Thompson, Geoffrey B.

AbstractBackgroundIntense postoperative monitoring has resulted in increasing detection of patients with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Our goals included quantifying successful reoperation, and analyzing surgical complications and reasons for relapse.MethodsFrom 1999 to 2008, a total of 410 patients underwent reoperation for PTC relapse. We analyzed post‐reoperative disease outcomes, reasons for relapse, and complications.ResultsBilateral reoperative thyroidectomy was performed in 13 (3 %) patients; lobectomy, 34 (8 %); central neck (VI) soft tissue local recurrence excision, 47 (11.5 %); bilateral VI node dissection, 107 (26 %); unilateral VI dissection, 112 (27 %); levels II–V dissection, 93 (23 %); levels III–V, 86 (21 %); lateral single‐ or two‐compartment dissection, 51 (12 %); and node picking, 20 (5 %) of level VI and 53 (13 %) lateral neck. Complications occurred in 6 %; including hypoparathyroidism, 3 %; unintentional recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis, 3 %; phrenic nerve injury, 0.5 %; spinal accessory nerve injury, 0.5 %; and chyle leak in 1.6 %. Of 380 (93 %) patients with follow‐up (mean 5.2 years); 274 (72 %) patients are alive with no structural evidence of disease, 38 % developed disease relapse (mean 2.1 years), 42 (11 %) died from PTC, and 55 (14 %) are alive with disease. The reason for relapse was a false negative pre‐reoperative ultrasound (US) in 18 (5 %), nodal recurrence in the operative field in 37 (10 %), a combination of these two reasons in 10 (3 %), and disease virulence (local or systemic recurrence) in 81 (21 %).ConclusionsAlthough 72 % of patients were rendered structurally disease free after reoperation, nearly 40 % suffered additional relapse. Improved surgical technique or preoperative localization might positively affect 15–20 %; at least 20 % reflect the biologic aggressiveness of the disease.

Background: Prophylactic central neck dissection (CND) has been proposed in the treatment of patients affected by papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with clinically negative neck lymph nodes. The procedure allows pathologic staging of lymph nodes of the central compartment and treatment of the micrometastases. Nevertheless, the morbidity that its routine use adds to the total thyroidectomy must be taken into account. The aim of this study was to characterize the morbidity that CND adds to the total thyroidectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1087 patients with PTC and clinically negative neck lymph nodes. Patients were divided into three study groups: Group A, total thyroidectomy; Group B, total thyroidectomy and ipsilateral CND; Group C, total thyroidectomy and bilateral CND. Primary endpoints of the study were evaluated by comparing the rates of transient and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury and hypoparathyroidism in the three study groups. Results: Analysis of data showed no significant differences in the rate of transient (Group A: 3.6%, Group B: 3.9%, and Group C: 5.5%; p =0.404) and permanent (Group A: 1%, Group B: 0.5%, and Group C: 2.3%; p =0.099) RLN injury between the three study groups. Both ipsilateral CND and bilateral CND were associated with a higher rate of transient hypoparathyroidism (Group: A 27.7%, Group B: 36.1%, and Group C: 51.9%; p =0.014; odds ratio [OR]: 1.477; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.091–2.001; p <0.001; OR: 2.827; 95% CI: 2.065–3.870, respectively). Bilateral CND had a higher rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism (Group A: 6.3%, Group B: 7%, and Group C: 16.2%; p <0.001; OR: 2.860; 95% CI: 1.725–4.743). Conclusions: The increased rates of transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism in our series suggest a critical review of indications for the routine use of prophylactic CND for PTC. Prophylactic CND ipsilateral to the tumor associated with total thyroidectomy may represent an effective strategy for reducing the rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism. Concomitant completion contralateral paratracheal lymph node neck dissection should be performed in presence of lymph node metastasis on intraoperative frozen-section pathology. This approach limits the use of bilateral CND to patients with intraoperative pathological findings of lymph node metastases.

The development of subspecialty tumor groups for uncommon malignancies represents an effective approach to building experience, increasing patient volumes and referrals, and fostering development of increased therapeutic options and clinical trials for patients afflicted with otherwise historically neglected cancers.

AbstractBackgroundIndications and survival benefit for adrenalectomy (ADX) in the setting of metastasis are not clearly defined. We aimed to determine which patients with primary malignancies may benefit from ADX performed for metastasis. Mayo Clinic institutional outcomes in patients with metastatic disease to the adrenal(s) treated by adrenalectomy were compared to stage‐matched historical controls from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsA retrospective review (1992–2010) was conducted to identify patients treated with ADX for metastatic cancer at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Associations of clinical, surgical, and pathologic features with overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional regression models. OS for those treated with ADX was compared with that for SEER database stage‐matched patients who underwent primary resection without resection of distant disease using log‐rank tests.ResultsA total of 166 patients underwent ADX for metastatic primaries involving the kidney 60, lung 24, sarcoma 19, colon 15, pancreas 13, and other‐35. Patients with sarcoma and kidney, lung, and pancreatic tumors who underwent ADX had better OS at 1, 2, and 3 years than did the SEER‐matched controls. Respectively, the rates were for sarcoma (100, 93, 86% vs. 57, 36, 30%), kidney (86, 80, 72% vs. 55, 37, 27%), lung (91, 69, 52% vs. 52, 34, 25%), and pancreas (79, 56, 45% vs. 33, 20, 12%). Univariate analysis identified primary diagnosis <2 years before ADX, other distant site, pancreatic primary, palliative operation, and persistent disease as risk factors for death.ConclusionsAn aggressive surgical approach results in improved OS in patients with metastatic disease arising from soft tissues, kidney, lung, and pancreas. Other tumors may benefit, but larger study cohorts are needed for a meaningful comparison.

AbstractBackgroundMany serologic and radiographic modalities are used for monitoring multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) patients for pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). We compared serum markers and imaging studies obtained preoperatively with the gross pathology and immunohistochemical findings and correlated preoperative testing with postoperative outcome.MethodsFrom 2000 to 2008, 52 MEN 1 patients [32 (62%) female; median age = 43 years, range 19–74 years] underwent 56 pancreatic operations [49 (88%) distal pancreatectomies] for suspected PNETs. Preoperative serum markers [human pancreatic polypeptide (HPP), gastrin, and glucagon] and imaging [CT, 111In pentetreotide scintigraphy, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)] were compared to the pathologic findings. Postoperative serum markers and survival were followed.ResultsHuman pancreatic polypeptide had the highest agreement between an elevated serum level and positive tumor immunostaining (83% vs. 50% agreement for gastrin vs. 67% agreement for glucagon). Preoperative CT had 81% sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 97% for PNETs. 111In pentetreotide scintigraphy had 84% sensitivity and PPV of 96%. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) had 100% sensitivity and PPV, with close correlation (rs = 0.93) between the largest lesion seen on EUS and pathology. Median follow‐up was 4.3 years (range = 0.1–10.9 years). Overall survival was 89% at 5‐year follow‐up.ConclusionsOur study substantiates EUS as providing the highest preoperative sensitivity and PPV in assessing the presence of PNETs in MEN 1 patients. CT and octreotide scintigraphy can yield both false‐positive and false‐negative results. HPP, gastrin, and glucagon were the most commonly measured tumor markers in our series but did not always correlate with immunostaining. With an aggressive surgical approach, satisfactory rates of biochemical improvement and long‐term survival were observed.

AbstractBackgroundLaparoscopic insulinoma resection (LIR) for sporadic disease is increasingly supported as a feasible and safe operation in small series of patients. To determine whether LIR is an acceptable alternative to the open operation, it is necessary to compare LIR to historical controls. The purpose of this study was to identify the skills and technology needed for LIR and establish outcome standards.MethodsA database of patients with benign sporadic insulinoma who underwent an open procedure at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed for demographics, imaging, operative/pathology reports, and outcomes. Outcomes were compared to a world‐wide meta‐analysis of patients who had undergone LIR reported in the English literature between 1996 and 2009.ResultsTwo hundred fifteen patients underwent a primary open operation for benign sporadic insulinoma. Solitary tumors were found in 97%. Meta‐analysis identified 232 patients who underwent LIR. The open and LIR groups underwent comparable operations that included enucleations (64 vs. 68%) and distal pancreatectomies (28 vs. 35%) (p = 0.06). The mean estimated blood loss, operating time, and length of stay were comparable between the open and LIR groups (p = NS). Pancreatic fistula occurred more often in the LIR group (24 vs. 11%, p < 0.05). A curative operation was performed in 98% of control patients and in 99% of the LIR group (p = NS).ConclusionsMultiple insulinomas are rare and a focused resection guided by imaging may be performed. LIR is associated with an increased incidence of pancreatic fistula. Success of LIR will depend on accurate multimodality preoperative imaging, skilled use of lap‐US to replace palpation for localization, and safe methods to dissect the tumor adjacent to the pancreatic duct.