Agarwal, Siddharth

Introduction: There is a lack of data on the impact of sex on the outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that outcomes of patients with HF undergoing AF ablation differ between males and females and tested this hypothesis using data from a nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients were then divided into two cohorts based on their sex. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: A total of 21,439 patients with HF underwent AF ablation between 2016-2019, of which 8,103 had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [64.8% were females], and 13,336 had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) [38.4% were females]. Crude outcomes are shown in Figure 1. After multivariate adjustment, among patients with HFrEF, females had a longer length of stay (adjusted mean difference (aMD): 0.55 (0.16-0.93) days longer, p<0.01) along with lower odds of routine home discharge (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.55-0.70; p<0.01). Females had similar odds of in-hospital mortality, procedural complications, and 30-day/ 180-day all-cause, heart failure, and arrhythmia-related readmissions as compared to males. Among patients with HFpEF, females had higher odds of 30-day (aOR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.24-2.93; p<0.01) and 180-day heart failure readmissions (aOR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.04-2.28; p=0.03) along with lower odds of routine home discharge (aOR:0.67; 95% CI: 0.57-0.78; p<0.01), as compared to males. Conclusion: In conclusion, our results show that females with HFrEF undergoing AF ablation have similar odds of in-hospital/30-day/180-day outcomes whereas females with HFpEF have higher odds of 30-day/180-day HF readmissions, as compared to males.

Introduction: There is a lack of data on procedural safety and outcomes in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (RMVD) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of RMVD may affect the outcomes of patients undergoing AF ablation and tested this hypothesis using data from a large, nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients with RMVD were then identified by using ICD-10 CM codes. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: Our cohort included 50,728 weighted AF ablation procedures, of which 3,500 (6.9%) patients had RMVD. Patients with RMVD were older at the time of catheter ablation, with a significantly higher percentage of females, less likely to have paroxysmal AF, and had a higher burden of comorbidities including congestive heart failure, renal failure, and hypertension. On multivariable analysis, the presence of RMVD was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.47; p<0.01) with no difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality or other periprocedural outcomes. Also, RMVD was associated with longer length of stay (adjusted mean difference: +1.06; 95% CI: +0.67 - +1.45; p<0.01) days and lower odds of routine home discharge (aOR:0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.87; p<0.01). There was no difference in the odds of 30-day or 180-day all-cause, AF-related, or atrial flutter-related readmissions in patients with RMVD vs. no RMVD (Figure 1). Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with RMVD undergoing AF ablation have higher odds of periprocedural cardiovascular complications with similar odds of 30-day and 180-day all-cause and AF-related readmissions

Introduction: There is limited data on how psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) affect the outcomes of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of PSRFs affects the outcomes of AF ablation and tested this hypothesis using a nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing AF ablation. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of ≥1 PSRF. PSRFs were divided into 5 domains including limited cognitive understanding, substance use, psychiatric disease, low socioeconomic status, and uninsured status. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to adjust for confounders. Results: Our cohort included 50,623 AF ablation procedures, of which 21,363 (42.2%) had ≥ 1 PSRF. On multivariable analysis, the presence of ≥ 1 PSRF was associated with higher odds of cardiovascular complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.22; p=0.02), peripheral vascular complications (aOR:1.18; 95% CI: 1.01-1.38; p=0.04), pulmonary complications (aOR:1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.29; p<0.01) and neurological complications (aOR:1.42; 95% CI: 1.12-1.78; p<0.01), along with higher odds of 30-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.30; 95% CI: 1.19-1.43; p<0.01) and atrial fibrillation/flutter related readmissions (aOR:1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50; p<0.01), 90-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.30; 95% CI: 1.20-1.40; p<0.01) and atrial fibrillation/flutter related readmissions (aOR:1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.41; p<0.01), and 180-day all-cause readmissions (aOR:1.35; 95% CI: 1.24-1.45; p<0.01) (Figure 1). Conclusion: In conclusion, our data suggest an association between PSRFs and worse in-hospital outcomes along with increased all-cause and arrhythmia-related readmissions in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Introduction: Intravenous heparin is strongly associated with pocket hematoma (PH) formation in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. However, there is no data on subcutaneous prophylactic heparin in this population Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the subcutaneous heparin may increase the odds of PH in patients undergoing CIED implantation using data from a large, nationally representative sample of the US population. Methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was analyzed from 2016-2019 to identify patients >18 years old undergoing CIED implantation. Patients with PH were then identified by using ICD-10 CM codes. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders Results: A total of 267,650 patients underwent CIED implantation between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, of which 4,496 (1.68%) \developed PH. Single chamber pacemaker in 7.22%, dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted in 58.3% of patients, and CRT-P in 4.59%, ICD in 18.58%, CRT-D in 11.31%. Of the total cohort, 559 Patients received subcutaneous heparin within 3 days of the CIED implant procedure. Of these 559 patients, 91 (16%) patients were on subcutaneous heparin (pre-procedural: 19; post-procedural: 57) and developed PH. Subcutaneous heparin is associated with increased odds (OR :13.8,p<0.01) of PH formation. Conclusions: This study suggests that subcutaneous heparin is a strong risk factor for the development of PH. This may independently drive up the rates of PH in the inpatient population. Further studies on the timing of subcutaneous heparin need to be conducted.

Abstract Background Obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA). However, the current data on weight loss interventions show inconsistent results in preventing the recurrence of AF after CA. Methods We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies that reported the outcome of recurrence of AF after CA in obese patients undergoing weight interventions. The subgroup analysis included: (1) Weight loss versus no weight loss, (2) >10% weight loss versus <10% weight loss, (3) <10% weight loss versus no weight loss, (4) Follow‐up <12 months, and (5) Follow‐up >12 months after CA. Mantel–Haenszel risk ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random effects model and for heterogeneity, I 2 statistics were reported. Results A total of 10 studies (one randomized controlled trial and nine observational studies) comprising 1851 patients were included. The recurrence of AF was numerically reduced in the weight loss group (34.5%) versus no weight loss group (58.2%), but no statistically significant difference was observed (risk ratio [RR] = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.49–1.18, p = .22). However, there was a statistically significant reduction in recurrence of AF with weight loss versus no weight loss at follow‐up >12 months after CA (RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32–0.68, p < .0001). At follow‐up >12 months after CA, both >10% weight loss versus <10% weight loss (RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31–0.80, p = .004) and <10% weight loss versus no weight loss (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.31–0.49, p < .00001) were associated with a statistically significant reduction in recurrent AF. Conclusion In patients with AF undergoing CA, weight loss is associated with reducing recurrent AF at > 12 months after ablation and these benefits are consistently seen with both >10% and <10% weight loss. The benefits of weight loss in preventing recurrent AF after CA should be examined in larger studies with extended follow‐up duration.

AbstractThe association of psychosocial risk factors with cardiovascular disease is well‐established, and there is a growing recognition of their influence on atrial fibrillation (AF) . A recent National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop called for transforming AF research to integrate social determinants of health. There is limited data examining the impact of psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) on outcomes in patients with an established diagnosis of AF. Catheter ablation for AF has been shown to improve arrhythmia burden and quality of life compared with medical treatment alone. It is unknown how PSRFs affect clinical outcomes in patients undergoing AF ablation. It is important to understand this relationship, especially given the increasing adoption of catheter ablation in clinical practice.

Abstract Background and Aims Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug that may prevent post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). The effect of this drug has been inconsistently shown in previous clinical trials. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of colchicine vs. placebo to prevent POAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods and results A systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted from inception till April 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF after any cardiac surgery. The secondary outcome was the rate of drug discontinuation due to adverse events and adverse gastrointestinal events. Risk ratios (RR) were reported using the Mantel Haenszel method. A total of eight RCTs comprising 1885 patients were included. There was a statistically significant lower risk of developing POAF with colchicine vs. placebo (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59–0.82; P &lt; 0.01, I2 = 0%), and this effect persisted across different subgroups. There was a significantly higher risk of adverse gastrointestinal events (RR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.38–3.51; P &lt; 0.01, I2 = 55%) with no difference in the risk of drug discontinuation in patients receiving colchicine vs. placebo (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.93–1.89; P = 0.11, I2 = 0%). Conclusion This meta-analysis of eight RCTs shows that colchicine is effective at preventing POAF, with a significantly higher risk of adverse gastrointestinal events but no difference in the rate of drug discontinuation. Future studies are required to define the optimal duration and dose of colchicine for the prevention of POAF.

AbstractIntroductionMost patients undergoing a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedure are admitted for overnight observation. A same‐day discharge strategy offers the opportunity to improve resource utilization without compromising patient safety. We compared the patient safety outcomes and post‐discharge complications between same‐day discharge versus hospital admission (HA) (>1 day) in patients undergoing LAAO procedure.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase was conducted. Outcomes of interest included peri‐procedural complications, re‐admissions, discharge complications including major bleeding and vascular complications, ischemic stroke, all‐cause mortality, and peri‐device leak >5 mm. Mantel–Haenszel risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated.ResultsA total of seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between same‐day discharge versus HA regarding readmission (RR: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.29–1.31]; p = .21), ischemic stroke after discharge (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: [0.49–2.73]), peri‐device leak >5 mm (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: [0.42–3.85], and all‐cause mortality (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: [0.36–1.02]). The same‐day discharge study group had significantly lower major bleeding or vascular complications (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: [0.54–0.94]).ConclusionsThis meta‐analysis of seven observational studies showed no significant difference in patient safety outcomes and post‐discharge complications between same‐day discharge versus HA. These findings provide a solid basis to perform a randomized control trial to eliminate any potential confounders.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathology features of esophageal graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven esophageal GVHD diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2021 were included. Results: In 43 esophageal patients, other organ GVHD was present in 58% before and 86% at esophageal GVHD diagnosis. Esophageal specific symptoms were uncommon (dysphagia 26% and odynophagia/heartburn 5%). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was abnormal in 72% patients demonstrating erosive esophagitis, ulceration, desquamation, or rings/furrows in a diffuse or focal pattern. DISCUSSION: There should be a low threshold for esophageal biopsies for GVHD because esophageal symptoms and endoscopic findings may be nonspecific or absent.