Farley, David R.

AbstractBackgroundNeuroblastomas and ganglioneuroblastomas (NB/GNB) are malignant tumors that rarely occur in adults. Their disease progression and appropriate treatment are unclear.MethodsAll adults (age ≥18 years) were evaluated for histologically confirmed NB/GNB within our institution. Data were collected via chart review and direct patient contact.ResultsFrom 1980 to 2009, a total of 15 adult patients with NB/GNB were evaluated: six men (mean age 23 years, range 19–33 years) and nine women (mean 34 years, range 20–66 years). Their overall average age at diagnosis was 30 years. Tumor‐related symptoms occurred in ten patients: Pain (abdominal 3, back 2, pelvic 1, groin 1) was more common than a mass (abdominal 2) or dysmenorrhea (1). Five patients had tumors found incidentally by computed tomography (4) or chest radiography (1). Primary tumor origins were in the pelvis (4), mediastinum (3), abdomen (2), adrenal gland (2), retroperitoneum (2), and mixed locations (2). Altogether, 12 patients underwent surgical resection (biopsy in 3; resections of R0 in 5, R1 in 3, R2 in 4). Ten underwent chemotherapy. Histology showed four GNBs and 11 NBs. Five patients with stage I disease survived a mean of 21 years (range 10–40 years). Two are alive today. Three stage III patients died at 2, 6, and 9 years after diagnosis (mean 5.7 years). Six of seven patients (one was lost to follow‐up) with initial stage IV neuroblastoma died within 5 years (mean 2.7 years). NB and GNB patients had similar survivals.ConclusionsAdult‐onset NB/GNB is rare. Symptoms appear to occur later when incurable stage IV disease is detected. Complete surgical resection can lead to long‐term, disease‐free survival in stage I patients.

AbstractBackgroundIntense postoperative monitoring has resulted in increasing detection of patients with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Our goals included quantifying successful reoperation, and analyzing surgical complications and reasons for relapse.MethodsFrom 1999 to 2008, a total of 410 patients underwent reoperation for PTC relapse. We analyzed post‐reoperative disease outcomes, reasons for relapse, and complications.ResultsBilateral reoperative thyroidectomy was performed in 13 (3 %) patients; lobectomy, 34 (8 %); central neck (VI) soft tissue local recurrence excision, 47 (11.5 %); bilateral VI node dissection, 107 (26 %); unilateral VI dissection, 112 (27 %); levels II–V dissection, 93 (23 %); levels III–V, 86 (21 %); lateral single‐ or two‐compartment dissection, 51 (12 %); and node picking, 20 (5 %) of level VI and 53 (13 %) lateral neck. Complications occurred in 6 %; including hypoparathyroidism, 3 %; unintentional recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis, 3 %; phrenic nerve injury, 0.5 %; spinal accessory nerve injury, 0.5 %; and chyle leak in 1.6 %. Of 380 (93 %) patients with follow‐up (mean 5.2 years); 274 (72 %) patients are alive with no structural evidence of disease, 38 % developed disease relapse (mean 2.1 years), 42 (11 %) died from PTC, and 55 (14 %) are alive with disease. The reason for relapse was a false negative pre‐reoperative ultrasound (US) in 18 (5 %), nodal recurrence in the operative field in 37 (10 %), a combination of these two reasons in 10 (3 %), and disease virulence (local or systemic recurrence) in 81 (21 %).ConclusionsAlthough 72 % of patients were rendered structurally disease free after reoperation, nearly 40 % suffered additional relapse. Improved surgical technique or preoperative localization might positively affect 15–20 %; at least 20 % reflect the biologic aggressiveness of the disease.

AbstractBackgroundIndications and survival benefit for adrenalectomy (ADX) in the setting of metastasis are not clearly defined. We aimed to determine which patients with primary malignancies may benefit from ADX performed for metastasis. Mayo Clinic institutional outcomes in patients with metastatic disease to the adrenal(s) treated by adrenalectomy were compared to stage‐matched historical controls from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsA retrospective review (1992–2010) was conducted to identify patients treated with ADX for metastatic cancer at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Associations of clinical, surgical, and pathologic features with overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional regression models. OS for those treated with ADX was compared with that for SEER database stage‐matched patients who underwent primary resection without resection of distant disease using log‐rank tests.ResultsA total of 166 patients underwent ADX for metastatic primaries involving the kidney 60, lung 24, sarcoma 19, colon 15, pancreas 13, and other‐35. Patients with sarcoma and kidney, lung, and pancreatic tumors who underwent ADX had better OS at 1, 2, and 3 years than did the SEER‐matched controls. Respectively, the rates were for sarcoma (100, 93, 86% vs. 57, 36, 30%), kidney (86, 80, 72% vs. 55, 37, 27%), lung (91, 69, 52% vs. 52, 34, 25%), and pancreas (79, 56, 45% vs. 33, 20, 12%). Univariate analysis identified primary diagnosis <2 years before ADX, other distant site, pancreatic primary, palliative operation, and persistent disease as risk factors for death.ConclusionsAn aggressive surgical approach results in improved OS in patients with metastatic disease arising from soft tissues, kidney, lung, and pancreas. Other tumors may benefit, but larger study cohorts are needed for a meaningful comparison.

Purpose Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates in women with unilateral breast cancer are increasing despite controversy regarding survival advantage. Current scrutiny of the medical costs led us to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CPM versus routine surveillance as an alternative contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk management strategy. Methods Using a Markov model, we simulated patients with breast cancer from mastectomy to death. Model parameters were gathered from published literature or national databases. Base-case analysis focused on patients with average-risk breast cancer, 45 years of age at treatment. Outcomes were valued in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Patients' age, risk level of breast cancer, and quality of life (QOL) were varied to assess their impact on results. Results Mean costs of treatment for women age 45 years are comparable: $36,594 for the CPM and $35,182 for surveillance. CPM provides 21.22 mean QALYs compared with 20.93 for surveillance, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $4,869/QALY gained for CPM. To prevent one CBC, six CPMs would be needed. CPM is no longer cost-effective for patients older than 70 years (ICER $62,750/QALY). For BRCA-positive patients, CPM is clearly cost-effective, providing more QALYs while being less costly. In non-BRCA patients, cost-effectiveness of CPM is highly dependent on assumptions regarding QOL for CPM versus surveillance strategy. Conclusion CPM is cost-effective compared with surveillance for patients with breast cancer who are younger than 70 years. Results are sensitive to BRCA-positive status and assumptions of QOL differences between CPM and surveillance patients. This highlights the importance of tailoring treatment for individual patients.

AbstractBackgroundLaparoscopic insulinoma resection (LIR) for sporadic disease is increasingly supported as a feasible and safe operation in small series of patients. To determine whether LIR is an acceptable alternative to the open operation, it is necessary to compare LIR to historical controls. The purpose of this study was to identify the skills and technology needed for LIR and establish outcome standards.MethodsA database of patients with benign sporadic insulinoma who underwent an open procedure at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed for demographics, imaging, operative/pathology reports, and outcomes. Outcomes were compared to a world‐wide meta‐analysis of patients who had undergone LIR reported in the English literature between 1996 and 2009.ResultsTwo hundred fifteen patients underwent a primary open operation for benign sporadic insulinoma. Solitary tumors were found in 97%. Meta‐analysis identified 232 patients who underwent LIR. The open and LIR groups underwent comparable operations that included enucleations (64 vs. 68%) and distal pancreatectomies (28 vs. 35%) (p = 0.06). The mean estimated blood loss, operating time, and length of stay were comparable between the open and LIR groups (p = NS). Pancreatic fistula occurred more often in the LIR group (24 vs. 11%, p < 0.05). A curative operation was performed in 98% of control patients and in 99% of the LIR group (p = NS).ConclusionsMultiple insulinomas are rare and a focused resection guided by imaging may be performed. LIR is associated with an increased incidence of pancreatic fistula. Success of LIR will depend on accurate multimodality preoperative imaging, skilled use of lap‐US to replace palpation for localization, and safe methods to dissect the tumor adjacent to the pancreatic duct.