Barrett, Kevin M.

Background: American Heart Association/American Stroke Association recommends treatment of eligible acute ischemic stroke patients with intravenous rtPA <60 minutes from emergency department arrival. Purpose: A quality improvement project was designed to reduce the door to needle times for intravenous rtPA administration at Mayo Clinic Florida. We hypothesized that workflow changes in emergency department evaluation of suspected stroke patients would decrease door to needle times. The goal was to treat >75% of patients eligible for IV t-PA within 60 minutes of ED arrival. Methods: We utilized LEAN methods to develop a project charter, identify stakeholders, and visually map the emergency department clinical workflow. Prior to project initiation, suspected stroke patients were taken upon arrival to an exam room for clinical evaluation followed by transport to the CT scanner and return to the exam room for decision-making and rtPA administration. The clinical workflow was changed to obtain patient weight immediately upon arrival, abbreviated patient assessment and lab draws outside of the CT scanner in a holding bay and performing CT scanning prior to transport to an examination room for decision making and rtPA administration. Results: In a 12 month period preceding project initiation, 29 patients were treated with rtPA, 55 % were treated <60 minutes of emergency department arrival. In the 11 month period following implementation of CT scanning prior to neurological evaluation, 57 patients were treated with rtPA, 80 % were treated in <60 minutes of emergency department arrival. The mean door to needle time was reduced from 66 minutes to 46 minutes following the clinical workflow change. No patients experienced clinical deterioration at the time of CT scanning. Conclusions: Non-contrast head CT scan be safely performed prior to comprehensive neurological evaluation and reduces door-to-needle times for intravenous rtPA administration in eligible stroke patients. Validated process improvement paradigms such as LEAN have the potential to reduce door to needle times and improve patient outcomes.

Purpose: The safety of revascularization for asymptomatic carotid stenosis, and the efficacy of medical therapy for stroke prevention have improved. Therefore, results of prior randomized trials may not apply to current treatment decisions. The NINDS-funded CREST-2 will compare carotid endarterectomy and intensive medical therapy (IMT) versus IMT alone (n=1240), and carotid stenting and IMT versus IMT alone (n=1240) in asymptomatic patients with≥70% stenosis. Materials & Methods: CREST-2 consists of two parallel randomized clinical trials to be conducted at a target of ≈120 centers, including within NINDS StrokeNet. The composite primary outcome is stroke or death during the peri-procedural period or ipsilateral ischemic stroke thereafter up to 4 years. Blinded assessment of cognition will be done periodically. Centrally directed IMT includes tight control of blood pressure (systolic target <140 mm Hg) and cholesterol (LDL target <70 mg/dl) as well as lifestyle coaching. Results: As of June 12, 2015, 94 centers have been approved by the Site Selection Committee. Credentialing is ongoing, with 198 approved surgeons and 64 approved interventionists; 124 additional conditionally approved interventionists will be able to submit additional cases for review under the CREST-2 Registry. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid will offer CAS reimbursement for Registry enrollees. As of June 12, 2015, there are 39 actively enrolling centers, and 37 patients have been randomized. Conclusion: CREST-2 is designed to identify the best approach for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The first patient was randomized in December, 2014. An update will be provided regarding the numbers of patients randomized, centers certified, as well as surgeons and interventionists fully approved. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02089217

Introduction: Cilostazol has promise as an alternative to aspirin for secondary stroke prevention given its vasodilatory and anti-inflammatory properties in addition to platelet aggregation inhibition. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the comparative effectiveness and safety of cilostazol compared to aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with previous stroke or TIA. Hypothesis: Cilostazol is more effective than aspirin in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke with lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and bleeding. Methods: We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 2019. Randomized clinical trials that compared cilostazol vs aspirin and reported the endpoints of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage and bleeding were included. A random-effects estimate was computed based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. The pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were compared between cilostazol and aspirin and displayed as forest plots (Figure). Results: The search identified 5 randomized clinical trials comparing cilostazol vs aspirin for secondary stroke prevention that enrolled 7,240 patients from primarily Asian countries (3,615 received cilostazol and 3,625 received aspirin). The pooled results from the random-effects model showed that cilostazol was associated with significantly lower risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.70; 95%CI, 0.54-0.89), intracranial hemorrhage (HR 0.41; 95%CI, 0.25-0.65) and bleeding (HR 0.71; 95%CI, 0.55-0.91). See forest plots. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests cilostazol is more effective than aspirin in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke with lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and bleeding. Confirmatory randomized trials of cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention to be performed in more generalizable populations are needed.

Introduction: Left atrial enlargement (LAE) is associated with atrial fibrillation, a frequent cause of large vessel occlusion (LVO) leading to ischemic stroke. Leptomeningeal collaterals protect tissue from ischemia, but the association between collaterals and structural heart disease is not well described. We aim to investigate the association between LAE and cerebral collaterals during acute LVO when microvasculature, vasodilation, and chronotropic competence are critically important. Hypothesis: Left atrial enlargement is associated with poor collaterals. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients presenting with middle cerebral and internal carotid LVO who underwent thrombectomy from 2012 to 2017. Patients with CT angiogram of the head and echocardiogram were included. Poor collaterals were defined as ≤ 50% filling on CT angiogram. LAE was defined as left atrial volume index ≥ 35 mL/m 2 . Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between LAE and poor collaterals with adjustment for age and hypertension. Results: There were 128 eligible patients. The mean age was 68± 15 years, median NIHSS was 17, and 51 (39.8%) had LAE. Baseline characteristics are described in the table. Poor collaterals were observed in 50 (39%) patients. Patients with LAE were more likely to have poor collaterals compared to those with normal left atrial size (52.9% vs. 29.9%, p=0.009). After adjusting for age and hypertension, a trend towards association remained (OR 2.00, p=0.089). Conclusion: Our results indicate that patients with LVO and LAE were more likely to have poor collaterals. Further research is warranted to determine the cause of the association. One possibility is shared pathophysiology affecting both cardiac and cerebral vasculature such as microvascular disease or endothelial dysfunction. Alternatively, structural heart disease causing chronotropic incompetence may lead to poor collateral filling.

Background: Presence of atherosclerotic disease in more than one vascular bed (polyvascular disease) is associated with an increased risk of long-term vascular events. In the setting of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the predictors of disease in other vascular beds is not well delineated. Objective: To identify the frequency and predictors of disease in other vascular beds the CREST 2 randomized trial population with hemodynamically significant stenosis. Methods: Recorded baseline characteristics among CREST 2 participants included: demographics, past medical history, lifestyle factors, and laboratory studies. Each variable was tested against three potential definitions of disease in other beds (cardiac, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or disease in cardiac + PAD). Statistical analysis was done with Chi square and t tests as appropriate. Results: Data from 1447 patients were available for analysis. In these subjects with carotid disease, 51% also had cardiac disease, 24% also had PAD, and 16% had disease in in both cardiac and PAD. There was no relationship between age or race and presence of disease in other beds. Those with cardiac disease were more likely to be male. Diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and former history of smoking were all more common in those with either cardiac and PAD (TABLE). Elevated triglyceride and low HDL levels were also associated with all three definitions of disease in other beds. Those with either PAD or cardiac + PAD were more likely to be current smokers. Conclusions: Among CREST 2 participants, several medical conditions and lifestyle factors were associated with an increased frequency of disease in other vascular beds. Smoking, in particular, appears to be more common in those with PAD. Future analyses will address whether those with disease in other beds have higher rates of stroke or death.

Baseline Differences in Risk Factor Control and Medication Use Between 2 Trials Employing Intensive Medical Management (SAMMPRIS & CREST2) Background: The CREST2 trial Intensive Medical Management (IMM) protocol was adapted from the SAMMPRIS trial. However, since the 2011 publication of initial results of SAMMPRIS, there has been a greater appreciation for the importance of risk factor control in patients at risk of stroke associated with atherosclerosis. Therefore, we sought to determine differences in baseline risk factor control and medication use between SAMMPRIS and CREST2. Methods: Baseline risk factor and medication use data from 451 patients enrolled in SAMMPRIS (2008-2011) with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis and 1473 patients enrolled in CREST2 (2014-2019) with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis were compared using the Chi-square test and t-test. Results: The Table shows baseline risk factor values and medications. SAMMPRIS patients were younger but had significantly worse risk factor control than CREST2 patients for all measures. There was no significant difference in statin use at baseline, but the mean SAMMPRIS subjects’ LDL was 16.1 mg/dL higher than in CREST2. CREST2 patients had higher rates of use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and thiazides, but lower rates of use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Conclusions: Despite being older, CREST2 patients have significantly better baseline risk factor profiles than SAMMPRIS patients. This could be due to greater appreciation of the importance of risk factor control and healthy lifestyle habits for stroke prevention or more aggressive treatment targets in guideline recommendations. Although risk factor control appears to be improving since SAMMPRIS, many CREST2 patients are still not meeting recommended risk factor goals at baseline and may benefit from IMM protocols.

Background: The risk for intracranial (IA) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is partially heritable, with evidence mounting in favor of shared genetic risk for both. Methods: The Brain and Aortic Aneurysm Study (BAAS, NCT#17341) at University of Virginia seeks to determine the coprevalence of IA and AAA recruiting patients presenting with an aneurysm at one site and screening for aneurysm at the other. Participants undergo genetic screening and an interview where clinical, demographic, and radiographic data are collected. Recruitment and screening are ongoing, so preliminary demographic data regarding between group differences (IA vs. AAA) are presented. All clinical and demographic data were collected and recorded in REDCap and exported to Excel. We compared a total of 256 participants (IA=164, AAA=92) for demographic factors: age, sex, smoking and past medical history. Results: The AAA cohort was older (70.98 vs. 58.51, p<.001) and more male (79.34% vs. 23.78% p<.001). The AAA cohort had a higher proportion with diabetes mellitus (28.26% vs. 15.24%, p=.012), with hyperlipidemia (67.39% vs. 44.51%, p<.001) and higher smoking pack years (44.07 vs. 17.85, p<.001). The two groups did not differ in proportion with hypertension, coronary artery disease, or peripheral vascular disease (all p>.05). Conclusions: These data suggest that there may be subtle differences in the clinical profile of patients presenting with IA and AAA, especially when considering known aneurysmal risk factors like hypertension, diabetes, and smoking history. Further analyses will consider whether these factors modulate the coprevalence of the two types of aneurysms.

Stroke is a leading cause of the adult disability epidemic in the United States, with a major contribution from poststroke cognitive impairment and dementia (PSCID), the rates of which are disproportionally high among the health disparity populations. Despite the PSCID’s overwhelming impact on public health, a knowledge gap exists with regard to the complex interaction between the acute stroke event and highly prevalent preexisting brain pathology related to cerebrovascular and Alzheimer disease or related dementia. Understanding the factors that modulate PSCID risk in relation to index stroke event is critically important for developing personalized prognostication of PSCID, targeted interventions to prevent it, and for informing future clinical trial design. The DISCOVERY study (Determinants of Incident Stroke Cognitive Outcomes and Vascular Effects on Recovery), a collaborative network of thirty clinical performance clinical sites with access to acute stroke populations and the expertise and capacity for systematic assessment of PSCID will address this critical challenge. DISCOVERY is a prospective, multicenter, observational, nested-cohort study of 8000 nondemented ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients enrolled at the time of index stroke and followed for a minimum of 2 years, with serial cognitive evaluations and assessments of functional outcome, with subsets undergoing research magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography and comprehensive genetic/genomic and fluid biomarker testing. The overall scientific objective of this study is to elucidate mechanisms of brain resilience and susceptibility to PSCID in diverse US populations based on complex interplay between life-course exposure to multiple vascular risk factors, preexisting burden of microvascular and neurodegenerative pathology, the effect of strategic acute stroke lesions, and the mediating effect of genomic and epigenomic variation.

Background: Data from the CDC show that approximately one-quarter of adults have elevated triglyceride (TG) levels. Recent trials have demonstrated that pharmacologic treatment of high TG levels, in patients already on statin therapy, reduces the rate of major vascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke (REDUCE-IT trial). We sought to assess how often patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (CS) have elevated TG levels and factors associated with high TG values. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial (CREST 2) were analyzed. Baseline lipid profiles were evaluated to determine high TG treatment eligibility as per the REDUCE-IT trial. We also evaluated baseline use of pharmacologic treatment for high TG levels. Demographic factors and baseline medical conditions were studied in relation to high (>150 mg/dl) TG values. Chi square and t tests were used to assess baseline factors and abnormal TG values. Results: As of August 10, 2020, 1655 of 1689 randomized patients (mean age 69.7 years, 61% men) had baseline lipid profiles suitable for analysis. Treatment eligibility according to REDUCE-IT (LDL 41-100 mg/dl, TG>150 mg/dl) was present in 21% (345) of subjects. In these patients, the median TG value was 205 (IQR 93) mg/dl. Fibrate medications were used at baseline in 4.5% of patients. Analysis of demographic and medical history factors and TG values greater than 150 mg/dl is found in the Table. There was significant positive correlation between baseline hemoglobin A1C and triglyceride values (p<0.0001) Conclusions: One in five patients in CREST 2 has TG values that potentially justify pharmacologic treatment. Elevated TG levels are most correlated with diabetes, hypertension, obesity, decreased physical activity, and heart disease. Clinicians should investigate treatment of elevated TG levels as a component of intensive medical therapy for stroke prevention.

AbstractThe study aims to review the sex differences with respect to transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke and death in the perioperative period and on long-term follow-up among asymptomatic patients treated with carotid stenting (CAS) in the vascular quality initiative (VQI). All cases reported to VQI of asymptomatic CAS (ACAS) patients were reviewed. The primary end point was risk of TIA/stroke and death in the in-hospital perioperative period and in the long-term follow-up. The secondary end point was to evaluate predictors of in-hospital perioperative TIA/stroke and mortality on long-term follow-up after CAS. There were 22,079 CAS procedures captured from January 2005 to April 2019. There were 5,785 (62.7%) patients in the ACAS group. The rate of in-hospital TIA/stroke was higher in female patients (2.7 vs. 1.87%, p = 0.005) and the rate of death was not significant (0.03 vs. 0.07%, p = 0.66). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, prior/current smoking history (odds ratio = 0.58 [95% confidence interval or CI = 0.39–0.87]; p = 0.008) is a predictor of in-hospital TIA/stroke in females. The long-term all-cause mortality is significantly higher in male patients (26.9 vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox-regression analysis, prior/current smoking history (hazard ratio or HR = 1.17 [95% CI = 1.01–1.34]; p = 0.03), coronary artery disease or CAD (HR = 1.15 [95% CI = 1.03–1.28]; p = 0.009), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or COPD (HR = 1.73 [95% CI = 1.55–1.93]; p < 0.001), threat to life American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (HR = 2.3 [95% CI = 1.43–3.70]; p = 0.0006), moribund ASA class (HR = 5.66 [95% CI = 2.24–14.29]; p = 0.0003), and low hemoglobin levels (HR = 0.84 [95% CI = 0.82–0.86]; p < 0.001) are the predictors of long-term mortality. In asymptomatic carotid disease patients, women had higher rates of in-hospital perioperative TIA/stroke and a predictor of TIA/stroke is a prior/current history of smoking. Meanwhile, long-term all-cause mortality is higher for male patients compared with their female counterparts. Predictors of long-term mortality are prior/current smoking history, CAD, COPD, higher ASA classification of physical status, and low hemoglobin level. These data should be considered prior to offering CAS to asymptomatic female and male patients and careful risks versus benefits discussion should be offered to each individual patient.