or treatment at an outside institution were excluded. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2024, to July 18, 2025. Interventions DART consisting of 30 to 36 Gy in 1.5- to 1.8-Gy fractions twice daily with docetaxel 15 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8. Main Outcomes and Measures Progression-free survival as measured via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results A total of 282 patients were included in the analysis: 176 (62.4%) in the on-study group and 106 (37.6%) in the off-study group (252 [89.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 59.1 [9.3] years). Both groups were predominantly male (157 [89.2%] and 95 [89.6%], respectively) and consisted mostly of never smokers (118 [67.0%] and 62 [58.5%], respectively). Pathologic features were similar between groups except for nodal stage (pN1: 155 [88.1%] on study vs 102 [96.2%] off study; pN2: 21 [11.9%] on study vs 4 [3.8%] off study; P = .02). The median follow-up times were 5.2 years (95% CI, 5.2-5.8 years) in the on-study group and 2.2 years (95% CI, 1.9-2.4 years) in the off-study group. Two-year PFS was similar (93% [95% CI, 88%-97%] on study vs 93% [95% CI, 88%-99%] off study). For patients with pN1 and no extranodal extension (ENE), 2- and 5-year PFS were 97% (95% CI, 93%-100%) and 96% (95% CI, 92%-100%), respectively. Patients with pN1 and ENE had a 2- and 5-year PFS of 93% (95% CI, 89%-98%) and 87% (95% CI, 81%-94%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective cohort study of patients receiving DART on and off study, oncologic outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Fewer patients with pN2 received DART off study, given the interim results of MC1675. Patients with pN1 and no ENE treated with DART had excellent 2- and 5-year PFS, supporting DART as a compelling treatment option in well-selected patients. An additional study that is currently underway will evaluate biomarker risk-stratified treatment of patients with pN1 and ENE receiving DART.

Management of locoregionally advanced human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(+) OPSCC) can include induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation. The standard induction regimen of cisplatin, docetaxel, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) is associated with high toxicity. Given the chemosensitivity of HPV(+) OPSCC, platinum doublets are frequently used as induction therapy with potentially less toxicity. This retrospective study aimed to compare outcomes between treatment-naive HPV(+) OPSCC patients receiving induction TPF and those receiving an induction platinum doublet. Data collected included tumor characteristics, response after chemoradiation, hospitalization rates, and overall survival (OS). Fifty-five patients (18 TPF and 37 platinum doublet) were included. There was no significant difference in response after completion of definitive chemoradiation (TPF: CR 83.3%, PR 5.6%, progression or metastasis 11.1% vs. platinum doublet: CR 75.7%, PR 16.2%, progression or metastasis 8.1%; p = 0.5241). There were also no differences in hospitalizations for adverse events (38.9% in TPF vs. 40.5% in platinum doublet, p = 0.907) or recurrence (11.1% in TPF vs. 2.7% in platinum doublet, p = 0.198). The 5-year OS was 84.6% in the TPF group and 81.5% in the platinum doublet group (p = 0.581). Induction platinum doublet regimens offer comparable OS, response, and hospitalization rates to TPF in locally advanced HPV(+) OPSCC. Induction with a platinum doublet may be a viable de-escalation strategy for patients who are not candidates for TPF.

Background: To compare oncologic and postoperative outcomes in patients with scalp squamous cell carcinoma with periosteal, but not gross calvarial, involvement, treated with margin-clearing excision including either calvarial burring or periosteal excision alone. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single tertiary academic referral center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed surgical cases from January 2001 to January 2025. Inclusion criteria: patients ≥18 years with biopsy-proven scalp squamous cell carcinoma involving the periosteum without cortical invasion on imaging. Management of the deep margin included either burring of the outer table or periosteal excision alone. Demographic, surgical, and oncologic outcomes were collected and analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 70 (range 56-92), and 18 (86%) were male. Thirteen (65%) patients underwent calvarial burring, 7 (35%) underwent periosteal excision. Local recurrence occurred in 31% and 29% of the burring group and non-burring group. Disease-free survival at 2 years was 46% and 57% in the burring and non-burring group, respectively. Overall survival at 2 years was 77% and 86% in the burring and non-burring group. Three patients in the burring group had local recurrences with intracranial extension, 1 died of disease, 1 died with disease and concurrent meningitis, 1 is alive with disease recurrence currently on palliative treatment. There were 7 disease-related deaths. Conclusion: Burring did not confer a significant oncologic advantage compared to periosteal excision alone when there was no gross cortical invasion. Local recurrence in patients undergoing calvarial burring was associated with intracranial extension of disease.

Background: The role of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in diagnosing parotid tumors remains debated due to varying accuracy. This study evaluates FNA’s accuracy in diagnosing Warthin’s tumor (WT) and its safety in guiding observational management. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single institution, Tertiary referral center. Methods: Data from 2010 to 2022 including demographics, cytology, pathology, and surgical outcomes were extracted. Accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Among 808 patients with parotid tumors, 234 were WTs. Seventy-eight patients underwent surgery with pathology while 156 underwent observation. FNA sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for WTs were 98.2%, 98.1%, 91.8%, and 99.6% respectively. No observational patients developed clinical signs of malignancy, and the median change in tumor size was 0 cm (range −3.1 to 2.1). Conclusions: FNA is highly specific for WT but limited by nondiagnostic results. Observation is a safe approach with minimal risk of growth, malignancy, or infection.

6061 Background: PDS0101 is a T cell stimulating immunotherapy (therapeutic vaccine) targeting HPV16. The combination of PDS0101 + pembrolizumab (5 cycles) has shown durable clinical responses in HPV-positive recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. MC200710 is a window of opportunity study in patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC). This prospective phase II trial utilized 2 cycles of neoadjuvant PDS0101 aloneor in combination with pembrolizumab prior to surgical resection or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Herein, we report the initial results, including primary endpoint of ctDNA response. Methods: Between June 2022 and September 2024, 20 patients (10 per Arm) with locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC were enrolled in a sequential alternating design. Arm A received 2 cycles of PDS0101 and Arm B received 2 cycles of PDS0101 and pembrolizumab with all patients undergoing subsequent surgery or CRT. Assessments were done at baseline, post cycle 1, and post cycle 2 (prior to surgery or CRT). The coprimary endpoint of ctDNA response was defined as a ≥50% decline in ctDNA post cycle 2 compared to baseline as quantified using NavDx (TTMV fragments/mL). Radiologic objective response rate (ORR) was assessed as per RECIST 1.1. Toxicity through the neoadjuvant period was assessed using CTCAE criteria and recurrence rates following surgery or CRT are reported. Results: Patients were similar between arms: male 90%, median age 61 years, cT1/T2 70%, cN1 65%, and no smoking history 65%. All patients completed both cycles of therapy with 13 (65%) undergoing primary operative management and 7 CRT (35%). The most common toxicity was injection site reaction 85% grade 1, 15% grade 2, 0% grade 3, consistent with prior studies. One patient experienced grade 2 pneumonitis during the neoadjuvant window (Arm B). There was one grade 3 toxicity (5%) possibly attributable to study intervention with one patient experiencing transient hepatitis requiring hospitalization (Arm A). Zero of 10 patients in Arm A had a ≥50% decline in ctDNA from baseline while 5 of 10 patients (50%) met this primary endpoint in ARM B (p=0.03). After Cycle 2, based on RECIST 1.1, no Arm A patients had a partial response (PR), with 7 having stable disease (SD); Arm B had 2 patients with PR and 8 with SD. With median follow up of 6 months, 2 patients in Arm A recurred and 0 patients in Arm B. Conclusions: The combination of PDS0101 and pembrolizumab met the trial’s primary endpoint of ctDNA response and shows promise for further evaluation. ctDNA can be used to assess early response and future studies could use ctDNA to adapt neoadjuvant therapy. Based on these findings, a neoadjuvant dose optimization study in HPV16+ oropharyngeal carcinoma is warranted and evaluation of PDS0101 and pembrolizumab in comparison to pembrolizumab alone. Clinical trial information: NCT05232851 .

9503 Background: Neoadjuvant ± adjuvant immunotherapy improves event-free survival relative to adjuvant immunotherapy alone for patients with high-risk resectable stage III melanoma. However, the optimal regimen balancing efficacy and tolerability is not known. T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a promising immune checkpoint but its therapeutic potential in stage III melanoma is underexplored. Methods: In this phase II trial, patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma received four 21-day neoadjuvant cycles of 1200mg IV atezolizumab (atezo, anti-PD-L1) + 600mg IV tiragolumab (tira, anti-TIGIT), followed by therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) and eight 21-day adjuvant cycles of 1200mg IV atezo. Primary endpoints were pathologic response (of all patients initiating neoadjuvant therapy) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the time of TLND in patients who were operated on per protocol and received adjuvant therapy. Secondary endpoint was adverse events (AEs); exploratory endpoints included event-free survival (EFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Results: Thirty-four patients, median age 59 years, were accrued and initiated neoadjuvant atezo/tira. 76.5% had >1 metastatic lymph node involved at baseline and 73.5% presented with Stage IIIC disease. All 34 patients were evaluable for AEs, pathologic response and EFS. Four patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease during neoadjuvant treatment, while 30 had TLND per protocol and 28 received adjuvant treatment and were evaluable for RFS and DMFS. Major pathologic responses (MPR, ≤10% viable tumor) were observed in 16/34 patients (47.1%, Table). With 19.9 months median follow-up from registration, 12-month EFS was 72.0% (95% CI 57.9 to 89.5%). With 16 months median follow-up from operation, 12-month RFS was 73.3% (n=28, 95% CI 56.9 to 94.5%), while 12-month DMFS was 86.0% (n=28, 95% CI 72.2 to 100%). In the 16 patients with an MPR, 2 did not receive adjuvant treatment and were followed for 33.3 and 10.8 months without recurrence/death. In the remaining 14 patients, 12-month RFS and 12-month DMFS were both 91.7% (95% CI 77.3 to 100%). 5 patients (14.7%) experienced any grade 3+ AE with 2 (5.9%) at least possibly related to the neoadjuvant regimen. Conclusions: Among patients with high-risk resectable stage III melanoma, neoadjuvant atezo/tira was a promising regimen with a favorable safety profile and warrants further study. Identification of predictive biomarkers will allow for optimization of neoadjuvant therapy for individual patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03554083 . Pathologic response. N=34 Major Pathologic Response 16 (47.1%) Pathologic complete response (no viable tumor) 13 (38.2%) Near-pathologic complete response (0.1−10% viable tumor) 3 (8.8%) Pathologic partial response (>10.0−50% viable tumor) 2 (5.9%) Pathologic non-response (>50% viable tumor) 12 (35.3%) No per protocol operation 4 (11.8%)

AbstractObjectiveLow‐grade parotid malignancies have high overall survival rates; however, controversy remains about the appropriate extent of surgery. We aim to explore the trends in the extent of parotidectomy performed over time in low‐grade parotid malignancies in the United States, with a hypothesis that there has been a trend towards less aggressive surgery.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study of all low‐grade (grade I) acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) from 2004 to 2020.SettingGeographic areas served by SEER.MethodsTrends were assessed using Cochran‐Armitage tests and logistic regression; Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were used to analyze overall and cancer‐specific survival, and chi‐square tests were used to analyze patient characteristics.ResultsIn total, 1288 patients were identified (916 MEC; 372 ACC). Most patients (n = 772, 60%) were non‐Hispanic white, with an average age of 50.6 years and had a slight female predominance (1.58:1). Most of the cohort presented with tumor stage T1 or T2 (84%), N0 (90.1%), and M0 (96.9%). Treatment with total parotidectomy decreased significantly (34.6 vs 17.7%, P = .02) whereas sacrificing the facial nerve (FN) slightly decreased (20 vs 15.7%, P = .1). A significant increase in N0 patients (71%‐94%, P < .0001) was observed, whereas T staging remained stable (61%‐64%, P = .3). Overall, both ACC and MEC had excellent cancer‐specific survival.ConclusionOver the last 17 years, there has been a significant de‐escalation in the extent of parotidectomy for low‐grade parotid malignancy in the United States.