Burton, Duane D.

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Quinn et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16859 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16916

INTRODUCTION: Cannabidiol (CBD), a CBR2 agonist with limited psychic effects, antagonizes CB1/CB2 receptors. Allelic variation CNR1 (gene for CBR1) rs806378 and FAAH rs324420 were associated with altered gut motility and sensation. This study aimed to compare the pharmacodynamics and clinical effects of a 4-week treatment with pharmaceutical-grade CBD vs placebo and assess the interactions of FAAH and CNR1 gene variants on the effects of CBD in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled (1:1 ratio) study of CBD b.i.d. (20 mg/kg/d according to the US Food and Drug Administration escalation guidance) in FD patients with nondelayed gastric emptying (GE) at baseline. Symptoms were assessed by validated daily symptom diary (0–4 scale for upper abdominal pain, nausea, and bloating), weekly assessment of adequate relief, Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (8 symptoms, adjectival scores rated 0–4 for severity), and quality of life (Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index [average of 10 dimensions each on a 5-point scale]). After the 4-week treatment, all patients underwent measurements of GE of solids, gastric volumes, and Ensure nutrient satiation test. Statistical analysis compared 2 treatments for all endpoints and the effects of CBD in association with FAAH rs324420 and CNR1 rs806378. RESULTS: CBD and placebo effects on physiological functions and patient response outcomes were not significantly different. There were borderline CBD treatment-by-genotype interactions: rs806378 CNR1 with Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale ( P = 0.06) and GE solids ( P = 0.12). DISCUSSION: Approved doses of CBD used off-label do not relieve FD with normal baseline GE of solids or alter gastric motor functions and satiation. CBD treatment-by-gene interactions suggest potential benefits for postprandial distress with CNR1 rs806378 T allele.

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies with functional endoluminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP®) measure physiologic characteristics of the pylorus. EndoFLIP® has the potential to select optimal candidates for gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G‐POEM). Normative values of the pylorus using EndoFLIP® have not been established.MethodsTwenty‐four healthy volunteers (20–56 years old; 15 females) underwent unsedated, transoral EndoFLIP® measurements of the pylorus after 8 h of fasting. Measurements of diameter (DM), balloon pressure, and distensibility index (DI) of the pylorus were obtained twice over 5 min at 40, 50, and 60 ml balloon distensions.Key ResultsPyloric DM at 40, 50, and 60 ml balloon distensions were 13.0 ± 2.5, 14.3 ± 1.8, and 17.2 ± 2.0 mm, respectively. DM with 60 ml distension was notably higher than with 40 and 50 ml distensions. Pyloric DI at 40, 50, and 60 ml distensions were 10.9 ± 4.8, 11.3 ± 5.8, and 11.1 ± 4.3 mm2/mm Hg, respectively (p = 0.86). Linear regression and Bland–Altman plots showed similar distribution of the DM and DI during the second minute compared with the full 5‐min measurements at 50 ml distension, as well as between two sequential measurements using 50 ml distension. With 50 ml balloon distension, intraindividual coefficients of variation (COVintra) for DM and DI were 13.8% and 29.6%, respectively, and interindividual COV (COVinter) were 12.6% and 51.3%, respectively. Similar reproducibility was obtained with 40 ml balloon distension.Conclusions and InferencesUnsedated EndoFLIP® can be used to characterize human fasting pyloric diameter and distensibility, with best performance observed with 40 ml and 50 ml distensions and data collection during the second minute. Normative values reported serve as reference values for future studies.

SummaryBackgroundMost patients experience good functional outcomes following ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis.AimWe aimed to determine if asymptomatic patients with an IPAA had findings consistent with normal defecation on standard objective anorectal tests.MethodsPatients 18–65 years old with IPAA and self‐reported healthy pouch function were recruited. Patients with chronic pouchitis, Crohn’s disease, anastomotic stricture, or indication for IPAA other than ulcerative or indeterminate colitis were excluded. Patients underwent an interview with an abbreviated Rome Questionnaire followed by high‐resolution ano‐pouch manometry, balloon expulsion test, pouch barostat, and magnetic resonance (MR) defecography.ResultsTwenty patients completed all testing. Six patients were excluded from the final analysis due to symptoms suggestive of pouch evacuation disorder on the abbreviated Rome Questionnaire (n = 2), structural abnormality on MR imaging (n = 3), or both (n = 1). Of the remaining 14 patients, mean anal resting pressure during high‐resolution manometry was 72 ± 16 mmHg, mean anal squeeze pressure was 247 ± 69 mmHg, and mean pouch‐anal gradient during the simulated evacuation was −27 ± 37 mmHg. The meantime to balloon expulsion was 54 seconds. During dynamic MR defecography, the mean descent of ano‐pouch junction was 2.6 cm, and mean pouch evacuation was 44.5% and 74.2% pre‐ and posttoilet phase, respectively.ConclusionsA substantial proportion of patients with IPAA and self‐reported healthy pouch function have anatomic and/or functional abnormalities of the pouch. In asymptomatic IPAA patients with an anatomically normal pouch, we have proposed normal parameters for high‐resolution ano‐pouch manometry, time to balloon expulsion, pouch barostat, and MR defecography.

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Grover et al and Elwing & Sayuk papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16591 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16603

SummaryBackgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients often experience meal‐associated symptoms. However, the underlying mechanisms are unclear.AimTo determine small intestinal mechanisms of lipid‐induced symptoms and rectal hypersensitivity in IBSMethodsWe recruited 26 IBS patients (12 IBS‐C, 14 IBS‐D) and 15 healthy volunteers (HV). In vivo permeability was assessed using saccharide excretion assay. Rectal sensitivity was assessed using a barostat before and after small bowel lipid infusion; symptoms were assessed throughout. Next, an extended upper endoscopy with probe‐based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) was performed with changes induced by lipids. Duodenal and jejunal mucosal biopsies were obtained for transcriptomics.ResultsFollowing lipid infusion, a higher proportion of HV than IBS patients reported no pain, no nausea, no fullness and no urgency (P < 0.05 for all). In a model adjusted for sex and anxiety, IBS‐C and IBS‐D patients had lower thresholds for first rectal sensation (P = 0.0007) and pain (P = 0.004) than HV. In vivo small intestinal permeability and mean pCLE scores were similar between IBS patients and HV. Post‐lipid, pCLE scores were higher than pre‐lipid but were not different between groups. Baseline duodenal transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) 1 and 3 expression was increased in IBS‐D, and TRPV3 in IBS‐C. Duodenal TRPV1 expression correlated with abdominal pain (r = 0.51, FDR = 0.01), and inversely with first rectal sensation (r = −0.48, FDR = 0.01) and pain (r = −0.41, FDR = 0.02) thresholds.ConclusionLipid infusion elicits a greater symptom response in IBS patients than HV, which is associated with small intestinal expression of TRPV channels. TRPV‐mediated small intestinal chemosensitivity may mediate post‐meal symptoms in IBS.

ObjectiveLittle is known about the predictors of response to obesity interventions.MethodsIn 450 participants with obesity, body composition, resting energy expenditure, satiety, satiation, eating behavior, affect, and physical activity were measured by validated studies and questionnaires. These variables were used to classify obesity phenotypes. Subsequently, in a 12‐month, pragmatic, real‐world trial performed in a weight management center, 312 patients were randomly assigned to phenotype‐guided treatment or non‐phenotype‐guided treatment with antiobesity medications: phentermine, phentermine/topiramate, bupropion/naltrexone, lorcaserin, and liraglutide. The primary outcome was weight loss at 12 months.ResultsFour phenotypes of obesity were identified in 383 of 450 participants (85%): hungry brain (abnormal satiation), emotional hunger (hedonic eating), hungry gut (abnormal satiety), and slow burn (decreased metabolic rate). In 15% of participants, no phenotype was identified. Two or more phenotypes were identified in 27% of patients. In the pragmatic clinical trial, the phenotype‐guided approach was associated with 1.75‐fold greater weight loss after 12 months with mean weight loss of 15.9% compared with 9.0% in the non‐phenotype‐guided group (difference −6.9% [95% CI −9.4% to −4.5%], P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients who lost >10% at 12 months was 79% in the phenotype‐guided group compared with 34% with non‐phenotype‐guided treatment group.ConclusionsBiological and behavioral phenotypes elucidate human obesity heterogeneity and can be targeted pharmacologically to enhance weight loss.

In vivo human studies evaluated concurrently the volume of the stomach during fasting and after a solid and liquid meal using a new SPECT-based method. Although fasting gastric volumes did not impact the rates of gastric emptying, both postprandial and accommodation volumes of the whole and proximal stomach were significantly correlated with gastric emptying. Larger stomach volumes were associated with slower gastric emptying.

SummaryBackgroundIn primary bile acid diarrhoea, feedback by farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and fibroblast growth hormone 19 (FGF19) on hepatic bile acid production is impaired.AimsTo evaluate the safety, mechanisms and efficacy of negative feedback by FXR activation with tropifexor, a non‐bile acid FXR agonist, in patients with primary bile acid diarrhoea.MethodsIn this double‐blind, multicentre, randomised, cross‐over study, patients received tropifexor 60 µg or placebo once daily for 14 days in each of two treatment periods. Primary objectives included tropifexor safety and tolerability, and on stool frequency and form. Other assessments included pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures, biochemical markers and gastrointestinal transit.ResultsTwenty patients (tropifexor 60 µg/placebo [N = 10]; placebo/tropifexor 60 µg [N = 10]) were enrolled. Adverse event rates were lower with tropifexor vs placebo (52.9% vs 73.7%). No patient had pruritus during tropifexor intake. There were no significant differences in stool frequency, stool form or loperamide use between treatments. Tropifexor increased FGF19 and decreased 7α‐hydroxy‐4‐cholesten‐3‐one (C4) levels for up to 8 h. Plasma tropifexor concentrations peaked at 5 hours post‐dose on days 1 and 12. At day 12, tropifexor caused reduction in peak total bile acid concentration (33%, P = 0.032) and exposure (36%, P = 0.005). Moreover, tropifexor showed a significant increase in ascending colon half‐emptying time (P = 0.036).ConclusionsTropifexor 60 µg once daily had acceptable safety and tolerability. Changes in FGF19 and C4 showed effective target engagement; however, higher doses may be required to observe stool frequency changes. Slowing of ascending colon emptying suggests therapeutic potential of tropifexor in patients with primary bile acid diarrhoea.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02713243.

Buffet meal intake was inversely related to the ability to resist the urge to overeat. Factors associated with ingestive behavior significantly correlated with satiety and gastric accommodation. Gastric capacity during fasting is associated with calorie intake to the point of comfortable fullness; factors associated with ingestive behavior are associated with satiety and gastric accommodation.